logo
TONY HETHERINGTON: Help! Storage firm lost entire contents of our five-bed home

TONY HETHERINGTON: Help! Storage firm lost entire contents of our five-bed home

Daily Mail​31-05-2025

Tony Hetherington is Financial Mail on Sunday's ace investigator, fighting readers corners, revealing the truth that lies behind closed doors and winning victories for those who have been left out-of-pocket. Find out how to contact him below.
Mrs J.P. writes: We put the contents of our five-bedroom home into long-term storage, costing £200 per month.
We had retired to Spain, but returned to the UK and contacted the storage firm to have our goods delivered to our new home.
It then informed us that it had accidentally disposed of them.
Tony Hetherington replies: It has taken months of enquiries to unravel everything that took place. You first put your belongings into storage in 2017, but in 2018 your mother-in-law was nearing the end of her life so you returned to the UK and your belongings were returned to you. In 2019 you and your husband put everything into storage again and went back to Spain.
Last year you decided to return to this country, but were then told your belongings had gone.
The name of the storage company you gave me was Herts And Essex Removals Limited, which you told me was run by Martin Sontag. But this was impossible. That company did not exist until 2021, and it was compulsorily dissolved by Companies House in March last year so it cannot have been trading when you came home several months later.
I asked you to search out your agreement and you came up with a slightly different company name, Herts & Essex Removals & Storage Ltd, based at Matching Green in Essex. The agreement pledged: 'Your furniture and effects are covered to a substantial £100,000.'
I checked, and this company was formed in 2011. But no one named Sontag was involved, and it was voluntarily dissolved in 2013.
Judging by the dates, you should have been dealing with another of this crop of similarly named companies, Herts and Essex Removal and Storage Ltd – not 'Removals', with an 's'. This was set up in 2012 and, yes, it was run by Martin Sontag.
The snag was, it went bust in 2018. Martin Sontag borrowed over £30,000 before the business collapsed, and is repaying this gradually. So you may have put your belongings into storage with this company in 2017, and got them back in 2018, but when everything went into storage again in 2019 it cannot have been with this company because it was in liquidation.
So just who were you paying? No surprise, you were paying Martin Sontag himself.
Your husband told me: 'We always paid him cash as this was his preferred method of payment.' The money was handed over by a family member and you repaid them.
When the bad news came about the loss of your possessions, Martin Sontag explained that he told his employees to prepare your belongings to be returned, and on the same day other items that were not yours were to be dumped. The instructions were accidentally reversed.
He stressed he had a 'gold plated insurance policy', but his inventory of your possessions was on a corrupted computer drive. You put together your own list, and insurance giant Sedgwick, the company handling the claim on behalf of Axa, offered you £4,700. You asked me, how could you replace the contents of an entire house for £4,700!
Armed with your signed authority, I asked Sedgwick for a copy of the policy. It refused, but did tell me that the insurance did not provide 'new for old' replacement cover.
And Sedgwick then slashed its offer to just £2,800.
But who would pay £200 a month to store goods worth only £2,800?
Martin Sontag was more helpful, and gave me a copy of the policy. It was made out to him personally. He also produced his agreement with you, in the name of one of the companies that had ceased to exist.
He told me he had bought its customer base. Without realising it, you had been switched from a contract with a company to a cash-in-hand deal with an individual.
On the brighter side, Martin Sontag told me the damaged computer had been repaired, but the inventory did not match your own. He said your inventory showed items not on his, and you told me that he had failed to list some items.
I explained to Sedgwick that there was no way I could encourage you to accept £2,800. It had to think again, and it did. When you received the new offer, it had rocketed to just under £15,000. Absurdly, it was accompanied by an alleged copy of your storage deal – in the name of the company that folded in 2013.
I invited Sedgwick's legal team to explain this. The question was clearly too difficult as they failed to answer.
I have discussed the offer with you, so I can now report that you have accepted it. Isn't it amazing that an insurance payout can shoot up by 400 per cent!
And, of course, the payment you have accepted lets Sedgwick and Axa off the hook, but Martin Sontag could still be impaled if you feel it falls short.
Handing over your worldly goods to a storage firm should not involve sleepless nights, loss of belongings or a lengthy battle for fair payment, yet that is what you faced and you deserve a fair outcome.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police pushing for almost £3,000 in legal fees from grieving domestic abuse campaigner
Police pushing for almost £3,000 in legal fees from grieving domestic abuse campaigner

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Police pushing for almost £3,000 in legal fees from grieving domestic abuse campaigner

A grieving domestic abuse campaigner is being chased for almost £3,000 of legal fees by a 'vindictive' police force after she took them to court over her niece's death. Lorna McMahon claimed Greater Manchester Police (GMP) had neglected to investigate the potential role of domestic violence in the case of her family member Teresa McMahon, who was found dead in her flat in August 2021 aged 43. She suggested the force should have looked more deeply into the impact of her niece's former partner Robert Chalmers. But an inquest disagreed and ruled that Teresa, who had been an ITV journalist, took her own life and 'no other person forced her to do that'. Following a watchdog's decision to refuse her request for a reinvestigation, Ms McMahon lost a legal action. Now GMP are chasing £2,778.40 in legal fees despite being urged by a High Court judge to think 'very carefully' about whether this was a good idea, the Telegraph reports. Judge Matthew Butt KC denied the aunt's application for the costs order to be delayed until all matters regarding the 'inadequate investigation' into her niece's death had finished. He confirmed he did not possess the power to grant such a request but said the heartbreaking circumstances of the case called into question whether it was right to pursue the legal costs. The judge said: 'I would urge the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) and Greater Manchester Police (GMP) to consider very carefully whether, in all of the circumstances, it would be right to seek to enforce the costs order against Ms McMahon given the tragic death of her beloved niece, the recent death of Teresa's mother, Barbara, the health problems Ms McMahon suffers from, and her limited means.' He added he had been impressed by the 'dedication, eloquence and determination' of the aunt in her bid to secure a reinvestigation. Judge Butt continued: 'I have also read a letter to the claimant from Queen Camilla in which she expresses how she is full of admiration for her work.' The IOPC decided not to chase the costs but GMP pushed on with retrieving the legal fees from Ms McMahon. In a letter to the force, she wrote: 'I find it absolutely vexatious and vindictive that GMP's police chief, Stephen Watson, appears to have singled me out when choosing to enforce this particular cost order, especially since Mr Justice Matthew Butt urged GMP not to pursue the cost order made against me considering all the circumstances.' Teresa, a news editor at Granada News, was found dead in her flat in Little Hulton, Salford. She had reported broken fingers, and even potentially a broken rib, to GMP before her death. The journalist was 'mistakenly' told by an officer that she was not entitled to receive information about Chalmers' alleged history of domestic abuse because they were no longer in a relationship, the inquest heard. The force then attempted to contact her to inform her she might be entitled to the details under Clare's Law but it received no reply. Chalmers denied either physically hurting Teresa or trying to control her, during video evidence given after his arrest for failing to attend her London inquest. He admitted, however, that their relationship had been volatile. A GMP spokesman said: 'Our thoughts remain with Mrs. McMahon after the tragic death of her niece and while officers worked tirelessly to provide her with answers, we recognise we weren't able to provide the closure she was seeking despite the thousands of hours spent reviewing complaints and opening new investigations. 'We always carefully consider the circumstances of individuals when seeking to recover costs lawfully ordered by the court. As a public body, the force must balance these considerations against its obligations to protect scarce public funds.'

Entry-level job numbers have 'dropped by a third since ChatGPT was launched'
Entry-level job numbers have 'dropped by a third since ChatGPT was launched'

Daily Mail​

time28 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Entry-level job numbers have 'dropped by a third since ChatGPT was launched'

The number of new entry-level jobs has fallen by nearly a third since ChatGPT was launched in November 2022, it was reported last night. Openings for apprenticeships, graduate roles, internships and junior roles with no requirement for a degree fell by 31.9 per cent, according to The Times. Research by jobs search website Adzuna found that entry-level vacancies only make up a quarter of the overall jobs market, which is down by nearly 4 per cent since 2022. It comes as more companies outline their plans to use AI to reduce their headcount. BT said in May 2023 that 10,000 jobs would be replaced by artificial intelligence by the end of the decade. The roles impacted include call handling and network diagnostics. Its chief executive Allison Kirkby has claimed that advances in AI could result in even more job cuts at the company. Dario Amodei, head of $61billion AI start-up Anthropic, last month warned that the technology could cut half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years. He said this could increase unemployment by between up to 20 per cent. James Neave, the head of data science at Adzuna, said AI was a major factor in the reduction of entry-level jobs. 'If you can reduce your hiring at the entry level, that's just going to increase your efficiency and improve cost savings,' he said. Businesses are facing increasing costs including rises in national insurance contributions and the national minimum wage. The number of entry-level roles fell again by 4.2 per cent in May. Experts predict a 50-50 chance machines could take over all our jobs within a century. But a poll of 16,000 workers last year found many employees believe AI could do it already. Nearly half admitted the technology can outperform them in 'routine tasks' – while also paying better attention to detail. The 'jobs apocalypse' is expected to see admin and entry-level roles first – but will increasingly affect those higher paid as it becomes more sophisticated. The Future of Work Report by jobs website Indeed found just one in three respondents were confident AI would have a positive impact on their role. The majority however – nine in ten – felt confident they would be able to adapt to the changes over the next five years. Workers told how much of their day-to-day responsibilities were already ripe for automation – with three in five saying that AI can carry out data analysis better than humans. Routine tasks (48%) and attention to detail (45%) were other tasks where workers felt AI had the upper hand. While repetitive jobs are well-suited to AI, workers said they still felt confident they were better in critical thinking, creativity and emotional intelligence. Asked which jobs are most likely to be untouched by AI in a decade's time, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Chief Economist, Barret Kupelian said people should look to traditional trades - with roles plumbers, electricians and decorators He explained: 'It appears to me that jobs that require a quite a lot of manual labour...I don't think the technology is skilled there, in terms of augmenting those skills.' The PwC spokesman said that roles that require 'a high degree of judgement and creativity' are also unlikely to be able to be automated any time soon because they require 'bespoke skills that are quite difficult to replicate on a digital basis.' The IMF warned that, even where AI's effects are positive, computer automation is likely to drive wealth inequality. Highly paid professions will see AI boost their wages while lower paid roles are at a significant risk of pay cuts and lay-offs. A study by the IMF found that clerical workers such as secretaries and clerks are very likely to be replaced by AI because most of their could be done by machines. However, it is clerical support workers and technical service roles that are most likely to be replaced by AI. Professionals and managers, although they are very likely to be impacted by AI, are more likely to be impacted positively. These findings echo a previous study from the Department for Education which found that white-collar professionals were most likely to be replaced by AI. The study found that accountants, consultants, and psychologists were among the professions most likely to be pushed aside by computers.

As three submarine captains are stripped of their OBEs... How one brave woman – with the Mail's help – exposed a culture of sexual abuse, vile misogyny and bullying among the Royal Navy's top rank
As three submarine captains are stripped of their OBEs... How one brave woman – with the Mail's help – exposed a culture of sexual abuse, vile misogyny and bullying among the Royal Navy's top rank

Daily Mail​

time43 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

As three submarine captains are stripped of their OBEs... How one brave woman – with the Mail's help – exposed a culture of sexual abuse, vile misogyny and bullying among the Royal Navy's top rank

For more than a century, the Royal Navy's submarine service has operated behind a thick curtain of secrecy – a shadowy world of steel corridors and sonar silence, where power is absolute, scrutiny seemingly minimal and those in command are lionised as guardians of our country's deadliest weapons. But now, that carefully curated image is unravelling as the elite service faces perhaps its most damning reckoning yet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store