UFC legend Randy Couture suffers serious burns and other injuries in racetrack crash
Former UFC champion Randy Couture suffered severe burns and other injuries Tuesday when he crashed the car he was driving during practice rides at a racetrack near Kansas City, Mo.
The 62-year-old retired fighter and former Army drill sergeant was airlifted to a burn center and remained there as of Wednesday morning. He is expected to recover.
Advertisement
Read more: Win over Chávez makes Jake Paul feel like a real fighter and not just a YouTuber
"If you know anything about Randy — he's a freak of nature and will survive this like everything else," Couture's longtime manager and attorney Samuel Spira said in an email Wednesday afternoon.
No further updates on Couture's condition will be issued until Thursday, Spira said.
TMZ was the first to report about Couture's crash and his injuries, which include first- and second-degree burns, trauma injuries and smoke inhalation. The car he was driving was completely wrecked, TMZ reported, and it is unclear what caused the accident.
Advertisement
A state champion wrestler at Lynnwood High School in Washington state, Couture continued in the sport while in the Army in 1982-88 and at Oklahoma State, finishing second in the NCAA Division I championships in 1991 and 1992. He was an alternate for the U.S. Olympic team three times (1988, 1992 and 1996) and a semifinalist at the 2000 Olympic Trials.
Read more: Livvy Dunne tried to buy Babe Ruth's apartment. The building's co-op board said no
Couture went on to become a mixed martial arts superstar, becoming a six-time UFC champion in the heavyweight and light heavyweight divisions and was inducted into the organization's Hall of Fame in 2006.
More recently, Couture has become involved with hot rod racing. Scag Racing announced in April that Couture would drive for the team in the NHRA's Pro Mod program starting later this year.
Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
UFC Cuts Ties With Ranked Veteran And Fans Are Baffled
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA - JULY 06: UFC president Dana White is seen on stage during the UFC 290 press ... More conference at T-Mobile Arena on July 06, 2023 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo by Chris Unger/Zuffa LLC via Getty Images) The UFC dropped six fighters from the roster on July 10 and one of them was 38-year-old Brazilian veteran, and No-10-ranked women's flyweight, Viviane Araujo. While some of the other fighters who were cut weren't surprising, fans expressed disbelief when news of Araujo's separation from the company spread. UFC Roster Watch and UFC Roster Tracker reported the information on X, and fans commented on both posts with similar sentiments. Here's some of the comments from fans. 'That's a weird one, yea she's old but still decent. Just fraud checked Karine so.' 'Wow.' 'I get she's 38 and all, but she isn't even on a losing streak or anything like that. Weird to cut her like that.' 'They really burn you for having a s### performance, Tracy [Cortez] didn't look any better also I think they just cutting anyone who doesn't have any chance of being a champion one day.' Araujo's career record is 13-7. She lost her last fight via unanimous decision against Cortez at UFC 317 on June 28. Prior to that lost, Araujo pulled out an upset win over Karine Silva, despite coming in as a plus-240 underdog. Araujo established herself as a tough out in the women's flyweight division going the distance with Natalia Silva, Amanda Ribas, Alexa Grasso and Katlyn Cerminara, but falling short in each fight. Over her six-year UFC career, Araujo's biggest wins came over Alexis Davis, Roxanne Modaferri, Andrea Lee, Jennifer Maia and Silva. The one commenter is likely on to something as it pertains to Araujo's age and the unlikelihood of her challenging for a title. The UFC likely doesn't see her as a legit title contender and because she's close to 40–and not one for finishes–the powers that be likely found her expendable. Still, that doesn't make it sit right with everyone. Araujo's release feels more like a quiet rebalancing of the books than a cut based on merit. She wasn't streaking toward gold, sure—but she also wasn't getting blown out. Her recent loss to Cortez was one of those low-output, tactical chess matches, and it's not like Cortez ran away with it. And before that? Araujo flipped the script against Silva in a fight most expected her to lose. When a veteran wins as an underdog and gets released a month later, you have to ask: do gatekeepers have any security even when they win? This wasn't a fighter on a four-fight skid or someone getting stopped every time out. In fact, she's never been stopped in her UFC career. But the UFC has been blunt about what they value lately: marketability, momentum and ceiling. Araujo doesn't check those boxes at this stage, even if she remains a capable, game opponent. So she's gone. In the end, it feels like another reminder that in today's UFC, being solid just isn't good enough. You have to be ascending—or exciting enough to offset the plateau. Derrick Lewis who just defeated a talented up-and-comer in the UFC Nashville main event is proof. Araujo doesn't finish opponents or entertain like Lewis, so a ranked fighter who can actually push young fighters is off the roster. It's a cold MMA world out there.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The CV90 is a great vehicle, so why doesn't the US buy it?
The U.S. military has a long history of developing vehicles it never actually fields. The Army's Future Combat Systems died on the vine. The Ground Combat Vehicle was canceled before production. The Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle program has been stopped and started more times than most troops will change duty stations in a career. And of course, the M10 Booker, the not-light-tank the Army had to have, was killed off after about 80 were delivered. It is no wonder that whenever we cover the topic of U.S. vehicles on our YouTube channel, the comments are flooded with the same question: 'Why doesn't the U.S. just buy the CV90?' That is a valid query. The CV90 is a proven infantry fighting vehicle used by several NATO allies. It is modular, combat-tested and recently underwent a significant upgrade. So why can't the Pentagon stop with the seemingly endless programs that never actually produce a viable vehicle and just buy the Swedish CV90? The answer has little to do with whether the vehicle is any good and a lot to do with how the U.S. buys weapons, what it prioritizes in doctrine, and how the military-industrial complex operates. The CV90 was developed in the 1980s by Sweden's Hägglunds, now part of BAE Systems. It was designed with fighting the Soviet Union in mind to be fast, survivable and capable in a variety of terrains. Since entering service in 1994, it's become one of the most widely adopted infantry fighting vehicles in NATO. It comes in multiple variants, ranging from the traditional infantry fighting vehicle with an autocannon on it to command and control, mortar carrier, reconnaissance models, and many more, depending on the customer's requirements. The CV90 even comes with a variety of main weapons, starting at 30mm and going all the way up to 120mm. On paper, it checks a lot of boxes on the Pentagon's wishlist for an armored vehicle. So why not just buy it and move on? The most unsexy answer: money and politics. The Pentagon doesn't just buy vehicles, it buys programs. Those multi-billion dollar contracts aren't just for tanks or jets, they are for replacement parts, depot maintenance, technical manuals, training curriculum, simulators, everything necessary to keep a weapon functioning. This translates into jobs and decades of sustainment work. Buying the CV90 off the shelf would mean outsourcing production and all those program benefits to Europe. The U.S. could license the design to be built here in the United States, like we do with the UH-72 Lakota helicopters, but that would require significant investment into a weapon we don't have control over. Doctrine must also be considered. When the Pentagon buys a new weapon, it usually builds the vehicle around current doctrine, not the other way around. For instance, U.S. armored formations are built around combined arms maneuver. Bradleys are designed to fight alongside Abrams tanks, supported by artillery, drones and airpower, all feeding into a massive command-and-control network. That network assumes certain levels of system cooperation, speed, and firepower that aren't always a perfect match with off-the-shelf foreign vehicles, no matter how good they are. This brings us to the issue of interoperability with U.S. systems. The CV90 is built around NATO standards, but the U.S. military often takes that a step further with its own encrypted communications suites, battlefield management systems, Blue Force Tracker integration, electronic warfare and signals intelligence kits, and remote weapon stations that are all custom-fitted to American platforms. Retrofitting those systems into a CV90 isn't impossible — it's just time-consuming, expensive, and requires creating a new U.S.-only variant. At that point, you might as well be developing a new vehicle from scratch. Finally, we can't forget that the Bradley does exist and its capabilities overlap heavily with the CV90. Military planners aren't going to buy a foreign system that is very similar to the domestic one they already have hundreds of. In the latest YouTube video, we go over these reasons and many more that apply not just to the CV90, but other foreign weapon platforms that we admire, but will never purchase. Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps learns an old lesson: Don't mess with Audie Murphy A breakdown of safety procedures 'directly contributed' to an 82nd Airborne paratrooper's death WWII Marine Raider who fought at Iwo Jima, Guadalcanal wants cards for 100th birthday Navy identifies special warfare sailor killed while parachuting Pentagon appears to pause renaming of Navy ships
Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
UFC Pioneer Retires In The Octagon Following Back-To-Back Losses
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE - JULY 12: A detail view of the gloves of Lauren Murphy after announcing her ... More retirement during the UFC Fight Night event at Bridgestone Arena on July 12, 2025 in Nashville, Tennessee. (Photo by Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC) UFC veteran and women's MMA pioneer, Lauren Murphy called it a career on Saturday night in Nashville. Murphy, 41, took a unanimous decision defeat to Eduarda Moura. Murphy took the gloves off in the Octagon and called it a career. After the loss to Moura, Murphy addressed the crowd and left her gloves in the cage—a symbolic gesture that fighters often use to announce retirement. 'I came out here and I gave it everything I have. I've been in the UFC for 10 years, I've been fighting for 15. I wanted to come out and just give it my all one more time, hear the cheers of the crowd and walk out with the American flag. I love all of you guys so much. There's a lot of people to thank. But first of all, I want to thank me for doing all this motherf---ing hard work. I want to thank me for being a pioneer for women in this sport. I want to thank me for picking myself and dusting myself off every time I got knocked down.' Murphy got the most out of her athletic career. She did just about everything one could imagine in the sport, short of capturing UFC gold. Murphy punched her ticket to the UFC back in 2013 when she won the vacant Invicta bantamweight title with a victory over Miriam Nakamoto. NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE - JULY 9: Lauren Murphy poses for a portrait during a UFC photo session on ... More July 9, 2025 in Nashville, Tennessee. (Photo by Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC) While Murphy's UFC career began with back-to-back losses, she battled back. Murphy's best run in the UFC came during a five-fight win streak from 2019–2021. That win streak led to Murphy's only title opportunity in the UFC. At UFC 266 in September 2021, Murphy clashed with Valentina Shevchenko for the flyweight championship. Shevchenko successfully defended her title via fourth-round TKO. Murphy rebounded with a unanimous decision win over fellow icon Miesha Tate in 2022, but her career ends with two losses to Jessica Andrade in January 2023 and Friday's loss to Moura. Murphy's career is the kind fans respect even if they didn't always pick her to win. According to Tristen Critchfield of Sherdog, Murphy's place as a trailblazer in women's MMA is cemented by her longevity, her title challenge against one of the greatest champions in UFC history, and her willingness to always take on the toughest available opponent. Her Invicta success, UFC run, and defining win over Tate give her a résumé that stacks up with many of the best fighters never to win a UFC title. Most everyone else with a similar resume did break through to win a title at some point. Murphy is moving on to other endeavors following her retirement. Her understanding of the sport and personality would make her a great fit as an analyst. We'll see where she lands following a distinguished career.
