Pope Leo's Viral Tweet About Catholic Church In Gaza
Soon after, the office of Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu released a statement saying, 'Israel deeply regrets that a stray ammunition hit Gaza's Holy Family Church. Every innocent life lost is a tragedy.'
"I am deeply saddened to learn of the loss of life and injury caused by the military attack on the Holy Family Catholic Church in #Gaza," he wrote.
The post has been viewed by over five million people.
Further, NBC reports that during a Friday morning call between Pope Leo and Netanyahu, the pope relayed the importance of a ceasefire and end to the war in Gaza...
...and expressed that places of worship, worshippers, and citizens on the ground in both Palestine and Israel should be protected.
What are your thoughts? Please share in the comments.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
19 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Antisemitism Moves Into the Political Mainstream
Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali-born writer intimately familiar with Islamist and anti-Israel extremism, recently warned that a global 'purge of the Jews' is under way. It's an ideological insurgency with a clear goal: 'Erase not just Israel 'from the river to the sea,' but the Jewish people from the moral map,' Ms. Ali wrote in a recent essay. Her words ring true in this new world, where politicians refuse to denounce a 'global intifada,' kosher restaurants become targets and lunatics shoot Jews on the street. The purge includes the vilification of Israel and the blacklisting of Jews and Israelis in various professions by the unlikely pairing of militant Islamism and a revived Maoism. Together, their political credo of 'resistance' and 'liberation' declares that Jews are the oppressors and must be driven out of polite society. It's happening in many areas of public life. Several prominent international authors won't permit their books to be translated into Hebrew or published in Israel. Many Israeli authors have a hard time finding publishers outside Israel. Israeli scholars and their writings are no longer welcome at certain professional conferences and journals. The exclusion also extends to Israelis participating in sports events, musical programs, art exhibitions and pride parades. Israeli and Jewish-owned restaurants have been protested, boycotted and vandalized in Philadelphia, Miami, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Houston, Los Angeles and as far as Athens and Melbourne, Australia. One New York restaurant owner, trying to make sense of why his establishment was vandalized, said, 'It's not about Zionism or not Zionism. It's kosher food.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'I saw something different': IDF reservist refutes intl. claims of intentional starvation
People arrive on foot, in cars, on motorcycles, or on horses. They carry sacks. There are no lines. No supervision. It's a stampede. They push, they stab, they throw sand at each other." In the quiet outskirts of Tel Aviv, an active-duty soldier in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), who, for security reasons, will be referred to only as 'Y,' is between rounds of duty after completing more than 300 days of service since October 7. In an exclusive interview with The Media Line, he recounts what he saw during one of the most contested incidents of the war, challenging headlines that claimed Israeli soldiers opened fire on starving civilians. Another IDF reservist who was present at the scene also spoke with The Media Line and confirmed 'Y's' account of the incident, including the sequence of events and the nature of the crowd that approached the distribution site. Access to Gaza has been limited, and the foreign press has been unable to enter the area to tell the story accurately. Since the soldier gave this account, Israel's Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) has challenged Hamas' claim of widespread starvation in Gaza with a statement on Thursday that 'there is no famine in the Gaza Strip,' while acknowledging 'there are issues of access to food' in certain 'pockets' in Gaza. Photos were circulated on social media showing 1,000 humanitarian aid trucks stalled outside the Gaza Strip. While the UN claims that Israel's bureaucracy prevents distribution, Col. Abdullah Halabi of COGAT told Yahoo News, 'The State of Israel allows the entry of humanitarian aid beyond the standards of international law, without restriction. As long as the international community makes an effort to bring in the aid, we will allow them to bring it in.' The IDF announced Thursday that, in response to the humanitarian situation in Gaza, it will renew the airdrop of aid into the Gaza Strip. The effort will be coordinated by COGAT and the Israeli air force and will include seven aid pallets containing flour, sugar, and canned food provided by international organizations. In addition, the IDF said it will facilitate the movement of aid trucks within Gaza. While the IDF has acknowledged that mistakes occur amid the fog of war and that serious incidents are subject to internal review, 'Y' emphasizes that his account is based solely on what he witnessed during his deployment. 'I'm not saying everything always goes right—we're people, and people make mistakes,' he notes. 'But where I was, I didn't see what the news is claiming. I saw something very different.' The soldier's latest deployment placed him not in combat with enemy terrorists, but guarding one of the war's most controversial flashpoints: a humanitarian corridor intended to deliver aid to civilians in Gaza. 'Trained to fight terrorists, not to manage riots' 'This was the worst thing I've ever done,' says 'Y.' 'It was disgusting. You see people fight each other over food. Trampling, throwing sand, stealing. It's chaos. We're not trained for that. We're infantry. We're supposed to fight terrorists, not manage riots.' Assigned to a corridor, one of the three Safe Distribution Sites in southern Gaza, 'Y' was part of the Israeli effort to allow aid trucks into the Strip without empowering Hamas. The system was coordinated with US aid officials and monitored by drones to weaken Hamas's control over food distribution and, in turn, pressure the group to agree to a ceasefire and release hostages. 'It made sense strategically,' he explains. 'Take away their grip on aid, make life easier for civilians, and isolate Hamas. But on the ground, it turned into chaos.' According to 'Y,' thousands of civilians pour into the compound daily. 'It's the size of a football field, surrounded by sand berms and barbed wire. People arrive on foot, in cars, on motorcycles, or on horses. They carry sacks. There are no lines. No supervision. It's a stampede. They push, they stab, they throw sand at each other. Sometimes they trample the weak. We tried to bring some order, but the system collapsed from the start.' What shocked 'Y' most was how fast the humanitarian operation turned into disorder. 'The site was supposed to have minimal friction. Instead, it became a magnet for chaos. People beat each other, shoved kids aside, filled bags with sugar and rice, then sprinted out while gangs waited to rob them.' He says that on several occasions, those trying to loot aid would hide among the crowd, then attempt to breach the sand barriers in groups. 'They timed it. Always just before or just after the drones passed over. It wasn't spontaneous.' The danger didn't end inside the compound. Outside, 'Y' says, Hamas terrorists and criminal gangs waited to rob those who managed to secure food. 'They take it from civilians and resell it. We've arrested people doing it. Some are Hamas. Some are just opportunists. But it's organized. It's how Hamas keeps people dependent.' He directly rejects reports of starvation in Gaza. 'There is no one collapsing from hunger. That's a blood libel. If there's malnutrition in Gaza, it's because Hamas wants it. They have the food, and they block it. They want the photos of skinny children. That's their weapon.' He draws comparisons rarely heard in the international press. 'Saudi Arabia bombed the Houthis for 10 years and sent 5,000 trucks of aid, but there was no global outrage. Israel has been bombing Hamas, a terrorist organization, for 21 months and has sent more than 23,000 aid trucks into Gaza, but is somehow accused of starving Gaza.' Israel's security establishment, meanwhile, maintains that it has not restricted the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza. Since May 19, the government reports that nearly 4,500 aid trucks have entered the Strip via two channels: through US-operated distribution centers that supply weekly food packages, and through UN-coordinated deliveries of flour, baby food, and ingredients for bakeries and communal kitchens. Officials report that 50% of the aid goes through each channel, and that more than 1.5 million food packages and 2,500 tons of baby food have reached civilians. As of this week, however, the contents of some 950 trucks remain uncollected on the Gazan side of crossings, with Israel blaming UN agencies for delays in distribution. That frustration peaked on July 20, when international headlines reported that Israeli troops had opened fire on civilians waiting for food. 'Y' says he was there and that nothing about that morning resembled the story broadcast to the world. According to his account, the incident began the night before. On July 19, around 10 p.m., eight to ten aid trucks arrived at the site. The delivery was standard procedure, meant to prepare for morning distribution. But soon after, a crowd began to approach. 'They weren't supposed to be there. It was closed. They saw the trucks and came to loot,' he says. 'We fired warning shots. No one was hurt. They left, for the time being.' The army had posted the opening times on Palestinian Facebook groups. Drones circled overhead, broadcasting in Arabic: 'The site will open at 9 a.m. Do not approach.' 'Y' says the instructions were clear, constant, and public. Around 2 a.m., a small team was sent to a forward position one kilometer from the corridor, at a junction of several dirt paths. Their role was to intercept any suspicious movement before it reached the aid zone. At approximately 4:30 a.m., four Gazan men came into view. Voices echoed in the dark. Then came chants of 'Allahu Akbar.' 'That's when it became obvious; this wasn't just a spontaneous crowd,' he says. 'It was coordinated.' The four Gazan men emerged from behind a building. A warning shot was fired ten meters in front of them. They kept running. 'Then four became a hundred. Then a thousand. All adult men. No women. No children. Just men running straight at us.' The soldiers were surrounded on three sides, with the food trucks behind them. 'We heard Kalashnikov fire from behind the crowd. We didn't see who fired it, but we heard it clearly,' he says. With the mass approaching within 100 meters, a standing order was given: defend the position. 'Nothing stopped them, not the drones, not the megaphones, not flash grenades or warning shots. In the end, we fired. There was no other choice.' 'Hamas had two goals,' he says. 'Steal the food and provoke a tragedy they could film.' According to 'Y,' the same group had tried to storm the site at 10 p.m. and again at 2 a.m. 'They came back stronger. More people. More vehicles. Gunfire behind them. They knew what they were doing.' 'Y' describes intense restrictions placed on Israeli soldiers guarding the corridor. 'We weren't allowed to engage unless it was life-threatening. That's how Hamas exploited it. They knew we had limits. They sent the crowd ahead like a shield. And when things exploded, the cameras were already rolling.' The moral complexity, he says, is unbearable. 'We had to choose between protecting the mission and being slaughtered on a rooftop. And then we get called war criminals.' What angers him most is how quickly the story was rewritten. 'By midday, headlines were saying we shot starving civilians. That's not what happened. It wasn't a line for food. It was a violent attempt to overrun the corridor.' Telegram channels later published the names of the dead. 'All adult males. No women. No children.' The soldiers held their positions for over thirty minutes. At one point, a small force was actively defending the rooftop. 'If they had broken through, we would've been overrun. There was no alternative.' Asked how he felt watching the international coverage, 'Y' didn't hesitate. 'People want to believe lies. It helps justify their hate. But it only hurts the Palestinians. Because every time this propaganda is believed, Hamas gets stronger.' 'Y' is convinced the entire event was staged. 'They wanted a bloodbath. Something to sell to the media. And they got it.' On the proposal to restore distribution control to United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), his response is just as blunt: 'UNRWA is Hamas. There's no difference between them. Giving them back control is handing it straight to the terrorists.' In his view, there is only one path to end the current cycle. 'Ceasefire and hostage return,' he says. But that, he insists, 'can't mean full withdrawal. There has to be a buffer zone. We can't allow another October 7.' 'Y' doesn't expect the headlines to change. 'The lies will continue. The world will keep blaming us. But we'll keep doing the job, because someone has to.' Then, without raising his voice, he adds: 'They weren't hungry. They were coming for the trucks.' Meanwhile, the Foreign Press Association released a statement expressing concern over the humanitarian crisis, including reports of starvation in the Gaza and calling on Israel to allow the flow of humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip. Solve the daily Crossword
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Some Republicans aren't backing down from Epstein transparency push
Amid bipartisan calls for transparency and a cascade of Epstein-related headlines, some GOP lawmakers are holding the line — while others are urging more sunlight from the Trump administration. The big picture: The case of the disgraced financier, who died in 2019, has taken on new life under the second Trump administration, creating splinters in the president's base and dominating conversations on Capitol Hill. While some Republicans are falling in line with President Trump and making calls to move on, others are defying leadership and joining in with Democrats by continuing to criticize the administration's handling of the case. Driving the news: Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who are leading a bipartisan charge to force a House vote on releasing files related to Epstein, were optimistic on Sunday's political talk shows that their measure would succeed. "It will pass," Khanna said on NBC's "Meet the Press." Massie warned on ABC's "This Week" that if a vote doesn't come to the floor, the GOP could feel political punishment in 2026, cautioning voters could "check out" because "Republicans didn't keep their promise." And with the House breaking for its weeks-long recess, Massie predicts the pressure will only build: "I don't think it's going to dissipate like the speaker hopes that it will." Yes, but: House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) argued in a Sunday interview with NBC's Kristen Welker that the lawmakers' discharge petition is "not the right approach," contending it doesn't build in "adequate protections" for victims. "House Republicans insist upon the release of all credible evidence and information related to Epstein in any way, but we are also insisting upon the protection of innocent victims," he said. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), echoed Johnson on "Meet the Press," saying he's "on board" to "release as much as you can, protecting victims the best you can." The other side: Massie, responding to the DOJ's conclusion that releasing further materials could hurt victims, told Welker, "That's a straw man." He continued, "Ro and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names will be redacted and that no child pornography will be released, so they're hiding behind that." Catch up quick: Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to "produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval" earlier this month. But a federal judge on Wednesday struck down the administration's request to unseal grand jury transcripts in connection with an investigation into Epstein, writing that the court's "hands were tied." And while Trump has said Bondi should release"credible" information, he's repeatedly bashed what he has dubbed the "Jeffrey Epstein Hoax" and blamed his political rivals for "making up" the files. Zoom out: While some Republicans and MAGA-friendly figures have turned up the heat on the administration, other Trump allies have echoed the president's targeting of his predecessors. Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) sparred with CNN's Jake Tapper Sunday over Epstein's controversial plea deal with federal prosecutors in Florida, arguing the agreement was struck under the Obama administration.
