logo
On Writing by Stephen King: How to write a bestseller by Stephen King

On Writing by Stephen King: How to write a bestseller by Stephen King

Daily Mail​2 days ago
On Writing by Stephen King (Hodder & Stoughton £22, 416pp)
Together with Grisham, Clancy and Crichton, Stephen King is one of the world's most successful authors, earning hundreds of millions of dollars from his stories, which are full of his trademark 'dread and wonder'.
Even if you've never read one of his actual books, everyone has seen a film adaptation: Carrie, The Shining, The Shawshank Redemption, The Green Mile, or Misery, in which an Academy Award-winning Kathy Bates smashes James Caan's ankles – Caan plays an author, Bates an over-besotted fan.
In On Writing, and at the risk of sounding like 'a literary gasbag,' King promises to divulge the secrets of his craft. That's to say, how 'ambition, desire, luck and a little talent' blend with one's personal knowledge of 'life, friendship, relationships, sex' to create, if not works of literature for the ages, then bestsellers.
King's lessons, originally published in 2000 and reprinted in this new edition, will hold few surprises to those of us taught English Language O-Level, back in the last century, when high standards pertained. Thus, delete extraneous verbiage, especially adverbs and clumsy exposition. 'Your main job is to take out all the things that are not the story.'
Secondly, be plain and direct. A fancy vocabulary is pretentious. Don't ever say 'at this point in time' or 'at the end of the day,' or assume 'my angry lesbian breasts' is clever. Obscurity belongs solely with student poetry groups.
King is correct to say writers must be compulsive readers. 'I take a book with me everywhere I go,' he asserts.
If you want to pull the reader in and get them to keep turning the pages, focus is essential. 'Once I start work on a project, I don't stop and I don't slow down unless I absolutely have to.' There must be no distractions in the study, such as a television set, video games, or intrusive music.
Which is all well and good – highly sensible. But in the end, King can't explain how he became Stephen King. Inspiration, to him, remains a complete mystery. 'It came from nowhere . . . It arrived whole and complete, in a single bright flash,' he says of a typical novel's gestation.
It's what he lives for, it's what gives him joy, 'that sudden flash of insight when you see how everything connects', and the next thing we know, King is pouring out his fables about vampires invading New England, people being trapped in cars by rabid dogs, policemen going berserk and viruses wiping out 99 per cent of the human race.
King was born in Portland, Maine, in 1947 and brought up in poverty by a hardworking single mother, Nellie Ruth Pillsbury King, 'a sharecropper living a largely cashless existence'. He never knew his father (who had walked out when he was a toddler) or had a father-figure, only horrible nannies, who'd 'just all of a sudden wind up and clout the kids'.
Most of his childhood recollections involve acute pain: wasp stings, dropping a brick on his foot, 'mashing all five toes'. Taken short outside, King wiped his bottom with poison ivy. Gigantic blisters appeared, leaving 'deep divots of raw pink flesh'.
There are terrifying descriptions of having an infected eardrum repeatedly lanced. 'The pain was beyond anything I have ever felt since . . . I screamed so long and so loud I can still hear it.'
His mother Nellie's main memory was seeing a body fall from a building. 'He splattered. The stuff that came out of him was green.' Children don't forget being told things like that – King certainly didn't.
For a year, King was bedbound with complications from tonsillitis. He read loads of comics, watched lots of television and began imagining his own macabre scenarios about robot monsters, teenage grave-robbers and 'radioactive corpses that came out of the ocean and ate surfers'.
He also had a penchant for anything involving 'girls in black bras who looked like trailer trash' and for watching Vincent Price's screen victim Hazel Court 'wandering around in a lacy low-cut nightgown'.
King became expert in fantasy-horror and science fiction. His own works would be notable for a 'hallucinatory eeriness', and, while at school – where he edited a magazine called The Village Vomit, which got him into trouble with his teachers – King was cranking out short stories for pulp magazines. He received heaps of rejection slips before getting his first acceptance in 1967, aged 20.
There were plenty of dead-end jobs: in factories overrun by rats as big as dogs; in laundries, where tablecloths and motel bedsheets 'stank to high heaven and were often boiling with maggots'.
King did his writing after work, in a cubicle in a caravan, where he couldn't afford a telephone.
As a janitor in a high school, he noticed the tampon machine in the girls' showers. This, coupled with his awareness of bullying ('teasing became taunting'), and something he'd read in a newspaper about poltergeist activity and telekinetic phenomena, gave him the idea for Carrie – his thriller about a misfit traumatised by her first period.
The book was published by Doubleday in 1974. Paperback rights were instantly sold for $400,000. There was a classic film in 1976, starring a blood-drenched Sissy Spacek.
So, farewell cubicles in caravans.
'Do you do it for the money, honey?' King was asked by an interviewer. I absolutely disbelieve him when he answered, no, the work is always its own reward. None but a blockhead writes for anything other than money, and King is no blockhead.
What he was, for a spell, was an alcoholic. 'By 1985, I had added drug addiction to my alcohol problem,' he recalls. He shoved cotton wool up his nose to stem the flow of cocaine-induced bleeding.
Managing still to produce novels whilst stoned, King saw himself as belonging to that proud tradition of literary inebriates – Dylan Thomas, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway. Eventually, King saw sense: 'We all look pretty much the same when we're puking in the gutter.'
It's a paradox that King came nearest to death when sober and clean. In 1999, he was knocked down by a minivan, which threw him 14 ft into the air.
Before losing consciousness, he just about remembers 'wiping palmfuls of blood out of my eyes' from the lacerations in his scalp. King's lung collapsed. His leg was broken in nine places, the bones turned into Scrabble tiles. His right knee was split apart, his hip smashed, his spine chipped and four ribs cracked.
There were to be many operations, much rehabilitation, but King (no stranger to agony) pulled through to write many more books, win many more Lifetime Achievement awards and earn lots more money.
Such vivid slices of autobiography are what make this book vastly more than worthwhile.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Billie Piper breaks silence on ‘emotional' return to Doctor Who
Billie Piper breaks silence on ‘emotional' return to Doctor Who

The Independent

time41 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Billie Piper breaks silence on ‘emotional' return to Doctor Who

Billie Piper has spoken about her "last-minute" appearance in the Doctor Who season 15 finale, where she seemingly replaced Ncuti Gatwa as the Doctor through regeneration. Piper described the filming as "very emotional" and noted the "cloak-and-dagger" secrecy surrounding her involvement. She expressed her deep affection for the show, saying she could not refuse the opportunity to return to the "Whoniverse". Piper previously played Rose Tyler, companion to the Ninth and Tenth Doctors, and returned for the 50th anniversary episode in 2013. Gatwa previously explained his departure from the programme was due to the role's demanding nature, calling his exit "bittersweet".

Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz renew wedding vows amid bitter family feud
Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz renew wedding vows amid bitter family feud

Daily Mirror

time42 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz renew wedding vows amid bitter family feud

Brooklyn Beckham and his wife Nicola Peltz have renewed their wedding vows just three years after they first tied the knot amid the ongoing feud with David and Victoria Beckham It has been months since news emerged that the Beckham family were going through a troubled time as Brooklyn Beckham and his wife Nicola Peltz noticeably distanced themselves from the clan. But it looks as though the public family feud has done little to dampen the couple's love for one another as they have just renewed their vows after three years. ‌ A source close to the couple reportedly confirmed the news of their renewed nuptials to the People magazine. The source said: "This is a moment to celebrate their love and commitment, and to create a meaningful memory together." ‌ This comes after the touching moment Lucy Bronze consoles rumoured girlfriend and rival Ona Batlle. ‌ Brooklyn, 26, who is the eldest son of David and Victoria Beckham, first started dating the Hollywood heiress in 2019 and announced they were engaged the following year. In what has been described as one of the most expensive weddings to date, the couple became husband and wife in April 2022, at Nicola's sprawling family estate in Florida. ‌ It was only a few months ago that the aspiring chef posted on social media to reflect on the moment he proposed to Nicola. Sharing a picture of them together, with Brooklyn kissing Nicola's cheek, he captioned the post saying: "It's been 5 years since I asked this beautiful woman to marry me xx best decision ever x I love you so much." ‌ At the time of their third wedding anniversary, neither Victoria or David publicly wished their son or daughter-in-law a happy anniversary. The growing feud between them appeared even more evident as neither the former Spice Girl or England footballer liked or commented on Brooklyn's anniversary post. Further fuelling speculation that the rift had impacted Brooklyn's siblings, it was reported that none of his brothers, Romeo and Cruz had mentioned anything in respect of their brother's anniversary. ‌ Back in April, Brooklyn posted a throwback picture of him and his wife on their wedding day and captioned the message saying: "Happy 3 year anniversary baby x I love you with all my heart x I'm so lucky I get to spend everyday with you and wake up to your beautiful face everyday you are my world x I love you so much Nicola xxxxxxx." The family feud appeared to gather pace when Brooklyn failed to attend his father's 50th birthday party in May, which, according to reports, left David heartbroken. It also emerged that neither Nicola or Brooklyn were following his brother's Instagram accounts. But according to the publication, sources revealed that it was in fact Cruz and Romeo who have blocked Brooklyn.

Paldem review – Industry's David Jonsson brings the sexual tension in OnlyFans drama
Paldem review – Industry's David Jonsson brings the sexual tension in OnlyFans drama

The Guardian

time42 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Paldem review – Industry's David Jonsson brings the sexual tension in OnlyFans drama

Kevin and Megan are friends who reap the benefits when a one-night stand is accidentally caught on camera. It captures them at it and she (Natasha Cowley) likes the outcome. 'We're hot,' she says to him (Michael Workeye), watching back the footage. So their pornographic OnlyFans account is born, providing homemade sex videos and an income stream. Written by David Jonsson, an actor and Bafta Rising Star who has appeared in Industry and Rye Lane, this debut is one of the most anticipated offerings of the fringe. Directed by Zi Alikhan, who has also worked on Industry, it is an adventurous setup but its central sexual drama does not quite come off. Part of the problem is that it is handled too gingerly rather than fully penetrated, as it were. So it is too restrained, its drama and ideas not fully realised. The dialogue is vibrant but unnatural as the couple repartee in witty one-liners. There are growing tensions in their relationship but you do not access its emotional complexity – need, desire, resentment, maybe even love. There is not enough context either and too much is left unspoken: Kevin is a photographer but beyond that we learn little about him, and even less about Megan. The OnlyFans storyline in itself has potential but goes nowhere. The set looks like a living room cum photographic studio, with a screen on which videoed images are projected. There is a strange kind of sterility when the sex scenes are enacted. It is maybe an encapsulation of the awkwardness of homemade pornography. Still, we are told that this couple has great sex yet there are few fireworks between them. Things become more amusing when another couple joins the fray but this also flips the tone into satire, so it seems. There are a few other illuminating glimmers: Kevin says he enjoys watching Megan watching him enjoying himself on screen ('circles of desire'). It is a good observation. But not enough is carried through. Racial tensions between the couple come flooding in at the end, too late and truncated. There is great potential here nonetheless. If this play could find a better focus, it might just have something. At Summerhall, Edinburgh, until 25 August All our Edinburgh festival reviews

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store