Australia 'lagging' behind insufficient 1.2 million new homes target, REA Group senior economist Anne Flaherty declares
Aussies desperate to break into the nation's housing market have been delivered a devastating reality check as Labor attempts to boost housing supply.
The Albanese government has promised to build 1.2 million new homes by 2029.
However, construction efforts in Australia have not matched up to the target which are also insufficient to meet the nation's housing needs, REA Group senior economist Anne Flaherty said.
'We are lagging,' Ms Flaherty said on Business Now.
'There are some positive signs that things are picking up a bit but if we continue on the trajectory that we're already on, we're looking at around a 20 per cent shortfall in the government's target of 1.2 million houses or homes.
'I should add to that … (Labor's) 1.2 million new homes is really what we need to keep the ratio of supply of homes to the population steady from where we are.
'With population growth continuing to outpace forecasts, that's likely to mean that this 1.2 million new homes - which we are unlikely to achieve - would already be below what we would actually need.'
Ms Flaherty's warning comes as recent figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics showed the nation is falling well short of its 1.2 million new home goal.
If the government were to achieve its target, it would need to ensure 240,000 are built each year.
However, ABS figures show that since the Housing Accord began in July 2024, only about 90,000 new dwellings have been completed.
There were 90,136 houses built from July to December 2024 under the Albanese government, almost the same amount delivered by the Morrison government over the same period in 2021.
The National Housing Supply and Affordability Council has projected the government will fall short of its target by more than 250,000 homes—or roughly 20 per cent.
In separate findings, the ABS found that younger Aussies are struggling more to get their foot in the door of the housing market compared to previous generations.
About half (55 per cent) of Millennials are homeowners, whereas 66 per cent of Baby Boomers were homeowners at the same age.
In 1984, the average Australian could buy a home that cost 3.3 times their annual income, while in 2025, the average person faces house prices 10 times their annual pay packet.
In the lead up to the 2025 Federal Election, both major parties put the nation's housing crisis under the microscope.
Labor pledged $10b to build 100,000 homes exclusively for first home buyers and promised to guarantee mortgages for homeowners that can put down a five per cent deposit.
The Coalition said it would allow home buyers to take upwards of $50,000 out of their super to put towards a down payment and vowed to unlock 500,000 new homes through $5b of investment in essential infrastructure.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Herald Sun
an hour ago
- Herald Sun
StockTake: Uvre to dot the i's and cross the t's on New Zealand gold pickup
Don't miss out on the headlines from Stockhead. Followed categories will be added to My News. Stockhead's Fraser Palamara unpacks the latest from Uvre (ASX:UVA), which is set to complete its purchase of a number of New Zealand gold assets. Following final conditions being met, the company is now on track to complete the transaction this week. Watch the video to learn more. This video was developed in collaboration with Uvre, a Stockhead advertiser at the time of publishing. This video does not constitute financial product advice. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any financial decisions. Originally published as StockTake: Uvre to dot the i's and cross the t's on New Zealand gold pickup Stockhead Division 296 may shift wealthy Aussies to assets with steady, realised returns, like private credit. Stockhead Many Peaks Minerals has retained an exclusive option to acquire 100% of the Baga gold project in Côte d'Ivoire.


West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Melissa Price blasts NDIS reforms as blow to remote providers
Member for Durack Melissa Price has slammed upcoming changes to the National Disability Insurance Scheme, warning the reforms will hurt regional WA's practitioners and their clients. The changes to the NDIS Pricing Arrangements and Price Limits, due to come into effect from today, are part of the Albanese Government's push to rein in the scheme's rising costs. The plan aims to reduce annual spending growth from 15 per cent to 8 per cent by aligning therapy prices with national benchmarks. While Ms Price agrees the NDIS needs reform, she says uniform pricing ignores the higher costs of delivering services across remote areas like Durack. 'The NDIS has blown out beyond its original intent and clearly needs serious reform,' Ms Price said. 'However, that reform must be fair, informed and grounded in real world experience. Ripping funding out of the regions should not be the first step.' Ms Price said she had been contacted by allied health professionals across Durack, particularly in the Pilbara, and the Kimberley, who fear the removal of regional loadings and reduced travel support will force them to cut services or shut up shop altogether. 'These are small, often women-led, businesses — speech pathologists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists etc. — who have chosen to work in remote communities,' she said. 'These changes put their livelihoods, and their clients' care, at serious risk.' The Coalition has also raised concerns about the sudden nature of the announcement, which it says came with no warning and leaves little time for providers or participants to adjust. 'It is not feasible for providers and participants to adapt service delivery at such short notice,' Ms Price said. 'This is yet another example of the Albanese Government's failure to consult the sector or understand the reality on the ground.' In response, Ms Price said she and the Coalition have written to the Minister for Disability and the NDIS, Mark Butler, calling for a three-month deferral of the changes to allow proper planning and consultation. 'The Government must explain how regional providers are expected to adapt without harming participants,' she said. 'The Coalition will continue to monitor the impact and hold the Government to account for any negative outcomes for NDIS participants.' The Kimberley Echo has contacted Minister for the NDIS Jenny McAllister for comment.

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Coalition demands Albanese government amend preventative detention laws after Labor made a ‘shocking admission' about their use
The Federal Coalition is demanding the Albanese government amend preventative detention laws passed in the wake of a landmark High Court decision after the Home Affairs Minister made a major admission about their use. Labor rushed laws through parliament with the support of the Coalition in late 2023 after the High Court ruled individuals could not be held in immigration detention indefinitely when there was no realistic prospect of deportation. The ruling led to the release of more than 330 immigration detainees, including 13 convicted of murder or attempted murder, and 95 convicted sex offences or child sex offences. And as of the end of March, 104 had since re-offended. However on Sunday Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke told Sky News Australia the preventative detention orders that were a key plank of the laws had not been used because the legal threshold was too high. Shadow immigration minister Paul Scarr described the admission as 'shocking', adding that if there was an issue with the law 'we should be looking at how to amend the legislation'. 'What has the government been doing?' Senator Scarr said. 'The legislation was passed back in December 2023… when that legislation was passed, the Labor government said that it provided four layers of protection to the Australian community. The first layer of protection was preventative orders. 'After the legislation was passed, we repeatedly asked questions to the department as to where they were up to in terms of thinking the first application for a preventative detention order, we were told that the work was underway. 'And then we have the shocking admission 16 months later - 16 months later - by the Minister on Sunday, that it wasn't practical to make applications. 'So there are serious questions, which the government needs to answer.' On Sunday Minister Burke said that while he hadn't given up on using the preventative detention provisions, his focus had shifted to finding third-party countries they could deport the offenders to. 'The reality is the legal thresholds that we are stuck with… are more difficult to be able to reach than I want them to be,' Mr Burke said. "I'm not giving up, I'm going to keep (trying), but I'll tell you to be honest, I would much prefer the individuals out of the country altogether.' But Senator Scarr questioned why the Albanese government had seemingly given up on using the provisions without testing them in court. 'No application has been made under these provisions, so these provisions haven't been tested in the court, and that's one of the major issues that I have with respect to how this matter has been managed,' he said. 'We don't know what the court thinks of these particular provisions in the context of this particular cohort.' Senator Scarr said the Coalition was 'willing and able to work with the government, constructively' on amendments to the legislation.