The Irish Times view on Ireland's nursing homes: the need for fundamental reform
on the recent RTÉ Investigates
programme were deeply upsetting. It showed multiple examples of unacceptable care failings and neglect of vulnerable older residents in two private nursing homes. This comes twenty years after a similar expose on shocking conditions and work practices in the private Leas Cross Nursing Home in Swords, which triggered the landmark Leas Cross review by Professor Des O'Neill, and a subsequent programme of reform of the nursing home and home care sectors.
Since then, we have had the creation of Hiqa to set standards, monitor compliance, and inspect all nursing homes. It also has the power to shut down non-compliant facilities.
But it is clear that despite this increased regulation, some nursing home patients are still being failed. As was highlighted in the Leas Cross report, and now again in the RTÉ Investigates programme, staffing remains a core issue; both in numbers as well as training levels and oversight.
The way checks are conducted on nursing homes by Hiqa must also be examined,
as underlined by Taoiseach, Micheál Martin this weekend
. The organisation has played an important role in improving standards, but there are questions about how these are monitored.
READ MORE
The issues raised are bigger than the specific failings shown in the report. Ireland needs to reconsider its whole system of care for vulnerable older adults in need of longer-term nursing care.
The number of nursing home beds in Ireland increased by 12 per cent between 2013 and 2023, to over 32,000. About 440, or 80 per cent, of our nursing homes are private, or voluntary. Many smaller family run nursing homes, particularly in rural areas, have closed in recent years, with others bought up by large international for-profit companies. There is also a trend towards building larger nursing homes with more beds.
We have a growing, ageing population with projections that we need potentially thousands more nursing home beds in the next two decades. But is our current model of nursing home care provision and significant outsourcing to the private sector really the best way forward? We have largely moved away from congregated institutional-type settings for the care of people with intellectual disabilities and mental health. Is this an option for many older adults needing care?
The Covid-19 pandemic highlighted how isolated and vulnerable those in private nursing homes can be, and the differences in their care and entitlements compared to their public counterparts. While there have been increased supports provided to private nursing homes since then, and a raft of new regulations, it is clearly not enough. It is tinkering around the edges of a system, important parts of which look broken. More comprehensive reform is needed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
‘Constructive' talks take place between Minister and disability service providers, says department
Talks between Minister for Disability Norma Foley and service providers on problems faced by the sector have been described as 'constructive'. The Department of Disability said that the meeting on Tuesday formed part of ongoing engagement. Organisations providing specialist disability services have been concerned for some time about funding for the sector. The Irish Times reported in May that more than two dozen bodies providing services to tens of thousands of people warned there was 'an extreme risk' to their ability to expand services or, in many cases, sustain existing operations. [ Disability service providers warn of 'extreme risk' to operations and ability to expand Opens in new window ] In an unprecedented joint letter to Health Service Executive chief Bernard Gloster , the chairmen/women of 26 voluntary disability service providers – voluntary public service organisations and voluntary grant-aided bodies – said their ability to deliver existing services and meet the needs in their communities was under threat. READ MORE The letter said many organisations were facing such acute financial situations that their boards were 'concerned they may be in breach of the reckless trading provisions of the Companies Act'. The department said on Tuesday that Ms Foley, in conjunction with the HSE, had 'had a constructive meeting with disability services organisations ... and further engagements will be arranged over the coming weeks/months.' Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said the issue of disability is a top priority for his Government. However, while the amount of money allocated for specialist disability services has grown by €1.6 billion since 2020, the Government has recognised that some providers are experiencing 'funding, operational and governance challenges'. The letter sent to the HSE in May said that boards of public service disability organisations were 'having to operate in crisis mode'.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Burned out' bra saleswoman wins €15,800 for constructive dismissal
A lingerie saleswoman who said she was forced to quit her job of nearly 20 years over the health impact of workplace stress at due to a 'toxic' work environment at a Dublin department store has won €15,800 for constructive dismissal. Karrin Breslin was awarded the sum on foot of a complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 against Chantelle Lingerie Ltd, the operator of a concession in the lingerie department of the unidentified store. The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) awarded Ms Breslin her full losses after ruling that the international lingerie brand repudiated her contract of employment by failing to address grievances about understaffing and rostering while her health deteriorated over the course of two years. It was submitted on behalf of Ms Breslin – an employee of the brand since 2004 – that when the department store reopened in May 2021 following the Covid-19 lockdown, her section was down to 12 staff with just two full-time, compared with 10 full-timers out of 17 before the pandemic. READ MORE The tribunal heard Ms Breslin had moved from north Co Dublin to Co Wexford during the pandemic closure. She asked at that stage to be given a set working day of 9am to 5.30pm, she said. Her employer's response was that 'this was not a request that could be granted given the opening hours of the shop and the need for a fair departmental roster', the tribunal was told. The tribunal was told that the department store, rather than the lingerie brand, was responsible for setting the roster governing Ms Breslin's working hours. 'I feel my mental and physical health has deteriorated ... I don't have a good work/life balance and it's going to get worse due to the late closing times coming back again,' she wrote. Ms Breslin's case was that her job was made 'overwhelming and physically hard' because of these issues and that she began to experience anxiety, low mood, high blood pressure and gastrointestinal problems 'as a result of work-related stress'. Following a medical absence in June 2022, Ms Breslin again wrote to her employer and set out that because the department was so 'understaffed' that sales were being lost because customers were walking out without being served. Her employer's position was this was 'a commercial point and not a personal grievance'. Ms Breslin had seven periods of certified medical leave between January 2022 and the summer of 2023, the tribunal heard. In an exchange of emails with her employer during her fifth period of medical leave in June 2023, Ms Breslin said she believed her illness was 'work-related'. 'There are major obstacles stopping me from doing a good job and this has been going on for years. It's got far worse in the last 4 months and definitely having a negative impact on my working life due to a stressful and sometimes toxic work environment,' she wrote. In responding correspondence, she was told: 'I am hoping you can get to the bottom of your sickness so you feel better,' the WRC heard. The tribunal heard that Ms Breslin worked her last shift on 25th June 2023 and ultimately did not return to work before she tendered her resignation on 31st October that year. Chantelle's managing director, who gave evidence, said she had assumed Ms Breslin would return to her job when she got better and that her resignation 'was pleasant and made no mention of issues or other employees' behaviour'. When it was put to her in cross-examination that Ms Breslin had told her she was 'burned out', the managing director said she 'understood there was an issue' of work-related stress but that she 'did not relate this' to Ms Breslin's resignation. Asked what she had done to respond to the staffing issues raised by Ms Breslin, the managing director said these were 'a matter for the shop'. In her decision, adjudicator Patricia Owens wrote Ms Breslin had been raising 'serious concerns for her physical and mental health' starting in October 2021. While the managing director made efforts to resolve 'minor issues' for Ms Breslin around medical certs and annual leave, 'more complex matters' around roster problems and staff shortages 'were never addressed', Ms Owens wrote. 'I consider that the respondent failed in its duty of care to the complainant to protect her health, safety and wellbeing while at work,' Ms Owens wrote. She considered the firm's failure to respond adequately to amount to 'repudiation of contract', upholding Ms Breslin's unfair dismissal claim. Ms Owens awarded the claimant €15,800, her full losses for five months' unemployment. A further complaint of disability discrimination under the Employment Equality Act was ruled out of time by the Commission. Ms Breslin was represented by Aisling Irish of Parker Law Solicitors in the case, while human resources consultancy Tom Smyth and Associates appeared for the employer.
Irish Times
15 hours ago
- Irish Times
Minister who lost two siblings to cancer introduces ‘right to be forgotten' law
Cancer survivors will have the 'right to be forgotten' to allow them to obtain mortgage protection without discrimination based on their past diagnosis. Legislation is now expected to be passed by the Oireachtas in the autumn. It was first introduced in the Seanad by then Fianna Fáil senator Catherine Ardagh in October 2022, was reintroduced by her as a TD in the Dáil in February, and has now been taken up by the Government. Minister of State for Finance Robert Troy said: 'For too long cancer survivors in Ireland have faced a challenging and unfair situation where they can be refused cover or be charged higher premiums because of their past diagnosis.' Mr Troy said the Central Bank (Amendment) Bill 'aims to put a stop to this by giving effect to the right-to-be-forgotten concept that is now becoming recognised throughout Europe'. Laws are already in place in France, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. READ MORE The Minister, who has special responsibility for insurance, reintroduced the Bill in the Dáil on the last day before the summer recess. Mr Troy said: 'I lost two siblings to cancer and I see it as a great privilege to be in a position to effect positive change.' The Bill 'gives statutory weight to protections that were previously voluntary, making them enforceable by law'. He said his is a 'crucial step forward'. 'At the heart of the Bill is the straightforward but powerful principle that, where survivors have completed treatment and remained in remission for a defined period, a past cancer diagnosis should not be held against them in the underwriting of mortgage protection insurance.' They will not have to disclose their cancer after a set period of remission. A five-year timeline is under consideration. [ Buying a home after surviving cancer: 'No matter how much paperwork I gave, it never sufficed for mortgage protection' Opens in new window ] Under a previous, voluntary code, not adopted by some insurers, a survivor could access mortgage protection after seven years of remission or five years if individuals were diagnosed when under the age of 18. The Bill focuses solely on cancer survivors and mortgage protection and does not cover other financial products or medical conditions. Mr Troy said this is for 'prioritisation and pragmatism'. They were taking a 'stepwise approach similar to other EU member states, focusing first on where the need is greatest and where there is the clearest evidence base'. Ms Ardagh said discrimination can be very damaging, 'with people having to relive their cancer diagnosis'. People have been quoted 'prohibitively high premiums' despite being in remission for many years. 'It has meant house purchases collapsing at the very last minute, family plans being put on hold, or feeling trapped by a system that continues to define them by the most difficult chapter in their lives.' Sinn Féin's Máire Devine welcomed the Bill but questioned if five years cancer-free was fair. There are 'the difficult years of battling cancer', but only when they are cancer-free 'does the clock start for five years of waiting to apply for a mortgage'. 'That does not seem right to me,' she said.
