New rent rules: What will changes mean for you? Send us your questions
major reforms
to rent caps and tenancies in a bid to address the rental crisis.
As details on the plans continue to emerge, do you have questions on how the moves will impact you and your particular situation? We'd like to hear your queries and our journalists will try to answer some of them. Please leave them in the form below. Here is what the proposals will entail:
Rent Pressure Zones (RPZs)
will be extended across the entire country with increases capped at 2% or the rate of inflation, whichever is lower.
However landlords of newly-built apartments will be allowed to impose higher rent increases in line with inflation.
Landlords will be allowed to reset rents on tenancies
, beyond the RPZ cap, every six years or when tenants decide to move out.
Tenant protections from so-called 'no-fault evictions' will be increased.
It will be years before any increased housing supply brought about by rental market reforms lowers the cost of renting,
the Coalition was told
The proposals raise several questions. How will all this help renters? Will it ultimately reduce rents? Can I expect a rent rise if I'm in my apartment over six years? Will existing tenants be protected? Will landlords be incentivised to force tenants out to increase rents? And will all this encourage foreign funds to build more properties, and how long before we see change?
Please leave your questions using the form below. You can submit anonymously or include contact details if you'd be happy to speak to a journalist about your situation.
READ MORE
We will curate a selection of questions for a piece but please note we may not answer every submission we receive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
How much do landlords in Ireland really earn? You might be surprised
How much do landlords in Ireland actually earn? To listen to the many lobbying groups who dominate the property sector in Ireland, the answer is not nearly enough to compensate for all the regulations and bureaucratic hurdles they face. This, it is argued, explains what is often characterised as the ' mass exodus ' from the private rental sector although the number of registered landlords has actually increased in recent years . More than 80 per cent of Irish landlords have one or two tenancies and, we're frequently told, are mostly ordinary people whose livelihoods depend on rental income. This narrative suggests landlords are mere, to use the international term, 'mom-and-pop' investors who are 'struggling' or 'earning pin money' (an argument used by short-term let lobbyists as well). Or they are 'accidental landlords', sometimes represented as almost victims of the housing crisis themselves. This is not borne out by the data. The reality internationally, as well as in Ireland, is that small landlords have higher household income and wealth levels. Here, data made available on request from the CSO's 2024 Survey on Income and Living Conditions shows that the gross household income of those with a rental income from a second property or rent-a-room is €133,800, or 85 per cent higher than households without a rental income, who earn €72,500. And their net income is 56 per cent higher. READ MORE Average income premium of households with rental income At the other end of the scale, Ireland's largest landlord, Ires Reit , averaged €21,768 rental income per annum from each of its 3,668 units in 2024. And it was able to shelter all this income from tax via a special company structure . The reason such narratives continue to be so pervasive is partly down to the effectiveness of several large lobbying groups that dominate the property sector in Ireland. Representing professional bodies, there's the Institute of Professional Auctioneers and Valuers and the Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland . Ireland's small landlords are represented by the Irish Property Owners' Association. Property Industry Ireland is part of Ibec . Irish Institutional Property represents large landlords and is run by a former secretary general of Fianna Fáil and senator, Pat Farrell . Influencing policy since 1935 is the Construction Industry Federation, which was recently in the headlines after a terrace it owned in Dublin 6 partly collapsed . It was run for many years run by a former Progressive Democrats minister, Tom Parlon. Banking and Payments Federation Ireland is run by a former Fine Gael minister, Brian Hayes, and Airbnb is represented by a former Labour TD, Derek Nolan. All the former politicians have unfettered entry to Leinster House, allowing what Róisin Shortall called ' undue access ' to Ministers and influential politicians. Other groups peddle policy ideas mostly imported from elsewhere. Progress Ireland, which recently proposed garden cabins without planning permission as housing, was reportedly offered a meeting with senior Government advisers less than 24 hours after sending an email to Micheál Martin 's office. There is an obvious irony here: lobbying bodies demand " policy certainty " and stability for their members, and yet it is their function to lobby for policy change. Certainty and stability for developers is coincidentally mentioned in 2021's Housing for All policy, after which the Government went on to make numerous industry-friendly changes, including restricting access to judicial review and introducing inferior apartment standards - changes for which the Minister for Housing James Browne can unfortunately provide no credible evidence . This is not a uniquely Irish phenomenon. As nations' economies globalise, so too has the reach of international property money and its lobbyists. In the private rented sector internationally, global investors were enticed back post 2008 by tax-free rental income and the promise of significant profits. As housing for sale and mortgage credit dried up, the private rented sector became the tenure of necessity and grew significantly. Calls for meaningful changes to the sector to allow for it to become a better option for tenants were and are strenuously resisted everywhere. What is interesting about resistance to change is the consistency of narratives across countries. Research from Sweden's Uppsala University show three main arguments appear repeatedly: the 'vulnerable landlord', the 'counterproductive effects' and the 'violation of property rights'. This is a lobbying playbook. We've seen how the vulnerable landlord argument works in Ireland. The counter-productive effects argument claims that pro-tenant measures ultimately harm tenants by disincentivising rental housing supply and maintenance. This claim works on the basis that there is perfect competition in the housing market and that all other factors remain equal, what economists call ceteris paribus . But there's little competition in housing markets due to the fact that the supply of market land is limited and also privately owned, and other factors such as demand and interest rates are always changing, so nothing remains equal. Property lobbyists and right-of-centre politicians argue that the problem of high rents can be solved by expanding the supply of private rental housing. The logic is that high rental prices stimulate new supply, which will eventually lower rents. This sounds very familiar. Even if you ignore the interim financial pain of rising rents for existing tenants, this argument is ropey. Whereas rising prices may make the construction of housing for sale or rent more attractive, rising prices also make waiting around, or hoarding, just as attractive (as does increasing the density of housing). Owners of valuable land, who are unsurprisingly keen to extract the most profit from it, will not necessarily crystallise their risk by commencing construction, and so will not necessarily supply housing any faster. There is currently permission granted for about 70,000 new houses and apartments nationally that are lying around not commenced. As land prices rise, a natural brake is applied to new housing supply. The third argument found internationally concerns the violation of property rights. Such absolutist views ignore the social function of property. This violation-of-rights argument was recently deployed by a landlord who illegally evicted a tenant, saying at the Residential Tenancies Board hearing that ' no external authority may dictate his housing decisions '. The RTB disagreed. No matter what measure is proposed – tenants' rights, changes to planning rules or regulations – the playbook of counter arguments is automatically mobilised. There is little detailed critiquing of individual proposals. Instead, we're offered off-the-shelf responses driven by ideology, entrenched beliefs, and profits. The real contest here is between the needs of the market and the needs of society. This permanent tension is going to arise when a Government's strategic approach - as is there case here - is to rely on the market for the supply of most of its housing, private and public. Dr Lorcan Sirr lectures in housing at Technological University Dublin
Irish Independent
8 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Irish Independent's View: Prudence, rather than largesse, makes most economic sense for Ireland right now
As August begins, we have already seen so many budgetary kites take flight to tell us the making of the next year's budget starts earlier each year. Right now, Ireland is a rich nation and its people have expectations that accord with that. But in a Trumpian discordant world, that situation could change rapidly, as we found to our cost in 2008 when we entered what former finance minister Michael Noonan later called 'a lost decade'. Ireland's small, open economic model leaves us susceptible to swift boom-and-bust switches. In early October, we will learn the 2026 financial plans of 'Mr Prudence' himself, Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe. Many of us believe we deserve more goodies, but this is more a time for caution. If tough global economic times hit soon, we will be in a better position than we were in 2008, but the atypical budget surplus, which contrasts with our European neighbours, can only cushion so much. Ireland cannot be an economic outlier forever. We are reminded that the days of the early 2000s, when taoiseach Bertie Ahern declaimed that the 'boom just got boomier', presaged tough economic times. The impact of Donald Trump's tariffs may diminish the resources available for such largesse Mr Donohoe and his colleagues insist that one-off budget payments, like electricity bill grants, are not going to happen next year, but closer analysis suggests the Government's dilemma is that voters will notice the difference if they do not happen again. This is particularly true for households with children, who benefited from two double welfare payments. For a single worker on €50,000 last year, the budget measures delivered about €860 extra per year. When you add the two energy credits amounting to €250, you find it was a nice bonus that will be missed. The impact of Donald Trump's tariffs may diminish the resources available for such largesse, which should at all events be targeted, rather than blanket, measures. It may also provide some political cover for a more prudent approach to public spending. Last month's Summer Economic Statement indicated that there would be scope for a tax package of about €1.5bn, but a substantial part of that would be taken up by the pledged hospitality Vat rate cut to 9pc. Put this alongside keeping the lower Vat rate on household energy bills and you are suddenly over €1bn for a full year. Yet voters want income tax cuts, which are key to politicians' re-election, assuming there is available cash. Then there is the demand for welfare increases averaging €12 a week last year. All things considered, the Budget 2026 will prove more challenging than in the years of austerity when cutbacks virtually wrote themselves.
The 42
15 hours ago
- The 42
Low morale, fear of job cuts and desperate for funding - The FAI need a big win
PART OF THE fallout from The 42′s story a week ago that one of the core aims of the FAI's Football Pathway Plan was effectively 'dead in the water' was a willingness from some in Abbotstown to open up about morale. At yet another critical time for the association, the feeling among staff is at an all-time low, with some going as far as describing the mood at its lowest ebb. Fear of redundancies, cuts to budgets for international teams, and stagnant progress have combined to sap the life out of many. In the midst of all this some of the FAI's most important work is ongoing as they prepare the funding proposal to Government for League of Ireland academies. Separately, but still linked to the attempted overhaul of player development, talks over the last few months between grassroots elements of the game and FAI president Paul Cooke, as well as others from the FAI, have made it clear that the Aligned Calendar Season is not something that will be implemented as planned – a phased approach beginning in January of 2026 with full link up to professional level by 2028 will be shelved. Advertisement Details seen by The 42 that were also sent to some members of the Schoolboys/Girls' Football Association of Ireland, it was put to them that a delay of another three years for further consultation might be on the cards. The 42 reported last week how this was rejected by those on the SFAI side, and after the FAI's board meeting on Tuesday The Beat understands that it was agreed to a revised proposal of resolution regarding the calendar year, and that once that happens it is to be brought back to the board for their review as a matter of urgency. In the meantime, as detailed by the Irish Examiner on Wednesday night, a 'Business Transformational Plan' is also to be presented to the FAI board next month. With debt levels around the €40 million mark and staff numbers at 251, with associated payroll costs not far of €14m per annum, there are some who fear for their jobs. The Beat also understands that international coaches at youth level have seen their budgets reduced and have been forced to limit the time they would like to spend with players. Amid the backdrop of such frustration, The 42 revealed on Wednesday that former senior women's manager Eileen Gleeson was set to be appointed to a new position with an emphasis on development and strategy, although it will not be the same role as head of women's and girls' football that she held previously and which Hannah Dingley has since departed. And with the independent auditors appointed on track with their report on the League of Ireland academies, there is at least positivity that the timeframe that was set out by LOI academy manager Will Clarke to present their funding proposal to Government will be met in mid August, with clarity expected in time for October's Budget. An ask of an 11-year commitment with a top end figure of €8m phased in and then tapering off is what the FAI are looking for. Getting this over the line is crucial to provide an element of hope for the future, and that's before you consider that next week will see the FAI continue their search for Marc Canham's permanent replacement as Chief Football Officer. At least two internal candidates are understood to be in the frame, as well as three from outside including one former senior men's international. All will be tasked with presenting their vision on how they intend on delivering the Football Pathways Plan. With so much happening in the background the FAI top brass will soon be back in front of an Oireachtas sport committee after they requested a four-week deferment on a scheduled appearance just after the start of July. The FAI asked for more preparation time for the session, citing 'the complexity introduced by the committee seeking material that relates directly to an ongoing Garda investigation.' A Garda investigation is ongoing after RTÉ and the Sunday Independent detailed in their own joint investigation allegations from the 1990s against former male coaches relating to unwanted sexual advances. Related Reads Roy Keane ad and RTÉ boss miss the point as League of Ireland fans drive culture change Bohemians are a financial monster in League of Ireland and will only get stronger Losing the LOI's top scorer for €30,000 shows measures clubs must take just to keep up With so much happening in and out of the spotlight, the FAI really could do with a big win soon. Roll on the start of World Cup qualifying in September.
