Scots woman kept 28 animals in 'rubbish and excrement' in 'appalling' incident
A Scots dog walker has been given a disqualification order for five years for dogs, cats and other pets after keeping more than 20 animals in squalid conditions.
On Monday June 23, Sarah Cummines appeared at Peterhead Sheriff Court where she pled guilty to failing to meet the basic welfare needs of dogs, cats and a ferret in her care.
Cummines worked as a dog walker and pet sitter when the incidents occurred and admitted to multiple counts of animal neglect after being found keeping animals in a home described as one of the worst ever seen by Scottish SPCA inspectors, reports Aberdeen Live.
Inspectors discovered a shocking scene of nine adult dogs, nine puppies, four adult cats, five kittens, and one ferret living among piles of waste, excrement, and debris. The animals had no access to clean resting areas, food, or water, and many were exposed to dangerous and unhygienic conditions.
A Scottish SPCA inspector said: "We received a complaint in October 2024 about potential neglect at Cummines' property. On arrival, the smell was overwhelming, and the interior conditions were truly appalling. The floor was completely obscured by a foot-high layer of rubbish, excrement, and discarded items.
"Cats were living on top of kitchen cabinets among faeces and filth. The kitchen sink was full of rubbish and clearly had not been in use for some time. The animals had no access to clean areas and were forced to groom themselves in filth, posing serious health risks."
"One small dog was seen climbing over piles of waste and jumping between appliances to avoid touching the floor. All the animals were frightened, and the cats were visibly nervous. This was no environment for any animal or human."
The investigation also found that the animals were navigating over old dog crates and hazardous items to reach basic spaces like the kitchen or doors. Evidence of chewed beds and distressed behaviours indicated prolonged suffering and stress.
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
The inspector continued: "We were horrified not only by the condition of the animals but by the state of the entire home. The bedroom was one of the worst rooms we've encountered, and a box room was barricaded shut inside, a ferret had escaped its cage. These were among the worst living conditions for both animals and a human we have ever witnessed."
Despite being offered help and the opportunity to relinquish the animals voluntarily, Cummines refused. The Scottish SPCA then removed the animals for their welfare.
Alongside her sentence, Cummines was given a community payback order with supervision for one year.
A spokesperson for the Scottish SPCA added: "We welcome the court's decision today. No animal should be forced to live in such filth and fear. This outcome sends a clear message that neglecting the welfare of animals will not be tolerated in Scotland."
The Scottish SPCA encourages anyone concerned about the welfare of an animal or if they suspect signs of animal neglect to contact their confidential animal helpline on 03000 999 999.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
27 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
‘Hitman' accused of blasting Ross Monaghan & Eddie Lyons Jr to death in Spain faces extradition hearing
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) AN alleged hitman accused of killing Scots gangsters Ross Monaghan and Eddie Lyons Jnr in Spain won't face an extradition hearing until November - five months after his arrest. Michael Riley, 44, is charged with the murders of the underworld figures at Monaghan's Bar in Fuengirola, Costa del Sol, on May 31. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 The hitman accused of murdering Ross Monaghan and Eddie Lyons Jr (both pictured) is facing extradition Credit: The Scottish Sun 3 The pair were gunned down inside Monaghan's Bar in Fuengirola Credit: Google Maps Authorities in Spain want him sent there to face criminal proceedings. Riley, of Huyton, Liverpool, was arrested by Merseyside police on June 13 under an international arrest warrant issued by the Spanish authorities. His extradition hearing was due to take place on October 9 at Westminster Magistrates Court, but it will now be heard on November 20. Riley was not on a video link from Wandsworth Prison for the hearing. Judge Timothy King said: "I am prepared to vacate the hearing. "I make directions for the extradition hearing to be heard on 20 November. 'The next call over date will be on 15 August. Hopefully Mr Riley will have been produced via video link.' Monaghan, 43, and Lyons Jnr, 46, were key Lyons crime gang members. Malaga-based Spanish police chief Pedro Agudo Novo has described Riley as a member of the rival Glasgow-based Daniels gang. Bizarrely, Police Scotland have denied a link between the 30-year feud and the murders. 'Godfather' Eddie Lyons Snr bids farewell to gunned down son & kingpin pal at double gang funeral The victims - who were laid to rest in a joint funeral earlier this month - were watching the Champions League final with friends when they were gunned down at the bar on the beachfront. Lyons Jnr died after he was hit by a single bullet outside the bar in front of horrified drinkers. CCTV showed the gunman pursuing Monaghan inside the pub before shooting him dead. Riley remains in custody.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
The Epping unrest proves far-right violence never went away
My heart raced. I kept hearing sounds that weren't there. Getting out of bed, I peered out of the window, looking for any unfamiliar noise or lights. Nothing. I climbed back into bed and stared at the ceiling; while images of people lighting fires and attacking people of colour on the streets flooded my mind. The UK race riots – which saw thousands of fascists take to the streets to intimidate and attack immigrants – brought on these kinds of feelings in the summer of 2024. But this was happening to me last night. My anxiety had peaked and I was terrified again. Yesterday, I read the news that far right, anti-immigration protestors had taken to the streets in Epping, Essex, outside of a hotel housing asylum seekers and they had become violent. Last year, it didn't take long before the riots that initially began in Southport following the murder of three young girls there, went nationwide, and so, of course, I panicked. After an immigrant was detained in Epping for alleged sex offences, days after arriving in the UK, which he denied in court on July 10 – protestors gathered outside of the accommodation that they believed housed him for demonstrations over a number of days. Last night, anti-racist organisation, Stand Up to Racism, heard about far-right elements in the group and formed a counter-protest, meeting them outside of the hotel with placards. Then chaos ensued. Fireworks were reportedly used in the crowds, eggs were thrown at people and even the police were assaulted. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video It was almost a perfect, and chilling, echo of last year's riots. When stabbings in a Southport dance studio saw the murder of three children and a further ten injured, by 17 year old Axel Rudakubana, far-right agitators organised and caused hell. Last year, living in Hounslow – a heavily immigrant borough – I was terrified. Reports of riots entering my area came flooding in via social media. Friends and family who lived nearby texted me in a panic of misinformation, via forwarded WhatsApp messages. One claimed that Hounslow was completely taken over by fascists. Another said local boys were sitting around the town center holding baseball bats. We were all tense. My anxiety was deepened with the silence that enveloped me in my empty house and I twitched at every creak, as I waited for the windows to crash in with hordes of angry racist mobs not far behind. My dad texted me 'We lived through NF (National Front), same again', and told me not to leave the house. But I felt infuriated. Under the anxiety a stubborn frustration bubbled, and I realised I wasn't scared of them, but of how they have controlled me. So I left the house; quietly grinding my teeth, my eyes shifting, sweat forming all over my body. And just like that I was back home, triumphant in having taken a bus to the shops. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video But that frustration never really left. Because deep down, I knew things would forever feel terrifying. A friend confessed to me a month later that she was attacked during the riots and had been house-bound since, too terrified to walk outside. It took months for her to start to recover, but she still looks over her shoulder when she's alone. The guise under which the far-right have used to attack migrants – the protection of women and girls – is hypocritical, because it is the women around me who have been hurt. A year on, I can't shake the feeling that the far-right are running the exact same playbook. And they have been emboldened to continue by the action of some politicians, and the inaction of others. At least one local Reform councillor joined demonstrators yesterday in Epping, with another quoted as saying 'they're trying to dilute the Englishness out of us.' Meanwhile, the Conservative leader of Epping Council and two local Tory MPs have called for the migrant hotel to be shut down, a key demand of rioters. There have been no words on the Essex unrest from Keir Starmer either – instead, he is busy tweeting about how he is actively working to stop migrants from entering the country and how 'angry' small boat crossings make him. It was only two months ago that Starmer referred to current levels of immigration as causing 'incalculable damage'. More Trending Even after the riots last year, at Labour conference in September, he didn't make an explicit link between the riots and rising anti-migrant rhetoric – instead, he refuted it, saying he would 'never accept the argument … that millions of people concerned about immigration are one and the same thing as people who smashed up businesses'. Meanwhile, many of us are living in fear again. In fact, we never stopped. I look into the eyes of people I walk past in the street and wonder whether they want me gone. I wonder if they would happily attack me, and that no one will save me. These riots, I fear, are now becoming common-place. And while people of colour and immigrants have always persisted against fascism, we need our government to support us, instead of adding to the fear. We can't live like this forever. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: The BBC can't justify still showing Mrs Brown's Boys MORE: Votes at 16 is a classic Labour policy – for all the wrong reasons MORE: Germany's 6ft 6in Chancellor towers over Keir Starmer – see how other leaders stack up
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
2 mothers lose legal challenge against DWP over rape clause rules
The mothers had both conceived their eldest children while in abusive relationships. The non-consensual conception exception, also known as the rape clause, allows universal credit (UC) recipients to claim benefits for more than two children – but only if the third or subsequent children have been conceived non-consensually. This leaves some women unable to use this exception if, for example, their first two children are conceived in rape, but they have further children in consensual relationships. READ MORE: John Swinney sets out 3-point plan to achieve Scottish independence The two mothers, identified only as LMN and EFG, brought legal action against the DWP over the rules around the policy, saying they breached their human rights and were 'irrational'. In a ruling published on Friday, Justice Collins Rice dismissed their claim, saying the issue was 'a policy question' and not for a court to decide. A hearing at Leeds Administrative Court in June heard both women were young and vulnerable when they began relationships in their teens and first became pregnant. Karon Monaghan KC, representing the women, said both were subject to regular violence and coercion, with one describing how she was choked to unconsciousness and raped multiple times. EFG conceived her two eldest children through rape and was told she could not claim the benefit for her third and fourth children, both of whom were conceived consensually in a later long-term relationship. She was initially paid the child element of UC for the third child, but this was later rescinded, after the fourth child was born. Mother-of-six LMN was subjected to domestic abuse and violent and coercive behaviour by former partners with whom she had children. READ MORE: Independence campaigners react to new John Swinney referendum plan Monaghan said she had older children in care and two living with her, but then one of the older children returned to her home. She was refused an exception to the two-child limit under these 'ordering provisions'. The Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG), which provided the women's legal representation, said that while LMN was eventually granted an exception for her youngest child, 'she went for years without this support, amounting to thousands of pounds which will not be backdated'. Justice Collins Rice said the two women were 'survivors of appalling relationship abuse' which involved 'sustained physical, sexual and psychological violence'. She said their claim was that: 'The UC 'two-child benefit cap' should not apply to them, unless and until they have been afforded the opportunity everyone else takes for granted – if they can, to bring two children into the world as a result of freely chosen intimacy within a freely chosen relationship. 'This is an argument which takes its place in the intensely controversial political debate within which both proponents and opponents of the 'two-child benefit cap' have advanced their views over the years, in which CPAG has played an active and tireless role, and which continues to the present day. 'To the extent that it is conducted in the political arena and in the forum of public opinion, that is where the argument will ultimately be resolved.' The judge concluded: 'There is no legal analysis, or standards, by which a court can decide whether or not UC recipients who are mothers of two non-consensually conceived children should receive additional financial support from the state by excepting them from the 'two-child benefit cap' and paying the child element of UC for a further one or two consensually conceived children. 'It is a policy question dealing in social, economic, moral, and ethical subject matter. It is also a question with potential resonances in family law more generally. It is a political law reform question.' Responding to the judgment, the woman known as EFG said the decision was 'disappointing' but that she would 'keep going and fight this to the end'. The woman said: 'All of my choices were taken away from me for years by my abuser before I fled. I've fought hard to get on with my life for me and my kids. 'But the two-child limit makes it more difficult. The Government says that the exceptions are to protect people who – like me – didn't have a choice about the number of kids in their family, but the rape clause doesn't do that. "The rules need to change to protect families like mine.' The woman known as LMN added: 'I want to keep going with the case as I feel like it's against my human rights. READ MORE: Unionists accuse John Swinney of pressing 'panic independence button' 'When my oldest came back to live with me from care and before I got the exception for my youngest, we had to survive on less money. That stopped me doing things with the children – I never planned on having the children but that's not their fault.' Claire Hall, solicitor at CPAG who represented the women, said: 'Our clients are obviously disappointed with today's decision but are determined to keep going with their cases. 'We will look at appealing today's decision but in the meantime all eyes are on the government which has the chance to do the right thing and abolish the inhumane two-child limit in the autumn child poverty strategy.' A DWP spokesperson said: 'Violence against women and girls is a national emergency – and our mission is to halve it within a decade. 'Victims of rape and coercion should be treated with dignity and respect. 'This court decision is about whether a policy – designed by the previous government – was being implemented lawfully. 'This policy will be considered along with all other levers including Social Security reform by the Child Poverty Taskforce, the group will publish the Child Poverty Strategy in the autumn.'
