Taliban to send envoys to Germany to work on deportations
The flight on Friday was the second from Germany since expulsions to Afghanistan were resumed last year.
Germany does not recognise the Taliban authorities in Afghanistan but does have 'technical contacts' on the deportations, which have been facilitated by Qatar.
Government spokesman Stefan Kornelius said that during the exchanges 'it has been agreed that two representatives of the Afghan administration will be incorporated' into Afghanistan's missions in Germany.
Germany must honour visa obligations to Afghan refugees, rules court
According to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) daily, the two envoys will work at the Afghan embassy in Berlin and at the country's consulate in the western city of Bonn.
The Taliban authorities demanded this step in return for making last Friday's flight possible, the paper reported.
The FAZ said that the names of the envoys had been sent to Berlin and that they had already worked in consular services and were not considered extremists.
Germany stopped deportations to Afghanistan and closed its embassy in Kabul following the Taliban movement's return to power in 2021.
However last year the last German government resumed expulsions with a flight in August carrying 28 Afghans.
Current chancellor Friedrich Merz has vowed to continue deportations, having made a tougher line on immigration a key campaign theme in February's general election.
Kornelius said that further flights were in the offing.
'The government has committed to systematic expulsions of those convicted of crimes and this will not be accomplished with just one flight,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan back in the game
Listen to article When the US pulled the last batch of its troops from Afghanistan in August 2021, it was the end of what many believe was a costly and unwinnable war. For 20 years, the US and its allies spent trillions of dollars only to see the return of the Afghan Taliban, who were thrown out after the 9/11 attacks. The US involvement in Afghanistan brought Pakistan again in the spotlight as Washington needed Islamabad's help for its campaign in the neighbouring country. Despite the trust deficit, the successive US administrations had to work with Pakistan given its strategic location. But once the US was out of Afghanistan, relations with Pakistan started dwindling. It was almost the repeat of first Afghan Jihad when after the Soviet defeat in Afghanistan, the US left Pakistan in lurch. Washington imposed crippling economic sanctions on Pakistan, reinforcing fears that the US can never be a trustworthy partner. The situation again looked bleak when the US withdrew troops from Afghanistan. President Joe Biden, once a strong advocate of close ties with Pakistan, never spoke to any of the Pakistani PMs during his four-year term. There were hardly any high-level exchanges between the two sides. And when Donald Trump won the elections in November last year, there were many in Pakistan who were concerned that ties with the US would only get worse given Trump's America first policy. Second, unlike the past, Pakistan had little to offer to the US or the US had little interest in the region. There was near consensus among the experts that Trump 2.0 would further bolster its strategic partnership with India. Pakistan was nowhere to be seen a foreign policy priority of the Trump administration except in the realm of security and counterterrorism. But six months into Trump's presidency, all those predictions fell flat. Contrary to the forecast, Trump's presidency proved positive for Pakistan at least for now. It all began when Pakistan arrested and extradited to the US one of the masterminds of the Abbey Gate bombing in Kabul in August 2021. Thirteen American servicemen were among those killed in the deadly attack outside the Kabul Airport. Trump had, during his election campaign, promised to bring to justice those behind the bombing. Many here may not be aware of the fact that any fatality of an American serviceman has huge domestic implications. In the past, elections were won and lost on the body bags of American soldiers. Pakistan helped Trump fulfil his election promise. It was because of this reason that Trump had praised Pakistan in his maiden address to the US Congress. That initial Pakistan help led to revival of contacts at the level of intelligence agencies as well as at the political level. What brought the two countries even closer was the Indo-Pak conflict in May, following the Pahalgam attack. While Pakistan acknowledged the Trump Administration's positive role in brokering the ceasefire, India kept challenging the US claims. Pakistan, in order to make further inroads, nominated President Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his courageous leadership and peace efforts in the subcontinent. The unprecedented luncheon hosted by President Trump for Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir in the middle of the Iran-Israel war highlighted that Pakistan still remains a key player to be reckoned with. This upset India since it was trying to portray the Pakistan Army Chief as evil. But Trump seems to care a dam. This past weekend, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio hosted Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar at the State Department in a first structured meeting between the two sides in several years. The US Secretary of State praised Pakistan's efforts to counter terror and maintain regional stability, much to the dismay of New Delhi. While Dar was in Washington, the Army Chief was in Beijing holding meetings with senior Chinese civil and military authorities. This goes to show the delicate balance Pakistan is trying to maintain with big powers. Given Pakistan's vulnerabilities and so many other challenges, Islamabad seems to be playing its cards well.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
India's proxy web: Afghan general's revelation validates Pakistan's stance
Listen to article The recent confession by former Afghan General Sami Sadat regarding Indian money being channeled through the Taliban to arm anti-Pakistan militant groups once again validates Pakistan's long-held concerns about India using Afghan soil for terrorism. He further disclosed that terrorist leaders have been openly operating from Afghan territory, enjoying safe havens and logistical support provided by elements within the Taliban. Over the past few years, three key factors have emerged as a persistent threat to Pakistan's stability: ungoverned spaces in Afghanistan, the advanced weaponry left behind following the 2021 withdrawal of US troops, and the growing cooperation between the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA). As the rise in terrorist attacks originating from Afghanistan demonstrates, the Afghan government has failed to manage its security situation. The Taliban's tacit approval — also acknowledged by the United Nations in 2024 — has enabled terrorists to use Afghan territory for training, weapons storage, and cross-border operations. A 2024 West Point analysis revealed that terrorist digital command structures rely on encrypted servers traced back to Indian intelligence. Airfields in Kandahar and Herat, now controlled by proxy groups, have reportedly become key transit points for arms, with NATO documents confirming their use in transporting drones and weapons to the Fitna-al-Khawarij (FAK). Hawala networks are also being exploited to conceal foreign state support for terrorism, with RAW and GDI operating behind tribal fronts. In addition, Afghanistan's weak oversight has allowed it to become a thriving narco-terror hub — a crucial supply line for FAK, supporting terrorist operations in K-P and Punjab. According to the Danish Institute (2024), the manipulation of transit routes — underwritten by foreign actors — is not about trade but about fuelling instability in Balochistan. Pakistan has repeatedly pointed to the Afghan government's full patronage and India's involvement in state-sponsored terrorism, particularly along the border. Indian state-sponsored terrorism is not covert — it is being implemented as official policy. Since January 2024, 5,436 Indian-sponsored terrorist incidents have been recorded, with 1,987 terrorists killed by Pakistani security forces. Pakistan is not alone in facing this threat. Other regional neighbours have also suffered due to India's use of state-sponsored terrorism to advance its Hindutva-driven agenda. For the first time in South Asia's history, India's infamous intelligence agency, RAW, executed suicide bombings in Sri Lanka via its proxy, the Tamil Tigers. Today, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and NSA Ajit Doval continue to spread terror in Pakistan through proxies like the TTP and BLA. India has historically been, and remains, a hub of terrorism in South Asia and beyond. It funded 70 militants through Sarfraz Bangalzai, who exploited Baloch women for subversive purposes. BLA spokesperson Bahot Baloch, speaking on an Indian news channel, openly claimed responsibility for attacks in Khuzdar, on the Jaffar Express, and in other areas. The rise of terrorism in Pakistan is not the product of internal insurgency alone. It is a carefully orchestrated proxy war — funded, directed, and supported by hostile intelligence agencies across the border. Pakistan must take decisive and comprehensive action against Indian-sponsored proxies, as pledged by its military leadership. Terrorist groups operating from Afghan territory pose a serious threat not only to Pakistan, but to regional and global stability. The continued inaction of the international community risks emboldening countries engaged in state-sponsored terrorism — and may set a dangerous precedent for others to follow. The writer is a freelance columnist and contributes regularly on issues concerning national security.
Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Italy's Meloni: Recognising Palestinian state before it is established may be ‘counterproductive'
MILAN: Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said on Saturday that recognising the State of Palestine before it is established could be counterproductive. 'I am very much in favour of the State of Palestine but I am not in favour of recognising it prior to establishing it,' Meloni told Italian daily La Repubblica. 'If something that doesn't exist is recognised on paper, the problem could appear to be solved when it isn't,' Meloni added. France's decision to recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September drew condemnation from Israel and the United States, amid the war in Gaza between Israel and Hamas. On Friday, Italy's foreign minister said recognition of a Palestinian state must occur simultaneously with recognition of Israel by the new Palestinian entity. A German government spokesperson said on Friday that Berlin was not planning to recognise a Palestinian state in the short term and said its priority now is to make 'long-overdue progress' towards a two-state solution.
