
China asserts its military might in a new and uncertain world order
Mark Rutte's grovelling to
Donald Trump
this week went viral in
China
, with countless social media posts showing the Nato secretary general referring to the
United States
president as Daddy. For some of the more chauvinistic who shared it, the clip exemplified Europe's subordination to the United States and the contrast with China's policy of standing up to Trump.
In advance of this week's Nato summit in The Hague, Rutte warned that China's 'massive' military build-up made closer links between the alliance and countries like
Japan
and
South Korea
more important than ever. He expressed concern that between three and five Chinese defence companies now rank among the world's top 10 whereas a few years ago none did.
'Of course, they don't do this only because they want to have nice parades in Beijing. I guess it's there for a reason,' he said.
China's foreign ministry on Thursday accused Rutte of spreading misinformation, stoking confrontation and looking for an excuse for Nato to increase its military spending.
READ MORE
'Nato claims to be a regional organisation but keeps reaching beyond the geopolitical scope defined in its treaty and uses Eurasian security connectivity as an excuse to have a presence in the Asia-Pacific,' spokesman Guo Jiakun told a press conference.
'The international community sees this clearly and countries in the Asia-Pacific are on high alert.'
China's defence budget has more than doubled since 2010, growing at 7 per cent a year for the past decade, although it still amounts to less than 2 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP). The People's Liberation Army (PLA) is the world's largest standing army with 2.2 million active service personnel and its navy has more ships than any other.
China has been upgrading its military technology, developing weapons systems and building new stealth aircraft and fighter jets. Chinese forces have not been involved in a war since the 1970s but some of the new technology found a showcase last May during an air battle between Pakistan and India.
[
Where were China and Russia when Iran needed them most?
Opens in new window
]
Pakistan sent fewer aircraft into battle but it succeeded in downing five from the Indian air force, including three French-made Rafale fighters. It did so using Chinese-made fighter jets, missiles, radar and electronic warfare systems.
Rutte is undoubtedly right when he says that China is not making all of this military hardware just to put it on parade. But some of it will be on display in a big parade in Beijing on September 3rd to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of the second World War.
Xi Jinping
will inspect troops on Tiananmen Square and preside over a parade that will feature Chinese-made, high-precision military equipment and 'new types of combat forces including unmanned, intelligent equipment'.
Vladimir Putin
will be among the world leaders at the parade and some Chinese commentators have suggested that Xi should invite Trump too.
This display of military strength will not be a reassuring spectacle for China's neighbours but one of the country's leading foreign policy experts said this week that Beijing has no ambition to replace Washington as the global hegemon. Gao Fei said the 'one superpower and many powers' pattern was giving way to a multipolar system in which China will prioritise developing global partnerships.
'Partnerships are not distinguished as superior and subordinate, and there is no division into camps,' he wrote in the People's Daily.
'Those who share the same ideals and aspirations (like-minded) are partners, and those who seek common ground while reserving differences are also partners. All countries can establish partnerships based on common interests and pursuits, constructing a common rather than exclusive 'circle of friends'.'
Gao asserts that in the global partnerships China promotes, all states will be equal participants and the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of each will be respected. But he says that as a major power, China should play a leading role in improving global governance, not least because of the turn taken by the US under Trump.
[
Everyone's friend: How Mongolia stays on good terms with Russia, China and western powers
Opens in new window
]
'Certain western countries have abandoned their own international responsibilities, shifting from providing public goods to the international community to seeking rent from the international community through public goods, further affecting the legitimacy and stability of the international order,' he writes.
'As a responsible major country in the international system, in the face of enormous challenges to the international order, China must demonstrate its major power responsibility and play a mainstay role.'
During a visit to China this week, Singapore's prime minister Lawrence Wong spoke about the vulnerability of small countries as global norms and institutions weakened amid a rise in economic nationalism and a greater emphasis on security.
'I think, frankly, no one knows what this new order would look like. It is still very early days. We are in a period of transition and a period of evolution,' he said.
'There will be critics of today's system that say it is good that now the system is changing. But I would also say, let us have a care. Let us not be too quick to cheer. Because what is the alternative?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on trade and tax: the rules-based system is breaking down
As a small country, Ireland is best served by a stable international economic backdrop and a rules-based system governing areas such as trade and taxation. Unfortunately, the key institutions overseeing the international economic system are now under heavy pressure, as Donald Trump pursues his nationalistic economic agenda. The most recent demonstration of this came in recent days as the other G7 countries acceded to a US demand to rewrite a part of the global corporate tax deal that took years to put together under the aegis of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). The entire deal is now weakened and may even crumble completely. The issue for the US was a part of the agreement which would have allowed other countries, including Ireland, to collect top-up tax from American multinationals who were judged not to have paid the minimum rate of 15 per cent elsewhere. Washington saw this as an infringement of US tax sovereignty. The same issue lies behind new trade tensions between the US and Canada, What is notable is that the G7 countries agreed to unpick the agreement to meet the US demands, as was announced on social media by US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent. The other 140 plus countries who negotiated and signed the agreement are yet to be consulted. The big players are calling the shots. READ MORE In return, the US administration is asking Congress to withdraw a part of the new budget bill which would have given the US the power to levy punitive taxes on investors and companies from countries who were judged to be treating US firms unfairly. As in the field of trade, US threats are being met by significant concessions. The OECD's status as a mediator of the corporate tax deal has been undermined and the future of the whole agreement is now in serious doubt. In the same way, the World Trade Organisation looks on powerlessly as the rules of international trade are torn up. In this context, the suggestion last week from Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, that the EU investigates a new regime with a group of Asian countries who are part of a trade bloc – which the UK has also joined – was ill-judged to say the least. This new dominance by the big players and the tearing up of existing rules is worrying for Ireland. The previous government had hoped that by signing up to the OECD tax deal the controversy over the Irish system would be put to bed and there would be no further demands for change. Now this is all back in the melting pot. Meanwhile, Ireland has thrived under the rules-based trade system which brings certainty to those exporting from this country, whether multinationals or domestic businesses. Ireland needs to stick close to the EU to make it case and hope that Europe can find its voice on these issues more effectively than it has to date.

The Journal
6 hours ago
- The Journal
Senate pushes ahead on Trump's tax break and spending cut plan
CAPPING A TUMULTUOUS night, the Republican-controlled US Senate advanced President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks, spending cuts and increased deportation money, with more weekend work ahead as Congress races to meet his Fourth of July deadline for passage. By a 51-49 tally and with vice president JD Vance at the Capitol to break a potential tie, the Senate cleared a key procedural step on Saturday as midnight approached. Voting had come to a standstill, dragging on for more than three hours, with holdout senators huddling for negotiations and taking private meetings off the Senate floor. In the end, two Republicans opposed the motion to move ahead on Trump's signature domestic policy plan, joining all 47 Democrats. 'Tonight we saw a GREAT VICTORY in the Senate,' Trump said in a social media post afterwards. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all Republicans are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programmes as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. Trump had threatened to campaign against one Republican, senator Thom Tillis, who had announced he could not support the Bill because of Medicaid cuts that he worried would leave many without health care in his state. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the Senate version of the Bill would increase by 11.8 million the number of people without health insurance in 2034. Advertisement Tillis and senator Rand Paul voted no. Renewed pressure to oppose the 940-page bill came from billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, who called it 'utterly insane and destructive'. Ahead for senators now will be an all-night debate and amendments. If they are able to pass it, the Bill would return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. With the narrow Republican majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans released the bill 'in the dead of night' on Friday and were rushing through before the public fully knew what was in it. He forced a full reading of the text that began late on Saturday and continued into Sunday morning. At its core, the legislation would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The Bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the cutbacks to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments are also causing dissent within republican ranks. Senator Ron Wyden said the environmental rollbacks would amount to a 'death sentence' for America's wind and solar industries.


The Irish Sun
8 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Trump says he has group of ‘very wealthy people' lined up to buy TikTok after pushing back ban of social media app
DONALD Trump said he has a group of "very wealthy people" lined up to buy TikTok. The President has repeatedly delayed a ban blocking the app to allow more time for negotiations with the Chinese owners - who have consistently refused to sell. 4 Donald Trump said he has potential buyers of TikTok waiting in the wings Credit: AFP 4 TikTok was temporarily disabled on US devices in January Credit: Getty 4 TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew has argued the sale to American owners is not necessary Credit: AFP Trump has fought to force TikTok's owners to sell to an American party since his first term. A bill signed last year makes it illegal to operate under the current Chinese owners, but the ban has been delayed three times and the company has always refused to sell. However, on Sunday, Trump told Fox News a "group of very wealthy people" wanted to purchase the app from ByteDance. He said: 'I think I will need China['s] approval, and I think President Xi will probably do it." Without revealing any details, he added: 'I'll tell you in about two weeks.' The closest to Trump has come to barring American users from TikTok was at the time of his inauguration in January this year. A ban took effect on January 19, and TikTok shut itself down an hour before that, telling users "you can't use TikTok for now" due to a "law banning TikTok". But around 12 hours later it Most read in The US Sun Since then, Trump has delayed the ban three times - twice for 75 days and most recently by 90 days on June 17. The eventual ban or sale is required by a "foreign adversary" bill signed in March 2024. ByteDance challenged the Act, but it was upheld by the Supreme Court in January. Trump rips critics & insists 'bombs went through like butter' at Iran sites It's not clear how much TikTok would sell for, with valuations ranging from $30billion to $300billion. Rumoured new American owners have included major tech companies like Microsoft and Oracle. The wildly popular YouTuber Mr Beast, real name Jimmy Donaldson, said in January he would submit an official offer for TikTok through and investment group led by Jesse Tinsley. Steve Mnuchin, Trump's treasury secretary during his first term in office, also floated the idea of purchasing the app with a group of billionaire investors when the ban was first passed. Amazon reportedly made a last-minute bid to purchase TikTok three days before the second recent extension in April. The bill banning continued Chinese ownership of TikTok cites concerns about national security risks. ByteDance was initially given nine months to sell-up - and that expired in January. However, the company has repeatedly insisted it will not give-up the app. It said in April: "ByteDance doesn't have any plans to sell TikTok." Read more on the Irish Sun Reports circulated that it was considering a sale of the app without the key algorithm, but these were denied. The owners insisted: "Foreign media reports of ByteDance selling TikTok are not true." 4 Trump has postponed the ban of TikTok three times this year Credit: Getty