UK-Nigeria business ties strengthen following London mayor's first Africa visit
The United Kingdom is strengthening its economic and technological collaboration with Africa, focusing on Nigeria as a pivotal center.
Lagos was highlighted as Africa's fastest-growing tech ecosystem during the Mayor of London's visit to the city.
Discussions during the visit revolved around digital innovation, trade, and collaboration between UK and Nigerian businesses.
This growing alignment was highlighted during the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan's recent visit to Lagos, where a high-level tech delegation met with Nigerian innovators and business leaders to explore collaborative ventures and partnerships.
It was the first official visit to the continent by a sitting Mayor of London — a symbolic and strategic gesture that highlighted the increasing importance British officials are placing on Africa's fast-growing markets.
At the centre of discussions were digital expansion, trade facilitation, and cross-border innovation, with Lagos, Africa's fastest-growing tech ecosystem positioned as a natural gateway.
Khan hails Lagos tech innovation
During his landmark visit to Lagos, London Mayor Sadiq Khan praised the city's booming tech scene, calling Yaba's innovation hub 'Yabacon Valley' and describing it as a symbol of Nigeria's immense potential.
' We come not as patrons, not in a patronising way, ' Khan told ARISE NEWS. ' I recognise the history of the UK and Nigeria has not been an equal one in the past. The new government's reset relations — we've come as partners.'
Accompanied by a delegation of top London firms in fintech, sustainability, and other sectors, Khan highlighted Lagos as ' the fastest growing tech cluster in the world, ' lauding its ' ambition, energy and great ideas.'
UK-Nigeria business ties deepen
According to Mayowa Olugbile, CEO of Itana, Africa's first Digital Special Economic Zone, British businesses are increasingly recognising Nigeria's youthful talent pool, vibrant startup culture, and growing digital infrastructure as strategic advantages in today's competitive global landscape.
' This is a relationship that has huge potential,'. 'More businesses from London expand into Africa than from any other city in the world, while the bilateral trading relationship between the UK and Africa continues to rise. ' he told Business Insider Africa
Olugbile added that the natural synergies between both regions are becoming more apparent, noting: 'As the Mayor observed, Lagos is the fastest growing tech cluster anywhere in the world, while London is the largest tech hub in Europe and a global hub for trade and finance.'
As both governments lean into this evolving partnership, the Lagos visit is seen not just as a diplomatic mission but as a catalyst for long-term investment, joint innovation, and shared economic growth across both regions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ian Baker-Finch will retire from golf coverage on CBS
FILE - Actor Bill Murray, center, jokes with announcer Ian Baker-Finch, right, on the 18th green about his shoes as D.A. Points, left, looks on during the trophy presentation of the AT&T Pebble Beach National Pro-Am golf tournament in Pebble Beach, Calif., Sunday, Feb. 13, 2011. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg, File) NEW YORK (AP) — Ian Baker-Finch is retiring after CBS ends its PGA Tour golf coverage next week after nearly 19 years of his friendly Australian voice contributing to the network's broadcast. Baker-Finch, best known for his British Open victory in 1991 among his 16 victories worldwide, joined CBS in 2007. He had worked the previous decade in golf announcing with ESPN and TNT. Advertisement 'Golf has been an enormous part of my life,' Baker-Finch, 64, said in a statement. 'I was fortunate to compete against the best players in the game and more recently work with the very best in television.' CBS ends its 2025 coverage of the PGA Tour next week at the Wyndham Championship. 'As a major champion during his successful playing career and over three decades in broadcasting, Ian Baker-Finch distinguished himself as one of the most respected and trusted voices in golf,' said David Berson, the president and CEO of CBS Sports. 'As he announces his retirement, we'll miss his passion, insight, warmth and steady presence on the air but know he will continue to make his mark across the world of golf.' ___ AP golf:
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Woke ‘Banter Bill' will destroy Britain's last bastion of free speech: the local pub
It's official: Nowhere in Britain is safe from the woke speech police. First they stomped their jackboot on universities, where it's now a risky business to express conservative opinions or even to state biological facts, including such sinful utterances as: 'Men are not women.' Then they came for the workplace. Advertisement Crack an off-color joke or voice a dissenting view and you might be made to take an 'awareness-raising course' — or what the Soviets called re-education. Now the Woke Inquisition is feverishly eyeing yet another zone of British society for one of its joyless crackdowns, this time laying down its ruthless writ in arguably the most sacred space in all of the United Kingdom. Where is that? The pub. Advertisement It pains me just to write these sentences, as a British-Irish hybrid who enjoys nothing more than a cold pint and a cheeky chat inside Britain's greatest invention — the public house. But it's true: Now the offense-taking freaks want to clamp down on banter in bars. The repression comes courtesy of Keir Starmer's Labour government, which is crazily allergic to freedom of speech, via an Employment Rights Bill currently up for a vote in Parliament. Advertisement Most of the bill is standard workplace stuff, revising the rules on sick pay, unfair dismissal, bereavement leave and other mundane matters. But the bill's Clause 20 will compel businesses to protect 'vulnerable' staff members from the objectionable utterances of their clientele. It demands that employers take 'all reasonable steps' to defend their staff from 'non-specific' 'harassment' by 'third parties.' Strip away all the legalese, and it means businesses will be liable for the hurt feelings of employees who feel 'harassed' by something a customer says. Advertisement That could include everything from offhand remarks to saucy jokes and 'contentious political views,' says the UK's Free Speech Union. The clause is labeled the 'banter ban,' and no wonder: It threatens to suffocate the chatter and wisecracks that make Britain's pubs world-famous. If this bill becomes law in its current form, its impact will be instant, dire and Orwellian. Imagine you're the manager of a feisty public house where pint-quaffing patrons love to engage in free and raucous conversation. You will be in a constant state of panic, forever fretting that a twentysomething bar staffer might overhear a blue joke or an unwoke opinion, then sue you for failing to guard them from such 'harassment.' Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters We might be headed for truly Kafkaesque territory, with pubs forced to employ 'banter bouncers' to reprimand the patter of those who've had a few too many. These literal speech police might 'eavesdrop on customer conversations,' the FSU warns, and 'eject them if they say something 'problematic.'' Advertisement After all, if a merry drinker says to his pal that 'trans women are men' or 'immigration levels are too high,' some purple-haired pint-puller who overhears them might feel offended. Better to boot out such customers than risk being sued, many pub-owners will reason. And it won't only be pubs: Will football fans have to temper their chants lest some PC steward take offense? Will parks put up signs saying, 'No cycling, no ball games and NO BANTER' to guard staff from the apparently crushing experience of hearing an idea they disagree with? Advertisement Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! This 'banter bill' would empower the easily offended, giving them jurisdiction over every arena of life, even the good ol' boozer. Their fragile self-esteem would take precedence over everything else, including the God-given right of every free-born Brit to get drunk and say whatever the hell he wants. Britain would be ruled by a wimps' veto, having to temper our tongues to avoid upsetting those woke fainthearts who think words are violence. Advertisement We are witnessing something quite terrifying — the spread of cancel culture from the campus to society as a whole. Having trained an entire new hyper-fragile generation to value their own feelings more than other people's freedoms, we should not be surprised that they're now bringing this censorious narcissism into the world with them. And while the United States has far better free-speech protections than Britain, you Americans are not immune to this creep of speech-policing. Too many of us turned a blind eye as the young fell under the spell of that creepy cult of censorship that insists 'words are wounding,' and now the British government is building a legal force field to shield these wallflowers from their fellow citizens' chatter. Advertisement The pub is truly Britain's hallowed ground. It's there that we cut loose, get tipsy and say what we cannot say in the more buttoned-up zones of society. For centuries Britons have been heading to their local to drink heartily and speak freely. So it's no exaggeration to say that Britain will no longer be Britain if we lose our pubs to wokeness. We don't need protection from 'offensive' words — but from the rampant authoritarianism of the mad elites. Brendan O'Neill is chief political writer for the British online magazine spiked.
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Obama office: Trump's ‘bizarre' claims ‘weak attempt at distraction'
Former President Obama on Tuesday denied the Trump administration's claims that he manipulated intelligence related to Russian interference in the 2016 election. 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,' Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesperson for Obama, said in a statement sent to NewsNation, The Hill's sister company. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio,' he added. Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard issued a report last Friday detailing the alleged election fraud and said officials involved were engaged in a 'treasonous conspiracy.' Gabbard also said her office was turning over evidence to the Justice Department for possible criminal referrals with the support of President Trump. 'He's guilty, it's not a question,' Trump told reporters referring to Obama. 'This was treason, this was every word you can think of.' The president said then-Vice President Biden, former FBI director James Comey, former DNI director James Clapper and former CIA director John Brennan could face criminal charges for the controversy. The report follows Trump's March memo ordering the declassification of 'all files related to Crossfire Hurricane,' the name given to the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Trump has long denied that Russia influenced his successful White House bid in 2016 against Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Clinton's campaign team spent more than $1 million on an investigation into Trump's ties to Russia. The Perkins Coie law firm led the probe using resources from the research company Fusion GPS, which later hired retired British spy Christopher Steele to discover information on foreign involvement in the U.S. election. The DNC was ultimately fined $105,000 and the Clinton campaign was fined $8,000 by the Federal Election Commission for not disclosing the amount spent on the investigation, according to a letter sent by the agency following inquiry.
