Chelsea's Club World Cup win was a victory for PR, not football
Image: AFP
To be honest, few would have been surprised to learn that the real Fifa Club World Cup trophy — designed by Tiffany & Co — is destined to remain in the White House in perpetuity.
It's the kind of garish Americana that fits neatly with the current president's brand: shiny, performative, and tailor-made for a press conference. Another glittering bauble to be paraded as proof of greatness — regardless of who actually earned it on the pitch.
'I said, 'When are you going to pick up the trophy?'' Trump remarked earlier this week, while showing it off at the White House. 'And (Fifa) said, 'We're never going to pick it up. You can have it forever in the Oval Office. We're making a new one.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
'And they actually made a new one,' he added. 'So, that was quite exciting, but it is in the Oval right now.'
So, after all that effort — seven matches, difficult conditions, the fatigue of a draining season — the eventual winners, Chelsea, didn't even get to take home the real McCoy. Instead, some replica will sit in the trophy cabinet at Cobham.
Moreover, they didn't even get to enjoy their moment properly after beating PSG 3–0. Trump gate-crashed the celebration, too.
These moments kind of encapsulate the problems with the Club World Cup for me. It's a political statement — not so much for the US (although they certainly profited from it), but for Fifa. It was created to satisfy the vanity of that organisation, to strong-arm the international association's members into participating.
According to reports the official Fifa Club World Cup trophy will remain in the White House. Photo: AFP
Image: AFP
They dangled prestige, a shedload of money and the title of 'world champions', but much like the replica trophy, it still means very little. Chelsea will not — at least not in this generation — look back on winning the competition as a defining moment in their history. That's not to say that, in 100 years' time, it won't carry some aura, but right now it feels all very manufactured.
From a purely commercial standpoint, you can't argue with it. Chelsea are R20 billion richer, their American owners have a new PR avenue to explore, complete with catchphrases to inspire the existing fanbase, while trying to court new supporters in the US and Asia. And a trophy is still a trophy.
But, had they lost, the narrative would have been the usual fallback: 'It was a good experience for this young team. It'll help them grow and prepare for next season.'
CHAMPIONS OF THE WORLD. pic.twitter.com/wWUEoi25Ov — Chelsea FC (@ChelseaFC) July 13, 2025
I'm a Chelsea fan. On Monday, after winning the cup — if you can call the Voyager-inspired design a cup — I woke up and immediately started riling up my fellow football fans (especially the Liverpool ones). I did so with tongue firmly in cheek, poking and prodding for a reaction.
'Good morning, champs,' I wrote to my fellow Blues supporters, with a knowing smile.
I didn't do it because I care deeply about the win (although I am proud of the performance) but rather because of the absurdity of it all.
When it comes down to it — was it the tournament a success?
It certainly was, in its own peculiar way. Just not in on-field terms. It felt like winning an elongated Community Shield — and I remain far more concerned about the upcoming Premier League and Uefa Champions League. I believe most, if not all, of the clubs that participated — regardless of where they come from — harbour a similar sentiment.
Maybe one day the Club World Cup will carry the weight its organisers desperately want it to. But until then, it remains a curious experiment: part sporting contest, part PR stunt — with just enough gloss to convince us it matters, even if we know deep down it doesn't.
After all, football has a funny way of turning sideshows into centrepieces.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
US eyes 'back to basics' revamp of G20 when it assumes presidency next year
The US aims to pare the Group of 20 major economies back to its financial roots next year when it takes over the rotating presidency from South Africa, sources familiar with the Trump administration's plans said. Washington has scaled back its participation this year, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent skipping a G20 finance chiefs' meeting that started in Durban, South Africa, on Thursday, his second absence from an event this year. Experts and administration sources say the absence of top US officials reflects the Trump administration's skepticism about multilateral institutions such as the G20, which the US helped found in 1999. US President Donald Trump has upended the global economy with a wide-ranging trade war that has targeted many developing countries, including G20 members, while slashing foreign development funds to pursue an "America First" agenda. Three US sources familiar with the matter say Washington still plans to assume the G20 presidency at the end of the year, which coincides with the 250th anniversary of the US. But it will focus on two "tracks" — the leaders' summit and the financial track — eliminating other working groups and ministerial-level meetings, including those on energy, health, commerce and the environment, two of the sources said.
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Newspaper headlines from around the world - Friday, 18 July 2025
Here are the stories that made headlines on the front pages of newspapers worldwide on Friday, 18 July 2025. The New York Times front page reported that China is investing billions to catch up in the AI race. The Washington Post reported that a Brazilian judge is in Trump's sights. The Jerusalem Post's front page reported that Shas ministers have officially resigned. China Daily's front page reported progress in intellectual property protection for more foreign innovators. The Daily Mail's front page reported that police will use facial recognition cameras at Notting Hill Carnival. The Guardian's front page reported that Labour has suspended Diane Abbott for a second time. If you wish to stay up-to-date – for FREE – on the latest international and South African news, then bookmark The South African website for all that plus the latest in the world of finance, sport, lifestyle – and more. Did we mention it was 100% free to read …?
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Trump's tariffs make us look like a monkey with a grenade
US President Donald Trump announced that he was immediately undertaking a programme to supply weapons to Nato for use in Ukraine. Image: AP US President Donald Trump's yo-yoing foreign policy continues to cause unprecedented ructions in international relations, with his sudden adoption of a hard stance against Russia the latest example of the dreaded unpredictability in diplomacy. One expert has likened President Trump's cantankerous approach to foreign relations to a 'monkey playing with a hand grenade'. In a typical flip-flop move this week, the US leader gave Russia 50 days to make a deal on ending the war with Ukraine or face 100% tariffs. In addition, Trump announced that he was immediately undertaking a programme to supply weapons to Nato for use in Ukraine at a cost of up to a trillion dollars. 'America will manufacture and supply, and Nato will pay,' he said. Leading Nato member-states — the UK, France and Germany, under the new Chancellor Friedrich Merz — have been leading the charge to arm Ukraine to the teeth, and have enthusiastically flirted with the idea of direct involvement in the conflict to defeat Russia. However, the apprehension to go to war with Russia without US backing has delayed the urge to confront Russia more directly. Instead, the three nations have led a public relations ramp-up of rhetoric against Russia, vowing to do everything in their power to ensure the attainment of a Ukrainian victory. On the information warfare front, the West started off by successfully cutting off the impactful Russian international TV station, Russia Today (RT) from its pre-war global reach. This was part of the strategy to win outright the Foucauldian battle over the framing of discourse, thereby influencing public opinion against Russia. But the advent of technology and social media has ensured the plurality of voices outside of the control of the traditional mainstream media. As such, RT continues to be available on other platforms such as Telegram. Lately, Nato has been particularly desperate to keep the Trump administration in the closest proximity, particularly in the wake of glaring indicators that Trump may no longer subscribe to Nato's Article 5, which refers to 'an attack on one is an attack on all'. The desperation to woo Trump was too conspicuous at the recent Nato summit in the Netherlands. Trying too hard to endear himself to Trump, Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte went as far as referring to the US president as 'daddy'. The summit ended on a positive note for members, at least publicly, concealing the simmering differences inside the offensive military bloc. But NATO's jubilation could be short-lived. A week in politics can be long, but 50 days is definitely too long. I bet a lot will change. Trump is desperate for a Nobel Peace Prize. Stopping the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza is the White House's top priority. Any hindrance to the attainment of set objectives will be met with tariffs, sanctions, diplomatic isolation, and military might. Moscow insists that the Kremlin is willing and ready to negotiate a truce with Ukraine. However, in ending the conflict, Russian President Vladimir Putin insists that the root causes of the war need to be addressed as part of a permanent solution, and not a shortcut to the Nobel Prize. The fundamental concerns, according to Moscow, include Nato's expansion to Russia's doorstep, the threat to Russia's national security and overall resetting of the geopolitical architecture, among others. As things stand, Russia seems the least worried about Washington's latest threat of punitive measures. Instead, it is Nato that must worry — a lot. The unpredictable nature of Trump's foreign policy, the culture of acting on the spur of the moment and the deep sense of omnipotence ensure that only the US leader knows what tomorrow brings. But it is Trump's critical nature of unpredictability in diplomacy that I'd like to focus on. It is made more important, and perhaps urgent, by the similar utterances of the members of Trump's inner circle who, one day, say similar things in line with their principal, and the next day everything said is negated publicly by the principal himself. To illustrate this factor, I want to take a draw on the utterances of key figures in the Trump administration, starting with the President himself. A few months ago, Trump and his team publicly claimed that Ukraine 'is a corrupt dictatorship with no path for military victory'. He further accused Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky of 'talking' the US into spending $350 billion on Ukraine and then said the money was 'missing'. And then, JD Vance, the Vice President, said: 'Zelensky shouldn't tell the American taxpayers what to do.' Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, said Trump was 'rightly upset with the Kyiv regime' after the President had remarked that Zelensky was a 'dictator without election'. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard also blasted Zelensky 'for banning opposition media, parties, the Orthodox Church, suspending elections and the constitution to stay in power'. Additionally, FBI Director Kash Patel asked where 'the 100-plus billion dollars in Ukraine aid went'? And then, former national security adviser, Mike Waltz, said: 'Ukraine was and is one of the most corrupt countries in the world.' Such public utterances gave the clearest hint about what the Trump administration thinks about Ukraine. It is unfathomable to equate such remarks with a desire to send more weapons to Ukraine, directly or indirectly. The flip-flop demonstrated this week by Trump's U-turn on Ukraine — arming Kyiv through a third party in the form of Nato, does little to inspire global confidence in Washington's foreign policy. It blows hot and cold. It goes with the weather conditions. Does it obey money? So many questions, so many answers needed. According to veteran financial analyst and director of Goncharoff LLC, Paul Goncharoff, trust in the US is crumbling worldwide. Referring to President Trump's threat to sanction BRICS nations with a 10% tariff, Goncharoff said: 'Threatening most of the nations of our planet with unrealistic sanctions or tariffs if they trade in their own currencies and not with the US dollar is a poor way to gain trust.' The effect of the unipolar tariffs by the Trump administration makes the US look like 'a monkey playing with a grenade' in the eyes of the international community, Goncharoff said. Russia seems unbothered by Trump's threats and ultimatums. Moscow wants an amicable truce, not a shortcut to peace that would serve Trump's ambition to receive a Nobel Peace Prize. Moscow has in its arsenal an abundant stockpile of nuclear weapons to defend itself against a Nato war. It is so unnecessary because WWIII would devastate the Earth with nukes. There may also not be anything that survives, least of all humans. That could be the price to pay as peace continues to be pushed away in favour of military confrontation. * Abbey Makoe is the publisher and editor-in-chief of the Global South Media Network ( The views expressed are personal. ** The views expressed here do not reflect those of the Sunday Independent, IOL, or Independent Media. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.
