logo
Farage inspires rural Canadians to demand independence from Carney

Farage inspires rural Canadians to demand independence from Carney

Telegraph23-06-2025
It doesn't get much more Canadian than an ice hockey watch party at a sports bar in Olds, a small town in the middle of rural Alberta that could not be further from the political elites who run the country from the Far East.
Cam Davies, the leader of the recently renamed Republican Party of Alberta, slaps backs and shakes hands as he signs up new supporters for the cause of independence, even among those keeping one eye on the biggest game of the season.
'Alberta has a very different mindset. We are a unique culture, farming, ranching, oil and gas sector, mining, forestry,' he says, sipping on a Diet Pepsi and explaining why the province is different to the rest of Canada.
'The people who settled Alberta at the turn of the century left the safety and security of downtown Montreal and Toronto embracing literally nothing. They embraced the risk. They embraced the opportunity in pursuit of freedom and a better life for their families.'
'I'd like to toast that man'
The province has long felt unfairly treated by leaders in the capital Ottawa. Its oil and gas fields make it a key contributor to the national economy but those industries have chafed against new environmental regulations.
Now, the Republican Party of Alberta, buoyed by Nigel Farage 's success at breaking through an older party's monopoly on rightwing voters, is pursuing its goal of splitting from Canada with renewed enthusiasm.
Hopes of a more friendly government were dashed in April when the Liberal Party came from behind to win its fourth general election in a row.
But Mark Carney's arrival as prime minister triggered a surge in interest in independence as the only way to improve Alberta's prosperity. The Liberal leader may have done more than any other politician in recent history to promote the cause runs the local joke. 'I'd like to toast that man,' says Miles Myers, who is Mr Davies' campaign manager.
The separatists face their first test on Monday when voters go to the polls in a provincial by-election.
'So focused on woke ideologies'
Mr Davies is running to represent the riding of Olds-Didsbury-Hills (an area the size of Belgium, he says) in the Alberta legislature.
He is an unlikely standard bearer for an independent Alberta at a time when tensions with the US are running high over Donald Trump's plan to make Canada his 51st state. The 34-year-old politician is a joint US-Canadian citizen, and he spent four years in the US Marines.
He says he and his friends looked at joining the Canadian army. 'Under Justin Trudeau, they were, they were so focused on woke ideologies, gender quotas, tampons in the men's room,' he says.
'We have the same problem in Canada as the UK'
After four years of service, he is now a full-time politician. Earlier this year he left the United Conservative Party, which runs Alberta, to join the Republicans, which had recently changed its name from the Buffalo Party.
Victory here, he explains, would be the first step towards a referendum on breaking away, much like the UK's Brexit vote.
'We have the same problem in Canada as the UK had with a bunch of brainless socialists and spineless conservatives,' he said. 'What we want to make sure happens is that we have a successful referendum, and there's no five years of foot-dragging like what it took for Brexit. Rip the Band Aid off, get it done.'
Behind him, the big TV screens show the Edmonton Oilers (about two hours up the road) going two early goals down in their Stanley Cup final game against the Florida Panthers.
'We are being taxed to death'
The atmosphere in the bar is muted, in part because this is Calgary Flame territory (an hour down the road), explains Richard Lefaivre, who has one eye on the action.
He has signed up Mr Davies' campaign and bought a $20 hat, emblazoned with a map of Alberta and an 'R' for Republicans.
'We work hard and we are being taxed to death,' he said.
One of the key issues in the general election was a cost of living crisis that has sent house prices spiralling beyond the reach of young people.
Pierre Polievre, the Conservative leader, presented himself as the candidate of change but eventually lost to Mr Carney, who it turned out was just enough of a change from his Liberal predecessor Mr Trudeau to eke out a narrow victory.
Danielle Smith, Alberta's premier, is pushing Ottawa for legislative reform and infrastructure projects, such as an oil pipeline, to boost the province's economy and mute calls for separatism.
'Give Mark Carney a chance'
She has offered a referendum if a petition gathers enough support.
But Mr Davis and his supporters say she has not gone far enough and is giving Mr Carney too much credit.
'You have a Conservative government here in Alberta that wants to give Mark Carney a chance,' he said. 'And my message to folks is Mark Carney wrote the book on how to be a socialist. Trudeau just read it.'
The hated Mr Trudeau may have been dumped out of power, runs the argument, but his replacement is much cleverer and much more dangerous.
Their argument faces an uphill battle. Analysts suggest Ms Smith's United Conservative Party is the favorite to win the seat.
'Our voters are enthusiastic'
For Mr Davies, the campaign is about demonstrating a growing movement.
'We started at zero,' he says. 'What I can tell you is that our voters are enthusiastic.'
Even if they are not always totally on the same page.
'I'm hoping Carney says something about us becoming the 51st state,' Sue Carney, who describes herself as a farm wife, says with a broad smile in contrast to the anxious grimaces she triggers among the party officials at the table beside her.
'Anything is better than what we have got.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mike Johnson would have ‘great pause' about a Ghislaine Maxwell pardon
Mike Johnson would have ‘great pause' about a Ghislaine Maxwell pardon

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Mike Johnson would have ‘great pause' about a Ghislaine Maxwell pardon

The US House speaker, Mike Johnson, said on Sunday he would have 'great pause' about granting a pardon or commutation to Ghislaine Maxwell while another House Republican said it should be considered as part of an effort to obtain more information about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. Donald Trump and his allies, including Johnson, have been under immense pressure to disclose more information about Epstein for weeks, especially amid scrutiny over the extent of Trump's relationship with Epstein. The splits over what to do with Maxwell illustrate the complicated challenge posed by the scandal for Trump, his Maga base and the broader Republican party. Johnson weighed in on the possibility of a pardon after Todd Blanche, the deputy attorney general, met with Maxwell, who is serving a 20 year prison sentence for sex trafficking, over two days last week. The one-time British socialite was Epstein's close confidante for years and his partner-in-crime. Epstein killed himself in jail in 2019. The House speaker was asked about the possibility of a pardon by Kristen Welker during an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday. 'If you're asking my opinion, I think 20 years was a pittance. I think she should have a life sentence at least. I mean, think of all these unspeakable crimes,' he said. 'It's hard to put into words how evil this was, and that she orchestrated it and was a big part of it, at least under the criminal sanction, I think is an unforgivable thing. So again, not my decision, but I have great pause about that, as any reasonable person would.' Pressed directly on whether he favored a pardon, Johnson deferred to Trump. 'Obviously that's a decision of the president. He said he had not adequately considered that. I won't get it in front of him. That's not my lane,' he said. Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who has been pushing for disclosure of more Epstein information, said a pardon should be on the table for Maxwell. 'That would be up to the president. But if she has information that could help us, then I think she should testify. Let's get that out there. And whatever they need to do to compel that testimony, as long as it's truthful, I would be in favor of,' he told Welker on Meet the Press. Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who has joined Massie's effort to release more information, said he did not support a pardon for Maxwell, who was charged with perjury in connection to a civil deposition in 2016 (prosecutors did not move forward with those charges once they obtained her sex-trafficking conviction.) 'I'm concerned that the deputy attorney general Todd Blanche is meeting with her supposedly one-on-one. Look, I agree with Congressman Massie that she should testify. But she's been indicted twice on perjury. This is why we need the files. This is why we need independent evidence,' he said on Meet the Press. After Trump pledged to disclose more information about Epstein on the campaign trail, the justice department said earlier this month it had determined Epstein did not have a 'client list' and did not blackmail anyone. Johnson adjourned the US House of Representatives early last week to avoid a vote on releasing Epstein files. He said on Sunday he favored 'maximum disclosure'. During his appearance on Meet the Press, he defended that decision, saying the legislation being pushed by Massie and Khanna would require the release of uncorroborated information and could harm the victims of Epstein and Maxwell's crimes. 'You have to protect innocent people's names and reputations whose names might be, as you noted at the outset of the program, intertwined into all these files,' he said. 'These are minors in many cases who were subjected to unspeakable crimes, abject evil. They've already suffered great harm. We do not need their names being unmasked.' That kind of argument is a 'straw man' Massie said on Sunday. 'Ro and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names will be redacted and that no child pornography will be released. So they're hiding behind that,' he said. Khanna also pushed back on the idea that releasing the information could damage reputations. 'Different people feel that the rich and the powerful have been not held accountable, that they have a different set of rules, and that there may be government officials involved,' he said. 'They're going to be able to distinguish between someone who got a grant for Jeffrey Epstein to do cancer research versus rich and powerful men who were abusing underage girls.'

Tough talk on the small boats crisis is no longer enough
Tough talk on the small boats crisis is no longer enough

Times

time16 hours ago

  • Times

Tough talk on the small boats crisis is no longer enough

President Trump arrived in Scotland for his golf break with a warning to Britain and Europe to get their act together on immigration. Peter Mandelson, our man in Washington, recently observed that there is always a kernel of truth in what the US president says, and there was more than a kernel in what he said about immigration. Trump can point to his own success in bringing down illegal immigration at America's land border with Mexico. What US Border Patrol describes as 'encounters' with illegals fell more than 90 per cent last month compared with October last year, before the president's re-election. Tougher border measures and deportations are having a decisive impact. In contrast, Trump's British hosts have a record of failure in stopping sea crossings from France, which in theory should be easier. In the first half of this year nearly 20,000 migrants crossed the English Channel to the UK, up almost 50 per cent on the corresponding period of 2024 and a record for the first half of a year. Numbers of what the government calls 'irregular' migrants keep rising, with 638 in the seven days to Friday. • Magnus Linklater: Scotland doesn't want Trump — until you're near his golf course It has become the hottest of hot-button issues. A poll for this newspaper by More in Common shows that 61 per cent of people do not think France is doing enough to stop the boats, while nearly seven in ten back Nigel Farage's call for the navy to be involved. People also think the UK's pull factors are part of the problem, with 54 per cent believing it is easier to gain access to welfare in this country and 49 per cent thinking it easier to obtain asylum. It is also being noticed in towns up and down the country, where asylum seekers are being accommodated. Last summer there were riots outside migrant hotels, triggered by false reports about the appalling Southport murders. There has already been an echo of that in Epping in recent days, where peaceful protests by local residents have turned violent thanks to the presence and influence of outside agitators. The violence has rightly been condemned but the sense of unease in many places from the presence of large numbers of young men from different ­cultures with time on their hands is real. • Trump arrives in Scotland to claim immigration is 'killing Europe' The government is in a real bind on this issue, not made any easier by Sir Keir Starmer's clumsy comment that there is 'lots of housing available' for both the homeless and asylum seekers. When Labour was elected on a pledge to scrap the Tory Rwanda scheme and ­target people smugglers, it was popular. Many people thought the Rwanda scheme was an expensive and harsh gimmick that would prove unsuccessful. It was, though, a deterrent and, as things stand, the UK lacks one, while the absence of ID cards makes it easier for illegal immigrants to slip into the country and stay here. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, in a piece for us on Sunday, says she inherited an asylum system in chaos, and pledges to 'keep accelerating enforcement and returns'. The government will use mobile fingerprint units and digital ID cards for foreign nationals 'to take swifter action against those with no right to work or reside here'. What Cooper describes as 'our groundbreaking new pilot agreement with France' will reduce small boat crossings, she claims, and the Border Security Bill 'will enable us to tackle illegal working by delivery drivers, seize the mobile phones of small-boat migrants, and use new ­counter-terror powers against the smuggling gangs'. It is a tough message from her, with a promise to tackle the problem with 'hard graft'. If people are sceptical, however, it is with good reason. If tough talk solved the problem, it would have ended years ago. It is 13 years since Theresa May, as home secretary, promised to create 'a really hostile environment for illegal immigrants'. The people smugglers would not exist if there was not a powerful desire among tens of thousands of people each year to come to this country illegally. The pull factors are still pulling them towards this country and the lack of an effective deterrent makes them think that, once here, they are likely to be able to stay. Until that changes, the problem will persist.

Shock poll shows UK is set for ‘Rainbow Coalition' which will shatter current system – but will it make us ungovernable?
Shock poll shows UK is set for ‘Rainbow Coalition' which will shatter current system – but will it make us ungovernable?

The Sun

time18 hours ago

  • The Sun

Shock poll shows UK is set for ‘Rainbow Coalition' which will shatter current system – but will it make us ungovernable?

BRITAIN is heading for a five-party 'Rainbow Coalition' for the first time in its history if there is a small shift in the polls, experts have warned. Pollsters More in Common recently carried out a massive survey predicting how people may vote at the next election, seat by seat. It predicted a coalition government is on the cards in 2029. 2 2 Nigel Farage's Reform UK would be the biggest party on 290 seats — but not enough for a majority. They would have to team up with the Tories to get into No 10. But just a 3.5 per cent swing from Reform to Labour and a small bump for the Greens would see a five-party Rainbow Coalition led by Labour — with the Lib Dems, SNP, Greens and Plaid Cymru. DAYS before the 2015 General Election, then-Prime Minister David Cameron said: 'Britain faces a simple and inescapable choice — stability and strong Government with me, or chaos with Labour's Ed Miliband.' And in the decade since, with six Prime Ministers, four elections, Brexit gridlock, a pandemic, a cost of living crisis, partygate and the mini-Budget, many rightly wonder: 'If that was stability, how bad could chaos have been?' But at the time Cameron's pitch worked, partly because many feared Labour might end up governing in a three-party combo with the Lib Dems and SNP, with the late former Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond calling the shots. Unlike our neighbours on the Continent, we aren't used to coalitions and dislike the idea of smaller parties holding the Government to ransom. Fast forward to 2025 and it looks like Brits might have to get used to coalitions. Our political map has been reshaped. Fewer than half the public now describe themselves as strong supporters of any one party. The days of being 'a Labour family' or voting for 'anything with a blue rosette' are over. Voters shop around to see what they like best. As recently as 2017, the two main parties took more than 80 per cent of the vote. That plummeted to 57 per cent in last year's election and our polling suggests it's fallen further still since — just 43 per cent now say they'd vote Labour or Tory. Instead, voters are turning to new emerging parties on the Right and the Left. Last year's General Election was the first time post-war that more than three parties each won over ten per cent of the vote — and more than four won over five per cent. Why is this happening? More in Common's latest report, Shattered Britain, delves into what's behind our growing fragmentation. Simply put — it finds the old dividing lines of left and right no longer cut it. New political fault lines are emerging. These include whether we can fix a country many feel is broken by improving our institutions or, as 38 per cent think, we need to 'burn them all down'; whether the answers to our problems are common sense or complex; whether diversity strengthens or erodes British identity; and crucially whether we trust mainstream news or prefer independent voices online. Just as our politics is fragmenting, so too is where we get our information with a knock-on effect on politics, reducing the stranglehold the big two parties have in communicating with the public. None of these divide the map neatly on to our existing political landscape and our First Past The Post system is struggling to cope as these new fault lines scatter Britons' votes across multiple parties. More in Common's latest MRP — a model for projecting what the next Parliament might look like — helps to show how this might all play out. And it suggests an election tomorrow could deliver a political map we've not seen before. Reform UK would come first on 290 seats, with Labour trailing on 126, the Tories barely third on 81 and the Lib Dems at their heels on 73. NUMBER OF SEATS IF ELECTION TOMORROW BRITAIN is heading for a five-party 'Rainbow Coalition' for the first time in its history if there is a small shift in the polls, experts have warned. Pollsters More in Common recently carried out a massive survey predicting how people may vote at the next election, seat by seat. It predicted a coalition government is on the cards in 2029. Nigel Farage's Reform UK would be the biggest party on 290 seats — but not enough for a majority. They would have to team up with the Tories to get into No 10. But just a 3.5 per cent swing from Reform to Labour and a small bump for the Greens would see a five-party Rainbow Coalition led by Labour — with the Lib Dems, SNP, Greens and Plaid Cymru. With 325 seats needed for a majority, the likeliest outcome would be a Reform UK–Tory coalition. But how comfortable would the Conservatives be as junior partners to Farage's party, given the bad blood? Even those headline numbers hide more turbulence beneath the surface. Nearly 100 seats could be won on under 30 per cent of the vote and small shifts could flip many of them. Sixteen and 17-year-olds, voting for the first time at the next election, will make up two to three per cent of the vote, but in tight races that could make all the difference. With only a modest Labour recovery from mid-term blues and a Reform dip, we could end up with the only viable option being a five-party coalition: Labour, Lib Dems, SNP, Greens and Plaid Cymru. How's that for a stable Government? Ungovernable And that's before factoring in Jeremy Corbyn's newly announced party, which our polling suggests could take ten per cent of the vote, further muddying our electoral waters. At this stage, it's fair to ask will the next Parliament be ungovernable? Maybe, but we've been here before. In 2019, the Brexit Party was topping the polls, the Lib Dems surged, and the two main parties were barely registering a third of the vote. On election day, Boris Johnson won a stonking majority. In the 1980s, the SDP–Liberal Alliance looked set to reshape politics, only to fall back. Still, as Britain drifts into uncharted political waters and the two main parties continue to struggle, it might be wise to use our summer holidays on the Continent to pick up a few tips on coalition-building from our European neighbours. Voting map blown apart By Kate Fergu s on THE UK used to be known for its stable, two-party system. The choice was either Tory or Labour. Elections nearly always delivered a majority government. But all that could be about to change. Our political system has become fragmented. Nigel Farage and Reform UK have redrawn the political map and decimated the Tory vote. Labour are being challenged on the Left by the rise of the Greens and the creation of Jeremy Corbyn's far-left party. That begs the question: is Britain about to become ungovernable? We are not used to coalitions but pollsters say the most likely outcome will be a Reform-Tory pairing. But can we imagine Nigel Farage and Kemi Badenoch in bed together? The alternative is a coalition of Labour, the Lib Dems, SNP, the Greens and Plaid Cymru. The next general election is still four years away and much can happen in that time. One thing is clear — voters want politicians who can get things done. It's why they gave Boris Johnson a majority to get Brexit sorted. It's why they handed Sir Keir Starmer a landslide — then sent his ratings tumbling when he failed to come up with reforms. If the polls stay the same then Britain is heading for more political turbulence. But who knows? Voters may hand Nigel Farage a majority next time. I would not bet against it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store