Testifiers question need for proposed Nebraska requirements for abortion pills
LINCOLN — Advocates for a Nebraska legislative bill that would add new steps women must take to access abortion pills said they want to make using the pills safer for pregnant women.
Opponents testifying during the public hearing Thursday for Legislative Bill 512 said the goal of the measure by State Sen. Rick Holdcroft of Bellevue is to reduce the use of the drugs.
LB 512 does not outright ban or directly restrict mifepristone or misoprostol, the typical two-drug regimen for a medical abortion. But it adds several required steps.
It would require women to see a doctor three to 14 days after being given the pill, in addition to before, which state law already required. It would require testing for an ectopic pregnancy.
The bill also would require doctors to estimate and document the gestational age of the pregnancy before the pill is given and to report information about the use of the pill to the state.
Part of the screening requirement had been aimed at ensuring whether the woman's blood type requires offering women an additional treatment to reduce the likelihood of future miscarriages.
But Holdcroft told the Health and Human Services Committee that he introduced a white-copy amendment to remove that blood screening because medical practices have moved away from the value of that type of testing.
He said his goal is to make sure no place acts the way he perceives some abortion clinics have, by providing abortion pills without proper oversight.
'No matter how any of us feels about the issue of abortion, we can all agree that no pregnant woman should ever be neglected or endangered by a careless abortion provider,' Holdcroft said.
Abortion-rights groups and medical professionals supportive of reproductive rights said the result of the new restrictions and requirements on the use of abortion pills is aimed at reducing the ease of use.
While Nebraska law requires in-person dispensing of abortion pills, some women still obtain them online from out-of-state sources. Opponents argued that the bill's additional restrictions could push more women toward darker corners of the internet to seek out pills, which they said would likely increase risks.
Some also said they fear the state or federal government knowing what they were doing.
Critics of how the pill is used said the ease with which abortion pills can be obtained online makes enforcing time-tied abortion bans like Nebraska's difficult to enforce.
They want the bill to more strictly and explicitly clarify that the pills cannot be ordered and delivered independently of a local medical provider.
Supporters argued they cannot accurately track complications like excessive bleeding and ineffective or incomplete abortions from the abortion pills without requiring a follow-up appointment. They say they want to close the data gap on medical abortions, particularly any going untracked today.
Nebraska law today prohibits most abortions after 12 weeks gestational age, with legal exceptions after that for the life of the mother or for rape or incest.
Voters in November passed a state constitutional amendment cementing current law as the latest an abortion could happen, banning abortions after the first trimester of pregnancy.
The way the amendment was written left room for state lawmakers to restrict abortion further, up to a full ban, so Holdcroft's bill would be legal, if approved.
Gov. Jim Pillen and some in the administration of President Donald Trump have embraced the anti-abortion movement's focus on tightening restrictions on medical abortions.
Some abortion opponents opposed LB 512 on Wednesday, fearing that its language might somehow codify the legality of medical abortions in Nebraska beyond the scope of the bill.
Teresa Fondren of Abolish Abortion Nebraska said her God equates abortion with murder. She says she opposes LB 512 and all forms of abortion, including medical abortion. She said she doesn't want to make it safer.
'This bill plainly treats abortion like health care, which can be regulated, rather than murder,' she said.
State Sen. John Fredrickson of Omaha apologized to the crowd of testifiers for the all-male HHS Committee not having at least one member who knows what it means to be pregnant.
State Sen. Merv Riepe of Ralston, a swing vote on abortion bills, questioned why the measure appeared worded broadly enough to affect more than the state's two abortion clinics.
'Why wouldn't you limit this piece of legislation to just abortion centers?' Riepe asked.
Holdcroft said he wrote the bill to limit the reach to abortion providers. Riepe said the language of the bill risked reaching accidentally into miscarriage care and other medical care.
Doctors who testified argued that the pills commonly prescribed for chemical abortions can be used during miscarriage care, and are sometimes prescribed for that purpose.
Holdcroft said the bill would hold no woman responsible if she does not attend the follow-up exam. It aims consequences at physicians, and Riepe said that might create liability concerns.
'What my bill does is it tries to establish a standard of care for chemical abortions,' Holdcroft said. 'That's all it is.'
Dr. Timothy Tesmer, Nebraska's chief medical officer, represented Pillen's support for LB 512. He said the state would like to know more about complications.
The lack of follow-up appointments and U.S. Food and Drug Administration research on potential complications like bleeding and infection show the need for more information and data on what the drugs do to pregnant women.
He said the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services can't say much about the impacts of the drugs HHS says were responsible for 82% of Nebraska abortions in 2023.
Under questioning from Fredrickson about the medical safety of one drug used in medical abortions, Tesmer said, 'I'd have to say it's safe to use … in the right or proper context.'
Marion Miner of the Nebraska Catholic Conference said the church would prefer no abortions, but they would rather see a minimum standard of care than see pregnant women die or be injured.
'You screen for ectopic pregnancy,' Miner said in his testimony. 'You schedule a follow-up afterward. You report complications. It's that simple.'
Sandy Danek, executive director of Nebraska Right to Life, said her group opposes abortion but backs LB 512 because 'supporting the woman who participates in an abortion is not an approval of the procedure.'
Dr. Elizabeth Constance, a maternal-fetal specialist testifying for the Nebraska Medical Association, pushed back on the bill, saying it stepped the Legislature once again in between patients and the best care physicians can provide.
She said she runs a fertility clinic in Omaha and said the same medications used to terminate pregnancies can also be used to help with miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies.
'Requiring in-person follow-up does nothing to help patient safety,' Constance said. 'But it does put an unnecessary and undue burden on our patients, particularly those from rural communities who may have to travel several hours.'
Constance said requiring reporting of heavy or adverse bleeding misunderstands what the drugs do, because 'every single person' who uses the drug will have 'heavy bleeding.'
Adelle Burk, senior manager of public affairs for Planned Parenthood North Central States, said her group opposes LB 512 because it is 'unnecessary government overreach.'
Burk said there is no medical reason to require the follow-up appointment. She said the reporting process is designed to make life more difficult for clinics.
'LB 512 creates a one-size-fits-all political mandate that doesn't consider the patient's individual needs,' she said.
State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair asked Burk if her organization might be more willing to be neutral on the bill if the mandated visit and reporting requirements were tweaked.
Burk said changes could make the bill 'better,' but she stopped short of saying the organization would support it.
Dr. Emily Patel, an OB-GYN speaking in her personal capacity, called LB 512 a 'thinly veiled attempt' to make abortion care harder for patients to obtain and more difficult for medical professionals to provide.
She said that if safety were the priority, the bill would regulate the drug for all uses, not just some. She said research shows erectile dysfunction pills are riskier and less regulated.
'Let me be clear, LB 512 will not improve patient safety or help outcomes,' she said. 'It is about controlling women's reproductive choices.'
Taylor Givens-Dunn of I Be Black Girl called LB 512 a 'direct attack on reproductive autonomy' that she said could disproportionately impact people in poverty and people of color.
'It undermines the doctor-patient relationship and disregards the expertise of medical professionals,' she said.
Bailey Joy Annenson of the League of Women Voters of Nebraska said she and her partner are deciding where and whether to have a family and that state laws like LB 512 will have an impact.
She said the risk of having fewer maternal care doctors is a very real risk for young professionals deciding where to locate and where to raise young families.
Holdcroft and Riepe agreed at the end of the hearing that they need HHS to do a better job holding wayward providers accountable. The committee took no immediate action on LB 512.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


American Press
16-07-2025
- American Press
Jim Beam column:Independent thinkers are rare
U.S. Rep. Don Bacon, a Republican from Nebraska, is leaving Congress like others who are frustrated about the failure of members of Congress to compromise for the good of the country.(Photo courtesy of Nebraska Public Media). Moderates are leaving Congress as fast as chickens would run from an open coop. U.S. Rep. Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican who said his fifth term would be his last, is among the latest. The Advocate last week ran two columns talking about moderates leaving Congress. Kathleen Parker wrote about U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, announcing he wouldn't seek re-election after President Donald Trump threatened to support primary challengers to any Republican who dared oppose his Big Beautiful Bill Act. Parker said a lengthening line of dropouts that GOP members like to call RINOs — Republicans in Name Only — have left office since Trump first became president. Steve Roberts in his column said, 'While Trump had promised to protect Medicaid funding, Tillis argued that his bill would eventually deprive almost 12 million Americans of health care coverage, including 663,000 in Tillis' home state. Tillis joined all 47 Democrats and Republican Sens. Rand Paul and Susan Collins in voting against Trump's BBB Act. Vice President JD Vance cast a tie-breaking vote to pass the bill. The Nebraska Examiner quoted Bacon when he announced he was leaving Congress who said, 'I hope to be remembered for … I'm a Christian, first … American, second … somewhere down here being a Republican. It's about doing the right thing .. I'm a traditional conservative at heart.' Like Louisiana's Republican U.S. Sen. Bill Cassidy of Baton Rouge, Bacon cast a pivotal vote for President Joe Biden's bipartisan infrastructure bill that put him at odds with Trump. After the vote, Trump criticized Bacon during a May 2022 visit to Nebraska, calling him 'bad news.' His political team worked for years to recruit potential GOP primary challengers. The Examiner said, 'But Bacon kept winning and continued to publicly spar with Trump…' Bacon did vote for the BBB Act and was criticized for it by some national and Nebraska public officials. NBC News in a story about Bacon's retirement from Congress said he spent 30 years in the Air Force and specialized in intelligence matters. He is a retired brigadier general who did four tours of duty in Iraq and also spent time in Afghanistan. The NBC report said Bacon is one of the few sitting Republicans willing to publicly criticize Trump who has a reputation for retaliating against his enemies and ending their political careers. Bacon insisted that neither the public feuds with Trump nor the violent threats he and his wife have faced had any impact on his decision to leave Congress. He said he didn't have the 'fire in my belly' for another congressional run. The news about Bacon caught my attention because, like me, he is a strong defender of Ukraine in its war with Russia. He has a photograph on the wall of his meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. And he has consistently been critical of Trump's handling of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and Trump's 'appeasement' of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly ordered a pause in sending a shipment of missiles and ammunition to Ukraine and Bacon said whoever ordered the weapons pause should be fired. Bacon said, 'If Ukraine falls, the world's a more dangerous place. I really don't understand why President Trump doesn't see that. And if Ukraine goes down, Moldova will definitely fall. I think Georgia is in trouble.' Although he said he was embarrassed to say it, Bacon said, 'President Trump has done worse than Biden (on Ukraine). I don't like it. He seems to have a blind spot with Putin. I don't know what purpose it serves to withhold weapons to Ukraine and not see that Putin is the invader.' Trump has since resumed weapons for Ukraine, but the delay has been costly in terms of lives lost and damage in Ukraine. Bacon added, 'I do believe that if I was president, I'd be trying to provide Ukraine with every weapon they needed to convince Putin he has no chance to win.' He added that he wished GOP Vice President JD Vance 'saw the Russian threat a little better.' Tillis confirmed where this country is at the moment when he said, 'In Washington over the last few years, it's become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species.' Jim Beam, the retired editor of the American Press, has covered people and politics for more than six decades. Contact him at 337-515-8871 or


The Hill
04-07-2025
- The Hill
Sanders points to Nebraska medical center closure after GOP bill passes: ‘Dark day for rural America'
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said the Thursday passage of the GOP's spending bill symbolizes a 'dark day for rural America,' citing cuts to federal funding for medical centers and hospitals in remote areas. 'While Republicans celebrate the passage of the largest Medicaid cut in history, the Curtis Medical Center in Nebraska announced it will shut down as a result of these horrific cuts — the first of many hospitals to close,' Sanders wrote in a Thursday statement on X. 'This is a dark day for rural America and for our country,' he added. An hour prior, Community Hospital in McCook, Neb., announced its closure. 'Unfortunately, the current financial environment, driven by anticipated federal budget cuts to Medicaid, has made it impossible for us to continue operating all of our services, many of which have faced significant financial challenges for years,' Troy Bruntz, President and CEO of Community Hospital, said in a news release, according to Nebraska Public Media. Six of the state's hospitals could be forced to close due to provisions in the 'big, beautiful bill.' 'We currently have six hospitals that that we feel are in a critical financial state, three that are in an impending kind of closure or conversion over to the rural emergency hospital model,' Jed Hansen, executive director for the Nebraska Rural Health Association, said during a meeting this week, as reported by Nebraska Public Media. 'We would likely see the closures within a year to two years of once [the bill is] fully enacted.' Other states are facing similar shutdowns due to reduced funding under the Republican backed bill approved by Congress. A total of 760 hospitals are at risk of closure nationwide, according to Becker's Hospital Review. Fifteen hospitals in New York are also at risk of closure in GOP districts, according to the Fiscal Policy Institute.
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
Homeless, sick and aging: Pierce County faces worsening crisis in 2025
Homeless-service providers in Pierce County are sounding the alarm on the need for healthcare among those living unhoused. During the Pierce County Council's Health and Human Services Committee meeting June 3, a panel of homeless-outreach workers, healthcare specialists and social workers painted a picture of the high number of elderly and disabled people experiencing homelessness and the lack of resources available to keep them from dying on the streets. Jake Nau is the homeless outreach manager for St. Vincent DePaul. His job is to develop relationships with people living unhoused with the goal of helping them find housing. On June 3, Nau told the committee at least 50% of the unhoused people he meets are either over 55 years of age or are experiencing a physical or mental disability they either were living with before becoming unhoused or have incurred through their experience living on the streets. During the 2024 survey of those living unhoused in Pierce County, volunteers counted 2,661 people living unhoused in a single night. Of those surveyed, 25% reported having a chronic health condition, and 22% reported having a physical disability. 'Homeless seniors and people with disabilities are largely from here,' Nau told the committee. 'This population is not chasing benefits across counties and states. They were housed here, and now they are not.' Nau said the normal process of aging is 'harmfully accelerated' by being unhoused. According to the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness (USICH), people who experience homelessness have an average life expectancy of around 50, almost 20 years lower than people who are housed. The Center for Disease Control states that people experiencing homelessness are at a greater risk of infectious and chronic illness, poor mental health and substance abuse. They are also more susceptible to violence, 'a fact confirmed by over 20 years of reports on bias-motivated crimes,' a letter from USICH stated in 2018. 'On the street there are perpetrators of harm and victims. Seniors and people with disabilities are almost always the victims,' Nau said. 'Our parents and grandparents get exploited, robbed, beaten and bullied.' Nau said there are simply not enough shelter and housing options to get those folks off the street, specifically not enough Americans with Disabilities Act-compliant shelters. He said many shelters cannot accept individuals who are physically unable to wash themselves or use the bathroom on their own. He also said there are not enough senior-specific permanent supportive-housing options for folks who need specialized care. Amy Decker is a social work case manager for MultiCare Health System. Decker reported that 404 people were discharged from Tacoma General Hospital and Allemore Hospital into homelessness through the first five months of 2025. Of those known to be unhoused at the time of their discharge, 176 were between the ages of 50-69 and 25 were over the age of 70. One individual discharged from a Tacoma hospital into homelessness was over 90. Recently the county has obligated funding to increase its medical respite capacity. Medical Respite facilities offer a place for unhoused individuals to stay while they heal after a hospital stay. In January 2023, Pierce County awarded the Low-Income Housing Institute (LIHI) over $10 million to support a new shelter project, which would eventually become the acquisition of the Oasis Inn. The former hotel will be converted into 117 units of non-congregate emergency shelter and permanent supportive housing, with at least 51 of the units capable of providing medical-respite services. John Brown of the LIHI told The News Tribune potential clients at the facility would need to be healed enough for discharge, meaning they can still perform activities of daily living and only be in need of basic nursing services such as wound care and medicine management. If the client regresses in treatment during their stay, they would be moved to a long-term care respite facility. 'Once the client heals and progresses through recovery, they could either be referred into one of the long-term rental permanent supportive-housing units in the building or another low-income housing building as openings become available,' Brown wrote in an email to The News Tribune. It is unclear when the facility wound open. Meanwhile the county has made funding available for operation of a temporary medical respite facility in Parkland. The facility will have roughly 16 beds available. Jan Runbeck is a registered nurse who provides healthcare at one of Tacoma's only operating medical-respite facilities in Tacoma. Runbeck previously told The News Tribune that Nativity House has 12 beds reserved for medical-respite referrals. She said patients discharged from the hospital can use a bed for 30 days before they have to be treated like everyone else who comes to the shelter and receives a bed on a first come, first served basis. During the June 3 Health and Human Services Committee meeting, Runbeck said many individuals living unhoused are dying a 'prolonged death,' typically resulting from unmanaged chronic diseases such as diabetes, heat disease, kidney failure and CPD. She said the deaths would be preventable with access to primary care. Runbeck said many individuals she met in Nativity House and in her street-outreach work became homeless in their 50s and 60s. She recalled several cases in which individuals suffered injuries and had jobs without benefits, creating financial pressures leading to homelessness. Runbeck made the case that medical-respite facilities ultimately save tax payer dollars. She said before Nativity House implemented a medical respite program with nurses who could provide healthcare it had more 911 calls than almost anywhere in the city, averaging more than two emergency calls a day. After the program was implemented, it reduced calls there by 30%. 'When you have prolonged death, it is messy, it is ugly, it is nasty,' she told the committee. 'You go to the [emergency room] way too many times, you go to urgent care way too many times. You have all these other complications of untreated chronic disease.'