Two years after switch, Fort Polk's name returns
Fort Johnson — which was named after World War I Sgt. William Henry Johnson — was renamed Fort Polk on Friday. This time, however, it's named after a different Polk.
'We do not erase history, but build upon it,' said Chaplain Col. John V. Ijeoma as he opened the dedication ceremony. 'Today with this new name and new identity we embrace the future. May this redesignation reflect a spirit of unity, dignity and purpose.'
The Leesville base was initially named for Confederate Gen. Leonidas Polk but was renamed after Johnson in 2023 during the Joe Biden administration. The recent renaming — ordered by President Donald Trump — reverses the change with the base now honoring Gen. James H. Polk, a Silver Star recipient from World War II.
Polk served more than 38 years in the Army. He graduated from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point in 1933 and began his career in the Cavalry. He would later became a pioneer in mechanized warfare.
He served with distinction in World War II as the commander of the 3rd Mechanized Cavalry Group, leading reconnaissance operations across France and Germany during the Allied advance. He was awarded the Silver Star, among numerous other decorations.
He proceeded to serve in both the Korean and Vietnam wars, and later became the commander of U.S. Army Europe, helping to strengthen NATO's defensive posture during the height of the Cold War.
Among Polk's family members in attendance for Friday's renaming ceremony were son James H. Polk III, daughter Josephine 'Jody' Polk-Schwartz, sister Ann Polk Talbot and grandsons Johnathan Schwartz III and James Polk Schwartz.
A portrait of Polk, unveiled by his family, will be centered under the entranceway to the JRTC and Fort Polk headquarters building.
'To be here today is, of course, a special occasion,' his son told attendees. 'We know he would be extremely proud and honored as we are to have this historic Army post and training area named after him. His dedication and service to our country and his patriotism has always been an inspiration to our family and to all who knew him. Indeed, our admiration for his life and accomplishments in the U.S. Army have continued to increase since his death over 30 years ago. The span of his career and the great events of the 20th century that he witnessed and participated in is truly remarkable.'
Polk met his future wife, Josephine 'Joy' Polk, in 1933.
'By his side and through it all — after 28 moves and 55 years of marriage — was our mother, Josephine 'Joy' Polk. She was an exemplary Army wife, always with him, always supporting to her utmost in his various rolls in commands. We would like to pay tribute to her today. There's no doubt our father's Army career would not have succeeded without her support and I know she'd be very proud of this event today,' he said.
'We'd also like to honor the legacy and spirit of Sgt. William Henry Johnson and his heroic record in World War I,' he continued. 'We know that our father would want and expect that Sgt. Johnson continue to be remembered at Fort Polk by the U.S. Army as the great hero that he was.'
Polk said his father was a great student of history and would quote Shakespeare. His father also had several inspiring sayings of his own and one that continues to stay with his son is, 'Don't take counsel of your fears.'
This quote is sometimes hard to live up to, Polk admitted, and said it highlights his father's positive approach to life as a military man of action.
'He was always stepping up and moving ahead no matter what the challenge was ahead.'
Brigadier General Jason A. Curl said since its establishment in 1941, Fort Polk has been a cornerstone of Army readiness, where soldiers have honed their skills and prepared for the demands of combat.
Curl said the story of Johnson — a member of the legendary Harlem Hellfighters who 'exemplified valor beyond measure' — 'demands to be told.'
'Sgt. Johnson in May 1918 armed with little more than courage, a rifle and a bolo knife, single handedly repelled a German raiding party and saved his soldiers' lives,' Curl said. 'His sacrifice in service resonated across decades, inspiring soldiers of every generation to embody what we call uncommon valor. In naming this installation after him, we ensured that every soldier who trains here understands that readiness is built on grit, determination and courage to do what's right — even when no one is watching.'
Curl said the installation post exchange will now bear Johnson's name and the soldier will 'remain a living part of our
history and the strength of character of those who served.'
'The legacies of Sgt. William Henry Johnson and Gen. James H. Polk reminds us that greatness is never given, it is earned through character, commitment and the relentless pursuit of excellence,' Curl said. 'May this installation forever stand as a testament to their courage, their leadership and their devotion to country.'
The total cost of renaming Fort Polk was less than $300,000, Curl said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Army and Navy want the ‘right to repair' their own equipment
A fundamental value of life at sea is 'Don't give up the ship,' an axiom ingrained in sailors that all damage and problems aboard a vessel fall to the crew to fix. But under modern contracting rules, some of the most critical systems on U.S. Navy ships, as well as major systems used by the Army, can only be fixed by defense contractors. When one of these systems breaks — whether a vital weapon or the machines that produce fresh water — sailors and soldiers may not have the tools, training or permission to fix them, due to the contracting rules under which the military cedes its 'right to repair' systems to contractors who built them. Many view this repair system as an Achilles' heel for the U.S. military. 'I can tell you that when the shooting starts, sailors will have to keep their ships in the fight at sea because we can't count on being able to bring civilian contractors onboard in a war zone,' a post-command Navy surface warfare officer captain told Task & Purpose. That's why the U.S. military and some lawmakers are both stepping up their focus on'right to repair'for weapons and other systems, ensuring that troops have the necessary tools, training and authorization to fix their own equipment, said Greg Williams, of the Project on Government Oversight, or POGO, a non-partisan watchdog group. Two senators introduced a bill this week that would make 'right to repair' a staple of military contracting, with rules requiring that future weapons systems be delivered with manuals, tools and access to parts and information that would make systems fixable by the military members who use them. Separately, the Senate Armed Services Committee has advanced its version of the fiscal year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act that also includes a 'right to repair' provision, which would require defense contractors to 'submit instructions for continued operational readiness necessary for operations, maintenance, installation, and training,' according to a summary of the bill that was released on Friday. A variety of equipment used by the military – from ships and aircraft to generators and handheld gear – is purchased with a warranty, and that means the manufacturer has the responsibility for making repairs, said Williams, director of POGO's Center for Defense Information. 'Now, that makes a lot of sense when, perhaps, you buy a car or a mobile phone,' Williams told Task & Purpose. 'It does not make a lot of sense when you're thousands of miles from home, potentially under fire; you have a piece of equipment you need either to succeed in your mission or simply to survive, and you want to be able to do whatever you can to repair that on the spot.' Another issue is that servicemembers are not allowed to try to fix certain types of equipment because the U.S. military does not own the intellectual property rights to it, Williams said. But the U.S. military wants service members to perform more types of repairs. In April, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a memo ordering sweeping reforms to the Army, including directing the service to include 'right to repair' provisions in existing contracts and ensure such provisions are part of future contracts. While the Army has a general 'right to repair' its gear, soldiers face certain restrictions when fixes involve proprietary systems, advanced electronics, and software that is protected by intellectual property laws, or if making such repairs would void the warranty, said Army spokesperson Elias Chelala. 'Commanders often prefer having their soldiers perform basic and intermediate repairs to reduce downtime and increase operational readiness,' Chelala told Task & Purpose. 'This includes diagnostics, component-level replacements, mechanical repairs, and preventative maintenance tasks in the field.' Granting soldiers and sailors access to the tools, manuals, and software needed to repair more types of equipment would both increase their autonomy and sharpen their skills, he said. This would also require soldiers to undergo more training on using diagnostic tools, troubleshooting software systems, and repairing complex systems to avoid damage and injuries. The Navy operates many aircraft, weapons systems, and critical ship systems that either require flying contractors to the ship for repairs or making the fixes when the ship is in port, said Capt. Ron Flanders, a spokesperson for the office of the assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition. Sailors and Marines do not have the technical manuals or diagnostic capability to repair those items, which include helicopters, jets, radar systems, guns, fire control systems, reverse-osmosis water filtration systems, and even ovens, Flanders told Task & Purpose. 'Navy commanders would much prefer that sailors be given the technical manuals and diagnostics capabilities they need to perform maintenance on all manner of combat systems,' Flanders said. Flanders added that he is confident that sailors would be able to take care of systems currently serviced by contractors if they were provided with the necessary technical manuals and diagnostic tools. 'Rapid, effective maintenance is a warfighting imperative,' Flanders said. 'This is especially true in contested logistics environments, where self-sufficiency will be required. ' Toward that end, a bill introduced by Sens Sheehy and Warren, in at least one sense, captures the bipartisan consensus on the right to repair. Sheehy is a former Navy SEAL and staunch Donald Trump supporter while Warren is a leading Democrat who has championed consumer protections for over a decade, including right to repairs issues for heavy farm equipment. Along with dictating terms to defense contractors, their bill would also require the defense secretary to conduct a review to modify contracts to remove any intellectual property barriers that prevent service members from repairing equipment. 'It's about time we stand up to Pentagon contractors that are squeezing every last cent from us at the expense of our national security,' Warren said in a statement to Task & Purpose 'Our warfighters – and the American public – deserve better, and I'm proud to lead this bipartisan legislation to streamline bloated bureaucracy, increase competition, and provide our warfighters with the quality and quantity of equipment they need to win the next fight,' Sheehy said in a statement to Task & Purpose. Williams said the underlying reason why troops are prohibited from making certain repairs is that maintaining equipment is 'a very profitable business' for defense industry. 'I think it's important to recognize that we spend tens of billions of dollars annually on these types of repairs, and eventually that could be done a lot less expensively by our people in uniform and by civilian defense employees,' Williams said. 'They generally cost about one third the hourly or annual rate of a contractor.' While it will cost money to train service members to fix equipment that currently must be repaired by contractors, Wiliams said, 'You either pay that expense, or you pay the expense if they're not able to get their equipment fixed when a mission is underway.' Not only do current constraints prevent troops from making repairs under 'dire circumstances,' but they also mean that service members cannot practice fixing equipment when they are not in danger, Williams said. This also means that service members need to wait for contactors to arrive to make necessary repairs. 'Just in case it's illustrative, I don't know if you're a 'Star Trek' fan, but you can probably picture Captain Kirk calling down to engineering to ask Scotty how quickly he's going to repair something,' Williams said. 'Now keep imagining if Scotty's answer was: 'Well it will take three weeks for the contractor to get here at Warp 4. Until then, we can't touch it.'' UPDATE: 07/11/2024; this story was updated with information about a right to repair provision in the Senate version of the fiscal year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act. Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps learns an old lesson: Don't mess with Audie Murphy A breakdown of safety procedures 'directly contributed' to an 82nd Airborne paratrooper's death WWII Marine Raider who fought at Iwo Jima, Guadalcanal wants cards for 100th birthday Navy identifies special warfare sailor killed while parachuting Pentagon appears to pause renaming of Navy ships
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump announces 25 percent tariffs coming for Japan, South Korea
President Trump announced Monday his administration would impose a 25 percent tariff on imports from South Korea and Japan beginning Aug. 1 as part of a batch of letters going out to foreign countries. Trump detailed the expected tariff rates in letters to the leaders of Japan and South Korea, also posting them to Truth Social. The president had previously indicated he would send letters to roughly a dozen countries Monday. 'Please understand this 25% number is far less than what is needed to eliminate the Trade Deficit disparity we have with your Country,' Trump wrote to both countries. The president warned that if either nation raised its tariffs in response, the U.S. would increase its tariffs by the same amount. 'As you are aware, there will be no Tariff if Korea, or companies within your Country, decide to build or manufacture product within the United States and, in fact, we will do everything possible to get approvals quickly, professionally, and routinely – in other words, in a matter of weeks,' Trump wrote to South Korea's president. He conveyed the same message to Japan's prime minister. Under the 'Liberation Day' tariffs announced on April 2, South Korea was hit with a 25-percent tariff and Japan hit with a 24-percent tariff, so Monday's announcement amounts to an extension of the negotiation deadline, which was initially set for Wednesday. The president also sent similar letters to the governments of Malaysia, Kazakhstan and South Africa, imposing 30 percent tariffs on their goods, and another to Myanmar laying out a 40 percent tariff. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Monday the president would send letters to a total of 12 nations by the end of the day, with more to come throughout the week. Trump is also scheduled to sign an executive order to delay his Liberation Day tariffs to Aug. 1. Administration officials have been touting tariffs and the new protectionist U.S. trade posture as delivering results in the negotiating room, but the extended deadline and increased rate of punitive tariffs indicates that things may not be proceeding as smoothly as hoped. 'The administration's delay announcement should come as no surprise,' Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at the Cato Institute, wrote in a commentary on Monday. 'We've known since April that quickly inking, no less implementing, complicated trade agreements with dozens of foreign governments was impossible.' Bill Reinsch, head of the international business program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told The Hill last week that he didn't believe negotiations were going particularly well. He said that Japanese and Korean negotiators have demanded exemptions from the tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. He said the Koreans demanded exemptions from all the tariffs and that they hadn't conceded on those points. Only two trade deals have been announced so far, one with the United Kingdom that was met with mixed results from U.S. industry and one with Vietnam, about which details are scarce. Securities markets came roaring back and hit new highs after tanking on the news of the April 2 tariffs, which were larger than many analysts had been anticipating and took even the Federal Reserve by surprise. Stocks were down again on Monday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average of big U.S. companies was down more than 1.2 percent in early afternoon trading, and the S&P 500 was down nearly a percent. Policy analysts told The Hill that they wondered if the rebound in equities wasn't premature and whether markets had accurately priced stocks amid continuing uncertainties. 'We had warned clients a lot going into the second Trump administration that they had assumed away too much of the risk,' Beacon Policy Advisers managing partner Stephen Myrow told The Hill Monday. 'Uncertainty is not a bug of the Trump administration trade policy – it's a feature.' Lincicome noted Trump's sensitivity to market reactions regarding ongoing trade talks. 'The President is deeply concerned about the market reaction to a worst-case US tariff scenario,' he commented. Updated at 3:20 p.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's law of the jungle means U.S. trade deals aren't worth the paper they're printed on, trade expert warns
By dismantling the mechanism that settles international trade disputes, there is no way for countries negotiating with the Trump administration to enforce any bilateral trade agreements. With little incentive to play by the rules, he could simply change the terms of any deal down the road. The best solution would be kicking the U.S. out of the World Trade Organization, argues trade expert Kristen Hopewell from the University of British Columbia, and re-establish the WTO's Appellate Body, the supreme court for global trade. When President Trump threatened Brazil with punishing tariffs on Wednesday, there was no fancy mathematical equation trotted out this time as justification. The 50% levy on goods was retribution for a perceived 'witch hunt' against his political ally, Jair Bolsanaro, whose supporters attempted a coup two years ago. This administration is bringing back the law of the jungle to international trade, according to trade expert Kristen Hopewell, and time is running out to salvage the remains of a post-war system of commerce that promoted stability and prosperity across the world. 'Trump is a totally unreliable negotiating partner,' she tells Fortune. 'Any deal you strike with the administration is not worth the paper it's written on.' As if to hammer home that point, news began to emerge on Thursday that Vietnam had been caught off guard when Trump prematurely announced a 20% duty on all goods entering the U.S. from the southeast Asian country. Vietnamese officials were reportedly still hoping for a number closer to half that. Nor is there any apparent rhyme or reason to his tariffs. Brazil, for example, doesn't even run a trade surplus with the United States—it imported $28.6 billion more goods and services from the U.S. last year than it exported. On Wednesday, when asked how he calculated his various import duties, the president answered that he uses 'a formula based on common sense,' one that reflects 'how we've been treated.' Hopewell, a professor at the University of British Columbia, argues this erratic and fickle approach to international negotiations is symptomatic of a Trump deal: 'He can simply come back later demanding more. There's no guarantee it will actually be upheld.' That's because the president already removed a cornerstone underpinning global commerce during his first administration six years ago when he blocked all appointments to what is essentially the supreme court of the World Trade Organization (WTO) — its Appellate Body. 'The WTO is unique amongst international organizations in that its rules are actually legally binding on states. It has teeth,' Hopewell said. Or rather it had teeth. Since the Biden administration continued its policy of blocking appointments to fill its vacancies, there is now no quorum to adjudicate trade disputes, leaving countries little incentive to abide by the rules anymore. Quite the contrary, they can break them with near impunity. The United States didn't always favor dismantling these guardrails. Over a decade ago, the country led a number of key partners, including Japan and the European Union, to press their rights against China when it attempted to restrict the export of critical minerals, including rare earths. In 2015, they later won in front of the Appellate Body, forcing Beijing to relent. Thanks to Trump, this enforcement mechanism no longer works. In January 2020, just weeks after the WTO's Appellate Body was decommissioned, Indonesia moved to impose a ban on the export of raw nickel. Since it has one of the largest remaining deposits of this element vital for electric vehicle batteries and stainless steel, it reckoned it could compel the creation of a domestic downstream industry for processing and refining the ore. Other countries argued in front of the WTO that it violated the rules and won—or at least they thought they had. Indonesia exercised its right to lodge a formal appeal to the Appellate Body, knowing full well that a ruling that settles the dispute was impossible. 'By appealing into the void, it could continue these WTO illegal export restrictions of nickel and is actually expanding them to other commodities,' Hopewell says. 'Other countries are now mimicking Indonesia and introducing similar bans on mineral exports.' Hopewell believes the moment for bold action has arrived. In a column for Politico this week, she argued the international community should consider expelling the United States from the World Trade Organization in order to revive its paralyzed Appellate Body. 'The stakes are really high, so it's worth considering more radical solutions,' she told Fortune. That attitude, Hopewell says, is no accident. Trump has long sought to undermine the WTO in favor of bilateral deals, where the U.S. holds more leverage. 'Trump is pursuing a divide-and-conquer strategy,' she said. 'He knows the U.S. is strongest when it negotiates one-on-one.' By agreeing to bilateral talks, she argues, foreign governments hoping to protect domestic industries are undermining themselves. 'They're playing right into Trump's hands.' Contacted by Fortune, the WTO Secretariat said it does not comment on the conduct of member states. The White House declined to respond. To many Americans, Trump's aggressive trade stance may appear cost-free. But the fallout has yet to reach consumers, in part because industries like autos stockpiled inventory ahead of new duties. 'It will take some time before the effects of the tariffs are felt in higher prices,' Hopewell said. 'But when that hits, it's going to be a profound economic shock for the U.S.' This story was originally featured on
