Women by Women: A Shared Vision: Girls in Film
It's always important to keep intersectionality at the forefront of our minds when pushing for representation in one aspect or another. Not everyone's experiences are the same and not everyone's struggles are equal. Listen to your fellow filmmakers and make space for everyone to speak.
We need to continue to platform global majority artists, and put pressure on institutions to do the same. We need to continue to find ways for working class artists to access an industry that is very heavily weighted towards those from more privileged backgrounds. We need to find ways for parents to continue their roles in an industry that is very much built around the traditional male existence.
Your work highlights underrepresented voices, both in front of and behind the camera. Since the beginning of your project, what challenges have persisted—and what positive changes have you seen emerge?
In the years following GiF's inception, opportunities for female, trans and non-binary talent grew significantly. There was a real focus on equal opportunities & conversations about representation were loud. In recent years, with budgets shrinking across the board - both commercially and institutionally, due to factors like Brexit in the UK and the rise of TikTok and lower end social content (no shade on TikTok though), we've felt a shift back to old thinking when it comes to awarding jobs to directors & representation on commercial rosters. Change isn't a fad and needs to be upheld by the industry, even when the industry itself feels under threat, because embracing change is the only way the industry will survive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geek Tyrant
31 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
Pubisher and Spider-Man Set to Clash in Reported Major Action Scene For SPIDER-MAN: BRAND NEW DAY — GeekTyrant
The web-slinger is about to go head-to-head with Marvel's most brutal vigilante. With production kicking off on Spider-Man: Brand New Day in Glasgow, Scotland, new intel teases a major confrontation between Spider-Man and The Punisher . According to insider Daniel Richtman, fans can expect a high-stakes brawl involving a Department of Damage Control (DODC) convoy. "I heard that tomorrow they'll be filming a big action scene with Punisher and Spider-Man fighting over a DODC transport convoy," Richtman revealed. If Frank Castle is gunning for someone in that transport, it's likely someone he sees as deserving his lethal brand of justice. Naturally, Peter Parker won't let that happen on his watch. This DODC connection ties neatly into what we've seen in previous MCU Spider-Man films, where the organization has played a significant role in cleanup and containment. The presence of their convoy implies whatever or whoever they're transporting is a big deal. So who's in the crosshairs? Rumors range from Bruce Banner to Mister Negative, or even a smaller-time threat like Boomerang. Recent set photos show a military-style vehicle that might be DODC property. Some fans have pointed out a devilish logo on the side, which could hint at Mister Negative's Inner Demons making an appearance. Word is The Punisher will be behind the wheel of one of these armored rides. As filming kicks off, early reports suggest rehearsals are happening ahead of a full shoot on Sunday. So while we haven't seen Tom Holland in costume just yet, it's only a matter of time before Spidey swings into action. We did get a tease of the costume, though! And while bringing The Punisher into Spider-Man's world is a big and exciting move, don't hold your breath for Charlie Cox's Daredevil to join the mix just yet. That team-up might be off the table for now. Spider-Man: Brand New Day is set to hit theaters July 31, 2026.
Miami Herald
34 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Sydney Sweeney ad sparked controversy. Here's what Americans think of it in poll
An American Eagle advertisement campaign featuring actress Sydney Sweeney has ignited a fiery debate, drawing reactions from social media users, celebrities and even the White House. But what do ordinary Americans think of it? The controversy stems from the clothing brand's use of wordplay involving 'jeans' and 'genes.' In one commercial, released in late July, Sweeney explains, 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color,' while the camera lingers on her denim pants. It concludes with the tagline 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.' The ad, and others like it, sparked a flurry of comments on apps like TikTok and X, with some users accusing American Eagle of promoting eugenics, white nationalism and 'Nazi propaganda.' 'It's more than cheeky wordplay, it's a dog whistle,' one TikTok user said. Public figures soon weighed in. Singer Doja Cat released a video appearing to mock Sweeney — who rose to fame starring in shows like 'Euphoria' and 'The White Lotus.' Late night host Stephen Colbert addressed the ad campaign on his show, saying online claims that it supports eugenics 'might be a bit of an overreaction.' Vice President JD Vance also offered his thoughts on the matter during a podcast interview, accusing Democrats of making a fuss over nothing. 'My political advice to the Democrats is continue to tell everybody who thinks Sydney Sweeney is attractive is a Nazi,' he said. 'That appears to be their actual strategy.' American Eagle put out a statement on Aug. 1, saying the viral ad campaign 'is and always was about the jeans,' adding 'great jeans look good on everyone.' Most Americans appear to agree that reactions to the ad have been overblown, with a new YouGov poll revealing a majority do not have a problem with the campaign. In the survey — conducted with 3,509 U.S. adults July 31-Aug. 1 — 52% of respondents said the ad's use of wordplay is appropriate, while just 16% labeled it as inappropriate. About one-third, 32%, said they weren't sure. That said, there was a noticeable partisan divide on this question. While the vast majority of Republicans, 64%, said the ad campaign was appropriate, less than half of Democrats and independents — 46% and 49%, respectively — said the same. In contrast, 24% of Democrats said the campaign's wordplay was inappropriate, while 14% of independents and just 10% of Republicans said the same. The results were similar when respondents were asked if saying someone has 'great genes' is appropriate or not. A majority, 53%, said using this phrase is appropriate, while 15% said it is inappropriate, and 31% said they were not sure. Here, again, there were substantial partisan differences, according to the poll, which has a margin of error of 2 percentage points. Two-thirds of Republicans said the phrase is fine to use, while half of independents and 44% of Democrats agreed. By comparison, 24% of Democrats labeled the phrase inappropriate. Fourteen percent of independents and 9% of Republicans said the same. Respondents were also asked whether 'all press is good press.' The overwhelming majority, 73%, said they disagreed with this statement, while 10% said they agreed and 17% said they were not sure. It comes after American Eagle's stock price rose by roughly 25% on July 23, the day the ad campaign was announced, according to Rolling Stone. In more recent days, it has fallen.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man Utd club shop bans supporters from printing names of legendary trio on back of shirts due to key licensing issue
Fans cannot print name of three legends on their shirt United do not own player trademarks Sign at club shop informs confused fans Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱 WHAT HAPPENED? Reported by Manchester Evening News, the three players in question are legendary No. 7s Cristiano Ronaldo, David Beckham and Eric Cantona. United do not own the trademark to any of the trio of former players' names, which means they are not licensed to print them on the back of shirts. THE BIGGER PICTURE The report states that this has been the case for several years and not just at United, as Real Madrid do not have the rights to print the legendary Ronaldo's name either, despite his status as one of the club's greatest-ever players. With this in mind, the recent craze around retro football shirts makes sense as it gives fans the chance to sport the names of their favourite players from the past on their backs, on shirts which were printed at a time when the player in question was at the club. In the case of Ronaldo, Beckham and Cantona, these shirts must be very rare to find indeed. WHAT FANS HAVE SAID United fans expressed their confusion at the licensing rule on social media. One fan said on X: "That's really weird." "Modern football just gets weirder," another added. A third said: "What if I call my son Beckham and he wants his own name on his shirt?" Another stated: "How can you copyright a name lol I'm pretty sure there's more people with those names." WHAT NEXT FOR MAN UTD? The Red Devils face Everton and Fiorentina in their final pair of pre-season fixtures before Mikel Arteta's Arsenal visit Old Trafford on August 17. Ruben Amorim's side will be looking for a major improvement on their unprecedented struggles last campaign and may look to complete further transfer business before the campaign gets underway.
