
My Pixel 9 Pro is removing all color and warmth from my photos, and I'm sick of it
I have long been a proponent of the Pixel camera. From my Pixel 2 XL to the 4 XL, 5, 6 Pro, 7 Pro, 8 Pro, and 9 Pro XL, I've used a Pixel as my personal phone and my primary camera since 2017, taking over 10,000 photos in the process. For years, my Pixel phone's camera was near flawless, at least compared to everything else on the market. It took clear, accurate, and well-detailed photos in every situation. Darkness or light, in movement or steady, up-close or far away, zoomed-in or ultrawide, it did everything I wanted it to. And I used it to capture stunning photos again, and again, and again.
So when I say I'm getting sick and tired of this one issue with my Pixel 9 Pro XL's camera, you should know that I'm saying this out of love, not hate. And out of a growing frustration with the Pixel's propensity to suck every color and warm tone out of my pics in certain situations, leaving me with a bland, lifeless photo that is nothing like the real scene that my eyes are seeing. Let me show you some examples.
Are you happy with your Pixel 9 Pro's photos?
0 votes
Yes. I love the photos it takes!
NaN %
Kinda. Sometimes it gets things right, sometimes it fails.
NaN %
Not really. I was expecting so much more from this cam.
NaN %
Where the Pixel camera is failing me, repeatedly
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
The Pixel camera's post-processing has leaned heavily towards desaturated, closer-to-reality photos for years now, and this was the reason many of us fell in love with it in the first place. We didn't want the over-saturated effect of Samsung's camera, or the over-processed nature of many other cams that were trying too hard to compensate for bad optics or bad processing algorithms.
In its pursuit to capture the most balanced photo, though, Google has slowly left behind accuracy. Or reality, to be honest. I've been noticing this for years now, but my Pixel 9 Pro XL is the biggest culprit. I see it mostly in dark, warm environments. Cozy restaurants, dark airplanes, yellowish/reddish indoors. Anything that veers towards the warmer spectre of color is where my Pixel decides to even out the white balance no matter what, and thus strip all the color out of the photo.
In its pursuit of the most balanced photo, Google has slowly left behind accuracy or reality.
This is very obvious to me when I see pics captured with a Motion Photo. The short video is all warm and full of color; the still photo, in contrast, is cold and sometimes lifeless. Check out this photo of a Ratatouille plushie as an example. The entire still photo is better exposed, but it's also colder and less vibrant.
Still from motion photo
Final processed image
If the example above is not that obvious, here are a couple more. The wooden sculpture shot is the most glaring example.
Still from motion photo
Final processed image
Still from motion photo
Final processed image
But the most significant difference I notice is with people. I tend to snap pics of my husband in random cozy places, and most of those end up flatter than I ever thought they could. It's as if yellow, orange, and red hues are my Pixel 9 Pro's sworn enemy. It's so sad to see an interesting, lively, beautiful scene turn into a washed-out, over white-balanced snap time and again.
It's so sad to see an interesting and lively scene turn into a cold, flat, and washed-out photo.
Here's a screen recording showing the issue in action: I start with the cam viewfinder, tap to adjust white balance and exposure, take the photo, open it to see a good result that's similar to what I expected, then, when the 'Processing' is done, the final image is all flat and cold.
And here's another screen recording in an underground theatre with lots of red lights. This one ends up way too dark, too, as a side effect of Ultra HDR being enabled (I'll get to this later).
And one more. In this case, I didn't even tap to adjust white balance and exposure, to prove that my tap wasn't affecting the shot either.
I'm sure we can all agree that the final result is literally nothing like what the original shot was supposed to be. And in every case, I confirm that what I was seeing with my own eyes was closer to the viewfinder preview, and nothing like what the final photo ended up like.
Is it just Ultra HDR or…?
After noticing this repeatedly happening, I decided to dig in and see if Ultra HDR was messing with these photos. Maybe Google's over-processing was being affected by this zealous HDR or by my phone's display and its ability to show Ultra HDR images. So I tested it again and again, trying the same photos with and without Ultra HDR. The result? It's not the culprit.
Here's another screen recording where I snap a photo of my husband with Ultra HDR on, then go and disable it, and snap another photo. Both exhibit the same over-processing flatness and warmth-stripping symptoms that I've talked about earlier; Ultra HDR played no role in making that effect better or worse.
And here are the two shots, side by side. Like here, Ultra HDR doesn't make a tangible difference in most cases.
With Ultra HDR
Without Ultra HDR
So, what's the solution?
Throughout all this testing, what has annoyed me the most — beyond the fact that my Pixel 9 Pro is stripping photos out of their vibrance and color — is the fact that it's not obeying the white balance and exposure preview. When I tap a specific part of the image to focus there and tell the camera to adjust its settings around this particular area, I expect the preview and end result to be similar.
Instead, I see one thing on my screen and get a photo that has nothing to do with it. Google pipes the camera directly to the viewfinder but then applies heavy white balance, HDR, and color processing after you hit the shutter. With no indication of how that final picture will turn out, adjusting your settings via the viewfinder feels essentially useless. The only advantage to tapping on my subject is adjusting the plane of focus, nothing else.
I see one thing on my screen, then get a photo that has nothing to do with it.
Over the last few weeks, I've tried to adjust white balance before snapping the pic; it didn't do much. I tried editing the photo post-capture to add warmth, but it felt too artificial and unlike what the original shot should've been like, had my Pixel stuck with the viewfinder original colors and white balance. I wanted to try third-party camera apps, but there's still a lot I love about the Pixel Camera app and its processing in most situations that I don't want to give up on.
I think the only real solution to this is an update from Google itself, either for the Pixel Camera app or the phone's entire firmware. Clearly, something has gone amiss with the phone's processing powers and it's not doing what it's supposed to do anymore, which is give us true-to-life shots. I haven't tested this on other Pixels, but several Redditors have confirmed this is also an issue on their Pixel 7 and 8 series, too.
The ball's in your court, Google. You can't lose one of the biggest selling points of your phones.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
YouTube set to be banned for Australian teens
Australian children and teenagers under the age of 16 will soon be barred from logging into YouTube, after the government went back on its decision to grant the video sharing platform an exemption from the country's incoming social media ban. Under the new ban, children will still be able to access YouTube through an adult's account, but they won't be able to create their own. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese explained, 'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it.' YouTube's parents company, Google, has argued that the platform shouldn't be considered a form of social media, claiming in a statement, 'We share the government's goal of addressing and reducing online harms [but] our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content … it's not social media.' The ban is set to come into force in December this year, and social media companies could face fines up to AU$50 million for failing to make 'reasonable' efforts to bar children from their platforms. Video transcript Australian children and teenagers under the age of 16 will soon be barred from logging into YouTube after the government went back on its decision to grant the video sharing platform an exemption from the country's incoming social media ban. Under the new ban, children will still be able to access YouTube through an adult's account, but they won't be able to create their own. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese explained, social media has a social responsibility, and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it. YouTube's parent company, Google, has argued that the platform shouldn't be considered a form of social media, claiming in a statement, we share the government's goal of addressing and reducing online harms, but our position remains clear. YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content. It's not social media. The ban is set to come into force in December this year, and social media companies could face fines up to $50 million for failing to make reasonable efforts to bar children from their platforms.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Marathon at F1 speed': China bids to lap US in AI leadership
Beyond dancing robots and eager-to-help digital avatars, Shanghai's World AI Conference saw China stake its claim to global artificial intelligence leadership and frame itself as a clear alternative to the United States. Assumptions that the US was far ahead in the fast-moving field were upended this year when Chinese start-up DeepSeek unveiled a chatbot that matched top American systems for an apparent fraction of the cost. With AI now at the forefront of the superpowers' tech race, the World AI Conference (WAIC) that ended Tuesday saw China set out its case to take charge on shaping its global governance too. China, the United States and other major economies are "engaged in a marathon at Formula One speed", said Steven Hai, assistant professor of tech innovation at Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University. "Which country will attain the upper hand can only be assessed dynamically over the course of development." China and the United States dominate the AI sector -- only 10 to 15 percent of models developed in recent years were built without either's participation, according to Epoch AI, a non-profit research institute. While US companies like Google and OpenAI are still industry-leading, the institute labelled 78 percent of Chinese models "state-of-the-art" compared to 70 percent of models built with American participation. Beijing's stated aim is to become the world's leading AI "innovation centre" by 2030. "Now China is neck-and-neck with the United States in terms of core tech, that play (for global leadership) is more relevant than ever," said Tom Nunlist, associate director for tech and data policy at Trivium China. "With a solid AI offering and the US turning inward, the question is will Beijing's vision gain greater global traction?" In May, Microsoft's Brad Smith told the US Senate that "the number-one factor" in the tech race "is whose technology is most broadly adopted in the rest of the world". - 'Sovereign AI' - China's offer is technical and economical. "One of the biggest differences (with the US sector) is that most of the leading models in China... are open-weight and open-source," former Google CEO Eric Schmidt told an audience at WAIC. That means they can be adapted by other countries to fit their own needs, said George Chen, partner at Washington-based policy consultancy The Asia Group. "We already see some countries like Mongolia, Kazakhstan, even Pakistan are trying to adopt the DeepSeek model to build their own," he said. "China has a chance to win in the aspect of sovereign AI to export its model to those countries." The comparative low cost of Chinese technology -- software but also hardware, for example through firms like Huawei -- will be a big factor, especially for developing countries, Chen added. On Monday another Chinese start-up, Zhipu, announced its new AI model -- also open-source -- would cost less than DeepSeek to use. In June, OpenAI accused Zhipu of having close ties with Chinese authorities and noted it was working with governments and state-owned firms across Southeast Asia, the Middle East and Africa. "The goal is to lock Chinese systems and standards into emerging markets before US or European rivals can," it said. Washington has moved to protect its lead in AI, expanding efforts to curb exports of state-of-the-art chips to China in recent years. "While limiting China's share of the global AI hardware market, (these measures) have accelerated indigenous innovation and led Chinese firms to exploit regulatory loopholes," said assistant professor Hai, referring to "rife" smuggling and circumvention. - Issues of trust? - Other challenges to homegrown firms include the closed nature of the Chinese internet, and "general issues of trust when it comes to using Chinese tech", Trivium's Nunlist said. At WAIC, China sought to present itself as a responsible power. Premier Li Qiang emphasised the risks of AI and pledged to share technology with other nations, especially developing ones. His remarks contrasted sharply with US President Donald Trump's aggressive low-regulation "AI Action Plan" launched just days before and explicitly aimed at cementing US dominance in the field. China released its own action plan at WAIC, following a meeting attended by delegates from dozens of countries. Li also announced the establishment of a China-led organisation for international AI cooperation. However, China's foreign ministry did not respond to a request from AFP for details on the set-up of the organisation -- including any international participants -- and several foreign delegates said they had not been briefed on the announcement beforehand. Analyst Grace Shao wrote it was clear AI was still in its "infancy stage". "You can sense that vibrant energy but also the immaturity of the space," she wrote on Substack. "There just shouldn't be a definitive conclusion on who is 'winning' yet." reb/oho/kaf Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
Google is finally fixing an Android update bug that's been an annoyance for weeks
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority TL;DR Google is addressing an issue that's been affecting the installation of Play System updates on devices running Android 16. The company says it has identified the problem and will resolve it with an upcoming update. The issue also affected our Pixel 9a running Android 16, and many others reported the problem on other Pixel phones as well. I've been dealing with an update issue on my Pixel 9a running Android 16 for weeks, and it turns out I'm not the only one. For a while now, I haven't been able to install new Google Play system updates successfully. Every time I tapped the update button, the phone detected an available update and began installing it. However, partway through the process, the installation would abruptly stop and show a 'Failed to update' error message. At first, I brushed it off as a problem with a specific Play System update. But just as I was considering a full factory reset, I discovered that many others running Android 16 or Android 16 QPR builds were experiencing the same issue. Thankfully, Google has acknowledged the problem and is taking action. In a new support article, Google says it's aware of an issue that's preventing some Android 16 and Android 16 beta devices from installing the latest Google Play system update. (If you're unsure where to find that, go to Settings > Security & Privacy > System & updates > Google Play system update.) The good news is that Google says there's no need to factory reset your phone. A fix has been identified and will be included in an upcoming Google Play system update. Hopefully, this means the issue will be resolved soon, and we'll finally be able to install Play system updates again. I'm especially looking forward to the improvements included in the recent July updates. Follow