OpenAI and Jony Ive's startup seal the deal
Jony Ive and his LoveFrom design studio remain independent. Meanwhile, io's co-founders, Scott Cannon, Evans Hankey and Tang Tan, are now OpenAI employees. (Around 50 other io engineers, designers and researchers are, too.)
OpenAI and Ive are currently working on "a family of AI products for everyone." In May, Sam Altman and Ive dropped some hints about what to expect from their first product. They said it will be unobtrusive, portable and fully aware of its surroundings and the user's actions. It reportedly won't be a phone or a pair of glasses, which were likely the first two guesses for most people.
For the uninitiated, Ive was a trusted collaborator and confidant of Steve Jobs during the creative explosion that produced some of the most influential tech products ever made. Ive left Apple in 2019 to form LoveFrom. He and Apple parted ways three years later.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
18 minutes ago
- Axios
Mark Zuckerberg details Meta's superintelligence plans
Shengjia Zhao — formerly of OpenAI — will be chief scientist at Meta's new Superintelligence Lab, Mark Zuckerberg announced on Threads on Friday. Why it matters: The company is spending billions of dollars to hire key employees as it looks to jumpstart its effort and compete with Google, OpenAI and others. What they're saying: " In this role, Shengjia will set the research agenda and scientific direction for our new lab working directly with me and Alex," Zuckerberg wrote on Threads, presumably meaning former Scale CEO and founder Alexandr Wang. Catch-up quick: In addition to individual pay packages reportedly worth up to hundreds of millions of dollars per person in some cases, the company is investing $14.3 billion to take a 49% stake in Scale AI and hire its CEO Alexandr Wang. The company has been poaching talent from across the industry, nabbing key folks from Apple, OpenAI and Ilya Sutskever's Safe Superintelligence. From Apple, Meta grabbed AI experts Mark Lee and Tom Gunter, after hiring their boss Ruoming Pang, former head of Apple's LLM team, Bloomberg reported. Meta also hired Tianhe Yu, Cosmo Du and Weiyue Wang, three of the engineers that worked on the Gemini model that achieved gold medal performance at last week's International Mathematical Olympiad, right after the results were announced, per The Information. Between the lines: Hiring talent is just one part of the equation, of course.
Fast Company
18 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Think your ChatGPT therapy sessions are private? Think again.
If you've been confessing your deepest secrets to an AI chatbot, it might be time to reevaluate. With more people turning to AI for instant life coaching, tools like ChatGPT are sucking up massive amounts of personal information on their users. While that data stays private under ideal circumstances, it could be dredged up in court – a scenario that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warned users in an appearance on Theo Von's popular podcast this week. 'One example that we've been thinking about a lot… people talk about the most personal shit in their lives to ChatGPT,' Altman said. 'Young people especially, use it as a therapist, as a life coach, 'I'm having these relationship problems, what should I do?' And right now, if you talk to a therapist or a lawyer or a doctor about those problems, there's legal privilege for it, there's doctor patient confidentiality, there's legal confidentiality.' Altman says that as a society we 'haven't figured that out yet' for ChatGPT. Altman called for a policy framework for AI, though in reality OpenAI and its peers have lobbied for a regulatory light touch. 'If you go talk to ChatGPT about your most sensitive stuff and then there's a lawsuit or whatever, we could be required to produce that, and I think that's very screwed up,' Altman told Von, arguing that AI conversations should be treated with the same level of privacy as a chat with a therapist. While interactions with doctors and therapists are protected by federal privacy laws in the U.S., exceptions exist for instances in which someone is a threat to themselves or others. And even with those strong privacy protections, relevant medical information can be surfaced by court order, subpoena or a warrant. Altman's argument seems to be that from a regulatory perspective, ChatGPT shares more in common with licensed, trained specialists than it does with a search engine. 'I think we should have the same concept of privacy for your conversations with AI that we do with a therapist,' he said. Altman also expressed concerns about how AI will adversely impact mental health, even as people seek its advice in lieu of the real thing. 'Another thing I'm afraid of… is just what this is going to mean for users' mental health. There's a lot of people that talk to ChatGPT all day long,' Altman said. 'There are these new AI companions that people talk to like they would a girlfriend or boyfriend. 'I don't think we know yet the ways in which [AI] is going to have those negative impacts, but I feel for sure it's going to have some, and we'll have to, I hope, we can learn to mitigate it quickly.'
CNET
18 minutes ago
- CNET
Even OpenAI's CEO Says Be Careful What You Share With ChatGPT
Maybe don't spill your deepest, darkest secrets with an AI chatbot. You don't have to take my word for it. Take it from the guy behind the most popular generative AI model on the market. Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT maker OpenAI, raised the issue this week in an interview with host Theo Von on the This Past Weekend podcast. He suggested that your conversations with AI should have similar protections as those you have with your doctor or lawyer. At one point, Von said one reason he was hesitant to use some AI tools is because he "didn't know who's going to have" his personal information. "I think that makes sense," Altman said, "to really want the privacy clarity before you use it a lot, the legal clarity." More and more AI users are treating chatbots like their therapists, doctors or lawyers, and that's created a serious privacy problem for them. There are no confidentiality rules and the actual mechanics of what happens to those conversations are startlingly unclear. Of course, there are other problems with using AI as a therapist or confidant, like how bots can give terrible advice or how they can reinforce stereotypes or stigma. (My colleague Nelson Aguilar has compiled a list of the 11 things you should never do with ChatGPT and why.) Altman's clearly aware of the issues here, and seems at least a bit troubled by it. "People use it, young people especially, use it as a therapist, a life coach, I'm having these relationship problems, what should I do?" he said. "Right now, if you talk to a therapist or a lawyer or a doctor about those problems, there's legal privilege for it." The question came up during a part of the conversation about whether there should be more rules or regulations around AI. Rules that stifle AI companies and the tech's development are unlikely to gain favor in Washington these days, as President Donald Trump's AI Action Plan released this week expressed a desire to regulate this technology less, not more. But rules to protect them might find favor. Read more: AI Essentials: 29 Ways You Can Make Gen AI Work for You, According to Our Experts Altman seemed most worried about a lack of legal protections for companies like his to keep them from being forced to turn over private conversations in lawsuits. OpenAI has objected to requests to retain user conversations during a lawsuit with the New York Times over copyright infringement and intellectual property issues. (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.) "If you go talk to ChatGPT about the most sensitive stuff and then there's a lawsuit or whatever, we could be required to produce that," Altman said. "I think that's very screwed up. I think we should have the same concept of privacy for your conversations with AI that you do with your therapist or whatever." Be careful what you tell AI about yourself For you, the issue isn't so much that OpenAI might have to turn your conversations over in a lawsuit. It's a question of whom you trust with your secrets. William Agnew, a researcher at Carnegie Mellon University who was part of a team that evaluated chatbots on their performance dealing with therapy-like questions, told me recently that privacy is a paramount issue when confiding in AI tools. The uncertainty around how models work -- and how your conversations are kept from appearing in other people's chats -- is reason enough to be hesitant. "Even if these companies are trying to be careful with your data, these models are well known to regurgitate information," Agnew said. If ChatGPT or another tool regurgitates information from your therapy session or from medical questions you asked, that could appear if your insurance company or someone else with an interest in your personal life asks the same tool about you. "People should really think about privacy more and just know that almost everything they tell these chatbots is not private," Agnew said. "It will be used in all sorts of ways."
