logo
Lottery winner lands huge £65m jackpot prize - but she doesn't receive a penny

Lottery winner lands huge £65m jackpot prize - but she doesn't receive a penny

Daily Mirror20-06-2025
The woman, from Texas, filed the legal action after she bought a lottery ticket using a third-party carrier app. The eye-watering prize has been left unpaid for months
A furious lottery winner has launched a lawsuit against a jackpot commission after she claims her £65m prize had been left unpaid for three months.
The woman, from Texas, filed the legal action in Montgomery County on May 19 after she bought a lottery ticket on February 17 for the "Lotto Texas" game using a third-party carrier app, Jackpocket.

According to the lawsuit, the woman purchased her winning £65 million ticket via the app, which was legal at the time. However, just a week after her win, the lottery commission banned the courier service over its legality.

The lottery winner, only identified in the case as "Jane Doe", had verified her win on March 18, but the Texas Lottery Commission has withheld payments. The lawsuit alleges they are retrospectively applying new rules to invalidate her win, which she claims is illegal.
The unhappy woman previously said: "I've gone through frustration and being sad and stressed, and now I'm just angry. I literally spent $20. I didn't spend $26 million to run every single possible combination of numbers."
"Every Texan knows what that should mean when it comes to the lottery – if you win, you should get paid," the suit says. "It shouldn't take a lawsuit to get paid when you win the lottery. But that's exactly what has happened here.'
It comes as the Lottery Commission's recent ban on third-party services has led to several investigations and resignations.
In April, the commission voted to prohibit couriers from selling tickets online following several high-profile incidents, including a £70.33 million jackpot win in 2023 involving bulk ticket purchases through a courier and this latest £65million win.

The concern over using apps such as Jackpocket to purchase lottery tickets online through licensed retailers has sparked investigations about potential misuse.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced authorities would be investigating the woman's winning ticket.

"Texans must be able to trust in our state's lottery system and know that the lottery is conducted with integrity and lawfully," the governor said in a statement in February.
Texas Lottery executive director Ryan Mindell resigned in April following serious concerns of courier services.
"The proliferation of couriers in the state has raised serious concerns that the integrity, security, honesty, and fairness of lottery games is being undermined by the continued activity of courier services," he said in a statement.
A spokesperson for the commission said the lawsuit is 'being reviewed under the Commission's claim validation requirements and is the subject of external investigation.
"The agency does not have additional information to provide, as it does not comment on pending litigation and investigations," the spokesperson added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Glass Lewis, ISS sue Texas over law limiting DEI, ESG proxy advice
Glass Lewis, ISS sue Texas over law limiting DEI, ESG proxy advice

Reuters

timea day ago

  • Reuters

Glass Lewis, ISS sue Texas over law limiting DEI, ESG proxy advice

July 24 (Reuters) - Glass Lewis and ISS, two of the best known proxy advisers, sued Texas on Thursday to block a first-of-its-kind state law limiting their ability to advise shareholders on diversity, environmental and governance practices. In complaints filed in Austin, Texas federal court, Glass Lewis and ISS said Texas' law was unconstitutional, undermining their First Amendment right to advise clients even if the state didn't like the advice. Texas' Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, who enforces the state's laws and is running for U.S. Senate in 2026, is the only defendant. His office did not respond to requests for comment. ISS is short for Institutional Shareholder Services. Signed by Republican Governor Greg Abbott in June, the Texas law targets "non-financial" advice on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) matters, and environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, including for votes at shareholder meetings. It requires proxy advisers to conspicuously tell clients that the advice is "not being provided solely in the financial interest of the company's shareholders," and to provide financial analyses supporting the advice. The law takes effect on September 1. Glass Lewis and ISS said the law would force proxy advisers to broadcast Texas' preferred viewpoints when their own differed, including on hot-button issues that a Republican state legislator perceived as having a "hard left bent." Both advisers said they would likely lose clients and suffer reputational harm if forced to tell clients their advice is bad for them and not in shareholders' financial interests. ISS also said the law was designed to protect corporate directors and management, and harm shareholders whose votes are an "important check and balance" against boards. "Texas's experiment in anti-capitalism thus serves no one," ISS said. Glass Lewis said it has more than 1,300 institutional investor clients. ISS said it provided voting advice in 2024 to about 2,000 clients for around 51,500 shareholder meetings. Many companies have this year scaled back or ended their support for DEI programs. Republican U.S. President Donald Trump has made eliminating those programs a high priority in his second White House term. The cases are Glass Lewis & Co v Paxton, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, No. 25-01153; and Institutional Shareholder Services Inc v Paxton in the same court, No. 25-01160.

Glass Lewis sues Texas over law limiting DEI, ESG proxy advice
Glass Lewis sues Texas over law limiting DEI, ESG proxy advice

Reuters

timea day ago

  • Reuters

Glass Lewis sues Texas over law limiting DEI, ESG proxy advice

July 24 (Reuters) - Glass Lewis, one of the best known proxy advisers, sued Texas on Thursday to block a first-of-its-kind state law limiting its ability to advise shareholders on diversity, environmental and governance practices. In a complaint filed in Austin, Texas federal court, Glass Lewis said Texas' law was unconstitutional, violating its First Amendment right to freedom of association and protection against viewpoint discrimination. Signed by Republican Governor Greg Abbott in June, the law targets "non-financial" advice on environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, or diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) matters, including for votes at shareholder meetings. It requires proxy advisers to conspicuously tell clients that the advice is "not being provided solely in the financial interest of the company's shareholders," and to provide financial analyses supporting the advice. The law takes effect on September 1. Glass Lewis said the law unlawfully forces proxy advisers to broadcast Texas' preferred viewpoints when their own differ, including on hot-button issues that Republican state legislators viewed as "increasingly political." It also said it will likely lose clients and suffer reputational harm if forced to tell clients its advice is bad for them and not in shareholders' financial interests. Texas' Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, who enforces the state's laws and is running for U.S. Senate in 2026, is the only defendant. His office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Glass Lewis said it has more than 1,300 institutional investor clients, including more than one dozen in Texas. Many companies have this year scaled back or ended their support for DEI programs after Republican U.S. President Donald Trump campaigned against them. The case is Glass Lewis & Co v Paxton, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, No. 25-01153.

Untamed (2025) – Episode 2 'Jane Doe' Recap & Review
Untamed (2025) – Episode 2 'Jane Doe' Recap & Review

The Review Geek

time17-07-2025

  • The Review Geek

Untamed (2025) – Episode 2 'Jane Doe' Recap & Review

Jane Doe Episode 2 of Untamed Season 1 starts with a flashback to the day Jane Doe got shot. Her bag ripped, causing some medicine bottles to drop. She picked them up but missed one. She then hid a bag in an abandoned ice cooler and started walking. Out of nowhere, a stray bullet hits her. Presently, a reporter announces that the investigation into Jane Doe is still ongoing. The reporter also brings up another investigation. People are still looking for answers in the case of Sean Sanderson, a businessman who went missing. In the park, Kyle comes across more clues and finds the medicine bottle Jane Doe accidentally left behind. He notes that the cap has a golden X sign, similar to the tattoo on Jane Doe's body. At the office, Souter talks to Naya, curious about how she and her son are adjusting to their new surroundings. He also wants the tea about Kyle and how their partnership is working out. Naya mentions the bracelet, and Souter takes her to the storage room, where there is an entire box of similar bracelets. The discovery disappoints Naya, as it implies anyone could have given Jane Doe the bracelet. Turner calls her for an update and insists she keep following the lead. Kyle drives to town to talk to Teddy, a drug user who might have a lead on the medicine bottle and tattoo. Sadly, Teddy has no idea but promises to ask around. Kyle takes Teddy's stash and promises to return it if he gets him a lead. Later, he drops by a local hotel to study the carvings, which look similar to the drawings on the walls he found. It seems he has a complicated relationship with Lana at the front desk. At the hotel, he runs into Souter, who invites him for lunch. Souter brings up the case and asks Kyle to consider taking a different job. It seems Jill talked to Souter about her concerns for Kyle. The midnight calls have been worrying her. Souter is also worried about Kyle, but the latter insists he's fine. After lunch, Kyle calls Jill and asks her not to worry anymore. He promises to stop the midnight calls. Kyle drives back to his cabin only to find a lawyer waiting for him. The lawyer, Esther, is representing Sanderson's family, who are suing the park for wrongful death. Sanderson went missing five years ago, and Esther has questions about Kyle's involvement in the case. In particular, she is concerned about his state of mind at the time of the investigation. It turns out Sean disappeared a few months after Caleb's death. Kyle tries to answer Esther's questions professionally. The questions trigger his memories of loss and how he found Caleb's body floating in a river. Naya drops by to inform that the toxicology on Jane Doe came back clean. Kyle invites her to join him and takes her to the squatters' group. Unfortunately, the squatters refuse to cooperate even though one of them looks like she knows something. Kyle also asks about Abuelo. Abuelo is more of a drug peddler than the shaman he claims to be. Sadly, Abuelo is on one of his 'spiritual' walks to find his centre! However, one of the squatters mentions that a ranger named Deniro dropped by the previous day looking for Abuelo, too. After striking out at the squatters' camp, Kyle and Naya separate to follow different leads. Naya loses the horse and is late picking up her son. The lady mentions that Gael's dad called, causing Naya to leave her ex a message, warning him to stay away. In the meantime, Kyle tracks down Shane, a wildlife biologist. Shane has been looking for Abuelo, too. He believes there is a link between Abuelo and the sick deer. As Kyle asks more questions about Jane Doe, Shane clams up, saying he knows nothing. Kyle cleverly manages to fire Shane's gun and collect the bullet. He is hoping to run ballistics and compare the bullet to the one linked to Jane Doe's case. Kyle drops by the lab and begs Marlon to run the test and share the results only with him. Back in town, Teddy visits a tattoo shop to ask about the gold tattoo. The tattoo artist, Linson, insists that there is no such thing as a gold tattoo and kicks him out. Another guy listens to their conversation. Once Teddy leaves, Linson texts him. He asks Teddy to drop the issue, as nothing good will come of it. Sadly, later that night, Teddy is attacked and strangled in his car. The following day, the rangers attend Souter and Mary's 40th wedding anniversary. Milch tells Naya all about Caleb's death and how grief changed Kyle. It turns out a pervert took Caleb when he strayed from his group during a group hike. Unfortunately, they never found the guy. Grief led Kyle to hit the bottle hard, and if it were not for Souter, he would have lost his badge. Simultaneously, Kyle is jealous of Jill's new husband. It is also hard for him to see Gael, as the boy reminds him of Caleb. He checks out of the party early. Elsewhere in the park, a group of young people goes swimming. One of them comes across Teddy's body. Meanwhile, Kyle continues to follow Jane Doe's trail and comes across her footprint in the forest. He gets a call informing him of Teddy's death. Kyle drives to the crime scene and whilst there, Naya calls to inform him she has found Jane Doe. Thanks to her investigation, she discovered that Jane Doe was a young child who went missing years ago. The Episode Review This is one of the most anticipated mystery thrillers from Netflix this year and judging from the first two episodes, we are in for some heart-breaking truths! For starters, Jane Doe was a missing child. I can't imagine the pain the news of her death will bring to her family. For years, they have probably been praying for answers. To find out that she was alive all this time, then lose her forever again, must be heart-wrenching. Still, if Jane Doe has been alive for all these years, could Sanderman be alive as well? Where has Jane Doe been, and what do the wall carvings mean? As for Kyle, we get to understand him more. The fact that Caleb's killer is still out there probably haunts him every night. Seeing Jill move on must also break his heart. He wants her to be happy, but he is jealous of Jill's new husband. Then we have Teddy; he was most likely killed by the guy from the tattoo shop. That guy was listening keenly to Teddy's conversation with Linson. Also, his tattoo looks eerily similar to Teddy's attacker. Why is this guy taking such measures? How is she linked to Jane Doe's case? Lastly, Naya might want to start looking over her back. Her ex is onto her, and he will show up soon. Is he violent? Why did Naya relocate from L.A.? Previous Episode Next Episode

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store