Trump's tax bill snuck in Planned Parenthood attack that will hurt Indiana women
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law July 4, includes provisions that go into effect Oct. 1 mandating that Medicaid spending can't be used towards clinics designated as nonprofit organizations that provide family planning services and reproductive care.
A federal judge has partially blocked implementation of this provision. If it takes effect, though, that would mean Medicaid users won't be able to access care from Planned Parenthood clinics, among other similar nonprofit health services.
While conservatives are hailing this as a pro-life victory, this law is far from saving lives. It targets all of the resources and care that Planned Parenthood provides, including contraception, STI testing, HIV-related care, mental health support and so much more.
More from Sadia Khatri: Abortion ban, fetal anomaly and a ticking clock: 'an impossible decision'
There's a misconception that Planned Parenthood only provides access to abortions. The organization offers a wide variety of care. In states like Indiana, where abortion is banned, Planned Parenthood doesn't even provide abortions.
Some states might use state funding to cover abortion services for Medicaid enrollees, but federal dollars do not pay for abortions.
Dr. Tracey Wilkinson, a pediatrician and professor at the Indiana University School of Medicine, thinks the Big Beautiful Bill has less to do with fiscal responsibility and a lot more to do with control.
'The Hyde Amendment has been in place for decades, preventing any federal funds, including Medicaid funds, to ever be used for abortion,' Wilkinson said. 'This issue in the federal budget is not about that. This issue is about preventing people that want to get birth control or want to get testing for sexually transmitted diseases, not being able to go there anymore, and ultimately, hopefully, the goal being that that clinic no longer can keep their doors open and will close.'
This bill goes beyond the typical anti-abortion agenda. It's an attack on health care, and it's particularly concerning for a state like Indiana.
More from Sadia Khatri: Why young progressives shouldn't give up on Indiana — or flee from it
Many Indiana counties are considered maternity care deserts, which are defined as counties where there are zero hospitals that offer obstetric care and zero physicians who provide obstetric care. A little under a quarter of Indiana counties are maternity care deserts. An additional fifth of Indiana counties have limited access to obstetric care.
Collectively, almost half of the counties in Indiana have limited or no access to obstetric care.
Not all Hoosiers can easily get access to reproductive, sexual health and general OB-GYN-related care in Indiana. This bill is only going to exacerbate that.
Planned Parenthood last year received 34,403 visits from Hoosiers across 11 health centers, 53% of whom had incomes at or below the federal poverty line. In 35% of cases, patients were insured by Medicaid. Planned Parenthood provided 30,000 family planning visits, 42,000 STI tests, 5,500 HIV tests and 1,300 Pap tests.
Federal law threatens all of those services for Medicaid enrollees.
For Hoosiers on Medicaid who live in areas where obstetric care is limited or nonexistent, there aren't always alternatives to Planned Parenthood clinics. Planned Parenthood often is the alternative.
It's not just Planned Parenthood that's going to be negatively impacted. Indiana could lose 12 rural hospitals, Wilkinson said. When hospitals shut down, health care deserts worsen.
This allegedly big and beautiful bill is about taking bodily autonomy and control away from patients and placing it in the hands of elected officials. Limiting access to family-planning and contraceptive resources has ripple effects.
'When you take away people's abilities to decide if and when and how to become a parent, all the downstream impacts are worsened,' Wilkinson said. 'Infant mortality is worsened, maternal mortality is worsened and pregnancies tend to be more complicated.'
For Hoosiers enrolled in Medicaid, it's important to be vigilant and aware about your coverage. Dr. Wilkinson recommends regularly checking to make sure you are still enrolled.
Rebecca Gibron, a regional CEO for Planned Parenthood, said the organization will continue to build new pathways to care. Planned Parenthood recently increased access to its telehealth services, helping more patients access remote services.
"Indiana's reproductive health care landscape is being reshaped by relentless political interference from local and national leaders —designed to limit our freedom to control our own bodies," Gibron said. "But they should know: Planned Parenthood will never stop showing up for our patients."
Despite what some politicians and pundits may say about the Big Beautiful Bill, the reality is that people will lose access to healthcare in some way. The outlook on reproductive health in Indiana is only going to get more grim.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
Michelle Stoughton Named President of Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield Medicaid in Ohio
COLUMBUS, Ohio--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield (Anthem), a leading provider of health benefits for Ohio residents enrolled in the state's Medicaid managed care program, announced today that Michelle Stoughton has been named president of its Medicaid health plan. 'Michelle is a highly respected leader with extensive experience in healthcare policy and government,' said Jennie Reynolds, east region president of Anthem Medicaid. 'Her proven track record in Ohio and her dedication to community health make her exceptionally well-suited to lead our Medicaid operations in the state. We are confident in Michelle's ability to drive innovation, foster strong partnerships, and improve the whole health of the Ohioans we serve.' In her new role, Stoughton assumes responsibility for all aspects of Anthem's Medicaid health plan operations in Ohio, ensuring its more than 200,000 members receive access to innovative, high-quality healthcare and support services. She will also lead efforts to strengthen relationships in the community with state leaders, providers, and other key stakeholders. Starting in 2026, Anthem will be one of four managed care organizations to provide services to Ohioans who are dually eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid healthcare coverage under its Next Generation MyCare Ohio program, in addition to continuing to provide benefits through the managed care program. 'Anthem's long-standing commitment to improving the health of Ohio communities is one I deeply share, and I'm honored to take on this leadership role,' said Stoughton. 'I look forward to working alongside our state partners, providers, members, and local organizations to strengthen access to high-quality care—both today and as we prepare to support some of Ohio's most vulnerable individuals in the Next Generation MyCare Ohio program beginning in 2026. Together, we'll continue to serve with compassion, elevate health outcomes, and make a meaningful impact in the lives of Ohioans across the state.' Stoughton brings nearly 15 years of experience in healthcare policy to her new role. She most recently served as the regional vice president of government relations for Anthem in Ohio and managed the central region team of senior government relations directors for Anthem's parent company. Before that, Stoughton served as the Midwest director for Albers & Company and as government relations director for the Ohio Council of Retail Merchants. She has also served as a legislative aide in the Ohio House of Representatives. Stoughton holds a bachelor's degree from Miami University and a Master of Public Administration from The Ohio State University. She volunteers as coordinator of All Saints Episcopal Church's In the Garden Program, a meal service for homeless individuals in downtown Columbus. About Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield in Ohio Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield is the trade name of Community Insurance Company, an independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association. ANTHEM is a registered trademark of Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. The Blue Cross and Blue Shield names and symbols are registered marks of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. Additional information about Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield in Ohio is available at Also, follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X at @AnthemBCBS.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Democrats' Chances of Flipping Joni Ernst's GOP Senate Seat in Iowa—Polls
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Democrat Jackie Norris jumped into the Iowa Senate race to challenge GOP Senator Joni Ernst on Tuesday in a race Democrats are hoping they can make competitive next November. Bryan Kraber, Ernst's campaign manager, told Newsweek Iowans will "reject this Obama-era bureaucrat" in a statement responding to Norris' candidacy. Newsweek also reached out to Norris' campaign for comment via email. Why It Matters Democrats are facing a challenging Senate map ahead of the midterms, despite hopes that President Donald Trump's diminishing approval rating could fuel a 2018-style "blue wave" across the country. The party has to turn to states like Iowa, a former battleground that has shifted rightward over the past decade, as potential flip opportunities if they have any hope of taking back control of the upper chamber. Iowa has not elected a Democratic senator since 2008 and backed Trump in each of his three presidential bids—including by 13 points last November, an indication of how Republican the state has become. Nonetheless, Democrats remain hopeful that a strong national environment, as well as backlash over Ernst's recent Medicaid comments, can make the race more competitive than expected. Iowa Senator Joni Ernst speaks during The Hill & Valley Forum 2025 at The U.S. Capitol Visitor Center on April 30, 2025, in Washington. Iowa Senator Joni Ernst speaks during The Hill & Valley Forum 2025 at The U.S. Capitol Visitor Center on April 30, 2025, in 137 Ventures/Founders Fund/Jacob Helberg What To Know Norris emphasized her experience as a teacher and school board member in a video announcing her candidacy released on Tuesday. "As a teacher and a school board member, you see the invisible burdens families are carrying," she said. "Take the Medicaid cuts. Who is it impacting? Middle class families right now, they can't afford to put food on the table. We have to find a way to make things more affordable for families." Early polls of the race suggest Ernst will have an advantage in Iowa. A Public Policy Polling survey found that Ernst would lead a generic Democrat by about two percentage points—45 percent to 43 percent, with 12 percent still unsure. However, the poll did not ask voters about specific Democratic candidates. The survey of 568 Iowa voters was taken from June 2 to June 3. A Data for Progress poll from May found that Ernst would have a lead over most Democratic candidates on an informed ballot. When asked about Norris, voters preferred Ernst by about six points (50 percent to 44 percent). Democrat Nathan Sage fared better, leading Ernst by about two points (47 percent to 45 percent). Ernst also led State Representative J.D. Scholten by six points (49 percent to 43 percent) and State Senator Zach Wahls by 10 points (52 percent to 42 percent). The poll surveyed 779 likely voters from May 7 to May 12. Republicans are favored to hold the Iowa Senate seat, according to Kalshi betting odds, which give the GOP a 74 percent chance and Democrats a 26 percent chance of winning next November. Outside of Iowa, Democrats view the Maine seat held by Senator Susan Collins and the open North Carolina seat as their best opportunities to pickup a win in a GOP-held seat next November. Maine backed former Vice President Kamala Harris by about seven points, while North Carolina backed Trump by about three points last November. Republicans currently have a 53-47 majority, so Democrats need to win multiple double-digit Trump states like Iowa, Ohio or Texas to win back control of the Senate. Democrats are also defending seats in Georgia and Michigan, both of which backed Trump last year. What People Are Saying Bryan Kraber told Newsweek: "Our state is ruby red because Iowans reject higher taxes, open borders, and woke ideology, just like they will reject this Obama-era bureaucrat" Democratic hopeful Jackie Norris wrote in a press release: "Red versus blue isn't fixing anything. Iowa needs a Senator who doesn't just talk tough but rolls up their sleeves, and has the grit and experience to actually get something done." Sabato Crystal Ball forecasters J. Miles Coleman and Kyle Kondik wrote in a June update: "In 2014, [Ernst] won as part of a broader GOP wave—and she got help from a gaffe-prone opponent. Six years later, she won reelection as Trump was carrying Iowa by a strong margin (Ernst ran a little bit behind Trump). It's possible that 2026 could be like 2018: Iowa did not have a Senate election that year, but Democrats did end up winning three of the state's four U.S. House seats that year, and we suspect that if Iowa had had a Senate election, it likely at least would have been close." What Happens Next Ernst has not confirmed her plans for the 2026 election. Both the Cook Political Report and Sabato's Crystal Ball consider the race to be Likely Republican.
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
Where Have the Proud Boys Gone?
Last week, the Department of Homeland Security debuted a recruitment strategy to expand the ranks of ICE: sign-on bonuses. Thanks to a rush of cash from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the department announced that it's offering up to $50,000 to newly hired federal law-enforcement agents. The offer caught the eye of one group that seemed to be particularly pleased by the government's exciting career opportunity. On Telegram, an account linked to the Toledo, Ohio, chapter of the Proud Boys declared: 'Toledo Boys living high on the hog right now!!' Whether members of the extremist group have pursued job openings at ICE, much less been hired and handed a big check, is unclear. I asked the Toledo chapter whether its members are applying to work for the government, but I didn't hear back. Tricia McLaughlin, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson, said in an email that 'any individual who desires to join ICE will undergo intense background investigations and security clearances—no exception.' But the Toledo Proud Boys' enthusiasm for the work, if nothing else, is telling. The Trump administration is enacting a mass-deportation campaign centered around aggression and cruelty. The Proud Boys are staunchly against undocumented immigrants, and have repeatedly intimidated and physically antagonized their enemies (during the first Trump administration, they often got into fights with left-wing protesters). The group's ideals are being pursued—but by ICE and the government itself. Trump's deportations aren't what they seem There was every reason to believe that the Proud Boys would run wild in Donald Trump's second term. On his first day back in the White House, Trump pardoned everyone who was convicted for crimes related to the insurrection on January 6, 2021—including roughly 100 known members of the Proud Boys and other extremist organizations. They had received some of the harshest sentences tied to the Capitol riot: All 14 people who were still in prison when Trump returned to office were affiliated with either the Proud Boys or the Oath Keepers. At the time, a terrorism expert at the Council on Foreign Relations warned that the pardons 'could be catastrophic for public safety,' sending a message to extremist groups that violence in the name of MAGA 'is legal and legitimate.' Enrique Tarrio, the former leader of the Proud Boys who himself was pardoned, announced that there would be hell to pay: 'I'm happy that the president is focusing not on retribution, and focusing on success,' he said on Infowars, 'but I will tell you that I'm not gonna play by those rules.' Six months later, though, the Proud Boys have been surprisingly quiet. According to data from the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data (ACLED), a nonprofit that tracks political violence, the Proud Boys have been less active in 2025 than over the preceding several years. Since his release, Tarrio's most prominent action has been helping launch 'ICERAID,' a website that pays people in crypto in exchange for reporting undocumented immigrants. Tarrio, who did not respond to an interview request through a lawyer, also co-hosts frequent livestreams on X. In one episode of a livestream last month, Tarrio nursed a cigarette while a man who identified himself only as 'Patriot Rob' waxed nostalgic about how inescapable the Proud Boys once were. In 2020, members of the militant group showed up at anti-lockdown rallies across the country, clashed with racial-justice protesters, and earned a shout-out from Trump himself during a presidential debate. (The Proud Boys so frequently traveled to Washington, D.C., for various kinds of protests in 2020 that Politico wrote about their favorite bar.) Now, Patriot Rob said on the livestream, 'there's very few of us left.' It's unclear how many Proud Boy chapters there are today, but some seem to be defunct: Those in Philadelphia and Michigan have let their websites turn into dead links and stopped posting on Telegram, the social platform of choice for most Proud Boys. I reached out to 10 Proud Boy chapters and requested interviews. None was willing to speak with me. After I told a Miami chapter that I had spoken with experts on the current state of the Proud Boys, someone who identified himself only as 'Alex' responded: 'Experts' lol Experts at what? Sucking cock Y'all can go fuck yourselves!' The East Tennessee Chapter, perhaps mistaking my name for a woman's, replied by saying, 'We're going to request some nudes in order to confirm your identity 👌.' The Proud Boys have not disappeared. They have been spotted at a 'Tesla Takedown' event in Salem, Oregon; marched with anti-abortion activists in San Francisco; and confronted protesters outside of the 'Alligator Alcatraz' ICE facility. Other right-wing groups have been more active. After the Texas floods last month, a leader of the Patriot Front claimed that the extremist group was involved in recovery efforts to help ' European peoples.' Patriot Front, which has also held several marches across the country since the start of Trump's second term, remains a small organization. Estimates put its membership at 200 to 300 people, compared with the thousands that researchers believe are, or at least were, in the Proud Boys. On the whole, militia groups are 'keeping it low-key,' Amy Cooter, the deputy director and a co-founder of the Institute for Countering Digital Extremism, told me. Since the start of the year, ACLED has recorded 108 extremist protests nationwide—not even half as many as at this point in 2022. This is not entirely unexpected. As my colleague Adrienne LaFrance has reported, in the 1990s, a surge of militia activity and white nationalism appeared to die down after the Oklahoma City bombing—but those movements never disappeared; they simply moved underground. Today, part of the reason for the apparent decline is that even after Trump's pardons, far-right groups are still dealing with the hangover of January 6. Militia groups have always been relatively splintered, but the insurrection exacerbated the fissures. Some Oath Keeper groups are divided on whether their leader, Stewart Rhodes, went too far on January 6, when he rallied Oath Keepers to breach the Capitol, Cooter said. Some members have been vocal about leaving the organization, citing Rhodes's leadership. In 2022, the Southern Poverty Law Center recorded five active Oath Keepers chapters, down from 70 in 2020. (The number of current chapters is not clear.) Meanwhile, the Proud Boys fractured in 2021, after Reuters uncovered court records indicating that Tarrio had served as an informant to local and federal law enforcement before the group was founded. ('I don't recall any of this,' Tarrio told Reuters at the time.) Many Proud Boys chapters disavowed him, including part of his own in Miami. The city now has two separate chapters, an anti-Tarrio and a pro-Tarrio one. In January, I emailed the Toledo Proud Boys chapter to ask about Tarrio. I received an unattributed reply expressing disappointment that Tarrio had 'turned his back and squealed on brothers.' I reached back out this week, and received a similar response: 'Tarrio is a rat, punk, and low life!' The respondent also said this: 'You breland, are exactly what President Trump said. .fake news! I'm sure you preferred the last potatoe!' (I asked if by 'the last potato,' the account meant Joe Biden. 'Ahhh yes. .SMH,' the respondent said. 'You know. .the illegitimate one! The stolen election one! The one who wandered around aimlessly!') The bigger reason that these far-right groups remain underground is that the Trump administration's aggressive agenda has left them with little to do. One of the motivating issues for the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and other extremist groups is strong opposition to undocumented immigrants. After the presidential election, a leader of the Texas chapter of the Three Percenters, a militia group, reportedly wrote to Trump to offer manpower in enacting mass deportations. But ICE and other federal agencies are engaging in forceful action against immigrants backed by the state in a way that surpasses what the Oath Keepers or the Proud Boys could ever do. ICE agents, not far-right militias, are the ones who have smashed through car windows, thrown people into unmarked vans, and detained them indefinitely. Even apart from immigration, 'groups are taking a hands-off approach right now because their interests are often aligned with the government,' Freddy Cruz, a researcher at the Western States Center, a nonprofit that tracks extremism, told me. The Proud Boys was started in 2016 in part to double down on traditional gender norms. Gavin McInnes, the group's founder, has described the Proud Boys as a 'pro-Western fraternity' for men who 'long for the days when girls were girls and men were men.' The Proud Boys' extreme pro-male views are less distinct than they once were, as MAGA has embraced Andrew Tate and other openly misogynistic figures of the so-called manosphere. As a result, the Proud Boys have one less point to rally around. Still, the Proud Boys and other right-wing militias might not stay underground forever. Under the right conditions, they could surge once again. 'These groups are really responsive to news cycles,' Cooter said. They have specific flash points—immigration, the Second Amendment, and supposed 'election integrity'—that can mobilize them in certain contexts, she explained. The Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and other established far-right groups still have infrastructure, a durable brand name, and the precedent that Trump might pardon them if things go awry. In May, Tarrio was reportedly invited to Mar-a-Lago, where he briefly spoke with Trump. Newer groups continue to organize. Patriot Front, for example, has teamed up with 'Active Clubs,' a loose network of white supremacists and neo-Nazis who run their own mixed-martial-arts fight clubs. Together, all of this could help give extremist groups a head start that they didn't have in the first Trump administration, when the Proud Boys and many other militia groups began to find their footing. The pieces are there, even if the moment isn't yet.
