logo
European 'empty rhetoric' is not enough to stop Israel's 'ethnic cleansing' of Gaza, MSF says

European 'empty rhetoric' is not enough to stop Israel's 'ethnic cleansing' of Gaza, MSF says

The Journal17-06-2025
THE EUROPEAN UNION has the political, economic, and diplomatic means to stop Israel's 'calculated evisceration of the very systems that sustain life' in Gaza, and 'empty rhetoric' is not enough.
That's what European government leaders have been told in an open letter written by the heads of the medical charity Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), eleven of whose staff members have been killed during the 20 months of war on the besieged Palestinian territory.
Dr Christos Christou, MSF International's president and Christopher Lockyear, the NGO's secretary general, described Israel's campaign against the Palestinian people in Gaza as 'ethnic cleansing, wrapped in the rhetoric of security defence'.
'On a daily basis, MSF teams witness patterns consistent with genocide through deliberate actions by Israeli forces – including mass killings, the destruction of vital civilian infrastructure, and blockades choking off access to food, water, medicines, and other essential humanitarian supplies,' they wrote.
Israel is systematically destroying the conditions necessary for Palestinian life.
This pattern of violence and disregard for international humanitarian law, the said, 'shows that this war run by Israel in Gaza is against Palestinians as a whole'.
Israel stands accused of committing genocide in Gaza in a case taken by South Africa at the International Criminal Court.
It has also been accused of genocide by NGOs Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International.
Taoiseach Micheál Martin has also
described Israel's actions in Gaza as genocidal.
Despite these allegations, European support for Israel has remained steadfast, with some exceptions.
Last month, some European states closely allied with Israel openly criticised Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's war and the ongoing military operations and settlement expansions in the occupied West Bank.
That tone has
since shifted back to support for Israel
in the wake of its attack against Iran last Friday, which has also drawn attention away from the plight of the people of Gaza.
Weaponising aid
MSF pointed to the spate of massacres that have been committed by Israeli forces while hungry people have been waiting for humanitarian aid handed out by the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation(GHF), an organisation the UN and NGOs refuse to work with.
Advertisement
'The GHF launched its activities on 27 May, as part of the US-Israeli plan that instrumentalises aid,' the letter reads.
'Since then, hundreds of Palestinians have been treated in hospitals, and scores have been killed, after being shot at these aid distribution sites while waiting to receive basic necessities for survival.
'Humanitarian aid is being weaponised. It is being used as leverage to forcibly displace people, to meet military objectives, or blocked entirely.
Aid is not a bargaining chip. It is a lifeline.
'Denying it is collective punishment – a war crime.'
Yesterday, Israeli forces killed 34 people near a GHF distribution site. Today, Israeli forces
killed at least 51 people and wounded more than 200
while they waited to get flour from a UN site.
The war in Gaza is becoming ever more deadly and devastating. In what's become a macabre daily routine, more desperately hungry people were gunned down today, as they tried to collect food aid from the new US and Israeli backed distribution centre.
pic.twitter.com/X80yRWuPHd
— Channel 4 News (@Channel4News)
June 16, 2025
'Empty rhetoric'
'The European Union and European governments have the political, economic, and diplomatic means capable of exerting real pressure on Israel to stop this assault and open Gaza's border crossings to unhindered humanitarian aid,' the MSF letter said.
'These are not theoretical instruments; they can be effectively mobilised in defence of international law and to protect civilians.
The letter noted the recent rebukes of Israel by European leaders.
'Yet these words ring hollow, as they fail to take the substantive action needed to stop the slaughter, and hypocritically continue to provide weapons to Israel that kill, burn, or permanently disable the people who end up in our hospitals. This must stop.'
MSF said the words and actions of European leaders are 'a test of your credibility and leadership'.
Now is a moment that will define your legacy and determine whether laws meant to protect civilians in war retain any meaning at all.
'It requires political courage, legal responsibility, and moral commitment. The scale of suffering in Gaza demands more than your empty rhetoric.
'Every delay, every equivocation, and every policy that permits the machinery of devastation to roll forward with impunity is an act of complicity.'
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What the proposed CAP changes mean for Irish farmers
What the proposed CAP changes mean for Irish farmers

Irish Examiner

time32 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

What the proposed CAP changes mean for Irish farmers

The proposed EU budget post-2027 has caused waves in the agricultural sphere, with calls to action and pushback coming from all angles. The main worry is the proposed absorption of the CAP under the National and Regional Partnerships Plans (NRPP). The European Commission advertises this move to be more efficient and have a stronger, impactful use of EU funding with agricultural policy 'at its core'. Concerns have been raised revolving around whether money normally allocated to the CAP will be redirected and funnelled into other sections of the NRPP. Initially proposed for the NRPP is €865bn within the 2028-2034 EU budget. Billy Kelleher, MEP for Ireland South, said: 'The 21% cut in CAP funding will cause havoc among farm families in Ireland and across the [European] Union.' Another concern within the proposal is that the income support of €300bn ringfenced for EU farmers post 2027. This is a drop from the €387bn previously set aside for farmers within the current budget. This would mean the nearly 120,000 farmers who avail of EU-funded supports such as Basic Income Support for Sustainability (BISS) or Complimentary Redistributive Income Support for Sustainability (CRISS) could experience drops in the amount they receive. Billy Kelleher, MEP for Ireland South, said: The 21% cut in CAP funding will cause havoc among farm families in Ireland and across the [European] Union… "Perhaps it's a negotiating tactic to force member states to increase their national contributions or to agree on new own resources. Either way, it will make farmers deeply worried about their future viability,' said . According to the 2024 National Farm Survey conducted by Teagasc, direct payments amounted to 60% contribution to a family farm income in 2024 across the sectors examined (dairy, cattle rearing, cattle other, sheep, and tillage). This cut will have significant effects on farming families' incomes and livelihoods if a ringfence of €300bn is agreed. A 'Unity Safety Net' of €900m per year of the budget — a total of €6.3bn — is proposed for emergencies within the sector. This is meant to help ensure stable markets and to assist in times of crisis such as extreme weather events, geopolitical situations or persistent structural challenges for EU-based farmers. With the proposals of a single 'rule book', streamlined payments and a young and new farmers' 'starter pack' for targeted supports could benefit small enterprise farmers and young farmers entering or inheriting within the industry, reducing administrative burdens and offering lump sums. Overview is vague on eco schemes Notably vague within the proposal overview made public by the EU Commission was any mention of farming sustainability and eco schemes. Mentions of sustainability schemes and practices were made with no clear outline or budget proposed. In contrast, a leaked document that was circulated before the initial official proposal made several mentions of eco and sustainability schemes with recommendations to enhance these and similar areas for farmers to receive support based on uptake of beneficial practices. Areas outlined in this leaked document suggested support be provided for farmers or individuals who commit to climate change adaptations, climate change mitigations, soil health, preservation of biodiversity, and development of organic farming. Ireland's presidency of the EU Council With the uproar surrounding the proposed EU budget post-2027, the Irish presidency of the EU Council, occurring in the second semester of 2026, will take place throughout a period of finalisation of the 2028-2034 EU budget. Ultimately, this will have farmers and their organisations alike watching the Department of Agriculture closely. The Irish presidency of the EU Council will mean Irish ministers chairing council meetings, and our very own agriculture minister will chair talks that will focus on the finalisation of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) in the context of agriculture. 'We'll negotiate through this proposal line by line and we'll have a very significant role to play during our EU Presidency in the second half of next year,' said agricultural minister, Martin Heydon, in a recent press release regarding the formation of a CAP consultation committee. The last Irish presidency occurred in 2013, which oversaw the agreement of the MFF of the time. Agreements were also reached on the seventh Environmental Action Programme and the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy. Mr Heydon opened the first meeting of the CAP Consultation Committee, made up of key stakeholders, on July 17, to discuss the prospective CAP and EU Budget post-2027. CAP consultation committee The committee contains representatives from: Department of Agriculture, Food & the Marine, the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage (including NPWS), the Department of Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation, the Department of Climate, Energy and the Environment, the Department of Rural and Community Development and the Gaeltacht; The Agricultural Consultants Association, An Taisce, Bord Bia, the County and City Management Association, the Environmental Pillar, the EPA, Ibec; Irish Cattle & Sheep Farmers Association (ICSA), Irish Co-operative Organisation Society (ICOS), Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association (ICMSA), Irish Farmers Association (IFA), Irish Grain Growers Association, Irish Natura & Hill Farmers Association, Irish Organic Association; Irish Rural Link (also representing National Rural Network), Local Development Company Network, Macra na Feirme, National Biodiversity Data Centre, National CAP Network, academic members (UCD and UCC), Teagasc, and Women in Agriculture Stakeholder Group. Mr Heydon said: 'The committee will play a crucial role in ensuring that the CAP reform process is transparent, inclusive, and responsive to the needs of various stakeholders within the agricultural and rural community.' He concluded: 'The Commission proposals for new CAP structures in a new MFF architecture will require careful analysis. This seems like a very big change, but in fact this announcement marks the starting point in a long negotiating process. "I will continue to work very closely with Commissioner Hansen, the European Parliament, and my EU counterparts to ensure that the end result delivers the best possible outcome for Irish farmers and the rural communities in which they live.' Following the committee's meeting, a spokesperson for the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine informed the Irish Examiner that: 'Committee members were briefed on the European Commission announcements, bearing in mind that the detailed CAP legislative proposals have not yet been published. Committee members gave their initial reactions to the announcements and outlined their priorities for the CAP negotiations. Opening the meeting, Mr Heydon emphasised that the commission proposals are only the first step in a lengthy negotiation process. He emphasised that stakeholders on the committee will be essential partners in the process of working to secure a robust CAP that delivers for Ireland and for all member states.'

Moment Iran helicopter faces off with US warship in the Gulf in pathetic show of force after Trump threatens new strikes
Moment Iran helicopter faces off with US warship in the Gulf in pathetic show of force after Trump threatens new strikes

The Irish Sun

time32 minutes ago

  • The Irish Sun

Moment Iran helicopter faces off with US warship in the Gulf in pathetic show of force after Trump threatens new strikes

THIS is the moment a single Iranian naval helicopter tries to drive away a huge US destroyer in a pathetic show of force. The USS Fitzgerald was sailing through the Gulf of Oman this morning when the attack helicopter buzzed the guided missile destroyer. Advertisement 11 The USS Fitzgerald is seen from an Iranian helicopter today Credit: Tasnim News Agency 11 Iran claimed it forced the destroyer to retreat Credit: Tasnim News Agency 11 Iran has vowed to push on with its nuclear enrichment programme 11 Iranian state media claims the pilot issued a "stern warning" to vacate the waters. Footage shows the pilot attempting to order the destroyer to "change course" without success. The destroyer issued threats of its own, Iran said, but "the Iranian pilot... reiterated the warning to stay away from Iranian waters", forcing the US vessel to "give in" and alter its course. Iranian forces have a history of confronting US forces in waters off the country's southern coast. Advertisement Read more about Iran here In 2023, the rogue state said it forced a US submarine to surface while crossing the strategic Strait of Hormuz, which Washington denied. The flashpoint comes at a tense moment between the two nations a month after Donald Trump struck three nuclear sites during Iran's frenzied 12-day war with Israel. Iran's president Masoud Pezeshkian has warned Iran will not halt its nuclear programme despite Trump unleashing the devastating blitz on the trio of facilities. The leader, who was wounded in the leg during the war and forced to flee a high-profile emergency meeting, said it is as "illusion" for Trump to suggest their nuclear programme has been obliterated. Advertisement Most read in The US Sun Latest Breaking He said: "Our nuclear capabilities are in the minds of our scientists and not in the facilities." The comments echo previous remarks by Tehran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi who said Iran would never abandon its uranium enrichment programme. Iran vows to press on with nuke enrichment despite Trump's threats and 'serious damage' done by stealth bombings Pezeshkian added that Iran remains on guard for any future Israeli attack and doesn't believe the ceasefire will hold. He said: "We are fully prepared for any new Israeli military move, and our armed forces are ready to strike deep inside Israel again." Advertisement Reflecting the simmering tensions that remain in the region despite the ceasefire, Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said yesterday there is a possibility of renewed attacks against Iran. His statements came during a situation assessment with several top Israeli military officials, including the chief of staff. He stressed the need for an effective plan to ensure that Iran does not restore its nuclear program. Earlier this week, Araghchi told Fox News: "We Advertisement "And now, more than that, it is a question of national pride ." The Foreign Minister also said: "Enrichment is so dear to us." 11 Iran's president Masoud Pezeshkian has warned Iran will not halt its nuclear programme Credit: Alamy 11 A satellite view shows an overview of Fordow underground complex after the US bombings on June 21 Advertisement 11 Firefighters extinguish a blaze after an Israeli missile strike Credit: AP 11 Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Iran would keep pushing forward with the programme Aragchi confirmed that the damage done by Donald Trump's Operation Midnight Hammer on Iran's nuclear sites had been "serious". But he stopped short of commenting on whether any enriched uranium survived the Advertisement "Our facilities have been damaged – seriously damaged," Araghchi said. "The extent of which is now under evaluation by our atomic energy organisation." He did confirm, however, that all enrichment capabilities in Iran had been ceased as a result of the facilities being "seriously damaged". Iran is due to meet with representatives from Britain, France and Germany on Friday to discuss its nuclear programme. Advertisement The European trio have warned that if no progress is reached by the end of August, they will invoke a "snapback" mechanism. This would reimpose UN sanctions on Tehran that were lifted under a 2015 deal in return for restrictions on Iran's nuclear programme The three European countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to the 2015 nuclear deal - from which the United States withdrew in 2018. 11 Israeli Iron Dome air defence system intercepts missiles over Tel Aviv Advertisement 11 President Donald Trump and his national security team meeting in the Situation Room in June 11 Tehran denies seeking a nuclear weapon and says its nuclear programme is solely meant for civilian purposes. This was despite enrichment levels reaching 60% prior to the US bombardment. Advertisement The The Israelis also orchestrated Operation Red Wedding - which saw 30 top Iranian military chiefs killed in a near-simultaneous blitz as Tel Aviv sought to root out the Less than a fortnight later, Trump joined the Israeli bombing campaign against Iran with The US military 's flagship Advertisement The The Don celebrated his sophisticated blitz on the Iranian regime - and said that the US bombs went through enemy nuclear sites " Iran, which vowed to hit US military bases across the Middle East, sought its revenge by But Tehran seemingly Advertisement Trump dubbed the expected response "weak" before announcing that a ceasefire deal had been reached between the Israelis and Iranians.

McKinsey bars China practice from generative AI work amid geopolitical tensions
McKinsey bars China practice from generative AI work amid geopolitical tensions

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

McKinsey bars China practice from generative AI work amid geopolitical tensions

McKinsey has stopped its China business from undertaking consultancy work related to generative artificial intelligence amid geopolitical tensions, excluding it from one of the most potentially lucrative markets for consultants in the country. The US firm instructed its mainland Chinese operation to refrain from projects deploying generative AI in recent months, according to two people with knowledge of the matter. One of the people said the move was prompted by Washington's growing scrutiny of US companies operating in sensitive sectors such as AI and quantum computing in China. The ban extends to projects in the mainland offices of multinational clients, but does not stop McKinsey's China business from working with companies that have more established forms of AI in their products. One person with knowledge of the matter said the policy could constrain McKinsey's ability to secure new business, given the central role generative AI now plays in corporate strategy and IT systems through products such as chatbots. READ MORE McKinsey has previously come under fire from US lawmakers for working with Chinese state-owned enterprises and local governments while also holding contracts with the US defence department. Bob Sternfels, McKinsey's global managing partner, was questioned by Congress last year over the consulting firm's alleged ties to the Chinese government. Although the US government has not imposed any explicit ban on consultancies advising on AI in China, it has sought to curtail the development of China's AI industry by tightening export controls on advanced chips and limiting American investment in Chinese tech groups. McKinsey's stance is more cautious than that of some of its competitors. A consultant at a rival US firm said they avoided Chinese clients that had been blacklisted by Washington, but continued to undertake AI-related work for others using mainland-based teams. McKinsey's move comes as foreign professional services firms, including law firms, consultancies and investment banks, retrench in China amid geopolitical tensions and a slowing economy. Chinese companies are increasingly turning to cheaper local rivals, while many multinationals are withdrawing from China or greatly reducing their investment in the country. McKinsey has reduced its headcount in mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan to about 1,000 from 1,500 in 2023, according to figures on its website. Despite the pullback, McKinsey continues to position itself globally as a leader in AI transformation. The firm has rolled out internal tools, including an AI chatbot, to help consultants automate tasks such as drafting proposals and building presentations. Its AI-focused unit, QuantumBlack, builds and deploys systems based on large language models. Asked about the ban, McKinsey said in a statement: 'Last year, we further strengthened our client service policies in China, where today our work focuses on multinational and Chinese private sector firms.' The firm added: 'We follow the most rigorous client selection policy in our profession, and we continue to evolve and strengthen our approach.' --Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store