
Harvard challenges Trump administration in court over cancelled research funding
The court hearing before US District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston stretched more than two hours but ended without a ruling. The case marks a high-stakes flashpoint in the administration's broader push to reshape US higher education through funding leverage.
DOJ DEFENDS FUNDING CANCELLATION
Michael Velchik, a senior lawyer for the US Justice Department, argued the cancelled grants reflected a government priority to stop supporting institutions that "tolerate antisemitism".
'Harvard prioritized campus protestors over cancer research,' Velchik said, while asserting the matter should be handled by the US Court of Federal Claims, which hears monetary disputes.
The administration said Harvard's rejection of an April list of demands triggered a wave of cancellations, including the suspension of hundreds of research grants. It accused the university of failing to adequately respond to reports of antisemitic harassment on campus.
RESEARCH AT RISK
Harvard, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, says the funding cuts threaten hundreds of research projects, including those focused on cancer, infectious diseases and Parkinson's.
Steven Lehotsky, a lawyer representing Harvard, said the administration was using antisemitism as a pretext for broader ideological retaliation.
"The administration has given no consideration to patients, the public at large, and the harm of all this research being cut off," Lehotsky told the court.
JUDGE QUESTIONS LEGAL BASIS
Judge Burroughs expressed scepticism over the government's assertion that it could cancel grants on broad policy grounds without a formal process.
"That's a major stumbling block for me," she said, adding that if funding could be cut over issues related to speech, the constitutional consequences would be 'staggering.'
Burroughs, an Obama appointee, has already barred the administration from ending Harvard's ability to host international students in a separate case. She is expected to issue a written ruling in the funding case in the coming weeks.
GOVERNANCE DEMANDS SPARKED CONFLICT
The administration's push to defund Harvard followed its refusal to comply with demands issued in an April 11 letter by a White House task force. The letter called for sweeping changes including governance restructuring, revised admissions and hiring practices to ensure ideological diversity, and the termination of select academic programmes.
Harvard has said the demands overstepped legitimate concerns about antisemitism and aimed instead to control academic speech, in violation of First Amendment protections.
University President Alan Garber said the cuts could cost the school nearly US$1 billion annually, forcing layoffs and hiring freezes. The amount includes the cancelled multi-year federal research grants.
TAX PENALTIES ADDED TO PRESSURE
As part of Trump's spending and tax legislation, the Republican-led Congress also raised the federal excise tax on Harvard's US$53 billion endowment income from 1.4 per cent to 8 per cent. Endowment income accounts for 40 per cent of Harvard's operating budget.
Garber said the school has taken steps to support Jewish and Israeli students who faced 'vicious and reprehensible' treatment following the outbreak of war between Israel and Hamas in October 2023.
But he maintained that the administration's measures extended far beyond the issue of antisemitism and amounted to unconstitutional interference in Harvard's academic independence.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
20 minutes ago
- Business Times
South Korea pitches Trump on shipyards for last-minute trade deal
[SEOUL] South Korea is pitching the US on a shipbuilding partnership as a key proposal to seal a last-minute agreement to avoid a 25 per cent tariff rate. While details remain unclear, Yonhap News reported that South Korea has proposed a multi-billion dollar project dubbed 'Make American Shipbuilding Great Again'. South Korea's Industry Ministry declined to comment. 'We confirmed the US side's strong interest in the shipbuilding sector and the two countries agreed to work together to develop mutually acceptable terms that include shipbuilding cooperation,' South Korea's presidential office said on Saturday (Jul 26). As countries across Asia clinched deals last week, Seoul's negotiators have been racing to stay engaged with their US counterparts as Washington shifted its focus to the European Union and China. The US and EU announced a pact on Sunday that will see the bloc face 15 per cent tariffs on most of its exports to the US, including automobiles. The latest agreement, which follows a Japan deal last week, adds to the pressure on Asia's fourth-largest economy to clinch a deal. South Korea, where negotiations have been slowed by internal political turmoil, is one of the biggest Asian economies to still be without a deal. Aside from China, other major exporters in the region that are in the thick of negotiations include India and Taiwan. South Korea's finance and foreign ministers are set to meet with their US counterparts this week in a last-minute bid to close the negotiations and the government in Seoul has said the two countries are committed to making a deal before US President Donald Trump's Aug 1 deadline. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Also on the table is increased access to South Korea's agricultural market, as well as a fund to invest in American projects similar to an agreement Japan struck. Under the deal, the two sides touted a US$550 billion fund as part of the agreement on the tariff rate dropping to 15 per cent. The South Korean talks are similarly focused on reaching a 15 per cent tariff rate, including for autos, and the recent proposals suggest a comparable structure. Putting agricultural imports on the table raises the stakes for South Korea's new government. Past efforts to open the country's beef market sparked nationwide protests and any shift on rice imports could face even stiffer resistance. Barring a deal, Bloomberg Economics estimates a 1.7 per cent hit to South Korea's gross domestic product, with market volatility and uncertainty threatening to push the GDP losses beyond that. Overseas shipments were equivalent to more than 40 per cent of South Korea's GDP last year. 'Japan's trade deal paints a positive backdrop but also sets a high bar for others,' Morgan Stanley economist Kathleen Oh said in a note last week. 'Korea and Taiwan may need to ramp up new investment schemes to increase agricultural and energy imports and expand market access, as seen in Japan's case.' BLOOMBERG

Straits Times
42 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Boeing emerges as a winner in Trump's trade wars
US President Donald Trump and President and CEO of Boeing Kelly Ortberg attending a roundtable discussion in Doha, Qatar, in May. WASHINGTON - There are typically not many winners in a trade war, but Boeing appears to be reaping some rewards from the one started by US President Donald Trump. The aerospace company has received a steady stream of new orders as part of trade deals between the United States and other countries. These sales could be a boon for Boeing as it emerges from years of bruising crises. They also allow Mr Trump to claim that his unconventional trade policies are helping American manufacturing. Orders for hundreds of Boeing jets have been announced in deals with Indonesia and Japan in Jult, as well as Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Qatar earlier in 2025. 'Ever since his first term, his trade deals have generally involved these kinds of purchase agreements,' said Mr Bruce Hirsh, a trade policy expert at Capitol Counsel, a lobbying firm in Washington that has clients in the aerospace industry. 'Our trading partners know this, so they're looking for these kinds of big-ticket items that they can offer to purchase.' Some aviation analysts are sceptical that US trade negotiators had to twist arms to persuade countries to buy Boeing planes. Airlines, including those controlled by foreign governments, plan such expensive purchases carefully and over months, if not years. Moreover, airlines have few choices, since Boeing and Airbus of France are the only two suppliers of large commercial jets. Still, those experts said, it was not surprising that Mr Trump and his aides have made a point of highlighting new Boeing orders as part of their trade deals. The company employs tens of thousands of Americans and is one of the country's top exporters. Wall Street has also taken note of the announcement of new orders, and Boeing's share price has climbed steadily since early April, when Mr Trump announced steep new tariffs on many countries. Analysts note that the trade deal announcements could generate even more orders. That is because customers who have not placed orders may feel pressure to buy planes now or risk having to wait when they need them. Planes ordered today will typically be delivered years from now. Boeing, which declined to comment for this article, has seemed to welcome Mr Trump's interest in its business. Boeing chief executive Kelly Ortberg joined Mr Trump on a May visit to the Middle East, during which the Qatar deal was announced. 'If the president of the country says, 'Come with me and be certain that we sign something big that says there will be many jobs in the US', what will you do?' said Mr Adam Pilarski, president of Avitas, an aviation consulting firm. But Mr Pilarski and other experts cautioned that the orders might not be nearly as substantial as they seemed. The administration, other countries and Boeing have offered few details about the deals, suggesting that at least some are still subject to complex negotiations between the manufacturer and airlines. In July, for example, Mr Trump said Indonesia had agreed to buy 50 Boeing jets. Later, however, an Indonesian official said the deal was still being hashed out between Garuda, a state-owned airline, and Boeing. 'I suspect these orders are, as we used to joke at air shows, Mouthls – memoranda of understanding to have lunch,' said Mr Richard Aboulafia, a managing director at AeroDynamic Advisory, a consulting firm. 'The real hard work of contract negotiation and finance package negotiation takes place after the President's plane has left the country.' Even if the orders are confirmed with formal contracts, many probably would have been placed even without Mr Trump's intervention, experts said. In May, Qatar Airways, a large airline that operates many long-distance flights, placed an order for 150 of Boeing's wide-body planes. The announcement was notably thorough. 'They involved press conferences, shaking hands, everything but the proverbial kissing of the babies,' said Mr Courtney Miller, managing director of Visual Approach Analytics, an aviation consulting firm. That deal, he said, probably would have been placed anyway, even if the timing had been accelerated to align with Mr Trump's visit. While some orders may be the result of real political pressure, even then a lot can change by the time the planes are ready to be delivered. Boeing and Airbus each have thousands of planes on order, accounting for many years of production. In that time, airlines can back out of agreements, though they may have to forfeit deposits. Customers can also ask Boeing or Airbus to delay deliveries or reduce their orders. A manufacturer may be willing to make such changes, especially if doing so will allow it to sell those planes to another airline that is desperate for new jets. The tariffs Mr Trump has imposed may threaten the financial health of Boeing's suppliers, and the prospects of retaliation by US trading partners like the European Union could hurt the plane maker's sales. Last week, budget airline Ryanair said it would consider deferring deliveries of Boeing planes if European officials imposed tariffs on American planes. European leaders may take other steps that could hurt Boeing. If the trade deals that the US strikes with other countries give Boeing too big an advantage, Europe could try to entice other countries to order more planes from Airbus, experts said. 'If this game is going to be played, the question is, in the long term, who plays it better?' Mr Miller said. 'It has reopened a very old dynamic of aligning aircraft and airline economics with geopolitical favour.' NYTIMES
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Trade talks with US in trouble as Thai-Cambodia conflict escalates
[BANGKOK] After months of uncertainty over the tariff fate imposed on its exports to the US, a deadly border clash between Thailand and Cambodia has now added fresh geopolitical risk to an already tense trade standoff as Bangkok scrambles to avoid punishing new duties. Fighting broke out on Jul 24 along the Thai-Cambodian border, killing at least 32 people and displacing over 200,000 civilians. The violence comes as Thailand struggles to finalise a trade agreement with Washington, even as regional peers like Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines have secured deals that cap US tariffs at 19 to 20 per cent. Both Thailand and Cambodia, which run sizeable trade surpluses with the US, face tariffs of 36 per cent on their exports to the American market starting Aug 1 if no deal is struck. For Thailand, one of the most export-reliant economies in the region, such a steep rate – among the highest globally – would deal a heavy blow to its already faltering economy. US President Donald Trump on Saturday said both sides had agreed to a ceasefire, following calls with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai. He added on Truth Social: 'They are also looking to get back to the 'Trading Table' with the United States, which we think is inappropriate to do until such time as the fighting STOPS.' Although fighting continued, both sides reportedly agreed to let Malaysia, Asean's current chair, mediate the conflict. According to reports, the two prime ministers are expected to travel to Malaysia on Monday for initial talks. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Growth on the line Economists had already projected GDP growth of less than 2 per cent this year under a best-case scenario of 10 to 20 per cent US tariffs. That forecast is now expected to be downgraded to below 1 per cent if the full 36 per cent rate takes effect. Thailand's economy remains heavily export-driven, recording around US$300 billion in exports last year. The US accounted for 18 per cent of those shipments – one of the highest shares in Asean, behind only Vietnam and Malaysia. During the first six months of 2025, Thailand's exports grew 15 per cent year-on-year, with much of that attributed to front-loading by US clients. Exports to the US were up 41.9 per cent in June. Thailand's second main engine of economic growth is tourism, a sector now facing fresh headwinds as a sharp drop in Chinese visitors, spooked by security concerns, has been further compounded by the border conflict. The kingdom's tourism arrivals in the second quarter fell 12 per cent year on year, after falling 5 per cent in Q1 of FY2025, driven by weakness from North Asia, Southeast Asia, the Middle East and China (down 40 per cent), according to government figures. Arrivals are expected to reach 32-33 million, compared with 35 million in 2024. Sluggish domestic factors And unlike many neighouring countries, Thailand's domestic consumption remains sluggish, crippled by high household debt (88 per cent of GDP), which cuts into spending. 'If you cannot improve your competitiveness in the export sector, and you have high household debt, it constrains your ability to build your economy through domestic channels because already people have to pay a lot of their incomes to service their debt,' said Kim Eng Tan, Senior Director for Asia Pacific sovereign ratings at S&P Global Ratings, at a recent Bangkok conference. While Thailand has a well-diversified range of export items, including automobiles and auto parts, agricultural commodities, processed foods, electrical appliances and electronics, it has lagged in moving up the value-added ladder in electronics, nowadays the main driver of export success. In this sector Thailand already faces stiff competition from Asean neighbours, which now look like they will face lower tariff rates in the important US market. 'The impact of tariffs on Thailand will actually depend on the tariffs imposed on its competitors,' said Louis Kuijs, chief economist for Asia-Pacific at S&P Global Ratings, speaking at the same event. Most of the Asean economies are competitive in the US market, so it matters less how competitive Thailand is compared to US factories – which are unlikely to reopen – and more how it stacks up against other Asean exporters. Thailand is also competing with China in the US market. 'A lot depends on the tariff rate on China as it is Thailand's main competitor in the US market,' said Kirida Bhaopichitr, Research Director at the Thailand Development Research Institute. 'China is Thailand's main competitor in 18 of the top 20 Thai exports to the US,' she pointed out. The final tariff rate on China is expected to be announced on Aug 11. Political risks Thailand's future efforts secure a deal with the US are further complicated by its own political disarray, which the conflict with Cambodia has added to. Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was suspended from her post by Thailand 's Constitutional Court on Jul 1, after a supposedly private conversation with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen was leaked, in which she called him 'uncle' and criticised the Thai commander of the border region. Paetongtarn is the daughter of Thaksin Shinawatra, a former prime minister and billionaire businessman once known to have close personal ties with Hun Sen. Thailand's political scene has arguably been shaky for the past two decades, with much of the divisiveness centered around power struggles between powerful politicians, such as Thaksin, and the elites identified with royalists, the military and entrenched business groups. 'We have to wait for a government that is able to get its policy vision lengthened to the extent that it is able to implement polices to deal with some of the problems,' said S&P's Tan. He added, 'But this development (US tariffs) is not likely to change the metrics in such a way that we may have to change our outlook, because overall the Thai metrics are still quite resilient. But it is not helpful.'