logo
Evers & Sons Honored with Dual Safety Awards from GPSA

Evers & Sons Honored with Dual Safety Awards from GPSA

Business Wire13-05-2025
HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Evers & Sons Inc. is proud to announce its recognition by the Gas Processors Suppliers Association (GPSA) with two prestigious safety awards for 2024. The company received both the GPSA Safety Award and the Perfect Record Award, exemplifying our safety excellence in the midstream sector.
Evers & Sons Inc. is proud to announce its recognition by the Gas Processors Suppliers Association (GPSA) with two prestigious safety awards for 2024.
Share
The GPSA Safety Award acknowledges member companies with outstanding safety records, based on Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) records and a three-year history of active safety programs demonstrating continuous improvement. The Perfect Record Award honors companies that have sustained zero lost-time accidents throughout the year.
"At Evers & Sons, safety isn't just a goal— it's a value that guides every decision we make. These awards are more than recognition; they're a reflection of our people, our culture, and our promise to send every worker home safe, every day. I'm incredibly proud of our team for turning commitment into consistency, and consistency into excellence," said Rudy Garza, HSE Director at Evers & Sons Inc.
Evers & Sons Inc. was among seven other companies honored with both awards. For more details on the 2024 GPSA Safety Awards, visit the original press release: GPSA Announces 2024 Safety Awards
About Evers & Sons Inc.
A third-generation family-operated firm, Evers & Sons Inc., is at the forefront of oil and gas construction. With comprehensive expertise in pipelines, gas and liquid plants, and fabrication, we offer services ranging from installation to integrity maintenance and even demolition. Rooted in Texas, our commitment to safety and quality has secured master service agreements with the nation's leading energy giants.
The information contained in this press release is available on our website at eversandsons.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Column: Grass won't always be greener in Illinois
Column: Grass won't always be greener in Illinois

Chicago Tribune

time07-07-2025

  • Chicago Tribune

Column: Grass won't always be greener in Illinois

Lake County pot shops close to the Wisconsin border have had a monopoly on the sale of marijuana products to out-of-staters for years. But, that green edge may fade if some politicians in the Badger State have their way. From Antioch to Winthrop Harbor and into Waukegan, cannabis dispensaries operate, beckoning Wisconsinites to partake in what is illegal in America's Dairyland: Buds and edibles. If Illinoisans headed north last week to buy fireworks, a steady stream of Wisconsin plates reciprocated, heading to Lake County grass dispensaries. Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers is confident if Democrats take control of the legislature next year, the state will legalize marijuana sales. At last month's annual party convention in the Wisconsin Dells, Evers told conventioneers, according to several media accounts, he believes next year with legislative redistricting and a Democrat majority in Madison, 'We could finally legalize marijuana so we can stop sending our revenue down to my good friend down in Illinois.' That was a reference to fellow Democrat governor JB Pritzker, as Evers acknowledged residents of his state do journey to Illinois for their stash. In 2024, the Illinois Department of Revenue estimated more than $385 million in adult-use cannabis products were purchased by out-of-state residents. Indeed, a separate legislative analysis requested by Wisconsin lawmakers estimated state residents spent more than $121 million on pot products at Illinois dispensaries in 2022, contributing some $36 million in tax revenue to its southern neighbor. Wisconsin lawmakers and elected officials have danced with Mary Jane before, but legislation never grew the way it did in Illinois. Republicans have been the ones stonewalling against legalizing recreational and medical marijuana sales in Wisconsin, despite several polls showing residents in favor of legalization. Evers may not just be blowing smoke in his assessment of Democrat gains in the off-presidential year election. The party gained legislative seats last November, narrowing the Republican majority in the state Senate by three seats. Wisconsin remains a pot prohibition island in the Midwest. Besides Illinois, Michigan has legal pot sales statewide. Just over the Wisconsin state line, there is an Upper Peninsula dispensary that offers the ease of a drive-thru option to buy ganja. Minnesota's marijuana market has had a slow roll-out since the state legalized recreational marijuana sales and usage in 2023. Pot shops in the state are still not up and running. Iowa offers medical marijuana sales. The Wisconsin Policy Forum maintains that more than half of state residents over the age of 21 live or will live within a 75-minute drive of a legal marijuana dispensary. A fiscal estimate of the economic impact of legal weed done by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue in 2023 found sales would generate at minimum $170 million annually in tax revenue through a proposed 15% wholesale excise tax, and a 10% retail excise tax. By comparison, Illinois, which is in its fifth year of legal reefer, has seen sales break records annually. Dispensaries reported that more than $2 billion in recreational and medical cannabis products were sold last year, a 2.5% increase from 2023, according to the state's Department of Revenue, which noted sales taxes on pot amounted to more than $490 million last year. That's some heady cash for Kush. Surely, if Wisconsin does legalize the herb, Illinois sales eventually will take a hit. It's not like Wisconsin needs more revenue. The state has about a $4.6 billion budget, enough to hand out $1.3 billion in income tax cuts this year for middle-class residents and getting rid of the state's tax on electricity usage. Even with record-breaking marijuana sales, Illinois residents continue to pay some of the highest taxes in the nation, including the second-highest tax on gasoline. However, sales numbers may be moot if more studies come out about the dangers of marijuana usage. In one of the largest studies to date, CNN reported last month that a new analysis of medical data involving 200 million people between 19 and 59 across the globe determined using pot doubles the risk of dying from heart disease. Compared to nonusers, those who used cannabis also had a 29% higher risk for heart attacks and a 20% higher risk for stroke, according to the study published in the medical journal, Heart. The information comes from studies conducted in the U.S., Australia, Egypt, Canada, France and Sweden between 2016 and 2023. One of the reasons researchers point to potentially higher cardiovascular disease among pot users is the potent strains of marijuana sold today compared to the illegal blends of the 1960s and '70s. Stronger weed, according to a 2022 study, also contributes to an increase in dependence, which may be a factor in sales at Illinois dispensaries. Regardless, marijuana sales are here to stay and have augmented Illinois revenues, just as fees on other vices. In the coming years, they may not stay higher.

Evers signs ‘compromise' budget quickly after Wisconsin Legislature gives final OK
Evers signs ‘compromise' budget quickly after Wisconsin Legislature gives final OK

Yahoo

time07-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Evers signs ‘compromise' budget quickly after Wisconsin Legislature gives final OK

Gov. Tony Evers signed the budget, now 2025 Wisconsin Act 15, at 1:32 a.m. in his office Thursday, less than an hour after the Assembly passed it. (Photo by Baylor Spears/Wisconsin Examiner) Gov. Tony Evers signed the $111 billion two-year state budget bill into law overnight following a marathon day of overlapping Senate and Assembly floor sessions where the bill received bipartisan support from lawmakers. The budget cuts taxes by $1.3 billion, makes investments in the University of Wisconsin system, boosts public schools' special education reimbursement rate to 45% and allocates about $330 for child care. Evers signed the budget, now 2025 Wisconsin Act 15, at 1:32 a.m. in his office Thursday, less than an hour after the Assembly passed it. Just before signing it, he thanked legislative leaders for working with him and said the budget reflects the fair legislative maps that he signed into law in 2024 and that were in place during November elections. 'We need to work together,' Evers said. As the Assembly and Senate prepared to meet for debate Wednesday evening, Evers was outside of the east wing of the Capitol for Concerts on the Square and telling people not to 'drop meatballs' on themselves. 'I was actually chatting with people about tonight outside,' he said. 'Many of them were saying 'How about that? Compromise.' Compare that to what's going on in Washington, D.C., and it's significantly different, so I'm very proud to sign it.' The passage and signing of the state budget comes two days after the end of the fiscal year. Following months of negotiations and the announcement of a deal between Evers, Republican legislative leaders and Senate Democrats on Tuesday, the Legislature worked for about 15 hours Wednesday to get the bill over the finish line. Their goal was to get the bill signed by Evers before the federal reconciliation bill made it to President Donald Trump's desk. One reason for the rush was a provision in the state budget that increases a Medicaid-related hospital assessment from 1.8% to 6%, the current federal limit, to supplement the state's Medicaid resources. It's estimated to result in over $1 billion in additional Medicaid revenue that will go back to Wisconsin hospitals, but the state's ability to make that change is set to be restricted under the federal bill. 'We want our health care system to be in good shape, and in order to do that, we're going to need help from the federal government,' Evers said. In addition to signing the budget, Evers exercised his partial veto on 23 items . He had agreed not to partially veto any part of the deal that he came to with lawmakers, but other pieces of the legislation were fair game. Evers vetoed language that set 2029 for closing Green Bay Correctional Institution. He said he supports closing the facility, but said more needs to be done before a date is set. 'We need more compromise on that. We need to get things going before we start taking people out of Green Bay,' Evers told reporters. 'Saying that we're going to do Green Bay by '29 doesn't mean a damn thing.' He also partially vetoed $750,000 in grants to the Lakeland STAR Academy, a Minocqua charter school that specializes in serving students with autism and diverse learning needs; vetoed language excluding two of Wisconsin's 11 federally-recognized tribes from a grant program; and vetoed $25,000 for a street project in the village of Warrens. In addition, he vetoed funds for five projects that would go through the Department of Natural Resource. 'I object to providing an earmark for a natural resources project when the Legislature has abandoned its responsibility to reauthorize and ensure the continuation of the immensely popular Warren Knowles-Gaylord Nelson Stewardship program,' Evers stated in his veto message. Lawmakers said they are still working on legislation to continue the program. 'Instead of renewing the program and helping the many, the Legislature has opted to benefit the politically connected few,' Evers wrote. 'The Legislature must do its job and renew the Warren Knowles-Gaylord Nelson Stewardship program.' Evers said if he would change anything about the budget, he would have wanted 'more in the area of specificity in child care.' The budget will spend about $330 million on child care including $110 million to extend direct payments to providers for another year, $65 million to a new program for providers serving 4-year-olds and $123 million to increase the reimbursement for child care costs for low-income families under the Wisconsin Shares program. Evers also rejected the calls of some advocates that he veto the entire budget, noting the uncertainty that could result and the funding that could be put at risk by starting from scratch on a budget. 'Failing to reach consensus and vetoing this budget in its entirety was an untenable option, not just for me, but for the people of our state,' Evers wrote in his budget message. Evers told reporters he wasn't caught off guard by the number of Democratic lawmakers who didn't support the budget. 'They have to do what they think is right, and everybody's kind of looking for what's going to happen in a couple years, and so I'm not surprised,' Evers said. 'But there's a whole bunch of Republicans that supported it so God bless them.' Republican lawmakers also said throughout the day that the prospect of losing hospital funding if the budget wasn't signed ahead of the federal reconciliation bill moving through Congress played a role in wanting to get the budget done as quickly as possible. 'That's why we're working really fast to get it done,' Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu (R-Oostburg) said during a press conference Wednesday morning. 'We will get the bill to the governor's desk prior to the President [Trump] signing the Big Beautiful bill.' Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) said at a mid-afternoon press conference he expected Evers would sign the legislation late Wednesday or early Thursday. 'It's about a billion dollars that will be able to flow to an awful lot of rural hospitals, people who are taking care of those with urgent needs,' Vos said. 'We want to get it done and we want access to those dollars.' The Senate took action on the bill first, passing it 19-14 shortly after 9 p.m. Five Democratic senators, including Senate Minority Leader Dianne Hesselbein (D-Middleton), joined 14 Republicans to pass the bill. Four Republicans, including Senate President Mary Felzkowski (R-Tomahawk), voted with the 10 Democrats against the legislation. Democrats' votes were needed to pass the budget bill in the Senate after several Republicans expressed concerns about the legislation. Hesselbein was at the negotiating table as a result. The hospital funding, which led to lawmakers rushing work to pass the budget in one day, was also the top reason that Felzkowski voted against the budget. Democrats voting yes, in addition to Hesslebein, were Sens. Kristin Dassler-Alfheim (D- Appleton), Brad Pfaff (D-Onalaska), Jeff Smith (D-Brunswick) and Jamie Wall (D- Green Bay). Republicans voting no, in addition to Felzkowski were Rob Hutton (R- Brookfield), Chris Kapenga (R-Delafield) and Steve Nass (R Whitewater). Felzkowski said she felt bad because there were good things in the budget, but that she was appalled the budget didn't address the cost of health care, noting Wisconsin has the fifth highest health care costs in the country. Felzkowski said that there should be other health care reforms if hospitals were going to get a 'windfall' of over $1 billion a year and blamed Evers and hospital lobbyists for opposing those, including additional hospital price transparency measures. 'Gov. Evers, you failed Wisconsin,' Felzkowski said. 'You failed constituents. You failed employers.' Evers rejected the claims, calling them 'bulls – – t.' 'The people that work in those hospitals are working real hard,' Evers said. 'The last thing we need is to have hospitals going belly up in the middle of the pandemic or something.' Sen. Rob Hutton (R-Brookfield), who voted no, mentioned Evers' previous vetoes of Republican tax cuts and said the current budget bill leveraged those vetoes 'to hide the 12% increase in spending' as well as a structural deficit. 'In a time of economic uncertainty, when our spending decisions warrant further restraint and discernment, we need a budget that creates proper spending priorities and puts taxpayers first,' Hutton said. Sen. Steve Nass (R-Whitewater) called the budget an 'orgy' of spending in a statement explaining his 'no' vote. Implicating fellow Republicans, he criticized lawmakers for spending the state's $4.3 billion surplus on one-time earmarks and 'funding for special interests' instead of larger tax cuts. Despite the handful of opponents, the majority of Senate Republicans supported the budget, touting the tax cuts that they secured and some of the investments. LeMahieu called it 'a responsible budget that invests in core priorities' and touted the $1.4 billion tax cut. At the Senate GOP press conference Sen. Howard Marklein (R-Spring Green) singled out some of the University of Wisconsin system funding that will 'put the thumb on the scale…to help some of those campuses like UW Platteville that have had declining enrollment over the last decade.' The budget allocates $53 million for UW system funding, distributed through two formulas: one for declining enrollment and another for the number of credit hours undergraduates complete. The University of Wisconsin system will also get $840 million for capital projects, $94 million for staff wage increases, $54 million for recruitment and retention and $7 million for virtual mental health services. Sen. Dan Feyen (R-Fond du Lac), who voted yes, said the budget didn't do everything he wanted it to do and included some things he didn't support. 'I always have, and always will, advocate for a smaller, smarter state government,' he said in a statement. 'I'm glad to see that this budget cuts over 300 vacant positions from state government.' Feyen highlighted his support for special education funding and child care provisions in the document. He said if people want a more 'conservative' budget, then Republicans would need to expand their majority and elect a Republican governor in 2026. Senate Democrats, whether they voted for or against the bill, all had a similar message: it doesn't do enough. 'What we have on the floor today is better than it would have been if Senate Dems had not been at the table, but let me be clear, it is not perfect,' Hesselbein said at a Wednesday morning press conference. She described the budget as a 'bipartisan deal' where 'everybody left the table wishing it was different, but this is something that we can agree on trying to move forward.' Asked about the advocates who called for lawmakers to vote against the budget and Evers to veto it, Hesselbein said she knew some people were upset. 'I'm glad they're making their voices heard,' she said. 'That's why today, we're going to be fighting for every single Wisconsinite.' The Senate convened a little after 10:30 a.m., but didn't pass the bill until after 9 p.m. The first several hours of debate centered on Senate Democrats' 25 proposed amendments that ranged from increasing funding for the UW system, K-12 education and child care to expanding postpartum Medicaid. The body got through about half of those amendments before pausing for several hours to caucus. During the delays, Republicans were working on a 35-page 'technical amendment' with several changes, including an added requirement that the UW system conduct an efficiency study on declining student enrollment and future operations. When the Senate reconvened around 7 p.m., it tabled the rest of the Democratic amendments and started debate on the full budget bill. Sen. Mark Spreitzer (D-Beloit) said Democrats helped improve the budget but that it l would not allow people in Wisconsin to thrive. 'We understand the urgency to act. Congress is actively restricting our future funding. This budget must move forward, but that does not make it a good budget,' Spreitzer said. The budget broke the 'rule of 17' — the Senate Republicans' practice of making sure 17 members support a measure before it's put on the floor — Spreitzer said, and criticized them for not breaking the rule to pass other measures, including postpartum Medicaid expansion or funding for the Knowles-Nelson Conservation program in a bipartisan way. 'Wouldn't it be easier to just get it done today?' he said. Spreitzer said the Democratic votes on the budget were not an endorsement, but were rather an acknowledgement that it was better than it would have been without bipartisan negotiations. Asserting that the budget didn't deserve one more vote than was necessary to pass it, he voted against it. Chris Larson (D-Milwaukee) said the optimism after Evers introduced his budget in February soon faded and criticized the governor for not fighting harder for his priorities. The result is 'grossly' insufficient and 'will do more harm than good,' he said 'It's a 'failure to fight' budget,' Larson said. 'This budget is cowardice. We all deserve so much better.' 'We have a guarantee that we're going to have a transformation budget that works for everyone,' Vos said during the Assembly floor debate. 'I assume, like in the state Senate where Democrats and Republicans are going to vote for the budget, we would have the same thing here in the Assembly, if people are serious about saying we want to work together.' The Assembly concurred in the bill 59-39 at around 12:40 a.m. Seven Democrats voted with Republicans in favor of the bill: Reps. Jill Billings (D-La Crosse), Steve Doyle (D-Onalaska), Jodi Emerson (D-Eau Claire), Maureen McCarville (D- DeForest), Lori Palmeri (D-Oshkosh), Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D-Milwaukee) and Tara Johnson (D-Town of Shelby). One Republican — Rep. Scott Allen (R-Waukesha) — voted with Democrats against the bill. Rep. Calvin Callahan (R-Tomahawk) was not voting. Assembly Co-Chair Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam) said the budget process this time was different from any other that he's worked on. This is his fourth as co-chair of the Joint Finance Committee. 'We did spend more time working with the governor's office, the governor and Democrats,' Born said, and called the budget 'more conservative' than the state's 2023-25 budget, to his surprise. He noted that the $1.3 billion tax cut will get signed into law, unlike previous tax cuts that Evers has vetoed. The budget spends the state's estimated $4 billion budget surplus down to about $800 million, according to the Legislative Fiscal Bureau. The budget also has a 6% increase in general purpose revenue spending and a 12% increase overall. While Republicans highlighted the bipartisan nature of the budget and measures included, Democrats throughout the day focused on their critiques and the measures that didn't make it in. Assembly Minority Leader Greta Neubauer (D-Racine) said at a press conference Wednesday morning that she was appreciative of Evers and Hesselbein for being at the negotiating table and getting what they could — but it wouldn't be enough to win her vote. 'This proposal is a far cry from the budget that Assembly Democrats would have written,' said Neubauer. She said she was not at the table when the budget deal was made. With a 54-45 majority, Assembly Republicans had the votes to pass the budget without the Democrats, Assembly Majority Leader Tyler August (R-Walworth) said at a GOP press conference. Neubauer said that as a consequence, the Assembly Democrats 'were not part of those negotiations.' School districts will get an increase in the special education reimbursement rate from about 32% to 42% in the first year of the biennium and 45% in the second year. It will be the highest that the rate has been in many years, but still lower than the 60% advocates and Democrats wanted. Democratic lawmakers said that without increases in general aid or schools, districts will have to continue relying on property tax increases to keep up with costs. 'You didn't set out to stop the cycle of [property tax increase] referendums, you set out to continue it,' Rep. Robyn Vining (D-Wauwatosa) said on the Assembly floor. 'When 96 of 99 Assembly districts have gone to referendum recently and the statewide demand for public school funding increases isn't partisan for our constituents, why are we fighting so hard to get Republicans to adequately fund our schools? This isn't a Democrat versus Republican issue across the state, and it shouldn't be a Republican versus Democrat issue in the state Capitol.' The four-member Wisconsin Legislative Socialist Caucus — including Reps. Ryan Clancy (D-Milwaukee), Darrin Madison (D-Milwaukee), Christian Phelps (D-Eau Claire) and Francesca Hong (D-Madison) — voted against the bill. In a joint statement they called the agreement between Republican lawmakers, Senate Democrats and Evers a 'catastrophic failure of leadership that surrenders to Republican austerity.' They cited the lack of a general school aid increase for public schools, the special education reimbursement not meeting 60% and the failure to expand Medicaid. 'This is not a compromise, this is capitulation,' the caucus said. Assembly Republicans mostly focused on the parts of the state budget they were appreciative of but also took jabs at Democrats for saying they would vote against the bill. The Agriculture Roads Improvement Program, which was created in 2023 to support local agricultural road improvement projects statewide, will get an infusion of $150 million. 'That's a big deal in my community and up in the rural part of the northwest,' Rep. Clint Moses (R-Menomonie) said. 'It helps our state's largest industry by improving the quality of our roads to get their products and goods out and inputs and services that farmers need into the field as well.' Rep. Jessie Rodriguez (R-Oak Creek) said lawmakers committed to providing tax cuts for seniors and Wisconsinites as a whole through the elimination of the utility tax, a policy Evers had advocated for. 'I know that some people on the other side of the aisle said that people are not seeking tax relief,' Rodriguez said. 'Yes, they have been. You just haven't been listening.' The Office of School Safety, housed in the Department of Justice, will get 13 permanent staff positions and $1.57 million in the budget. The office provides training and grants to schools for safety and runs the Speak Up, Speak Out tipline where students can anonymously report safety concerns. Funding for the office became a flashpoint of criticism in the 2023-25 budget debate. Rep. Todd Novak (R-Dodgeville) touted the new budget's provision for the office and spoke about working with Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul on getting the funding in this year's budget. He also credited lawmakers on the finance committee for helping to keep the office going. 'The process is ugly, but working together to get something done is a really great thing, so I will defend this budget. I will run on this budget,' Novak said. Rep. Tony Kurtz (R-Wonewoc) said on the floor that lawmakers who voted against the budget shouldn't take credit for any of its accomplishments in the budget later or attend groundbreakings for projects it funded.'If you vote against this, do not show your face,' Kurtz said. 'You didn't have the courage to vote yes.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Wisconsin governor signs budget in early morning to secure Medicaid funds
Wisconsin governor signs budget in early morning to secure Medicaid funds

Los Angeles Times

time03-07-2025

  • Los Angeles Times

Wisconsin governor signs budget in early morning to secure Medicaid funds

MADISON, Wis. — Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers signed a new two-year budget in the early morning hours Thursday in a race against Congress to ensure the state gets a federal Medicaid match that it would lose under President Trump's tax and spending cuts package. In an extraordinarily rapid succession of events, Evers and Republican lawmakers unveiled a compromise budget deal on Tuesday, the Senate passed it Wednesday night and hours later just before 1 a.m. on Thursday the Assembly passed it. Evers signed it in his conference room minutes later. Democrats who voted against the $111-billion spending bill said it didn't go far enough in meeting their priorities of increasing funding for schools, child care and expanding Medicaid. But Evers, who hasn't decided on whether he will seek a third term, hailed the compromise as the best deal that could be reached. 'I believe most Wisconsinites would say that compromise is a good thing because that is how government is supposed to work,' Evers said. Wisconsin's budget would affect nearly every person in the battleground state. Income taxes would be cut for working people and retirees by $1.4 billion, sales taxes would be eliminated on residential electric bills and it would cost more to get a driver's license, buy license plates and title a vehicle. There was urgency to pass the budget because of one part that increases an assessment on hospitals to help fund the state's Medicaid program and hospital provider payments. Medicaid cuts up for final approval this week in Congress cap how much states can get from the federal government through those fees. The budget would increase Wisconsin's assessment rate from 1.8% to the federal maximum of 6% to access federal matching funds. But if the federal bill is enacted first, Wisconsin could not raise the fee, putting $1.5 billion in funding for rural hospitals at risk. In the rush to get done, Republicans took the highly unusual move of bringing the budget up for votes on the same day. In at least the past 50 years, the budget has never passed both houses on the same day. 'We need to get this thing done today so we have the opportunity to access federal funding,' Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said at the start of debate just before 8 p.m. Wednesday. Governors typically take several days to review and sign the budget after it's passed but Evers took just minutes. In a concession to the Democratic governor, Republicans also agreed to spend more money on special education services in K-12 schools, subsidize child-care costs and give the University of Wisconsin System its biggest increase in nearly two decades. The plan would also likely result in higher property taxes in many school districts due to no increase in general aid to pay for operations. The Senate passed the budget 19-14, with five Democrats joining with 14 Republicans to approve it. Four Republicans joined 10 Democrats in voting no. The Assembly passed it 59-39 with six Democrats in support. One Republican voted against it. Democratic senators were brought into budget negotiations in the final days to secure enough votes to pass it. 'It's a bipartisan deal,' Senate Minority Leader Dianne Hesselbein said before the vote. 'I think everybody left the table wishing it was different, but this is something everyone has agreed on.' Democrats said newly drawn legislative maps, which helped them pick up seats in November and narrow the Republican majorities, led to greater compromise this year. 'That gave us leverage, that gave us an opportunity to have a conversation,' Democratic Sen. Mark Spreitzer said. Still, Spreitzer said the budget 'fell far short of what was needed on our priorities.' He and other Democrats said it didn't go enough to help fund child care, K-12 schools and higher education, in particular. The budget called for closing a troubled aging prison in Green Bay by 2029, but Evers used his partial veto to strike that provision. He left in $15 million in money to support planning for the closure, but objected to setting a date without a clear plan for how to get it done. The governor noted in his veto message that the state has 'painful experience' with trying to close prisons without a fleshed-out plan, pointing out that the state's youth prison remains open even though lawmakers passed a bill to close the facility in 2017. 'Green Bay Correctional Institution should close — on that much, the Legislature and I agree,' Evers wrote. 'It is simply not responsible or tenable to require doing so by a deadline absent a plan to actually accomplish that goal by the timeline set.' Evers used his partial veto powers to wipe out provisions in the budget that would have handed the town of Norway in southeastern Wisconsin's Racine County an annual $100,000 grant to control water runoff from State Highway 36. The governor said in his veto message he eliminated the grant because Republicans refused to extend the Warren Knowles-Gaylord Nelson Stewardship Program. That program provides funding for the state and outside groups to buy land for conservation and recreation. Republicans have complained for years that the program is too expensive and removes too much land from property tax rolls, hurting local municipalities. Funding is set to expire next year. Evers proposed allocating $1 billion to extend the program for another decade, but Republicans eliminated the provision. Evers accused legislators in his veto message of abandoning their responsibility to continue the program while using the runoff grant to help 'the politically connected few.' He did not elaborate. The town of Norway lies within state Rep. Chuck Wichgers and Sen. Julian Bradley's districts. Both are Republicans; Bradley sits on the Legislature's powerful budget-writing committee. Emails to both their offices seeking comment Friday morning weren't immediately returned. Rep. Tony Kurtz and Sen. Pat Testin, both Republicans, introduced a bill last month that would extend the stewardship program through mid-2030, but the measure has yet to get a hearing. Bauer writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Todd Richmond contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store