
Trump's mass deportation push expected to utilise military, diplomats and other govt workers
Donald Trump is expected to mobilise agencies across the US government to help him deport record numbers of immigrants, building on efforts in his first term to tap all available resources and pressure so-called "sanctuary" jurisdictions to cooperate, according to six former Trump officials and allies.
Trump claimed victory in the 2024 presidential contest, telling supporters America had given him an "unprecedented and powerful mandate".
Trump backers — including some who could enter his second administration — anticipate the Republican president-elect will call on everyone from the US military to diplomats overseas to turn his campaign promise of mass deportations into a reality. The effort would include cooperation with Republican-led states and use federal funding as leverage against resistant jurisdictions.
Trump recaptured the White House vowing a vast immigration crackdown. The centrepiece of his re-election bid was a promise to deport record numbers of immigrants, an operation Trump's running mate JD Vance estimated could remove one million people per year.
Immigrant advocates warn that Trump's deportation effort would be costly, divisive and inhumane, leading to family separations and devastating communities.
Trump struggled to ramp up deportations during his 2017-2021 presidency. When counting both immigration removals and faster 'returns' to Mexico by US border officials, Biden deported more immigrants in fiscal year 2023 than any Trump year, according to government data.
But a deportation operation targeting millions would require many more officers, detention beds and immigration court judges. American Immigration Council, an immigrant advocacy group, estimated the cost of deporting 13 million immigrants in the US illegally as $968 billion over a little more than a decade.
Tom Homan, a former acting director of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) expected to join the new administration, said in a late October interview that the scale of the deportations would hinge on potential officers and detention space.
'It all depends on what the budget is,' he said.
While the incoming Trump administration could benefit from experience gained during his first term, it could again encounter resistance from ideologically opposed government employees, including officers that screen migrants for asylum.
The American Civil Liberties Union and immigrant advocacy groups have been preparing for court battles if Trump again tests the bounds of his legal authority.
Lee Gelernt, an ACLU attorney who led the fight against Trump's contentious family separation policy, said more than 15 lawyers focused on immigration with the organisation's national office spent the year readying for the possibility of a Trump return.
'We definitely need to be coordinated and have more resources, because I think they will come in much more prepared,' Gelernt said.
The State Department in particular could be one place where Trump acts more aggressively than during his first term, several Trump backers said.
A key factor will be whether other countries will accept their citizens, an issue Trump faced with limited success during his first term. The Trump administration also struggled at times to convince other nations in the region — including Mexico — to take steps to stop migrants from moving toward the US-Mexico border.
Ken Cuccinelli, former acting deputy secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security under Trump, said the State Department was a 'roadblock' for immigration enforcement and that aggressive appointees will be key.
Christopher Landau, a former US ambassador to Mexico from 2019-2021, recently said he was frustrated with the reluctance of some US diplomats to tackle immigration enforcement.
"Nobody really thought that was their problem,' Landau said in an October panel discussion by the Centre for Immigration Studies, which favors restricting immigration.
About half of ICE's 21,000 employees are part of its Homeland Security Investigations unit, which focuses on transnational crime such as drug smuggling and child exploitation rather than immigration enforcement. Several Trump allies said the unit would need to spend more time on immigration.
HSI has distanced itself from ICE's immigration work in recent years, saying fear of deportation made it harder for its investigators to build trust in immigrant communities.
Stephen Miller, the architect of Trump's first-term immigration agenda, said in 2023 that National Guard troops from cooperative states could potentially be deployed to resistant states to assist with deportations, which would likely trigger legal battles.
Trump plans to use a 1798 wartime statute known as the Alien Enemies Act to rapidly deport alleged gang members, an action that would almost certainly be challenged in court.
The law has been used three times, according to the left-leaning Brennan Centre for Justice: the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II, when it was employed to justify internment camps for people of Japanese, German and Italian descent.
The Brennan Center and others have called on Congress to repeal the law.
"Many fear that a second Trump administration would seek to use this law to justify indefinite detention and remove people from the country swiftly and without judicial review," Naureen Shah, the ACLU's deputy director of government affairs, wrote in late October.
George Fishman, a former DHS official under Trump, said the Trump administration would need to prove the immigrants were sent by a foreign government.
'I worry a little about overpromising,' Fishman said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
PM Narendra Modi Has Skillfully Avoided The Issue Of Trump's Claim Regarding Ceasefire
By Nitya Chakraborty Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his long reply to the discussion in Lok Sabha on Operation Sindoor on Tuesday night skillfully avoided the issue of any mediation by the U.S. President Donald Trump by stating that no world leader told India to stop Operation Sindoor. His refrain was that Pakistan DGMO came begging on May 10 after the dismantling of Pakistan's military infrastructure and India agreed as the objectives of Operation Sindoor had been served. This was half truth. Prime Minister skillfully mentioned only one part of the conversation he had with the U.S. Vice President J D Vance on May 9 – May 10 which was the deciding factor in arriving at the ceasefire decision by the Prime Minister. PM mentioned about his talks with Vance only by mentioning that when Vance said that Pakistan was set to launch an offensive, Modi bluntly told Vance that India would respond fiercely if Pakistan tried to attack. They would pay a heavy price and India would respond to each Pak bullet with a canon, PM told Vance.. This was fine. This was certainly part of the conversation with Vance in that fateful hour. But Vance talked on behalf of the President Trump, he was communicating the message of the dear friend of the Indian PM which was quite stern. The conversation was long. So what other things Vance talked apart from what Modi mentioned that the VP informed of the probability of a big Pak attack. Let us recap the scenario starting from early May 7 to the evening of May 10 when President Trump announced the ceasefire decision claiming credit for that. After the devastating attacks by the Indian side on the terrorist infra on May 7 early hours, Pakistan retaliated but they found that their air surveillance network has been seriously damaged by the Indian system and they could hardly hit the Indian targets due to the super system of India to protect its skies. From May 8 onwards, Pakistani sources spread the reports that the Pakistan Nuclear Board is meeting and a decision would be reached soon. It was deliberately conveyed to Washington by Pak sources. Trump got panicky at the possibility of a nuclear war in South Asia. He asked his trusted officials Marc Rubio and J D Vance to talk to both India and Pakistan Prime Ministers and organize ceasefire within 24 hours. That was how the process started at a breakneck speed on May 9. March Rubio talked to Asim Munir, Pak chief of staff and the most important decision maker relating to this India-Pak war on May 9 night early morning in Islamabad 4-45 AM. He was persuaded .There was little effort on Rubio's part as Pakistan was looking for a face saving formula to wriggle out of the war. Pakistan side was ready. J D Vance took the responsibility of persuading PM Narendra Modi and he did that on May 9 night which Indian PM mentioned. The full details of Vance-Modi talks will reveal what exactly went into Indian PM's decision making process. After Vance's confirmation from PM Modi, Pakistan was told about India agreeing to ceasefire but the Pak DGMO would have to approach first to India with the offer. Accordingly, the Pak DGMO rang up the Indian DGMO at noon of May 10, but the Indian DGMO was in a meeting. Then in the afternoon at 3-35 PM on May10, both the DGMO's agreed to the ceasefire with effect from 5 PM of May 10. Trump was constantly following the developments and as the two DGMO's made it official, Trump made his announcement taking credit much before foreign secretary Vikram Misri announced the ceasefire decision officially in the evening. External Affairs Minister Dr. S Jaishankar tried to defend Prime Minister in Rajya Sabha debate on Wednesday by saying that Trump never talked to Narendra Modi during Operation Sindoor which was correct. Trump spoke to the Indian PM on April 22 after the Pahalgam massacre expressing support for fight against terrorists and then next he talked to the Indian PM on May 17, a week after ceasefire. But the talks carried out by his officials Marco Rubio and J D Vance between May 8 and May 10 were on behalf of their President Trump. The US officials were negotiating at the directive of their boss. So Jaishankar's argument that since Trump did not speak directly to Narendra Modi between May 7 and 10, there could be no Trump role in ceasefire decision, was flawed. As the EAM for long, Jaishankar should have known how directives are passed on to the other heads through the high officials. During the debate, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi demanded that the PM should clear the controversy over ceasefire by saying in Parliament- Donald Trump is lying. He wanted Modi to say 'Trump, you are a liar, you did not make ceasefire and we did not lose any planes'. Indian PM cannot say this but if it was true that if India on its own decided on ceasefire without any US intervention, he at least could have mentioned the name of Trump and said that this Trump statement was not true. Trump has till now claimed this for 29 times. PM Modi was not true to the facts regarding support received by India from international community as against Pakistan. India got full support against terrorist attacks in the country against its people. But regarding Operation Sindoor, that support was not forthcoming as India could not prove in the global forum that Pakistan inspired the attacks. Pakistan is claiming in the UN and in talks with other countries that India had not produced Pakistan links with Pahalgam attackers. The links have to be proved if the campaign against Pakistan has to be made a success. At the international level, India is diplomatically more isolated these days compared to even two years before. Indian diplomats who have been marketing Prime Minister's New Normal doctrine, are getting tepid response from the friendly countries as most of them think that the doctrine emphasizes on perpetual tensions in the India-Pak sub continent. Trump, a friend of Indian Prime Minister has put India and Pakistan together and has gone further by having lunch meeting with the Pakistan Army Chief and now Field Marshall Asim Munir in the White House. Russia has called for talks between India and Pakistan for defusing the tensions. China and Turkey have openly sided with Pakistan, though is talking for bilateral dialogue for resolving the contentious issues. As regards the LoP Rahul Gandhi, he did not show his political maturity by constantly taking an aggressive approach on Pakistan Occupied Kashmir or China. These are issues pending for long and require patient tackling. Playing into gallery by saying that India missed the opportunity of taking over POK does not suit the Congress leader who is aspiring to become the Prime Minister one day. He has been pursuing right policies on domestic issues but on foreign policy issues, his views are still blurred, not mature enough. He has to learn a lot. The long debate has however enabled Narendra Modi to come out unscathed from more bitter opposition attacks as the Vance conversation issue was not vigorously pursued. Prime Minister could get away by focusing on many irrelevant issues including Nehru's name fourteen times but not naming Trump once. It will be seen how the White House reacts to PM's statement in the debate in the coming days. (IPA Service)


Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US ambassador to Israel Huckabee blasts Europe, praises Arab states on Hamas
US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee attacked European states on social media while praising three Arab states that called on Hamas to disarm. 'France, UK, Ireland & Europe blast Israel but Saudi, Egypt & even Hamas helper Qatar rightly puts pressure on Hamas,' Huckabee posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, on Tuesday. Huckabee's statement comes nearly a week after French President Emmanuel Macron announced France would recognise a Palestinian state in September. It also comes a day after British Prime Minister Keir Starmer hinged British recognition of a Palestinian state on Israel's refusal to address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, stating Britain would recognise a Palestinian state in September if Israel did not agree to a ceasefire and take 'substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza'. Ireland, along with Spain and Norway, recognised a Palestinian state last year, becoming one of 147 UN member states to do so. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Huckabee's statement comes despite US President Donald Trump's seeming indifference to European recognition of Palestine. Trump previously said Macron's statement 'doesn't carry weight' and that he 'doesn't mind' Starmer taking a position. Trump has aimed to expand the Abraham Accords, an agreement enacted during his first term that normalised relations between several Arab states and Israel, by gaining the biggest prize of all: Saudi Arabia. Yet Saudi Arabia has refused to discuss normalising relations with Israel unless the war in Gaza ends and steps are made towards the establishment of a Palestinian state. Arab nations condemn Hamas Huckabee's tweet praising Arab states comes after Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Egypt signed a declaration condemning the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attack on southern Israel, demanding Hamas relinquish control of Gaza and supporting a ceasefire. The call, which was supported by Britain and France along with the Arab League, was the result of a Saudi and French-led conference at the United Nations focused on reviving a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine. The document condemned both the 7 October 2023 attack and 'attacks by Israel against civilians in Gaza'. The declaration called for the restoration of a ceasefire in Gaza, which Israel shattered in March, and for an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. 'If Egypt is free, Gaza will be free,' says activist who locked Cairo embassy Read More » The document also called for the Palestinian Authority to be the sole governing body in both Gaza and the occupied West Bank. 'In the context of ending the war in Gaza, Hamas must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority, with international engagement and support, in line with the objective of a sovereign and independent Palestinian State,' the document said. The Palestinian Authority is seen by some as collaborators and complicit in the Israeli occupation of the West Bank. Tuesday's declaration marks the first condemnation of 7 October 2023 by many Arab nations. Qatar, also a supporter of a two-state solution, has mediated talks between Israel and Hamas, and hailed France's upcoming recognition of Palestine. Egypt has faced criticism and protests for its alleged role in keeping the Rafah crossing closed, as malnutrition and famine spread in Gaza as a result of Israel's siege. At least 154 Palestinians, including 89 children, have died from malnutrition, according to Palestinian health officials. Egypt says the border is solely sealed by Israel, although in June it detained over 200 activists trying to break Israel's blockade. Egypt has also begun training hundreds of Palestinians for post-war security in Gaza, in line with its vision for Palestinian Authority control over Gaza after the war.


The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Trump says US and Pakistan have signed trade deal to develop oil reserves
President Donald Trump on Wednesday said that the US and Pakistan have signed a trade deal focused on the development of oil reserves in the Asian country. Mr Trump, who made the announcement in a post on his Truth Social platform, said his team has been 'very busy' working on trade deals. 'We are in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership,' Mr Trump said of the deal with Pakistan. The Express Tribune quoted Pakistan's Energy Minister Mohammad Ali as saying last year that his country has 235 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of gas reserves, and 10 per cent of it can be explored with an investment of $25 billion to $30 billion in the next one decade. 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling Oil to India some day!' the President added in his post. Pakistan and India have a historically tense relationship that boiled over into violence this year in Indian-controlled Kashmir, after more than two dozen people, most of them tourists, were killed by an extremist group. Tit-for-tat strikes between the two countries persisted for about two weeks before a ceasefire was announced. Mr Trump took credit for brokering that ceasefire. Earlier on Wednesday, Mr Trump announced the US would impose a 25 per cent tariff on goods from India as well as a 'penalty' for buying Russian energy and military hardware. He accused India of enabling the war in Ukraine through its purchases from Moscow. In his Truth Social post, the President said that he would be meeting with a trade delegation from South Korea to discuss the 25 per cent tariffs the US has levied on Seoul. 'Other Countries are making offers for a Tariff reduction. All of this will help reduce our Trade Deficit in a very major way,' Mr Trump added, adding that a full report 'will be released at the appropriate time'.