
Negotiators seek PMO's decisive word to clinch landmark US trade deal
The negotiators have sought the PMO's intervention in finalising the first tranche of the India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), as President Donald Trump has neither accepted nor rejected the deal even after approval by the United States Trade Representative, the people said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.
While the initial working deadline was 8 July, the US has now extended the window until the end of the month in view of the complexity of the unresolved items and the evolving trade posture under the second Trump administration. He has already issued letters to 22 other countries, disclosing new reciprocal tariff rates of up to 50%.
Concerns have been growing within the Indian team, led by chief negotiator Rajesh Agarwal, special secretary in the commerce ministry, over the US's continued insistence on deeper market access for its agricultural exports and other sensitive products.
Citing the case of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), the Indian team has explained in detail to their US counterparts about India's inability to open these sensitive sectors, a position that was accepted by Switzerland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.
India stays firm
Around a dozen Indian negotiators, including commerce secretary-designate Agarwal and joint secretary Darpan Jain, will shortly leave for Washington DC to close the remaining gaps with their American counterparts.
'The team will be in Washington for a week to negotiate on the sticky issues. The guidance from the top office has been sought to get more clarity on key subjects like agriculture, dairy, and genetically modified crops," said the first of the two persons cited above.
However, India has no plans to open up any sector that could affect a large section of the population, the person said.
So far, both sides have held five rounds of face-to-face discussions. The US team, led by assistant USTR Brendan Lynch has visited India twice—first for a four-day trip starting 25 March, and more recently from 4 to 11 June.
'The US side is firm that any agreement must reflect genuine gains for its farmers and agri-exporters. From our side, we've already made considerable offers across pharmaceuticals, tariff rationalisation, and even on some non-tariff barriers," said the second person.
'But on agriculture, we need political direction on how far we can go without hurting domestic producers," this person added.
Decisive round soon
A high-level US trade delegation is expected to return to New Delhi in the third week of July for what commerce ministry officials describe as the likely 'decisive round" of negotiations.
'The last leg is always the hardest in any trade negotiation. There is broad agreement on digital trade, services, textiles, and industrial goods," the second person said.
Mint reported on 7 July that the agreement is unlikely to be finalized without direct political intervention to resolve some of the remaining sticky issues.
As India continues its engagement, the persons quoted earlier maintain that the final decision will be guided by national interest, balancing trade gains with domestic sensitivities. The PMO's input, expected later this week, is likely to shape the contours of India's final position heading into the concluding round of talks, they said.
Queries sent to the commerce ministry and PMO remained unanswered at the time of filing this report.
'Seeking guidance from the PMO at this stage signals the strategic weight of the India-US trade deal," said Vinod Kumar, president, India SME Forum. 'With sensitive issues like agriculture still unresolved, the government wants to ensure that any final commitments align with broader national priorities and political acceptability."
Meanwhile, Union agriculture minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan said on 7 July that a trade deal with the US would be signed, keeping the interest of Indian farmers at the forefront.
According to commerce ministry data, Indian goods exports to the US rose 11.6% over the previous year to $86.51 billion in FY25. By comparison, imports from the US rose 7.42% to $45.33 billion.
Trump in April imposed a 26% tariff on Indian exports to the US. But before these were implemented, the US president announced a three-month pause that ended on 9 July.
However, earlier this month, Trump extended the deadline to implement the tariffs to 1 August and issued letters of revised tariff rates to 22 countries (till 9 July). Brazil faced the highest at 50%, while Laos and Myanmar were each slapped with a 40% tariff.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
2 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Harvard University under fire as US Congressional probe exposes deep ties to Chinese Communist Party
Harvard University, once revered as a bastion of academic excellence and intellectual freedom, is now facing a growing scandal that threatens its reputation and integrity. A congressional investigation has revealed that the Ivy League institution maintained formal partnerships with Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-controlled entities for over a decade, relationships that critics say directly assisted in the training of future CCP leadership. According to a letter obtained by the Washington Free Beacon, Reps. John Moolenaar (R-MI), Tim Walberg (R-MI), and Elise Stefanik (R-NY) accused Harvard of actively collaborating with organisations under the control of the CCP's Central Organisation Department. This department is responsible for indoctrinating officials with "Xi Jinping Thought" and selecting leaders for key positions within China's authoritarian regime. Of particular concern is the Harvard Kennedy School's long-standing cooperation with the Chinese Executive Leadership Academy Pudong, an institution controlled by the CCP. Whistleblower testimony indicates that cadres from China's party and government institutions were sent to Harvard as part of their official training, raising alarms about foreign influence on American soil. "Harvard's formal partnership with a CCP-controlled school to train their future leaders raises serious concerns about the CCP's influence in American institutions," said Rep. Moolenaar. "We are committed to uncovering the full extent of these relationships to ensure transparency and protect national interests." The revelations come at a time when Harvard is already under scrutiny. The university is reportedly considering a USD 500 million payout to resolve a standoff with the Biden administration over campus anti-Semitism complaints and controversial DEI policies. But lawmakers argue that financial settlements cannot undo the damage caused by Harvard's entanglement with entities implicated in human rights abuses. In April, The Free Beacon exposed Harvard's past training of members from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a CCP paramilitary group sanctioned by the U.S. for its role in the genocide of Uyghur Muslims. That report prompted congressional leaders to threaten Harvard's tax-exempt Harvard faces a deadline of August 7 to provide Congress with all records relating to its interactions with CCP-affiliated bodies, including any financial or material pressure mounts, the question isn't just whether Harvard broke federal laws or ethical boundaries, but whether one of America's most prestigious universities has willingly served the interests of a foreign authoritarian power.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
5 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump influence? US museum receives backlash for removing Potus's impeachment display
The parent organisation of a top-visited history museum in the United States denied that political pressure played a role in the removal of a display about the impeachment of US President Donald Trump, during his first term in office read more Signage for the exhibition, titled "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden", is displayed at the National Museum of American History in Washington, DC, on August 1, 2025. Reuters The parent organisation of a top-visited history museum in the United States denied that political pressure played a role in the removal of a display about the impeachment of US President Donald Trump, during his first term in office. The Smithsonian Institution, which runs the National Museum of American History in Washington, DC, said on Sunday that it removed the 'temporary' placard for failing to meet the museum's standards in 'appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation'. 'It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard,' the institution said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We were not asked by any Administration or other government officials to remove content from the exhibit," the statement further reads. The American institution runs around 21 museums and the National Zoo. In the statement, the Smithsonian Institution made it clear that the museum would be updating the impeachment section in the coming weeks to 'reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history'. What led to the clarification? The statment came after The Washington Post on Thursday reported that the museum removed an explicit reference to Trump's impeachment last month. This resulted in the exhibit about impeachment incorrectly reading that 'only three presidents have seriously faced removal'. The Post cited an unnamed source familiar with the exhibit plans and reported that the display was taken down following a 'content review that the Smithsonian agreed to undertake following pressure from the White House to remove an art museum director'. The museum's decision to remove the display swiftly drew backlash, with critics of Trump calling the development the latest capitulation to the whims of an authoritarian president. 'You can run, but you cannot hide from the judgment of history,' Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on Friday. 'So, here's my message to the president: no matter what exhibits you try to distort, the American people will never forget that you were impeached – not once, but twice," he added. Since the start of his second term, Trump has been seeking greater control over political, cultural and media institutions as part of his transformative 'Make America Great Again' agenda. In March this year, the US President signed an executive order to remove 'improper ideology' from the Smithsonian Institution's properties and deny funding for exhibits that 'degrade shared American values' or 'divide Americans based on race'. It is pertinent to note that during his first term in the White House, Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives twice, in 2019 and 2021. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, he was eventually acquitted by the US Senate on both occasions. Trump was the third US president to be impeached, after Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, and the only US president to be impeached twice. Interestingly, former US President Richard Nixon faced a near-certain impeachment before his resignation in 1974 following the Watergate Scandal.


India.com
5 minutes ago
- India.com
Despite Donald Trump Dead Economy Jibe, India Economy Is Firing On All Cylinders
New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently said India is on track to become the third-largest economy in the world, so the country must carefully protect its economic interests like farmers, small industries, and job creation. This comes after a report from Morgan Stanley that also predicts India will be the third-largest economy by 2028 and double its GDP to USD 10.6 trillion by 2035. Currently, India's economy is growing well. Inflation is low, exports are at record highs, and the rural economy is improving. For example, GST tax collections have increased 7.5 percent year-on-year, inflation dropped to 2.1 percent in June 2025 (lowest in years), and rural incomes and consumption are rising. The Reserve Bank of India lowered interest rates earlier in 2025, which helped boost loans and investments without raising inflation. Exports have also grown, reaching USD 210 billion in just the first quarter of FY 2025-26, with multiple sectors like electronics and agriculture contributing. Government programs and infrastructure improvements are helping small and medium businesses export more. India's GDP grew 6.5 percent in FY 2024-25 and is expected to grow similarly in FY 2025-26, keeping India as the fastest-growing major economy. Looking ahead, India's GDP is expected to reach USD 7.3 trillion by 2030, making it the third-largest globally, helped by a young population, strong domestic demand, and ongoing reforms. Several Indian states, like Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, and Karnataka, are expected to become economic powerhouses themselves, with some nearing USD 1 trillion GDP each by 2035. In simple terms: India's economy is growing fast, inflation is low, exports are strong, and the government is supporting businesses. If this continues, India will soon be the world's third-largest economy with big states leading the way.