Apple iPad Air M3 review: the premium tablet to beat
The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.
The new iPad Air M3 costs from £599 (€699/$599/A$999) – the same as its predecessor – and comes in two sizes with either an 11in or 13in screen. It sits between the base-model £329 iPad A16 and the £999 iPad Pro M4, splitting the difference in price and features.
Nothing has changed on the outside of the tablet. The M3 model is a straight replacement for the M2 model, featuring the same crisp screen, sleek aluminium design and Touch ID fingerprint scanner in the power button.
The Centre Stage webcam at the top of the screen makes video calls a breeze by automatically panning and scanning to keep you and your family in frame. Stereo speakers make watching TV and films great, while support for the £129 Apple Pencil Pro makes doodling or taking notes a joy.
Screen: 11in or 13in Liquid Retina display (264ppi)
Processor: Apple M3 (9-core GPU)
RAM: 8GB
Storage: 128, 256, 512GB or 1TB
Operating system: iPadOS 18.4
Camera: 12MP rear, 12MP centre stage
Connectivity: Wifi 6E (5G optional eSim-only), Bluetooth 5.3, USB-C, Touch ID, Smart Connecter
Dimensions: 247.6 x 178.5 x 6.1mm or 280.6 x 214.9 x 6.1mm
Weight: 460g or 616g
The big change for the new Air is an upgrade to the Apple M3 chip, which was first seen in late 2023 in the MacBook Pro and was successfully used in the MacBook Air until March when it was replaced with the M4 chip.
While the M3 isn't Apple's latest chip, it is still far more powerful than most will ever need in a tablet and much faster than the competition. It is about 10-20% quicker than the outgoing M2 model in tests and will make short work of games and even pro-level apps such as Affinity Photo, Procreate or Adobe Lightroom.
Combined with a reliable battery life of nine to 10 hours, it can easily be used as a laptop replacement when equipped with accessories such as the new version of Apple's excellent Magic Keyboard case, although that comes at great cost at £269. Cheaper third-party options from Logitech and others are available, however.
The iPad Air runs iPadOS 18.4, which includes a collection of multitasking tools, and can be plugged into an external monitor such as a laptop via the USB-C port. But the M3 chip also enables various Apple Intelligence features, which are not available on the standard iPad A16. These include several AI image editing and generation tools, writing and proofreading tools, ChatGPT integration into Siri and other bits.
Apple says the battery should last in excess of 1,000 full charge cycles with at least 80% of its original capacity, and can be replaced from £115. The tablet is generally repairable, with a damaged out-of-warranty repair costing from £429.
The tablet contains at least 30% recycled content, including aluminium, cobalt, copper, glass, gold, lithium, plastic, rare earth elements and tin. Apple breaks down the tablet's environmental impact in its report and offers trade-in and free recycling schemes, including for non-Apple products.
The 11in iPad Air M3 costs from £599 (€699/$599/A$999) and the 13in iPad Air M3 costs from £799 (€949/$799/A$1,349).
For comparison, the iPad A16 costs from £329, the iPad Pro M4 costs from £999 and the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE costs from £499. The MacBook Air M4 starts at £999.
The iPad Air M3 is a great premium tablet that makes for an excellent upgrade over the base model Apple tablet.
It is a highly capable machine with laptop-level power, long battery life, a quality screen and plenty of accessories to turn it into a drawing tablet, computer replacement or many other tools. The choice of sizes balances nicely between portability at the 11in and the big-screen utility of the 13in version.
But the M3 model isn't an upgrade worth making over recent iPad Air versions, and if all you do is watch TV or films on it, the standard iPad A16 does the job for much less. Meanwhile, the top-end iPad Pro M4 beats the Air on all counts but costs an awful lot more.
So for those looking for a premium do-it-all tablet, the iPad Air M3 is hard to beat.
Pros: choice of sizes, laptop-level M3 performance, solid battery life, quality screen, USB-C, long software support life, large range of apps and accessories, good speakers, landscape Centre Stage camera, recycled aluminium.
Cons: expensive, no multiuser support, iPadOS still needs work as a laptop replacement, no kickstand without case, no Face ID, 60Hz screen.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
42 minutes ago
- Reuters
Apple beats US appeal claiming it shortchanged customers on iCloud storage
July 23 (Reuters) - A U.S. federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected claims by Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab customers that the iPhone maker gave them less iCloud data storage than they paid for when upgrading. In a 3-0 decision, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said reasonable consumers in the proposed class action would not have been misled by Apple's promises about storage capacity in its iCloud+ plans. The plaintiff Lisa Bodenburg said she paid $2.99 a month for 200 GB of storage, believing Apple would add it to the 5 GB that all iCloud customers receive, and was shortchanged because Apple gave her only 200 GB of total storage, not 205 GB. Circuit Judge Milan Smith, however said Bodenburg "received exactly what Apple promised her" when the Cupertino, California-based company offered "incremental" or "supplemental" storage, on top of the 5 GB she got for free. He cited dismissals of other cases based on "unreasonable assumptions," including that Diet Dr. Pepper would aid in weight loss, and the net weight on a lip balm label failed to reveal that the dispenser's design left some balm inaccessible. "Apple's statements are not false and deceptive merely because [they] may be unreasonably misunderstood by an insignificant and unrepresentative segment of consumers," Smith wrote. Lawyers for Bodenburg did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The decision upheld a May 2024 dismissal by U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco. The case is Bodenburg v Apple Inc, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-3335.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
UK competition watchdog to act over Apple and Google's mobile platforms
A UK watchdog has said it intends to take action to open up Apple and Google's mobile platforms to more competition to benefit consumers, businesses and app developers. The Competition and Markets Authority has proposed to designate the tech companies as having 'strategic market status' – as they hold an 'effective duopoly' for access on mobile devices – and now intends to force the two companies to make changes to their mobile platforms. The regulator said that it had published 'roadmaps' for Apple and Google and that it would take a 'proportionate, pro-innovation' approach to 'promote competition in digital markets while protecting UK consumers and businesses from unfair or harmful practices'. The CMA said it would, in the first instance, focus on areas such as the tech companies' app stores – which have been criticised by developers over issues including fees of up to 30% for transactions – to ensure a 'fair and transparent' app review process, as well as making sure that smartphone users could 'steer' away from app stores to make purchases. The watchdog, which launched an investigation into the US tech companies earlier this year, will also address restrictions Apple imposes on digital wallets to ensure that competing financial technology companies can compete. 'Apple and Google's mobile platforms are both critical to the UK economy – playing an important role in all our lives, from banking and shopping to entertainment and education,' said Sarah Cardell, the chief executive of the CMA. 'But our investigation so far has identified opportunities for more innovation and choice. Time is of the essence: as competition agencies and courts globally take action in these markets, it's essential the UK doesn't fall behind,' she said. However, the CMA said it did not at this stage intend to force major changes such as requiring Apple to allow alternative app stores, or alternative payment methods for in-app purchases beyond its existing payment system. Tom Smith, a competition lawyer at Geradin Partners and a former CMA director, said the competition watchdog was 'ducking' taking major decisions 'which might draw political heat'. 'The CMA is implementing the regime in a thoughtful and authoritative way, but it is doing it more timidly than it should be,' he said. 'It is proposing some useful measures that would open up competition in digital markets, but it is ducking issues that would really threaten the entrenched positions of Apple and Google, and which might therefore draw political heat. For example, they have postponed the possibility for alternative app stores to challenge the App Store's monopoly on Apple devices.' Tim Sweeney, the founder and chief executive of Fortnite maker Epic, which has had legal battles with Google and Apple in the US, criticised the CMA's approach as 'surprisingly weak'. 'The monopolised UK app store economy has all of the vibrancy of a Soviet supermarket,' he said in a post on X. 'And consideration of unblocking competing app stores is delayed to 2026.' The company said it could not launch its Epic Games Store on Apple's iOS platform in the UK – as it was doing in EU countries and later this year in Brazil and Japan – and that availability of its globally popular Fortnite game on Apple phones in the UK was 'now uncertain'. The UK competition watchdog announced its investigations into Apple and Google's mobile platforms in January. When the investigation was launched, the CMA said that virtually all smartphones sold in the UK were pre-installed with Apple's iOS or Google's Android operating systems, while their app stores and browsers had privileged positions over third-party products and services. Apple's Safari and Google's Chrome dominate the mobile browser market on iPhones and Android devices. The CMA investigation was launched days after the appointment of Doug Gurr, the former country manager of Amazon UK, as its new chair. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The government, which has pushed for a shake-up of regulation to kickstart UK growth, was forced to deny it was 'in the pocket of big tech' after the appointment. Tech firms, publishers and the consumer watchdog Which? subsequently wrote to the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, raising concerns that Gurr's appointment posed a threat to the independence of the CMA. Gurr said he would make the CMA's investigations into mergers and takeovers 'simple and rapid', and Cardell said in February that a change of strategic direction was needed. Apple responded to the CMA's decision to act by saying the proposed new rules could hamper innovation and threaten privacy and security. 'We're concerned the rules the UK is now considering would undermine the privacy and security protections that our users have come to expect, hamper our ability to innovate, and force us to give away our technology for free to foreign competitors,' a spokesperson said. 'We will continue to engage with the regulator to make sure they fully understand these risks.' Google said its products were open-source and offered choice, security and innovation for users. 'That's why today's announcement is disappointing and unwarranted,' said Oliver Bethell, the senior director, competition, at Google. The company said that in 2022 its Android operating system generated more than £9.9bn in revenue for British developers, supporting more than 457,000 jobs. 'It is therefore crucial that any new regulation is evidence-based, proportionate and does not become a roadblock to growth in the UK,' Bethell said. If a company is designated as having 'strategic market status', that status can last for a five-year period, and breaches of conduct rules can result in fines of up to 10% of global turnover.
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
Apple cites Supreme Court's birthright ruling in fight over Epic Games injunction
July 23 (Reuters) - Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab is hoping a new U.S. Supreme Court ruling curbing the power of federal judges to issue nationwide orders will help the technology giant win an appeal in a lawsuit requiring it to revamp its lucrative App Store. In a court filing, opens new tab on Tuesday, Apple told the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the Supreme Court's June order in a case involving birthright citizenship bolsters the iPhone maker's arguments in a high-stakes standoff with 'Fortnite' game developer Epic Games. The Supreme Court limited when judges can issue so-called universal injunctions that apply broadly, and not just to the parties in a lawsuit. The justices did not rule on whether the Trump administration can legally terminate the right to citizenship for people born on U.S. soil, but the decision was a win for the administration, which had complained about individual lower courts blocking its policies nationwide. Even though the case at the high court had nothing to do with Apple, its appeal could test the scope of the justices' ruling. Apple and Epic did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Apple in its appeal is challenging a U.S. district judge's order in April that said the company must open its App Store to more competition, allowing all developers — not just Epic — more freedom to steer consumers to alternative payment options outside of an app. The appeal also challenges the judge's finding that Apple was in contempt for violating a prior injunction in the same case. Epic Games sued Apple in 2020 to loosen its control over transactions in applications that use its iOS operating system and how apps are distributed to consumers. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in 2021 said Apple must allow developers to more easily steer consumers to potentially cheaper non-Apple payment options. Apple defied that court order to maintain a revenue stream worth billions of dollars, Gonzalez Rogers ruled in April. Apple has denied any wrongdoing, and defended its compliance with the court's orders. Apple told the 9th Circuit that, after the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship decision, judges no longer have freestanding authority to issue universal injunctions. Apple also noted that Epic pursued its lawsuit on its own, not as a class action on behalf of a larger group. Epic told the appeals court in May that Apple's App Store changes will have wide-reaching benefits for the industry and consumers. 'The sky has not fallen. Instead, developers and consumers are finally beginning to see the long-awaited benefits of increased competition,' Epic said. The case is Epic Games Inc v. Apple Inc, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 25-2935. For Epic: Gary Bornstein and Yonatan Even of Cravath, Swaine & Moore For Apple: Gregory Garre and Roman Martinez of Latham & Watkins Read more: Apple, Visa and Mastercard win dismissal of merchant antitrust lawsuit over payment fees Epic Games settles lawsuit against Samsung over app controls Swiss privacy tech firm Proton sues Apple in US over app store rules Apple must face consumer lawsuit over iCloud storage, US judge rules
