Baba Vanga news: These predictions of Baba Vanga may cause massive destruction in 2025, know which will come true?
Baba Vanga Predictions: Bulgarian prophet and mystic Baba Vanga was famous for her predictions. Several of her predictions came true such as the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Barack Obama's presidency, even the assassination of Indira Gandhi, and because of this, several people have serious belief in her predictions. The Bulgarian prophet died in the year 1996 but before her death, she made several predictions till the year 5079. These predictions include contact between aliens and humans, climate change, earthquakes and tsunamis, the existence of a new world on Mars, and the emergence of dangerous viruses.
Baba Vanga had declared 2025 a year of tragedy. She predicted that the world would face strange incidents in 2025. Can These Predictions Of Baba Vanga Come True?
Baba Vanga had predicted a decline in the population of Europe by the year 2025. Interestingly, this prediction can come true as the birth rate in the continent is decreasing rapidly. The aging population there is a matter of concern for the society.
End of hunger in 2028
The Bulgarian prophet had predicted that hunger can be partially solved by the year 2028.
Sea Level Can Rise In 2033
She predicted a significant rise in sea level in 2033. These predictions of hers can prove to be true due to climate change and the melting of glaciers. The sea level is slowly but gradually rising, and scientists have already raised an alarm regarding this.
Artificial Body Organs In The Year 2046
Baba Vanga's prediction of artificial organ production by 2026 is gaining plausibility due to advancements in bioprinting and regenerative medicine.
End Of The Caste System By 2076
This prediction can also come true in the coming years as caste and racial inequalities in society are decreasing. People are accepting each other on the basis of looks, colour, and cultural perspective.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Baba Vanga's Scariest Predictions for 2025 Are Already Unfolding
The Baba Vanga, also known as Nostradamus of Balkans is one of the most well known clairvoyant and psychic, who became famous across the world due to her predictions she had made years ago. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now She was born in the Ottoman Empire in 1911 and it is believed that after losing her eyesight at the age of 12, she developed psychic abilities. It was 1996, when she died and in the year 2025, she again became a global name after her terrifying predictions came into the limelight across social media. A number of her forecasts came to pass, including the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and the election of Barack Obama. Do you know about her horrifying predictions? If not then we are going to give a light on those predictions which has created a chaos among people and are willing to know more about them. Let's move forward and check out the predictions: These are the following Spine Chilling Predictions by Baba Vanga: Natural Catastrophes in Asia Baba Vanga is believed to have predicted a catastrophic earthquake and tsunami in Asia, but here one more things you must keep in your mind that she had not mentioned any particular date for that. The collapse of the world economy As per Baba Vanga Predictions, there will be a serious economic disaster coming in the future which will start with the collapse of important markets. There will be global financial crisis and that might lead to unemployment. The prophecy reflects global concerns about debt, inflation, and unstable economic systems. Interaction with Aliens Do you know what is the most shocking predictions is that there will be an interaction with aliens or you can say people who belong to another world. Her predictions indicates growing interest in alien life and space travel. The caste system will end Given the decline in racial and caste disparities in society, this prediction may also come true in the years to come. On the basis of appearance, color, and cultural viewpoint, people will accept one another. The emergence of new illnesses One of the most chilling and scary prediction is the outbreaks of odd new diseases but one hope is enough to give relief and that hope is advancement in the medicine. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In addition to this predictions, some people anticipate that future illnesses brought on by environmental changes, genetic abnormalities, and connect her visions to pandemics like COVID-19. Artificial Organs for the Human Body Thanks to developments in bioprinting and regenerative medicine, Baba Vanga's forecast that prosthetic organs will be produced by 2026 is becoming more realistic. Medical Advancements As we said that there will be medical advancement so according to Baba Vanga there will be a treatment for the incurable diseases and increase life expectancy. There will be an advancement in area of medicine, genetic therapies, and anti-aging research, which could allay worries about emerging diseases. Europe's Population By 2025, Baba Vanga had projected that Europe's population will be declining. It's interesting to note that given the continent's rapidly declining birth rate, this prediction may come to pass. The society there is concerned about the aging population. Sea levels might increase in 2033 She predicted a significant rise in sea level in 2033. Climate change and glacier melting could make her predictions a reality. Scientists have previously expressed concern about the slow but steady rise in the water level.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 hours ago
- First Post
Mumbai train blasts: Maharashtra challenges 2006 terror case verdict, Supreme Court to hear plea on July 24
The Supreme Court has agreed to urgently hear the Maharashtra government's plea challenging the acquittal of all 12 accused in the 2006 Mumbai train bombings case. The hearing is scheduled for July 24, following a Bombay HC verdict that raised serious questions over investigation and prosecution. read more A view of Supreme Court of India building in New Delhi. PTI The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to urgently hear the Maharashtra government's appeal against the Bombay High Court's decision to acquit all 12 accused in the 2006 Mumbai train bombings. The hearing has been scheduled for July 24. A bench led by Chief Justice BR Gavai, along with Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria, listed the matter after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the state, sought an early hearing, citing the case's gravity and urgency. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Bombay High Court, in a stunning verdict delivered on Monday, set aside the convictions, ruling that the prosecution had 'utterly failed' to prove its case. The court noted it was 'hard to believe the accused committed the crime.' The serial blasts on Mumbai's suburban rail network during rush hour on July 11, 2006, killed over 180 people and injured hundreds—marking one of India's worst terror attacks. 'Inhuman, barbaric torture by ATS': Bombay HC slams probe In a damning critique of the investigation, the High Court found that the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) subjected the accused to 'most inhuman and barbaric' torture, leading to forced confessions that were later retracted. Justices Anil Kilor and Shyam Chandak, who delivered the verdict, observed that the accused were kept in police custody for up to 76 days and withdrew their confessions immediately upon being presented before a magistrate. The court noted that such confessions, obtained under duress, cannot be considered admissible evidence. 'It is well known that, in most cases, police are in the habit of extorting confessions through illegal means, including torture,' the court said, quoting established legal principles that dismiss statements extracted under fear or coercion. The court further highlighted inconsistencies in the prosecution's claim that the accused were uncooperative—an assertion made just before their confessions were recorded. The 7/11 Mumbai train blasts The 7/11 attacks refer to a series of seven coordinated bomb blasts that tore through first-class compartments of Mumbai's suburban trains on July 11, 2006. The explosions, timed within 11 minutes during peak evening hours, caused mass casualties and widespread panic. Over 180 people were killed and more than 800 injured in what remains one of India's deadliest terror attacks. The Maharashtra ATS had arrested several suspects, alleging cross-border links and a larger terror conspiracy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hindustan Times
7 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Muddied investigations deny justice to not just the accused but also the victims
Justice JR Midha (retd) of the Delhi High Court once profoundly stated, 'In a court of 'justice' both parties know the truth; it is the judge who is on trial.' For anyone familiar with the quality of evidence presented in the 2006 7/11 Mumbai serial train blast case, the Bombay High Court's decision on Monday to acquit 11 men (Kamal Ansari passed away while the proceedings were pending)—five of whom had been sentenced to death by a trial court in 2015—was simply a discharge of its duty. Muddied investigations deny justice to not just the accused but also the victims This article won't delve into the unspeakable horrors of the third-degree torture these men endured in prison and later testified to in court, nor the agonizing wait for judgment that stretched from days into months, years, and even decades, or the abject poverty resulting from their incarceration, or the deaths of spouses and parents during their 19-year-long imprisonment. Instead, this article aims to raise critical questions about a case shrouded in controversy from its inception, specifically regarding the accountability of investigating agencies that relied on unreliable evidence to secure convictions and assuage 'society's collective conscience'. In this particular case, such evidence sealed the fate of 13 men, some of whom were merely students at the time of their arrest in 2006. The 7/11 train blasts trial was riddled with allegations of forced confessions and improbable eyewitness accounts right from the beginning. Eleven of the 13 accused in the case testified under oath to prove their innocence, providing vivid details of third-degree police torture, particularly before their alleged confessions. Forced confessions are inadmissible as evidence under law. Medical reports from the time largely substantiated their testimonies and were accepted by the Bombay High Court to discard the confessions. As for eyewitness accounts, Ehtesham Siddique, accused of planting one of the bombs, filed hundreds of Right to Information (RTI) applications to demonstrate the improbability of statements made by eyewitnesses. For instance, an eyewitness claimed to have seen a man with a 'heavy bag' at Churchgate station on the day of the bombings and identified Siddiqui as that man. However, Siddique cited RTI replies to show that the eyewitness may have been lying about his whereabouts at the time of the incident. The witness claimed he was visiting someone at the ENT hospital near Fort who either didn't work there or hadn't reported to work at all. Since the ATS was exempt from providing information under the RTI Act, Siddique and the other accused in the case sought information from several other government forums and hospitals to counter the prosecution's theory. At a conspiracy level, the Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) alleged that the blasts were orchestrated at the behest of the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), a terrorist group based in Pakistan. ATS further claimed that one Indian and one Pakistani planted the seven bombs that detonated in first-class men's compartments of Mumbai local trains on July 11, 2006, resulting in 188 deaths and 829 injuries. However, not a single Pakistani or LeT member was prosecuted over time, immediately casting doubt on the ATS's initial allegations. Moreover, the prosecution failed to establish a credible link between the Student Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), to which many of the accused belonged, and the LeT. In fact, in 2008, Sadiq Israr Sheikh, a former SIMI member who later joined the terror outfit, the Indian Mujahideen (IM), claimed responsibility for the train blasts. Sheikh, arrested in a separate 2009 Indian Mujahideen case provided a detailed account to the Mumbai Crime Branch of how the IM executed the train blasts, but his claims were not substantially investigated by an independent agency, perhaps because it could have exposed critical loopholes in the ATS's investigation. Unsurprisingly though, during the 7/11 trial when Sheikh was called by the defence, he denied any involvement. His confession to the crime branch, however, did muddy the waters. Echoing the questionable investigative patterns of the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts probe was the 2006 Malegaon blasts probe. Two months after the train attacks in Mumbai, four bombs ripped through Malegaon city on Shab-e-Baraat, a holy day for the city's Muslim-majority population. The ATS swiftly arrested nine Muslim men, operating under the theory that they would target their community near a mosque. This investigation mirrored the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts probe, where 'confessions' were extracted in written Hindi from Urdu speakers and evidence, like RDX traces found months after the blasts, was presented. Two of the 7/11 accused, Mohammed Ali Alam Shaikh and Asif Khan were also implicated in the Malegaon blasts, with the ATS alleging their involvement in procuring explosives. However, after the case was transferred to the National Investigation Agency (NIA), Hindu extremist Swami Aseemanand in 2007 claimed responsibility for the blasts and the ATS's investigation in Malegaon blasts of 2006 subsequently fell apart under scrutiny. It turned out that Shabbir Masiullah, said by the ATS to have been a key conspirator in Malegaon blasts was already in police custody when he was alleged to have helped Mohammed Ali Alam Shaikh and Asif Khan procure explosives. Nearly 10 years after these revelations, in April 2016, a special court discharged Mohammed Ali and Asif Khan in the Malegaon blasts case along with the other accused, castigating the ATS's 'unbelievable' theory. These glaring inconsistencies and the human cost of wrongful arrests make one thing clear: there needs to be a complete overhaul of how investigating agencies perceive and investigate cases related to terrorism and how courts fix accountability. Agencies should refrain from making overly ambitious claims at the outset when their investigation is not yet scientific. Doing so is an affront to every victim of terror—living, injured or dead. Sharmeen Hakim is a journalist and the author of Six Minutes of Terror: The Untold Story of the 7/11 Train Blasts
