
Why Tesla may avoid the blow of Trump's auto tariffs
While foreign automakers and American consumers anticipate climbing car prices, the electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer — led by Musk — may be safe from Trump's 25 percent tariff because of its domestic production.
'Tesla made a business model choice that has served them well,' said Simon Ellis, who leads supply chain practices at IDC Manufacturing Insights. 'They can … argue more compellingly that their cars are really made in America.'
'And in the current climate, that probably helps them,' Ellis added.
Trump's 25 percent tariff is set to go into effect on April 2 as part of the president's broader trade war. He argued the tariffs will encourage foreign car manufacturers to move production into the U.S. and increase American jobs.
Tesla produces all of its North American vehicles in the U.S. at factories in California and Texas, potentially lessening the impact for Musk-led company, industry experts said.
'[Tesla] is well positioned because they have vertical integration,' said Stephanie Valdez Streaty, Cox Automotive's director of industry insights. 'They produce the vehicles they are building, the batteries. … They can have more control over that supply chain, which helps them out.'
The tariffs are meant to force automakers to move production to the U.S., which could be a lengthy and expensive process.
Trump told 'Meet The Press' in a Sunday interview he was fine with Americans paying higher prices for cars, so long as they were made in the U.S.
'I couldn't care less. I hope they raise their prices, because if they do, people are going to buy American-made cars. We have plenty,' Trump said.
Tesla has a head start to this transition, observers said, given the manufacturing process already takes place in the U.S.
'It going to take a while for some of these other manufacturers that don't have anything. It's going to take longer for them to retool the plants or shift production,' Valdez Streaty said. 'So that's another advantage.'
Tesla's EV competitors are poised to be especially hard hit by Trump's auto tariffs, Maxwell Shulman, a policy research analyst at Beacon Policy Advisors, told The Hill.
EVs already tend to be more expensive than their gasoline-powered alternatives and are reliant on battery and critical mineral supply chains that mostly run through China, Shulman noted.
'Any corresponding price increase makes them even less appealing to the average consumer,' Shulman said. 'And many companies are currently already losing money on every EV they make right now in the hopes that it might eventually be profitable.'
In a note to investors last week, Deutsche Bank analysts predicted Tesla would be 'best off' from the tariffs when compared to other major car manufacturers, including Ford, Honda, General Motors (GM), Nissan, Toyota and Stellantis.
Analysts predicted GM could be the most impacted given its presence in Mexico, while Nissan and Toyota could be 'materially impacted' due to imports made in Japan and Mexico.
Still, Tesla is not entirely immune, as some of its parts do not come from the United States.
Earlier this month, Tesla acknowledged in a letter to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer that some vehicle parts are 'difficult or impossible' to source in the U.S.
At least 20 percent to 25 percent of Tesla parts are imported from other countries, according to a document from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Another 60 percent to 75 percent are produced in the U.S. and Canada.
Musk said last week Tesla is 'NOT unscathed' by the tariff impact, which is 'still significant' for the company.
Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives echoed this, stating the tariffs still present a 'headwind' for Tesla.
'Tesla is getting hit … less than other automakers when it comes to the tariffs, but I see no way that they wouldn't have to increase prices if the tariff stays in its current form,' Ives told The Hill.
Trump's tariff could add, on average, $4,711 to the cost of buying a vehicle, according to a report from prominent economist Arthur Laffer last week.
Trump has wielded tariffs aggressively in his second term in office, levying import taxes on America's largest trading partners.
After imposing 25 percent tariffs on all products imported from both Canada and Mexico, Trump announced a one-month delay on auto parts and other products covered by a North American trade agreement he signed in his first term.
The extension is set to expire on April 2, the same day that Trump plans to unveil sweeping reciprocal tariffs on countries with duties on U.S. goods, which the president has labeled 'Liberation Day.'
Tesla is also vulnerable to retaliation from other countries.
The company warned of this in its letter to Greer earlier this month, stating 'U.S. exporters are inherently exposed to disproportionate impacts when other countries respond to U.S. trade actions.'
Shulman noted Tesla doesn't have the same 'global footprint' as other auto manufacturers, meaning it could be hit worse when other countries respond to U.S. tariffs.
Musk's relationship with Trump could also make his company a particular target for retaliatory actions. Canada announced last week that it had barred Tesla from the country's rebate programs in response to Trump's tariffs.
Nonetheless, Tesla's limited exposure to the auto tariffs may be a bright spot for the company, which has struggled in recent months as Musk has taken on a controversial role in the Trump administration leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Tesla's stock has plummeted nearly 50 percent since late December, and the EV company has become a target for both peaceful protests and violent demonstrations, including vandalism, shootings and arson attacks.
Trump and his allies rallied around the struggling company in recent weeks, with the president vowing to buy one of Musk's cars and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick urging Americans to buy Tesla stock.
Some industry observers argued the lessened impact of Trump's tariffs on Tesla will still not be enough to make up for the challenges facing the company and its standing in the electric vehicle community.
'Tesla is going through a brand crisis tornado because of Musk's DOGE influence,' Ives said, adding, 'I think the brand crisis tornado is much more of an impact than the net benefit from the tariffs in the U.S.'
Ives described the moment as a 'tipping point' for Tesla as Musk attempts to run both DOGE and Tesla, along with his other companies, including SpaceX, the social platform X and artificial intelligence firm xAI.
While Tesla has long been a dominant player in the EV space, the brand's focus appears to be shifting more toward artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics. Besides the Cybertruck, Tesla has not released a new EV model in the U.S. since 2020, when it launched the Model Y crossover SUV.
'[During] the last couple earning calls, Elon Musk has definitely highlighted that they [Tesla] are an AI robotics company,' she said. 'They still sell cars, but in terms of a kind of priority is this robotaxi they've been talking about launching.'
Even so, some in the business world believe this could serve Tesla's advantage.
'I don't think of Tesla as a car company. I think of them as a technology company, I think of them as an AI play, I think of them as a robotaxi provider, an autonomous driving provider and I think of them as an innovative company,' Paul Marino, chief revenue officer at Themes ETFs, told The Hill.
'If you're an investor in Tesla at its valuation today, you're not really worried or investing in them based on their ability to sell cars only,' Marino said, adding later, 'They're light years ahead of the other auto manufacturers from a standpoint of how they produce, how they manufacture, and then how they're going to generate additional revenue.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Van Hollen: ‘A big lie' that UN aid for Gaza has been ‘systematically' stolen by Hamas
Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said Sunday there is no truth to claims that United Nations aid for Palestinians in Gaza has been 'systematically' stolen by Hamas. 'This is a big lie, the claim that when the U.N. organizations were delivering food to Palestinians, civilians, that it was being systematically diverted to Hamas,' Van Hollen told CBS News's Margaret Brennan on 'Face the Nation.' 'I want to say loudly and clearly, this is a big lie,' the Maryland senator added. On Sunday, Trump said Hamas is stealing food that was meant for people in Gaza, saying to reporters on multiple occasions that goods are being stolen as he was pressed on the hunger crisis in the region. Trump, alongside President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen in Turnberry, Scotland, was questioned about his response to the images of starving children in Gaza. 'When I see the children and when I see, especially over the last couple of weeks people are stealing the food, they're stealing the money, they're stealing the money for the food. They're stealing weapons, they're stealing everything,' the president said. 'It's a mess, that whole place is a mess. The Gaza Strip, you know it was given many years ago so they could have peace. That didn't work out too well,' Trump continued. House Speaker Mike Johnson echoed Trump on Sunday's 'Meet the Press' on NBC News. 'This is important to note: Israel, since this war began, has supplied over 94,000 truckloads full of food. It's enough food to feed 2 million people for two years trying to get that into Gaza. But Hamas has stolen the food, a huge amount,' Johnson said. He also criticized 'the system,' calling it 'broken,' adding that beginning tomorrow, the Israeli military will open 'new channels of distribution to get it [food] to those people who are desperately in need.' Former President Obama said on Sunday that 'aid must be permitted to reach people in Gaza.' 'There is no justification for keeping food and water away from civilian families,' the former president added in a post on the social platform X on Sunday.

Boston Globe
10 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
'Relieved': Educators await Trump administration to release $6 billion in frozen funding
Advertisement The Trump administration announced the funding freeze on June 30, a day before the money was supposed to be sent to school districts in both New England and across the nation. It was another move toward the White House's goal to dismantle the Education Department, as President Trump argues that classrooms are teaching left-wing ideology. In Massachusetts, the freeze translated into $108 million withheld, leaving many districts scrambling to ensure they could still provide services during the summer months and the upcoming fall semester, with some cancelling summer programs entirely. In addition to training educators Advertisement Ray Hart, executive director of the Council of the Great City Schools, a nationwide association of urban districts that includes Boston, said in a statement they're 'relieved' about the administration releasing the funds 'for the benefit of schoolchildren throughout our nation.' In Rhode Island, education commissioner Angélica Infante-Green said, 'On behalf of Rhode Island's students, families, and teachers,' it is 'relieved to hear that the congressionally approved education funding is set to be released.' The Education Department 'will begin dispersing funds to states next week,' said Madi Biedermann, a spokesperson for the department, in a statement Friday. Biedermann said the Office of Management and Budget completed its review of the grants and directed the Education Department to release the funding. The move comes after the District of Columbia and 24 states, including Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Maine, 'It is impossible for states to effectively budget for an upcoming school year ... when the president takes the football away from us, like Lucy in a Charlie Brown cartoon,' said Peter Neronha, Rhode Island Attorney General, at a press conference announcing the lawsuit earlier this month. Related : A coalition of school districts and teachers' unions, including the Rhode Island Federation of Teachers and Health Professionals, Susan Collins, a Republican senator from Maine, and Ed Markey, a Democratic senator from Massachusetts, were among the politicians who criticized the freeze and demanded the administration release the money. Advertisement 'Every day that goes by without this education funding hurts our students, educators, and communities,' said Pedro Martinez, Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department for Elementary and Secondary Education, in a statement Thursday. 'We are still recovering from pandemic learning loss, and these federal funds are directly related to improving student academic achievement.' In early July, Governor Maura Healey said in a statement that districts would be forced to lay off staff, delay or cancel programs, and disrupt learning. 'Our schools were promised this funding, and the Trump Administration needs to deliver it,' Healey said. In a survey by the School Superintendents Association, about three-quarters said they would cut academic programs, and half said they would lay off teachers if funding was not restored. In a statement, the executive director of the association, David Schuler, said he was 'pleased' with the news of the funding being released. Some programs saw an immediate, negative impact following the freeze, including the The program, which has operated in Massachusetts since 1966, aims to address the toll on children's education caused by the frequent moves, as students transfer between different school districts or miss school altogether to work alongside their parents. In Springfield, 9-year-old Ery Perez Gutierrez last summer focused on sharpening his academic skills at Advertisement Ery is among hundreds of children in Massachusetts spending the summer at home because of the funding freeze. President Trump had proposed cutting the Migrant Education Program altogether in the next Last year, the grant served 438 students for summer programs statewide, said Emily Hoffman, director of the program in Massachusetts. The loss of the program at Boland Elementary is 'heartbreaking' and a 'huge step backwards,' as students are going without much-needed services, said Lisa Bakowski, the school's principal, who oversaw the program for the past three summers. Bakowski said the children enrolled in the program are among the most vulnerable in the community. Their parents work in the fields all day and often don't speak English. 'It sickens me that it's become a political issue when it really should never have been,' Bakowski said. 'It's about the betterment of humanity and being able to work to assist and provide for pockets of our community that need it.' Related : Other programs targeted in the freeze weren't immediately impacted. The largest grant frozen, known as Advertisement In previous years, Boston Public Schools used the funding to provide additional support for the district's recruitment efforts and educator preparation, including through an intensive 12-month program that prepares aspiring teachers to enter the classroom at no cost to them. Following the freeze announcement, BPS 'identified temporary one-time funding to maintain these efforts, which will continue in Fiscal Year 2026 despite the funding freeze with the hopes that the funding will eventually be available,' a spokesperson said in a statement Thursday. Massachusetts districts received $27 million in fiscal year 2025 for teacher training, with BPS receiving about Marcela Rodrigues can be reached at

Politico
28 minutes ago
- Politico
Ohio State president says he feels 'no pressure' after White House complaints
Carter's comments come shortly after the Trump administration announced the school — of which Vice President JD Vance is an alum — is one of 60 universities it has deemed may have antisemitic practices and policies on campus. Still, Carter said he is 'not feeling a lot of pressure.' 'We know how we acted during the time of the protests. We never had an encampment here at Ohio State,' he said, adding that some students did try to occupy tents in campus but were dispersed. 'I'm confident that as this plays out forward, that we're going to be just fine,' he said. Carter also appeared to agree with Vance's assertions that higher education has started to build a 'reputation' of being 'controlled by left wing foundations.' 'There was this conversation about the potential indoctrination of students, or that institutions were leaning very liberal,' Carter said. 'We as administrators of higher education maybe ought to listen to the American public and say, maybe we haven't always gotten it right. So I'm here to say, here at the Ohio State University, we have paid attention to that.' The Trump administration has been embroiled in battles with universities over hiring and admissions practices for several months. mixed in with complaints about general 'wokeness.' Most notably, the administration threatened to withhold federal funding from Ivy League schools including Harvard and Columbia.