Redress process for Post Office Horizon victims could go on for years
More than 900 subpostmasters were wrongfully prosecuted by the Post Office between 1999 and 2015 after faulty Horizon software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts.
The previous Conservative government said those who had their convictions quashed were eligible for £600,000 payouts – with victims such as Amanda and Norman Barber accepting the fixed offer.
Despite losing their business and home, the Warrington couple said they found it 'almost impossible' to provide the details required to have their case individually assessed so did not want to risk 'getting less'.
Unexplained shortfalls in their accounts at Thelwall Post Office eventually led to them being prosecuted over a deficit of £5,600 – despite using around £200,000 of their own money to attempt to balance the books.
Both received a community order of 12 months and 100 hours' community service.
Speaking about the redress process, Amanda, 55, said: 'We were being asked to produce evidence we simply couldn't get our hands on with regards to our losses as we are talking going back 15 years.
'We found it almost impossible to provide the details needed to go down the route of having our case individually assessed.
'It just didn't seem worth it. I think subpostmasters are still being left in an impossible situation when it comes to seeking true and full redress.
'Given the time it would take we simply couldn't risk a full assessment and getting less, particularly because the lack of documents we had.
'It got to the stage where, when the £600,000 was offered, it seemed the best way to bring years of torture to an end.'
Redress has been a key issue for subpostmasters since the scandal came to light, with many finding the various compensation schemes difficult to navigate.
Lead campaigner Sir Alan Bates previously described the various processes as 'quasi-kangaroo courts', telling The Sunday Times that the Department for Business and Trade 'sits in judgment of the claims and alters the goal posts as and when it chooses'.
The chairman of the Horizon IT inquiry, Sir Wyn Williams, is due to publish his findings on redress on Tuesday, with Amanda Barber saying she will join other subpostmasters in attending the report's publication event.
She said: 'We feel we just need to be there to hear what is said.
'Lives were ruined and compensation has been made too hard to get, and too little by far.'
One law firm involved in securing redress for victims, Hudgell Solicitors, said it still had more than 700 ongoing compensation cases to resolve.
Solicitor Neil Hudgell said the firm had agreed damages for more than 300 people, totalling £170 million, but said the redress process had 'far too much red tape to get through'.
He said: 'We have seen inconsistencies between the various compensation schemes, which remain over-engineered and over-legalistic, with far too much red tape to get through.
'There has also been a repeated failure to give the benefit of the doubt to subpostmasters in appropriate circumstances.
'It's made it far too long a process for so many people who have been through so much, and are now in the latter stages of their lives.
'It has been retraumatising for many, and increasing numbers are sadly passing away without seeing redress.'
Addressing how long it could take for all claims to be settled, the solicitor added: 'At the current speed, we are looking at another two to three years.'
Mr Hudgell said one client who was initially offered £50,000 has seen their offer rise to £500,000.
He added: 'It is not a one-off glitch, but a stark illustration of a very common issue.
'It has been a painful process for all, and ended with a new appeals process being confirmed earlier this year, in recognition that many people had been under-compensated.'
In a statement, the Department for Business and Trade said: 'We are grateful for the inquiry's work, which has revealed the immeasurable suffering that victims of the scandal have endured.
'This Government has quadrupled the total amount paid to affected postmasters to provide them with full and fair redress, with more than £1 billion having now been paid to over 7,300 claimants.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN GLOVER: Britain is broken. Wherever you look the State is failing. In many ways the mess is worse than in the 1970s - when Labour last ruined the country
Nearly 40 years have passed since Norman Tebbit, who died this week, was a power in the land. He was one of a handful of outstanding Conservative Cabinet ministers who gave Margaret Thatcher vital support in her crusade to save Britain from the depredations of socialism. Tebbit wasn't an intellectual. He didn't even go to university. But he understood with greater clarity than grander Tories with Oxbridge degrees how militant trade unions were destroying this country. His greatest achievement was to curb their excesses.
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Harvard makes biggest concession to Trump yet after he said Ivy League college was anti-conservative
Harvard is scrambling to shake off its woke image with a multimillion-dollar plan to launch a new academic center championing conservative thought - after months of pressure from Donald Trump and the White House. The Ivy League giant is reviving plans for a 'viewpoint diversity' center, modeled on Stanford's Hoover Institution - a hub for free-market ideas and small-government principles, the Wall Street Journal reported. Talks that had been happening behind the scenes picked up speed after pro-Palestinian unrest hit campus in late 2023 and the Trump administration ramped up attacks on what it brands Harvard's 'Marxist' ideology. The Journal reported that Harvard is courting deep-pocketed donors to fund the initiative, which insiders say could carry a price tag of $500 million to $1 billion. A Harvard spokesperson said the center wouldn't take sides politically but would 'model the use of evidence-based, rigorous logic and a willingness to engage with opposing views.' The effort unfolds as Harvard remains locked in a fierce clash with the Trump administration, which has accused the university of allowing antisemitism and enforcing what it calls biased DEI policies. In response, the government has slashed its federal funding, challenged its tax-exempt status, and taken aim at its international student programs. Education Secretary Linda McMahon said this week that talks with Harvard and fellow Ivy League college Columbia are still underway, noting, 'We're getting close... it's just not moving as fast as I'd like.' Some members of the Harvard Corporation view the initiative as a reasonable way to encourage viewpoint diversity while maintaining the university's independence, a person familiar with their thinking to the Journal. But a source close to the Trump administration dismissed it as 'window-dressing.' Harvard President Alan Garber has pushed back against external influence, even as he promotes a broader campaign for 'intellectual vitality' on campus. Internal surveys show growing concerns over self-censorship - and a 2023 poll found only 3 percent of Harvard College faculty identify as conservative, the Journal reported. Former Harvard Business School Dean Nitin Nohria floated the idea to donors back in 2020, according to the Journal - and now Provost John Manning is leading the charge to bring it to life. If the initiative moves ahead, Harvard would be the latest elite school to join a growing wave of universities launching centers dedicated to civics, classical education, and Western political thought - a trend already embraced by Arizona State, the University of Florida, and Yale. 'This is a national reform movement,' Paul Carrese, founding director of one such center at Arizona State, told the Journal.
North Wales Chronicle
9 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Plan to link rare cancer sufferers to suitable clinical trials clears Commons
Allison Gardner said the Rare Cancers Bill 'offers an entirely reasonable set of steps for research, for reviewing and hopefully enabling the development of so-called orphan drugs'. She thanked the Bill's proposer, Scott Arthur, the Labour MP for Edinburgh South West, before it cleared the Commons at third reading. If it clears the Lords after scrutiny at a later date, the Health Secretary would have to review the law relating to 'orphan' drugs, for life-threatening or chronically disabling conditions which affect fewer than five in 10,000 people or medicines which are unlikely to generate enough of a return to justify their further development. It would also demand that the Government sets up a system to enable potential clinical trial participants to be identified and contacted. 'We are indeed surrounded by cancer,' Dr Gardner told the Commons. The Labour MP for Stoke-on-Trent South had earlier said her mother, Breeda, died with pancreatic cancer. 'She fell ill on a Saturday, was diagnosed on a Thursday, and was dead by the following Saturday,' she said. 'One week after that, my father died of oesophageal cancer – not a rare cancer, I believe, but a less survivable one.' Her voice cracked with emotion as she dedicated her support for the Bill to her mother; her partner Jim's sister, Stella Gilbert, who died with bile duct cancer; and her sister's mother-in-law, Doreen, who died with pancreatic cancer. Mr Arthur, whose father-in-law died of glioblastoma, told the Commons that the NHS was 'ill-equipped' to deal with rare cancer patients. 'Awareness levels are often low amongst clinicians, and this leads to the scourge of late diagnosis,' he warned. He said the Bill was about 'justice; it's about creating a more equal playing field for these patients and their families'. Mr Arthur won the support of Conservative shadow health minister, Luke Evans, who said: 'The Bill won't solve everything overnight, but it's a serious step forward and a statement that even the rarest conditions deserve our fullest attentions.' Care minister Stephen Kinnock said the Bill 'aligned' with Government commitments and added: 'The Rare Cancers Bill raises the profile of rare cancers research, ensures our international regulatory competitiveness, and also allows rare cancer patients to be contacted as quickly as possible about research opportunities.' It was one of three private members' bills which cleared the Commons on Friday. MPs called 'aye' to approve Labour MP for Amber Valley Linsey Farnsworth's Unauthorised Entry to Football Matches Bill, which would create a new offence for fans tailgating, 'jibbing' or barging their way into stadiums. They also backed the Secure 16 to 19 Academies Bill, proposed by Labour MP for Cramlington and Killingworth, Emma Foody. It would reduce the minimum notice period for mutual, no-fault termination of a secure schools funding agreement from seven to two years. A further 32 Bills were listed for debate, but MPs ran out of time to accept or reject them. Among these was Ian Byrne's proposal for a Hillsborough law, named after the deadly 1989 stadium crush in Sheffield, which would place a legal duty of candour on public servants and authorities and provide legal aid for victims of disasters or state-related deaths. When the Labour MP for Liverpool West Derby rose to push his Bill, formally titled the Public Authority (Accountability) Bill, Labour whips called 'object' to stall its progress beyond second reading. Former Labour shadow chancellor John McDonnell, the now-independent MP for Hayes and Harlington who was sat next to Mr Byrne, heckled 'how disgraceful'. Mr Byrne, who did not name a date for its consideration in the future, spoke from he seat when he said: 'We need to get on with this.'
