
Mastectomy or Lumpectomy? Reassuring New Data for Young Women
New research suggests the likelihood of cancer recurring (coming back) in the same breast or nearby lymph nodes isn't related to her choice of surgical treatment – removing either the cancerous tissue (lumpectomy) or one or both breasts (mastectomy).
And for women 40 and under with invasive but not incurable cancer, recurrence risk across the board was "low" – just 5.6% over 10 years.
"Many young women with breast cancer choose to have bilateral mastectomies even if they may be a candidate for a smaller surgery," said study author Laura S. Dominici, MD, a breast surgeon at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Mass General Brigham in Boston. "We know survival isn't impacted by this choice, but historically, young women were felt to have higher risk for local recurrence and tend to have more 'aggressive' breast cancers."
The new findings, published Wednesday in JAMA Surgery, suggest that "women cannot make a bad choice," Dominici said. "A woman who wants to keep her breast isn't trading off a cancer outcome to do so."
Of the more than 1,100 people in the study, 30% had lumpectomy, 26% had a single mastectomy, and 43% had bilateral mastectomy. When researchers analyzed surgical treatment alongside cancer subtype – such as whether it was related to hormones or certain genes – they found no significant differences in recurrence rates.
Researchers attributed the low risk to advances in cancer treatments, which have become more targeted. Breast cancer patients in the study were diagnosed between 2006 and 2015, and they received optimal treatment after surgery – meaning breast cancer in young women may not be as likely to come back as older research suggested.
Does This Research Apply to Me?
The study included women age 40 or younger with stage I, II, or III breast cancer of any subtype – meaning hormone receptor-positive, triple negative, or any ERBB2 (formerly HER2) genetic status. If that describes you, you may want to talk to your doctor about it.
The researchers excluded women with stage IV breast cancer (which has already spread to other parts of the body) and women with stage 0, or ductal carcinoma in situ or DCIS.
"The results do require some caution in their generalizability because the patients were not from diverse populations, with nearly 85% non-Hispanic White women," Julie A. Margenthaler, MD, wrote in a commentary published with the study. Margenthaler was not involved in the study and is a breast cancer surgeon at WashU Medicine in St. Louis.
What Type of Recurrence Did This Study Look For?
It looked for local or regional recurrence (that is, in the same breast or surrounding lymph nodes), but not distant recurrence – when breast cancer returns in a distant part of the body like the brain or bones. That's a stage IV diagnosis, which is usually considered treatable but not curable.
What About BRCA?
About 1 in 10 women in the study had known BRCA genetic involvement, and most had mastectomies. "Women do not have to have a mastectomy in this setting, but many of them consider it," Dominici said. "Mastectomies will reduce the risk for future cancers (for which patients with BRCA mutations are at higher risk) but will not reduce risk for recurrence of the current cancer. A woman with BRCA mutation having lumpectomy should be doing high-risk screening with mammogram and MRI."
Does This Mean I Should Get a Lumpectomy?
When deciding what breast cancer surgery to have, you need to consider physical, emotional, and psychological factors, said Dominici, who is also a professor at Harvard Medical School.
"There is no 'right' answer," she said, "and it is often hard for women to both appreciate and consider the short- and long-term impacts of the different surgeries."
Lumpectomy may not be an option for some women with cancer in a significant portion or multiple areas of the breast, Dominici said.
"Surgery is one important part of treatment, but systemic therapy and radiation are also key to lower risk for recurrence," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
7 minutes ago
- CBS News
Chinese research ship detected off Alaskan coast, Coast Guard says
A China-flagged research vessel was detected Friday off the coast of Alaska, the U.S. Coast Guard said. The Coast Guard reported Saturday that the Xue Long 2, an icebreaker, was detected about 290 nautical miles north of Utqiagvik, Alaska, in the U.S. Arctic. The Xue Long 2 is operated by China's Polar Research Institute. The ship was in the U.S.'s Extended Continental Shelf, or ECS, which is a portion of the continental shelf that goes beyond 200 miles nautical miles off the coast, according to the State Department. The ship was determined to be 130 nautical miles inside the ECS. "The U.S. has exclusive rights to conserve and manage the living and non-living resources of its ECS," the Coast Guard said in its news release. A Coast Guard C-130J Hercules, a long-range surveillance aircraft, responded to the ship. The Coast Guard also released a photo of the vessel. "The U.S. Coast Guard, alongside partners and other agencies, vigilantly monitors and responds to foreign government vessel activity in and near U.S. waters to secure territorial integrity and defend sovereign interests against malign state activity," said Rear Adm. Bob Little, commander of the U.S. Coast Guard Arctic District, in a statement. CBS News reached out the Coast Guard for clarification on how it was dealing with the vessel. Earlier this week, Canada's CBC News reported that the Canadian military was monitoring the movements of the Xue Long 2 in the Arctic. In a statement provided to the CBC Tuesday, Maj. Alexander Naraine, a spokesperson for the military's joint operations centre said that the Xue Long 2 was "not currently in Canadian territorial waters." Canada was using a Lockheed CP-140 Aurora aircraft based out of Alaska to "actively" monitor the Chinese ship, Naraine said. This comes after four Russian military planes were spotted and tracked flying near the Alaskan coast Tuesday by North American Aerospace Defense Command. The aircraft flew through a section of international airspace called the Alaskan Air Defense Identification Zone. While the Alaska ADIZ is considered part of international airspace, it is defined as an area where sovereign U.S. airspace ends but "that requires the ready identification of all aircraft in the interest of national security," according to NORAD. In January, American and Canadian fighter jets were scrambled after Russian warplanes were also spotted in the Arctic, NORAD said. The Russian warplanes remained in international airspace. And in July 2024, the U.S. intercepted several Chinese or Russian bombers near the Alaskan coast. At the time, a U.S. defense officials said it marked the first time ever that Russian and Chinese aircraft have jointly entered the Alaska ADIZ, and the first time Chinese H-6s have encroached off Watson, Emily Mae Czachor and Stephen Smith contributed to this report.


Forbes
7 minutes ago
- Forbes
Cancer Survivors: If You're A Hero, Why Are You Hiding It?
Love, bonding and woman with her mom with cancer hugging, sitting and spending time together. Happy, ... More sweet and sick mature female person embracing her adult daughter with a smile in outdoor garden. Cancer survivors have a great story to tell. They should tell it. I started this campaign 15 years ago – and here's the latest iteration. Over the last few weeks, I spoke with five interesting people who had five things in common. Here are the first four. They are all cancer survivors, they are all returning to the workplace after a long battle, they are all having a monumentally hard time getting a job, and they are all over 55. However, the fifth thing they have in common is why today's column came to be. They are all doing everything they can to hide these facts, especially the first one: the cancer. Now jump to thing five, the difficulty in finding a job. That's why I got their calls and emails. I gave them all the same advice. Tell people about it. Don't hide it. Get it out front and out of the way. This seemed counterintuitive to them – it may to you as well – and when I first laid it out, it made them uncomfortable. By the time we finished our conversations, though, they all agreed. And I'll bet many people reading this disagree initially, too. In fact, the advice these five people had gotten from everyone to whom they had previously spoken was opposite to mine – don't mention it, don't bring it up, don't discuss it, employers are not allowed to ask about that, if employers know they'll never hire you, it's none of their business, your previous employer is not allowed to mention it. And so on, ad infinitum. Well then, if that's the right advice, why are these people unable to find work? If they've hidden these facts, shouldn't that – based on those others' advice – lead to job opportunities? No, because it's bad advice. If you follow that line of strategic (?) thinking, and it goes month after month – in two cases, over a year – doesn't that indicate it might be faulty? This advice came from people who meant well: doctors, social workers, psychologists, religious leaders, people from the state department of labor, lawyers, family, friends, and so on. They just don't know the realities of the job market. In each case, we got around to how these five answered the 'what-have-you-been-doing-since-your-last-job?' and 'why-did-you-leave-your-last-job?' questions. OK, so how did they answer those questions? With every half-baked cockamamie answer you can think of, none of which holds water. Other than the truth, any answer is weak and suspect. If you think otherwise, go ahead; try any other answer and get back to me if you come up with one that sounds convincing – and that sounds like one that will move you to the second round of interviews. Now, one might think this is asking for trouble, that (as they all said) employers would not hire them due to fear they would get sick again and … you know the rest. Underneath it all, what's wrong with all this is that, in the eyes of many – me included – cancer survivors are heroes, and nothing less. They know all about the important things in life, like vision, determination, patience, goals, positive thinking, decision-making, responsibility, team work, bravery, and fortitude. Are these not the characteristics an employer looks for? So why hide this? Is it because you feel you'll get fewer calls or second interviews? Indeed you will, but that's OK. This deception game is the same faulty thinking that goes into the hide-my-age-by-leaving-stuff-off-my-resume fallacy. C'mon, some employers might be unfair to older workers or cancer survivors or anyone else, but they're not stupid. Whatever you try to hide will come out sooner or later. If you do the deceptive dance, they'll just find out later (not sooner), and then you'll just have wasted an awful lot of your time, not to mention keeping your hopes up artificially. So my suggestion is this. Start your cover letters off with a bold statement: 'After spending the last 10 months battling cancer, I have won that battle and am now re-entering the workplace.' Continue your letter as you would normally. You know what's going to happen? For sure, you will get fewer responses. But the ones you get are going to be real – very real. Don't you think there are people who admire what you've done? Don't you think a large number of hiring managers have either had the same experience you did or had a family member who did? Don't you think there are companies who are such avid supporters of cancer research that they sponsor 5K runs, Relay for Life, and other events in which we now all participate? The answers are yes, yes, and yes. And don't you think that, to these companies and managers, you're a hero? Yes again. Well then, let them know! The ones who will disqualify you because of what you've been through are jerks, and if by any slim chance you get this by them initially, what do you think will happen once this comes out? Jerks are always jerks; don't forget that. I'll take fewer calls any day of the week if they're sincere and real, wouldn't you? And if you can create the conditions under which that happens, why wouldn't you? Do not lose sight of one thing. You're a hero. And if you're a hero, why are you hiding it? P.S. I subsequently received letters of thanks from two different offices of the Aamerican Cancer Society, one of which published it in their newsletter. E.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Star Trek: Starfleet Academy' Debuts Hopeful First Trailer With Holly Hunter and Paul Giamatti
'Star Trek: Starfleet Academy,' the newest series in the nearly 60-year-old franchise, warped into San Diego Comic-Con on Saturday with an introduction of its full cast and the first trailer for the show, which will debut in early 2026. The series takes place in the 32nd century after the events of 'Star Trek: Discovery,' with Starfleet relaunching the titular educational institution outside of San Francisco after the Federation's absence on Earth for more than 120 years. More from Variety 'American Dad' Producers on No Longer Getting to Swear as They Return to Fox; Upcoming Guest Stars Include RuPaul, Chris Pine 'The Simpsons' Upcoming Guests Include Kieran Culkin, Viola Davis, Idris Elba; Matt Groening on How to Liberate Parents from MAGA: 'Delete Fox News' 'Star Trek: Strange New Worlds' Teases Puppet Episode for Season 4 'We look at the generation now that is inheriting all of this division and all these major issues,' executive producer Alex Kurtzman said on the Hall H stage. 'We wanted to create a show that anchored us back to [Gene] Rodneyberry's essential vision of hope. How do you find it, how do you rebuild it?' Oscar-winner Holly Hunter plays Nahla Ake, the school's chancellor and the captain of the USS Athena; she greets the new class of cadets in the teaser, as it cuts to the cast exploring various parts of the campus. The teaser ends with a shot of Paul Giamatti as the season's main villain, Nus Braka, who is part-Klingon, part-Tellarite and is described in a Paramount release as 'a man with an ominous past connected to one of our cadets.' The main cadets on the show were revealed as: • Caleb Mir (Sandro Rosta), 'an orphan with a troubled past, and unlikely Starfleet cadet.'• Jay-Den Kraag (Karim Diané), 'a Klingon cadet who dreams of becoming a medical officer.'• Series Acclimation Mil (Kerrice Brooks), a.k.a. Sam, 'the first of her kind to ever attend Starfleet Academy.'• Darem Reymi (George Hawkins), 'an aspiring captain from a wealthy home world.'• Genesis Lythe (Bella Shepard),' an admiral's daughter determined to make her own name in Starfleet.' Other new characters include Tarima Sadal (Zoë Steiner), 'a Betazoid and daughter of the president of Betazed' and Commander Lura Thok (recurring guest star Gina Yashere), 'a Klingon/Jem'Hadar hybrid who is the chancellor's First Officer and Cadet Master.' Picardo is recurring his 'Star Trek: Voyager' character the Doctor, and Tig Notaro and Oded Fehr are reprising their 'Discovery' roles of Jett Reno and Admiral Vance, respectively. Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? Final Emmy Predictions: Talk Series and Scripted Variety - New Blood Looks to Tackle Late Night Staples