Air India crash: relatives struggle to break news of Anju's death to elderly parents
After her marriage, Anju had settled in Vadodara in the 1990s. She had boarded the London-bound flight to meet her elder daughter – Nimmi. She is survived by two daughters. He husband passed away a few years ago.
'We are all in a state of shock in the village. I don't know how to inform my brother (Anju's father) about the news of her passing. I am unable to muster the courage. How will they bear the weight of this tragedy,' Balkishan Sharma, Anju's uncle told the media persons.
'It's hard to believe for us, she visited her parents last month and stayed here for a fortnight, and now she is no more. Her father Jagdish Sharma, a retired government employee, has not been keeping well for some time and mother Santosh Sharma is also aged. We are trying to find how to disclose the news, but we can't hide it for too long,' he said.
Mr. Balkishan said Anju's late husband was an engineer who worked in the oil industry.
A few other members of Anju's extended family at her native village remembered her as a compassionate and caring person who supported her family.
'The loss has shattered our family,' they added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
a day ago
- NDTV
No Fault With Boeing Fuel Control Unit: US Aviation Body On Air India Crash
Oshkosh, Wisconsin: The head of the Federal Aviation Administration said on Thursday the fatal crash last month of an Air India Boeing 787 jet does not appear to have been caused by a mechanical issue or inadvertent movement of the fuel control unit or switches. "We can say with a high level of confidence is it doesn't appear to be a mechanical issue with the Boeing fuel control unit," Bryan Bedford, the FAA's administrator, told reporters on the sidelines of an air show in Wisconsin. He said FAA employees had taken the units out, tested them and had inspectors get on aircraft and review them. "We feel very comfortable that this isn't an issue with inadvertent manipulation of fuel control," he said. The probe into the Air India crash, which killed 241 of the 242 people on board and 19 on the ground, is focused on the fuel control switches of the Boeing 787 jetliner. Boeing and Air India did not immediately comment. The switches control fuel flow to aircraft engines, allowing pilots to start or shut them down on the ground, or manually intervene during in-flight engine failures. Air India said on Tuesday it has completed precautionary inspections of the fuel control switch locking mechanism on all 787 and 737 aircraft, with no issues detected. A preliminary report from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau earlier this month found the switches had almost simultaneously flipped from "run" to "cutoff" shortly after takeoff, causing the engines to lose power. Reuters reported last week, citing a source, that the cockpit recording on the Air India flight from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick suggested the captain cut fuel to the engines. Earlier this month, the FAA and Boeing privately issued notifications that the fuel switch locks on Boeing planes were safe.
Hans India
a day ago
- Hans India
Air India Crash Not Caused by Mechanical Problem, Says FAA
The top officer of America's flight safety group (FAA) said the big Air India plane crash last month was not caused by a machine problem. The crash happened just after takeoff. It killed 241 people on the plane and 19 people on the ground. The FAA checked the fuel control system on the Boeing 787 plane. This system controls fuel to the engines. They said it worked well and that there was no mistake with the fuel switches. These fuel switches are used by pilots to start or stop engines. They also use them in case of engine trouble. A report from India said that both fuel switches moved to 'cutoff' by accident right after takeoff. This made the engines stop working. Another report said that the pilot may have turned off the fuel by mistake. Air India checked all its other planes and said they are safe. Boeing and Air India have not made public comments yet.
New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
FAA rules out mechanical failure in June 12 Air India 787 crash
CHENNAI: The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has reportedly concluded that there was no mechanical fault in the fuel control system of the Boeing 787 aircraft that crashed on June 12, killing 260 people. The agency's statement confirms that the plane's fuel control units and switch mechanisms were functioning normally and showed no signs of failure or inadvertent movement. Air India Flight 171, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, was en route from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick when it crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport. The crash resulted in the deaths of all 241 people onboard and 19 individuals on the ground. Only one survivor, 27-year-old Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, was found in critical condition and remains under medical observation. The investigation is being led by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), with support from the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the UK's Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB). Preliminary findings reveal that both of the aircraft's fuel control switches moved from the "RUN" position to "CUTOFF" within seconds of takeoff, causing both engines to lose power. The switches were returned to "RUN" within 10 to 14 seconds, but the engines failed to regain sufficient thrust. Cockpit voice recordings captured one pilot questioning why the fuel had been cut off, while the other denied having done so. These recordings have raised questions about whether the switches were moved intentionally or by accident. The FAA's inspection confirmed that the switch locking mechanisms were intact and that no mechanical fault led to the fuel cutoff. Reports quoted FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford stating that the aircraft's systems performed as designed and there is no current plan to issue design changes or additional safety bulletins. Boeing has also confirmed that no systemic issues have been found in the 787's fuel systems based on inspections of its fleet and data supplied by operators, including Air India. While mechanical failure has been ruled out, the possibility of human involvement remains under active investigation. Former US safety officials and aviation experts have described the switch movements as highly unusual and not consistent with normal flight procedures. The Indian AAIB has expanded its probe to consider whether the crash could have involved intentional action. On Tuesday, Air India also confirmed that it has completed all Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA)-mandated inspections of the Fuel Control Switch (FCS) locking mechanisms on its Boeing 787 and 737 aircraft, including those operated by Air India Express. 'No issues were found with the said locking mechanism,' the airline said, adding that voluntary checks had already begun on July 12, two days before the DGCA directive was issued on July 14. India's DGCA had separately issued warnings to Air India over systemic safety lapses, including failures in fatigue management, inadequate crew training, and a lack of operational oversight. The regulator directed Air India to complete fuel switch mechanism checks across its fleet by July 21, which the airline confirmed had been done without any anomalies. Although speculation about pilot actions continues, the AAIB has not confirmed any conclusions regarding crew intent or error. A full investigation report, expected sometime later, will provide detailed analysis including the complete cockpit transcript and system data. Authorities and aviation experts have urged the public and media to avoid drawing premature conclusions as the investigation continues. The cause of the dual engine flameout remains officially undetermined, pending the outcome of further analysis of flight data, cockpit recordings, and crew background.
