logo
Punnapra-Vayalar — The blood-red uprising that shaped Kerala's Left

Punnapra-Vayalar — The blood-red uprising that shaped Kerala's Left

The Hindu13 hours ago
The story so far
V.S. Achuthanandan, the communist icon who passed away at the age of 101, was one of the last living flagbearers of the historic Punnapra-Vayalar uprising of 1946 in Kerala. The movement, which played a critical role in shaping Kerala's political landscape, was the crucible that forged his lifelong commitment to justice and resistance.
What was Punnapra-Vayalar uprising?
The Punnapra-Vayalar uprising of 1946 was a mass revolt by workers and peasants against the autocratic Travancore monarchy and the autocratic rule of Diwan C.P. Ramaswami Iyer. Rooted in the coastal belt of Alappuzha, particularly in the villages of Punnapra and Vayalar, the movement was spearheaded by the nascent Communist Party of India, which mobilised coir workers, agricultural labourers and tenants who were bearing the brunt of feudal exploitation and starvation in the wake of World War Two.
At the heart of the protest was rising discontent against the Diwan's proposal to keep Travancore an independent nation, separate from the Indian Union, an idea modelled on the American presidential system. The communists were objected to this 'American model', coining the slogan: 'Throw the American model into the Arabian Sea!'
A revolt fuelled by suffering
The economic hardship was acute. Food shortages, black market, inflation, unemployment and starvation plagued the people. Landlords, backed by the State, ruled with impunity.
In the face of such cruelty, the coir workers' union and the communist party began building ward committees and organising local resistance in Cherthala and Ambalapuzha taluks. By 1945, a general strike was held across Alappuzha, Cherthala and Muhamma, demanding basic rights and rations. The response was swift and brutal in the form of martial law and police repression.
The flashpoint
On 25 October 1946, as Travancore prepared to declare independence with a U.S.-style constitution, unrest was already boiling over. The All Travancore Trade Union Congress had called for a general strike starting October 22. Thousands of workers took to the streets, marching toward the reserve police camp at Punnapra, demanding freedom. When the protesters reached the camp, the officer-in-charge gave the order to open fire. Several demonstrators were shot dead. The officer and five policemen were also killed in the clashes that followed.
Outraged, over 1,000 communists in Vayalar retaliated with crude spears (varikuntham, as it is locally called) carved from arecanut tree stems and killed several police personnel. The Diwan responded by declaring martial law. By October 27, the Travancore army, with naval support, had surrounded Vayalar. Outgunned, the rebels resisted fiercely but were eventually crushed. The exact toll remains uncertain, but hundreds of communists lost their lives in the brutal crackdown.
Achuthanandan's role
Achuthanandan, then a 23-year-old coir worker and newly minted Communist, was deeply involved in organising workers ahead of the uprising. Though arrested before the final clashes, he played a crucial role in mobilising resistance.
After the uprising, V.S. went underground. Escaping to Kottayam through the backwaters, he trekked 30 km to reach Poonjar as instructed by Travancore Communist Party acting secretary K.V. Pathrose. In Poonjar, he hid in the homes of sympathisers but was soon caught and subjected to intense torture. He was presumed dead and nearly dumped in the forest. But he survived and was treated in Pala hospital before being transferred to the Poojappura Central Jail in Thiruvananthapuram.
Aftermath and legacy
Though the uprising was violently suppressed, it dramatically shifted Travancore's political trajectory. It symbolised the awakening of class consciousness among the oppressed and laid the ideological foundation for the rise of Left politics in the State. Less than a year later, Diwan C.P. Ramaswami Iyer resigned and left the State after an attempt on his life. This struggle also led to the beginning of a process through which the two princely States of Travancore and Cochin were first made into what was known as the Travancore-Cochin State. Seven years later, they were merged with the Malabar district of the British-ruled Madras presidency to form the new, united linguistic State of Kerala. In 1957, following the first-ever elections to the Kerala Legislative Assembly, the first democratically communist government came to power under the leadership of E.M.S. Namboodiripad.
The communists regard Punnapra-Vayalar uprising as not isolated. It was part of a broader wave of militant actions across Kerala — Karivellur, Kavumbai and Thillankeri in Malabar saw similar uprisings. But the resistance in Alappuzha stood out for its intensity, sacrifice, and impact. The slogan 'the blood of Vayalar is our blood' became a rallying cry for generations of Left activists.
A life lived in the spirit of resistance
For Achuthanandan, the uprising was a turning point that charted the rest of his life. As a trade unionist, Leader of the Opposition, Chief Minister and elder statesman of the Left, he carried the spirit of Punnapra-Vayalar into every phase of his public life. With his passing, Kerala also looses a bridge to its revolutionary past. But the legacy set by V.S. has ensured that the fire lit in 1946 lives on in Kerala's politics, memory and conscience.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tulsi Gabbard Releases New Documents Targeting Obama Over 2016 Polls
Tulsi Gabbard Releases New Documents Targeting Obama Over 2016 Polls

NDTV

time26 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Tulsi Gabbard Releases New Documents Targeting Obama Over 2016 Polls

Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, on Wednesday released a slew of documents that she said implicate members of the Obama administration for weaponising US intelligence. Gabbard said that Obama promoted lies that Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped US President Donald Trump win the 2016 election. In a post on X, she said, "New evidence has emerged of the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history. Per President Donald Trump's directive, I have declassified a House Intelligence Committee oversight majority staff report that exposes how the Obama Administration manufactured the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that they knew was false, promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election. In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people, working with their partners in the media to promote the lie, in order to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump, essentially enacting a years-long coup against him." 🧵 New evidence has emerged of the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history. Per President @realDonaldTrump 's directive, I have declassified a @HouseIntel oversight majority staff report that exposes how the Obama Administration… — DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) July 23, 2025 Obama's office issued a rare statement in response: "Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one," said spokesman Patrick Rodenbush. "These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio." There's still no evidence the 2020 election was rigged. There's plenty of evidence that Trump tried to subvert the results. The inflation problem is not necessarily solved, especially if Trump's tariffs go into effect, CNN reported. We caught Hillary Clinton. We caught Barack Hussein Obama. They're the ones -- and then you have many, many people under them. (Former national security adviser) Susan Rice. They're all there. The names are all there. And I guess they figured they're going to put this in classified information and nobody will ever see it again, but it doesn't work that way. However, there's no evidence for this type of conspiracy, as per CNN. According to the New York Times, the document was a report that the House Intelligence Committee originally drafted in 2017, when Republicans led the panel. The report took issue with the conclusion reached in December 2016 that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had favoured Trump. Kash Patel, now Mr. Trump's F.B.I. director, was a key author of the report released on Wednesday, according to officials. Only Republicans on the committee participated in the drafting of the 2017 report and revisions in 2020, as reported by The New York Times. The House report found that most of the judgments made by the intelligence community in 2016 were sound. But it argued that the work was rushed, as a recent tradecraft analysis by the C.I.A. also found. The assessment that Mr. Putin had favoured Trump did not follow the "professional criteria" of the other findings, the House report said, as per the New York Times.

Harvard under investigation for role in US visa programme for foreign researchers
Harvard under investigation for role in US visa programme for foreign researchers

India Today

time44 minutes ago

  • India Today

Harvard under investigation for role in US visa programme for foreign researchers

The US Department of State has opened a formal investigation into Harvard University's participation in the federal Exchange Visitor Programme, raising questions about the Ivy League institution's compliance with national security protocols and programme enquiry will assess whether Harvard remains eligible to serve as a sponsor in the programme, which brings thousands of international students and scholars to the United States annually for academic and cultural has come under increasing pressure from Washington since it refused to comply with demands from a federal antisemitism task force in April. The university is now suing for over $2.6 billion in federal funding cuts, accusing the Trump administration of carrying out a campaign of retaliation. 'All sponsors participating in this programme are required to fully comply with exchange visitor regulations, transparency in reporting, and a demonstrated commitment to fostering the principles of cultural exchange and mutual understanding upon which the programme was founded,' the State Department said in a department emphasised that sponsors must not conduct activities that 'undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States.'While the agency has not disclosed what triggered the investigation, the announcement marks a rare public scrutiny of one of the country's most prestigious American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe conditions for all students. "The investigation will ensure that State Department programs do not run contrary to our nation's interests," the department spokesperson Jason Newton said the investigation was 'another retaliatory step' taken by the administration. 'Harvard continues to enrol and sponsor international scholars, researchers, and students, and will protect its international community and support them as they apply for US visas and travel to campus this fall,' Newton said in a statement. He said the school is committed to complying with the programme's Bruen, a former director of global engagement under Democratic President Barack Obama, said there is no justification for the administration's action.'It not only damages Harvard, but American higher education & industry that depend on the best & brightest wanting to come here,' Bruen said in a post on Exchange Visitor Programme, also known as the J-1 visa programme, has long been seen as a soft power tool for US diplomacy, building goodwill through academic and cultural ties.- EndsInputs from Associated PressTune InMust Watch

Kilmar Abrego Garcia's deportation blocked by federal judge in blow to Trump Administration
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's deportation blocked by federal judge in blow to Trump Administration

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Kilmar Abrego Garcia's deportation blocked by federal judge in blow to Trump Administration

A federal judge in Maryland has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from detaining or deporting Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a 22-year-old immigrant who was previously deported to El Salvador in violation of a court order. The ruling comes amid growing legal and political tensions over Abrego Garcia's case, which has become a flashpoint in debates over US immigration enforcement. US District Judge Paula Xinis issued the order on Wednesday, barring Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from taking Abrego Garcia into custody if he is released from jail in Tennessee, where he is awaiting trial on human smuggling charges. She also mandated that the US government give three business days' notice before initiating any new deportation proceedings against him. Judge Xinis further ordered that Abrego Garcia's previous federal supervision status be reinstated — a condition that had allowed him to live and work legally in Maryland for several years while reporting regularly to immigration officials. That status was abruptly revoked when he was deported to El Salvador in March, despite a 2019 immigration judge's ruling that protected him from being returned to that country due to potential gang-related threats. 'Defendants have done little to assure the Court that absent intervention, Abrego Garcia's due process rights will be protected,' Xinis wrote in her ruling. The human smuggling case stems from a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee, where Abrego Garcia was found driving a vehicle with nine passengers. Authorities suspected smuggling but allowed him to continue driving. He was later charged, and his defense attorneys are now seeking his release from jail pending trial — but only on the condition that he won't be immediately detained or deported by ICE. On Wednesday, US District Judge Waverly Crenshaw ruled that Abrego Garcia is eligible for release under specific conditions that would address concerns about flight risk and public safety. However, his legal team has asked the court to delay that release until further protections are in place. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes, who had previously supported his release, signed an order postponing it for 30 more days. Abrego Garcia became a symbol of what critics say are overreaches of the Trump administration's immigration policies after he was wrongfully deported to El Salvador in March. His American wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, is now suing the Trump administration in Maryland court, seeking to block another deportation and to hold federal officials accountable for violating a 2019 court ruling that protected him from removal to El Salvador. US authorities argue that Abrego Garcia, who entered the US illegally in 2011, remains eligible for deportation based on a separate 2019 ruling — but they insist they won't send him back to El Salvador. Instead, they've suggested deporting him to a third country such as Mexico or South Sudan, citing alleged ties to the MS-13 gang — a claim his legal team strongly disputes. The court has not yet ruled on the legality of his original deportation, but the Maryland judge's order represents a significant rebuke of the administration's handling of the case and signals deeper scrutiny into the broader enforcement practices under Trump-era policies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store