logo
Farm plastics plan by NRW to cut River Cleddau pollution

Farm plastics plan by NRW to cut River Cleddau pollution

Natural Resources Wales (NRW) has set up drop-off centres within the rivers Cleddau, Teifi, Tywi and Usk catchment areas where farmers can drop off silage bale wrap, clamp cover sheeting, fertiliser and feed bags, and feed buckets.
The scheme is supported by Agriculture Plastics Environment, Birch Farm Plastics and Afonydd Cymru, who will provide the service at a reduced rate compared to charges for on-farm collection.
NRW wants to recycle an additional 200t of farm plastics through the trial scheme.
Chris Thomas, senior land management officer at Four Rivers for Life, says farm plastics have been found in the Cleddau, Teifi and Tywi rivers.
'Rivers can only fully perform this function and support farmers if they are healthy and free from pollution and plastic waste,'' he said.
Don't miss our next edition of Pembrokeshire Farmer, available free inside the Western Telegraph on July 30
A report in 2023 by non-governmental organisation Wrap found that the UK has an agri-plastic recycling rate of 20-30%, which is significantly lower than other European countries, including Germany, France and Ireland who have recycling rates of 65%, 80% and 90% respectively.
These countries operate drop off centres and these significantly help farmers recycle their used farm plastics.
In 2024, West Wales Rivers Trust (WWRT) carried out a survey of 100 farms to review current practices on the disposal of agricultural plastics in Carmarthenshire and across Wales.
The results showed that cost was one of the main barriers preventing more farmers recycling their silage plastic waste.
Cheryl Birch, director at Birch Farm Plastics, which is partnering NRW in the scheme, said the company's costs can be lower when collecting from drop-off centres and those savings can therefore be passed onto farmers.
One of the dedicated drop-off sites is at Crymych. More information can be found at ape-uk.com/fourriversforlife
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Healthcare boosts UK's FTSE 100 as earnings, Fed meeting in focus
Healthcare boosts UK's FTSE 100 as earnings, Fed meeting in focus

Reuters

time33 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Healthcare boosts UK's FTSE 100 as earnings, Fed meeting in focus

July 29 (Reuters) - Britain's FTSE 100 closed higher on Tuesday, led by healthcare shares, as investors assessed mixed corporate updates and awaited the Federal Reserve's next policy decision on Wednesday. The benchmark index (.FTSE), opens new tab rose 0.6%. Healthcare stocks (.FTNMX201030), opens new tab gained 2.2% after AstraZeneca (AZN.L), opens new tab beat second-quarter revenue and profit expectations. Shares of the drugmaker climbed 3.4%. Heavyweight bank stocks (.FTNMX301010), opens new tab advanced 1.5%, tracking gains in European peers. Barclays (BARC.L), opens new tab gained 2.8% after the British lender's first-half profit rose by a better-than-expected 23%. Europe's bank stocks rose to their highest level since September 2008 as investors bet on improved profits and resilience in an industry broadly insulated from tariff turmoil. Precious metal miners (.FTNMX551030), opens new tab led sectoral gains with a 2.4% rise as gold prices steadied after hitting their lowest level since July 9 on Monday. Conversely, chemical stocks (.FTNMX552010), opens new tab lost 5.4%, pressured by Croda International's (CRDA.L), opens new tab 10.4% fall, after the chemical company reported first-half sales below estimates. Industrial miners (.FTNMX551020), opens new tab lost 1.3%, tracking lower copper prices. Glencore (GLEN.L), opens new tab and Anglo American (AAL.L), opens new tab fell 3.4% and 1.6% respectively. Among other individual stocks, Games Workshop (GAW.L), opens new tab surged 5.4% to top the FTSE 100 index, after the miniature wargames maker reported a nearly 30% jump in annual pre-tax profit. The domestically-focused midcap FTSE 250 index (.FTMC), opens new tab closed down 0.7%, pressured by Inchcape's (INCH.L), opens new tab 11.7% fall after the car distributor reported a 4% drop in first-half adjusted pre-tax profit at constant currency. Greggs (GRG.L), opens new tab slipped 4.7% after reporting a 14% fall in first-half profit. On trade, U.S. Commerce chief Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday that President Donald Trump would make his trade deal decisions this week, even as separate negotiations with China and the European Union continue. U.S. and EU officials were still discussing steel and aluminium tariffs as well as digital services regulations. Trump also flagged a "world tariff" rate of 15% to 20% on Monday for countries that were not negotiating a deal, among the highest rates since the Great Depression of the 1930s. Focus will be on the U.S. central bank's policy meeting, which is expected to leave rates unchanged on Wednesday.

Trump is winning his trade war. Only the Left-wing media refuses to admit it
Trump is winning his trade war. Only the Left-wing media refuses to admit it

Telegraph

time33 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump is winning his trade war. Only the Left-wing media refuses to admit it

The deal 'will bring stability. It will bring predictability', said EU President Ursula von der Leyen at Donald Trump's Turnberry golf resort in Scotland on Sunday. 'Stability' and 'predictability' are not words the EU typically employs when discussing anything connected with the US president. But when you lead an economic bloc that has just been comprehensively outmanoeuvred in a trade dispute, forced into a deal that even your own side says favours the US, you could be forgiven for acting out of character. The basic rate of 15 per cent that will now be charged on most European goods entering the US was perhaps not coincidentally the same rate that Trump had extracted from Japan in a similar deal last week. It is the same rate that could, pending an announced review, become a new general norm in US foreign trade relations. It is also substantially higher than the less than 2 per cent effective rate that the US charged the EU before Trump returned to office. It was 'the best we could get', von der Leyen said almost apologetically in a news conference after the deal was announced. Indeed, a hard US-imposed deadline to conclude negotiations loomed on August 1, only four days after the agreement was reached. Without the deal, US tariffs on EU imports, which form about 20 per cent of the US's total foreign purchases, would have shot up to 30 per cent across the board, with high levies on automobiles, pharmaceuticals, and other key industries in which the EU has a competitive advantage left painfully in place. In other words, Trump appears to be winning his trade war. US markets were flat on Monday, largely in anticipation of corporate earnings reports, and have risen strongly in the year to date. Wiser commentators have also come to the realisation that Trump's tariff strategy is not the economic disaster that so many of them had predicted – noting robust aggregate data and little sign that households are under pressure. The IMF's latest forecasts indicate that the US will continue to significantly outperform its developed world rivals. The president has secured commitments for considerable new investment in the US from a range of trading partners, alongside a more level playing field for American exporters. America's discredited legacy media, however, refuses to accept that there might be any advantages to the president's approach. 'Few are cheering,' said CNN of Trump's EU deal. It also felt compelled to argue that the agreement will not allow the president to escape questions about the simmering scandal around the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. For good measure, the Left-wing news network featured a human interest story claiming Trump's tariffs could 'ruin' a women's golf apparel brand. 'Questions, critiques and discrepancies are hanging over the framework agreement,' declared a sceptical New York Times analysis, apparently written by seven reporters, who accused the deal of having 'drawn plenty of grumbling' from critics just hours after its announcement. On Monday, a follow-up New York Times article warned that the tariffs could inflict higher prices for Botox, Ozempic, and other cosmetic drugs. One could argue that the former paper of record, as it is often called, knows its remaining audience, but that same day it also unironically published an article observing that doctoral graduates in economics, an academic field overwhelmingly critical of Trump's tariffs, now face poor employment prospects. In fairness, on Tuesday, it did acknowledge that the slew of deals 'has seemingly proved Mr Trump right that his tariff threats are a powerful bargaining tool ', but it couldn't resist casting doubt on whether they would prove an economic success. 'Much of this would have happened anyway', sniffed the lead editorial in the Wall Street Journal of the EU's commitment to invest hundreds of billions more in the US. Pointing out that EU investment increased by about $200bn from 2023 to 2024, it joylessly observed that 'those investment inflows will increase the US trade deficit because of balance-of-payments accounting'. Perhaps some of these criticisms will be proven correct. But it is not hard to detect an unwillingness among the president's detractors to accept any upside to his approach, or to acknowledge when their own gloomy predictions have been proven disastrously wrong. Not all observers are so down in the mouth. ' The stock market is at record highs … I don't see a country in a depression … And I would have thought … that these tariffs were going to f‑--ing sink this economy by this time, and they didn't,' admitted the liberal American comedian and political commentator Bill Maher, a sometime Trump critic who has a record of giving the president credit when it is due. If the rest of the news media wants to recover ground among the 69 per cent of Americans who say they place little or no faith in it, its practitioners should recognise a good thing when they see it.

German zoo sparks outrage over killing 12 of its baboons after contraception failed to stop the primates breeding
German zoo sparks outrage over killing 12 of its baboons after contraception failed to stop the primates breeding

Daily Mail​

time33 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

German zoo sparks outrage over killing 12 of its baboons after contraception failed to stop the primates breeding

A German zoo has sparked condemnation after culling 12 baboons amid fears the group had grown too large for their enclosure, while contraception had failed to stop the primates from breeding. Nuremberg Zoo first announced plans to kill a number of baboons it did not have space for in February 2024. Zoo officials said that they had examined offers to take in some of the animals, but they were unable to make any of them work. Director Dag Encke said previously that the 'sensible' plan to kill off nearly half of the baboon population in the zoo would help 'ensure the survival' of the species. The zoo had been housing 43 Guinea baboons in an enclosure, built in the late 2000s, that had originally intended to accommodate 25 animals plus their young. Officials argued that a lack of space resulted in additional stress for the primates and more arguments between these otherwise social animals, which increasingly ended in blood. But the decision to cull the animals drew the ire of animal rights protesters, who were seen on Tuesday afternoon forcing their way into the zoo, which announced it was closed for the day for unspecified 'operational reasons.' Some of the activists were arrested by police after they glued themselves to the ground in protest. A statement released by the zoo shortly afterwards confirmed that 12 baboons had been killed, German news agency dpa reported. Further details were not immediately available, while animal rights groups said they planned to file a criminal complaint. The International Union for Conservation of Nature classified Guinea baboons as endangered and said they should be kept in zoos for species conservation. Guinea baboons live in protected areas in several West African countries, but because the population there has also surged there was no space to relocate Nuremberg's primates to African countries either, Encke previously explained. Since 2011, 16 baboons had been moved from Nuremberg Zoo to other facilities in Paris and China. Officials at the zoo argued that a lack of space resulted in additional stress for the primates and more violent arguments between these otherwise social animals But those zoos, and another in Spain to which baboons were previously sent, had reached their own capacity. Animals are regularly euthanised in European zoos for a range of reasons, but have equally provoked anger from animal rights activists. In 2014, Copenhagen Zoo killed a healthy two-year-old giraffe because he was 'surplus to requirements'. Staff then butchered its carcass in front of a crowd that included schoolchildren and fed the dead animal to the lions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store