
Mbenenge tribunal: Sikhakhane argues cultural, linguistic nuances important in analysis of person's actions
Sikhakhane made the assertion before the Judicial Conduct Tribunal sitting in Sandton, where he continued his cross-examination of expert witness, Lisa Vetten.
The senior counsel submitted that the evidence provided by the research associate at Wits University was deficient as Vetten did not possess the cultural background to adequately interpret the interactions between Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge and high court secretary, Andiswa Mengo.
Mengo, who accuses the judge president of making unwanted sexual advances towards her between 2021 and 2022, had several exchanges with the top judge on the social media platform, WhatsApp, in their language, isiXhosa.
Vetten testified that Mbenenge, on several occasions, insisted that Mengo send him her pictures despite her reluctance to engage with him.
Sikhakhane said that in some cultures, courting meant persistence.
"The word 'uk'qasa.' Are you familiar with the Zulu word 'uk'shela'?"
To which Vetten answered: "I've heard it."
"Are you familiar with the word 'uk'phemisa'? Would you differ with me when I say those three words emerging from those particular cultures, in them, they connote and involve persistence, pleading?" asked Sikhakhane.
He added that this was an aspect that was missing in Vetten's analysis.
"When you are not aware of particular cultural notions, you can miss in language a discussion between two people of a particular culture if your interpretation comes one from a position of ignorance or you come from a position of what you would call a superior culture. A culture that assumes that its understanding of things must be universal."
ALSO READ:

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Mbenenge's legal team pulls the ‘culture' and every other card in Judicial Conduct Tribunal
The tribunal heard that Judge President Selby Mbenenge would not take 'no' for an answer in a barrage of after-hours WhatsApps attempting to solicit nude photographs and discuss sexual positions. The equivalent of an Intellectual Heavyweight title fight between the Old Patriarchs and the Gender-Based Violence Expert lit up Judge President Selby Mbenenge's Judicial Conduct Tribunal this week. On Tuesday, after marathon testimony on Monday, renowned gender-based violence and sexual harassment expert Dr Lisa Vetten faced a gruelling cross-examination by advocate Mmusi Sikhakhane, representing Mbenenge. Sikhakhane is ruthless as a cross-examiner, with a propensity to slide into sarcasm, false flattery and personal jabs, a tactic long recognised as an attempt to unsettle a witness. He pulls at his tie like a man getting ready to roll, feigns surprise at replies and questions Vetten's credentials as one of the most experienced GBV experts in SA. From the start, advocates Sikhakhane and Griffiths Madonsela have vehemently defended their client's conduct, saying it was 'consensual'. 'Not your culture' On Monday, the tribunal heard from Vetten that Mbenenge would not take 'no' for an answer in a barrage of after-hours WhatsApps attempting to solicit nude photographs and discuss sexual positions. Mbenenge communicated various demands, including for nude photographs, in 47 WhatsApp conversations with the complainant, court secretary Andiswa Mengo, it was revealed on Monday. On Tuesday, Sikhakhne, after much badgering and informing Vetten that while he 'respected her as an intellectual', she could not possibly read or understand the nuances of the isiXhosa used in WhatsApps sent between the 64-year-old Judge President and the subordinate secretary, Andiswa Mengo, 41. In isiXhosa culture, Sikhakahne ventured, men were expected to persist when in pursuit of a woman, no matter how often she said 'no'. That is how it was done. 'Are you saying traditional courting rituals are unconstitutional?' Sikhakhane tossed at Vetten. On Tuesday, Vetten, undeterred by Sikhakane's red herring, pointed out this was also the case in most other cultures, but that the entire issue at hand was whether this behaviour was appropriate in the workplace. In this milieu, governed by strict labour rules and regulations, the Judge President had status and power far greater than that of Mengo, she said. A similar argument about the misunderstanding of 'culture' was used by Jacob Zuma's legal team during his 2006 rape trial and before his acquittal. In that instance, Zuma had claimed that Fezekile Kuzwayo, or Kwezi, as she was known at the time, had worn a 'kanga', which he had interpreted as an invitation to sexual intercourse. Zuma also argued that a Zulu man could, culturally, not leave a woman unsatisfied. Agency and recourse On Tuesday, Sikhahane also suggested that Vetten had 'infantilised' Mengo, rendering her a person without agency. 'She is a divorced woman with a teenaged daughter, she is not a child,' Sikhakhane responded to Vetten's suggestion that the complainant had viewed the JP, who is also a pastor, as 'a father figure'. He criticised Vetten for constantly interpreting matters in favour of the complainant during the tribunal while she had not had sight of the entire record. This would show that Mengo knew exactly what she was doing when she finally responded to Mbenenge, said Sikhakane. Anyone watching the live broadcast on YouTube on Tuesday would have had many occasions to shout at Sikhakane's undisguised dastardliness in framing questions and receiving answers. There were an equal number of occasions to punch the air as Vetten served comeback after comeback, undeterred. Mengo's intentions, through silence or responses, were surgically examined, including how to interpret her response that should she say 'yes' to her boss, this might lead to further unwanted contact. Mbenenge, on the other hand, had interpreted this to mean that should Mengo say 'yes', this would be an indication that she wanted to go 'Full Long Tom' – or sexual intercourse. At the end of her testimony, Vetten said she would not change her opinion of the meaning and intention of the WhatsApps as an expert witness, even after she had had sight of the entire record. 'In the end, he [Mbenenge] asked her multiple times for nude photos, which she ended up not sending. She also felt aggrieved enough to report the matter,' said Vetten. The hearing continues on Wednesday with Sikhakane leading witnesses in favour of Mbenenge. DM


eNCA
8 hours ago
- eNCA
Judge president faces sexual harassment tribunal
JOHANNESBURG - Shocking details continue to emerge at the Judicial Conduct Tribunal of Eastern Cape High Court Judge President, Selby Mbenenge. WATCH: Inquiry into Judge Mbenenge resumes He's accused of sexually harassing court secretary, Andiswa Mengo. As WhatsApp messegas are detailed in public we look at the emotional cost for victims who speak out and then face intense scrutiny. Clinical psychologist, Bradley Daniels, discussed this with eNCA.


Eyewitness News
9 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Mbenenge's legal team accuses gender expert of omitting texts sent by Mengo
JOHANNESBURG - Advocate Muzi Sikhakhane has accused research associate at Wits University, Lisa Vetten, of deliberately omitting texts sent by high court secretary, Andiswa Mengo, in which she initiated conversations with Eastern Cape Judge President, Selby Mbenenge. Sikhakhane cross-examined Vetten before the Judicial Conduct Tribunal sitting in Johannesburg and is tasked with investigating the sexual harassment allegations that Mengo has made against the top judge. In some interactions between the pair, Mengo sent Mbenenge messages after work hours, including one where she called him "cute" at 10:20 pm. ALSO READ: Vetten previously testified that Mbenenge engaged with the junior staffer on WhatsApp in the evenings and often asked her for her photos. But Sikhakhane highlighted the instances in which Mengo acted in a similar manner and accused Vetten of failing to highlight it. "She says to him, 'cute' and I'm saying this because you made a song and dance about people initiating or saying something after hours. You omitted this. Is there any particular reason? When she does it, when she tells him 'you're cute' in the evening, are you prepared to call it inappropriate or blurring the lines between this little girl and the father figure?" However, Vetten hit back. "No, I have mentioned that there is, this is in the context of a conversation that's been going on throughout the day. And I did mention that she does describe him, I think there are two occasions where she makes a comment on his appearance, where she says, cute and then it's followed into, but weren't you younger then or whatever. So there are two, there are two occasions where she does comment on his appearance."