
Iran drives out 1.5 million Afghans, with some branded spies for Israel
'Scapegoats'
Iran's crackdown has coincided with widespread accusations linking Afghans to Israel's intelligence agency Mossad, including Iranian media reports that cite police sources claiming some individuals were arrested for espionage."We're afraid to go anywhere, constantly worried that we might be labelled as spies," one person, who wished to remain anonymous, told BBC News Afghan."You Afghans are spies", "You work for Israel" or "You build drones in your homes", are other frequent accusations, according to this individual.Barnett Rubin, an expert on Afghanistan who served as senior adviser to the US Department of State, says Tehran may be "looking for scapegoats" for its shortcomings in the war against Israel."The Iranian government is very embarrassed by their security failures", which show Iran "was very thoroughly penetrated by Israeli intelligence", he says."So they had to find someone to blame."Critics also say the accusations of espionage are aimed at buying legitimacy for the government's plan to deport undocumented Afghans.The BBC attempted to contact the Iranian government but did not receive a response. The return of Afghan refugees "without tension and with respect for human rights… is a goal pursued at all levels", the state-backed Islamic Republic News Agency said on 18 July.
'Four days, like four years'
Abdullah Rezaee, whose name has also been changed, has a similar story to Ali Ahmad.At the detention centre where he was held, about 15 Iranian officers physically harmed him and other deportees, Abdullah told the BBC at Islam Qala."Iranian police tore up my visa and passport and beat me severely. They accused me of being a spy."
Abdullah says he'd only been in Iran two months before being detained, despite having a visa."They beat us with plastic batons and said: 'You're a spy, you're ruining our country'."The four days he was detained "felt like four years". He describes constant mistreatment, physical abuse and lack of food.The online allegations of collaboration between Afghans and Israeli secret services started early in the war.On 13 June, the day Israel attacked Iranian nuclear and military facilities, the government issued statements to the population, asking citizens to report suspicious activities such as unusual movements of vans, which might be transporting Israeli operatives' weapons.Then Telegram channels with large followings posted warning messages using similar wording to the government's. But they added that the population should be vigilant of "alien citizens" – an expression mostly used to describe Afghans in Iran – driving vans in big cities.The following day, a series of detentions of people allegedly connected to the Israeli attacks, including some Afghans, were reported.On 16 June, news channels broadcast a video of Afghans being detained claiming that they had been carrying drones with them. It went viral. But the video was old, and portrayed migrants detained due to their undocumented status.On 18 June, a Telegram group attributed to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps posted that 18 Afghans had been arrested in the city of Mashhad for building drones for Israel, according to the independent monitoring group Afghan Witness.The following day, the provincial deputy security chief was quoted saying the arrest had "no connection to drone-making" or co-operation with Israel. "They were arrested solely for being in Iran illegally."But posts connecting the arrests to espionage had spread widely on social media platforms. A hashtag saying the "expulsion of Afghans is a national demand" was shared more than 200,000 times on X in the space of a month, peaking at more than 20,000 mentions on 2 July.Anti-Afghan sentiment on Iranian social media is not new, but the difference this time is "the misinformation is not just coming from social media users but from Iranian-affiliated media", according to an independent researcher at Afghan Witness.
From 'serial killers' to 'spies'
More than 1.5 million Afghans have left Iran since January, according to the UN Refugee Agency. A spokesperson from the Taliban's Ministry of Refugees and Repatriation told the BBC that more than 918,000 Afghans entered Afghanistan from Iran between 22 June - 22 July.Some had been in Iran for generations.Millions of Afghans have fled to Iran and Pakistan since the 1970s, with major waves during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 and more recently in 2021, when the Taliban returned to power.Experts warn Afghanistan lacks the capacity to absorb the growing number of nationals forcibly returned to a country under Taliban rule. The country is already struggling with a large influx of returnees from Pakistan, which is also forcing hundreds of thousands of Afghans to leave.At first, Afghans were welcomed in Iran, says Dr Khadija Abbasi, who specialises in forced displacement at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London. But anti-Afghan sentiment increased gradually, with state media portraying Afghan refugees as an "economic burden" to society, she says.False narratives about Afghan migrants in Iran followed suit.
In the 1990s, a series of rapes and murders in Tehran was widely assumed, without evidence, to be the work of an Afghan, which led to a rise in hate crimes. It was later revealed that the killer was Iranian.When an estimated two million Afghans migrated to Iran in the post-2021 wave, exaggerated posts on social media claimed more than 10 million Afghans were living in the country. Iran had been the only neighbour to allow refugees and migrants to enter at scale during that time.Expulsion of Afghans from Iran, says Dr Abbasi, "might be one of the very rare topics that most Iranians" are in agreement with the government – although in July more than 1,300 Iranian and Afghan activists signed an open letter calling for an end to "inhumane" treatment of Afghan citizens in Iran.Today, anti-Afghan sentiment is widespread. "It has become very dangerous," she says, "so people will just try to stay at home."For huge numbers that is no longer an option. The border continues to swell with people.For Abdullah the deportation has destroyed his plans."I lost everything," he says.By Babrak Ehsas, Yasin Rasouli, Rowan Ings, and Sucheera Maguire, with additional reporting by Soroush Pakzad

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
British couple held in Iran call home for the first time since being detained seven months ago
A British couple detained in Iran are 'holding strong' after being able to speak to them directly for the first time in seven months, their family have said. Lindsay and Craig Foreman, of East Sussex, were detained in January while on a motorcycle tour around the world and later charged with espionage. They deny the allegations. The couple have been separated, are being held in different prisons and have access to basic resources, according to their son, Joe Bennett. Mr Bennett, of Folkestone, Kent, told the BBC he had an eight-minute call with his mother. He said: 'We laughed, we cried, and for a few brief moments, it felt like the weight of the past seven months lifted.' He feels his parents are 'holding strong', adding that 'they're resilient, they're positive, and somehow, they're still smiling'. He also told BBC Radio Kent that British officials saw his father was 'dishevelled and had lost a lot of weight'. His mother is not walking well due to prison conditions. The Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office advises British and British-Iranian nationals, who are at significant risk of detention, not to travel to the Middle Eastern country. A spokesman said: 'We are deeply concerned by reports that two British nationals have been charged with espionage in Iran. 'We continue to raise this case directly with the Iranian authorities. 'We are providing them with consular assistance and remain in close contact with their family members.'


Daily Mirror
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Gregg Wallace trying to 'earn a living' after MasterChef exit amid 'battle every day'
Former MasterChef judge Gregg Wallace has spoken about the aftermath of his departure from the BBC show, including his decision to remain in the public eye amid the scandal Former MasterChef co-host Gregg Wallace has opened up about his decision to remain in the public eye following his departure from the show. The presenter spoke about the aftermath of the scandal in a video message this week. Last month, it was reported that Gregg, 60, had been fired from the BBC show after an investigation upheld 45 out of 83 allegations of inappropriate behaviour. He had previously said that the review exonerated him of "all the serious allegations" but he apologised for "inappropriate" humour and language. Gregg hasn't shied away from being in the spotlight since his departure, with him promoting other ventures on social media lately. It comes after John Torode's businesses collapsed after racking up eye-watering debts. Gregg, who lost five stone in his fifties, has been promoting his health and fitness coaching recently. He's offering one-to-coaching for £200 a month, as well as a running a Healthy Fifty plan for men over the age of 50 that aims to help members "feel better and look fitter" for £11.99 per month. He has since spoken about his decision to remain in the public eye. Gregg discussed his career in a video message that was uploaded to Instagram today, with him saying that he's "had to stay public" if he wants to "earn a living". Gregg said in the video shared this morning: "Social media can be really cruel, really angry, really rude - but we all know this! I'm getting attacked by people that have never read the report into the investigation and think I'm guilty of all sorts of things that simply are not true." He continued by telling viewers: "I had an autism diagnosis in January at 60 years old. I get attacked by people that somehow think I'm making it up. During this time, I've worked hard and got myself qualified as a PT. And I get attacked on that, where people think somehow it's not true." Gregg added in the message: "Every day it's just a battle against people that, I don't know, just really wanna attack you. However, there are also loads and loads of people that send kind messages and messages of support." Discussing why he hasn't shied away from the spotlight, he said: "And I could have hidden away. I didn't have to be on here. But I still want to earn a living and I decided with my family if I was gonna earn a living then I had to stay public." Concluding the video, Gregg told viewers: "So thank you to all the people that are kind and for those of you that aren't, just consider the impact before you say something cruel. Before you say something angry. And also, please try and do a little bit of research before you get angry over something that isn't true. But for everybody else, thank you." It had been announced last year that Gregg would step away from MasterChef whilst production company Banijay UK reviewed historical misconduct complaints. As reported at the time, through a lawyer, he said: "It is entirely false that he engages in behaviour of a sexually harassing nature." Then, last month, the BBC said it has "no plans" to work with him in the future" following the review into allegations about him. It said: "The investigation details a substantial number of allegations of inappropriate conduct spanning 19 years." Gregg had already issued a statement about the Silkin's Report. He said in advance that it "exonerates" him of "all the serious allegations which made headlines last year and finds [him] primarily guilty of inappropriate language between 2005 and 2018." He said in his statement released last month: "I recognise that some of my humour and language, at times, was inappropriate. For that, I apologise without reservation. But I was never the caricature now being sold for clicks."


Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
UN alarmed by reports about possible expansion of Israeli Gaza operations
Aug 5 (Reuters) - The United Nations on Tuesday called reports about a possible decision to expand Israel's military operations throughout the Gaza Strip "deeply alarming" if true. U.N. Assistant Secretary-General Miroslav Jenca told a U.N. Security Council meeting on the situation in Gaza that such a move "would risk catastrophic consequences ... and could further endanger the lives of the remaining hostages in Gaza. "International law is clear in the regard; Gaza is and must remain an integral part of the future Palestinian state," he added. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met senior security officials on Tuesday to finalize a new strategy for the nearly two-year-old war in Gaza with media reporting he favored a complete military takeover of the Palestinian enclave. China's deputy U.N. representative, Geng Shuang, expressed "great concern" about the reported plans and added: "We urge Israel to immediately halt such dangerous actions." He called for a ceasefire and urged countries with influence to take concrete steps to help bring one about. Ahead of the U.N. meeting, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar addressed reporters at the U.N. and criticized countries that sought to pressure Israel by recognizing a "virtual" Palestinian state, saying this had "assassinated" a hostage deal and ceasefire and prolonged the war. Three Group of Seven countries have announced plans to recognize Palestinian statehood. France and Canada have said they would do so in September at the U.N. General Assembly. Britain said it would also back Palestinian statehood in September unless Israel takes substantive steps to end suffering in Gaza, where it is fighting Hamas, and meets other conditions. The U.S. ambassador to the U.N., Dorothy Shea, called a U.N. conference last week that saw dozens of ministers urge the world to work toward a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians an "unproductive publicity stunt," and said it had undercut the efforts of mediators. The brother of Israeli hostage Evyatar David, who was shown appearing emaciated in a video released by Hamas last week, told the Security Council to use its leverage to secure the immediate unconditional release of remaining hostages and to ensure humanitarian aid reaches them. "Every moment of delay is a step closer to final tragic outcome," Ilay David told the meeting. He said the video showed his brother as "a living skeleton. He had barely the strength to move or speak, his voice barely recognizable," the brother said, adding that neither he nor his mother could bring themselves to watch. "We knew that if we did, we would be unable to function. My father and sister, however, felt they had to see him, to hear his voice, to feel him somehow. Now these images haunt them. My father cannot sleep, and my mother has not stopped crying ever since," he said.