logo
Tiffany's $52,000 Patek watch strategy backfires among elite clients

Tiffany's $52,000 Patek watch strategy backfires among elite clients

Fashion Network17-07-2025
Salespeople were allegedly encouraged to guide top clients toward purchases worth $2 to $3 million. There was no official waitlist and no guarantees. Just whispers, strategy—and frustration.
'Everyone wanted that piece,' said luxury watch consultant Oliver R. Müller. 'With rich people, if you tell them they can't have something, they want it. It's the psychology of billionaires.'
The release of the Blue Dial came during the pandemic-era luxury boom. For Tiffany, the timing was ideal. The brand had just entered a new chapter under LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE, which acquired it for $16 billion in 2021. The acquisition was the largest in luxury history and aimed to reinvigorate Tiffany, whose sales had stagnated before the deal.
But what began as a masterstroke of exclusivity has become a cautionary tale—how mishandled scarcity can tarnish brand prestige.
Since the Blue Dial's launch, Patek Philippe has closed three of its four boutiques inside Tiffany locations. Former staff say the fractured relationship with the Swiss watchmaker continues to weigh on store revenue and staff morale.
Tiffany's press office declined to comment. Executives Kilaniotis and Anthony Ledru were unavailable for comment. However, LVMH maintains that Tiffany's strategic shift—including upscale store renovations and a focus on high-end Icons collections—is paying off.
'We are seeing continued very good progress on Tiffany's transformation plan,' said LVMH Chief Financial Officer Cécile Cabanis in April.
Tiffany remains the biggest contributor to LVMH's watches and jewelry division, which also includes Bulgari and Tag Heuer. Despite that, Bloomberg forecasts the division will post a 1% revenue decline when LVMH reports earnings on July 24.
Patek Philippe declined to comment on its Tiffany relationship or the Blue Dial's distribution.
In a 2021 interview, Patek President Thierry Stern hinted at potential trouble: 'Tiffany executives may not realize how difficult it's going to be to choose the clients.'
The financial logic for Tiffany was clear: If even two-thirds of the watches unlocked $2.5 million each in jewelry sales, the company stood to gain nearly $300 million. Sales staff could reportedly earn six-figure commissions on such deals.
But the execution left many clients bitter. Sources claim staff were warned not to put any bundling expectations in writing. Everything was discretionary—and often inconsistent.
Some loyal clients spent millions and received nothing in return. Others who did receive the watch grew frustrated when they appeared on the secondary market, often depreciating in value.
One client sued Tiffany over a $4 million jewelry purchase tied to a delayed custom necklace, ultimately settling out of court. Sources confirm that the client had purchased the jewelry to access the Blue Dial.
Another client, who was asked to spend $5 million, walked away and sold off his existing Patek watches from Tiffany in protest. 'I don't shop there anymore,' he said.
One entrepreneur from the Tri-State area spent over $2 million, believing the purchase would secure him the watch. Tiffany staff reportedly asked him to keep the amount confidential, since they quoted different spending thresholds to different clients.
Eventually, the backlash led Tiffany to make exceptions—allowing some clients to return items valued at over $75,000, which broke company policy, according to sources.
While Patek officially framed its boutique closures as part of a 'global consolidation,' insiders claim the Blue Dial controversy played a significant role.
Meanwhile, some luxury clients shifted loyalty to rivals like Cartier. According to Euromonitor International, Tiffany's global jewelry market share has dropped by one percentage point since 2022, while Cartier's has increased.
In contrast to LVMH's flat watch and jewelry sales, Richemont—owner of Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels—reported 14% growth through March 2024.
Symbolically, the Blue Dial was meant to close a chapter. The final release of the 5711 model. The beginning of the LVMH era. 'It was my little gift to say congratulations on buying Tiffany,' Stern said in 2021.
Tiffany had long served as one of Patek's key U.S. partners. Its dual-stamped dials are highly prized. As hype grew, clients were placed on 'wish lists'—a term deliberately used to avoid saying 'waitlist,' which implied delay and disappointment.
When photos of celebrities like Jay-Z, LeBron James, and Leonardo DiCaprio wearing the Blue Dial surfaced in early 2022, frustration deepened among regular clients who had spent millions and still had nothing to show for it.
The bundling tactic—requiring jewelry purchases to access the watch—though common in the industry, remains controversial. Watchmakers discourage the practice, and retailers rarely speak of it openly.
'Watchmakers give stores impossible tasks,' said Eric Wind, of Wind Vintage. 'You get three watches a year with hundreds on a list. So it becomes: Who's spending more?'
In 2023, a California man sued a jeweler for allegedly pressuring him to purchase $221,000 worth of watches and jewelry to access a specific Patek model, which he never received.
In 2024, Hermès faced similar litigation over alleged bundling practices with its Birkin bags—an accusation the brand denies.
In April 2022, Tiffany invited top spenders to an exclusive Miami jewelry gala, where staff told guests that spending $2 million or more might secure them a Blue Dial.
Clients stayed in five-star accommodations, attended lavish dinners, and bought pieces worth millions. Sales exceeded expectations.
However, after the event, some clients who had made large purchases were never offered the watch. Others waited months. Frustration spread.
Auction prices for the Blue Dial have since dropped—from $6.2 million in December 2021 to around $1.2 million in 2024, according to WatchCharts.
Patek, known for its craftsmanship, discourages the reselling of its watches. Still, Tiffany reportedly failed to vet some buyers. Watching the resale values tumble became the final disappointment for many.
Yet the bundling continues. In December 2024, Charlie Ho, a Boston anesthesiologist, was told by Tiffany staff that buying jewelry might help him obtain a gold Patek 5396R.
Ho declined. 'I've played that game,' he said. Years earlier, Ferrari told him to buy several cars to earn access to a limited-edition model. He bought five—and never got it.
'I don't want to play the game anymore.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How much has monthly rent in European city centres changed since 2020?
How much has monthly rent in European city centres changed since 2020?

Euronews

time3 hours ago

  • Euronews

How much has monthly rent in European city centres changed since 2020?

As rent prices across the bloc keep climbing, the biggest jump in costs over the past five years was detected in Southern and Eastern Europe. This is according to a recent Deutsche Bank report, which scrutinised 67 cities worldwide and 28 in Europe. According to Eurostat, house prices increased by 27.3% between the first quarters of 2020 and 2025, while rents rose by 12.5% from June 2020 to June 2025. But this report indicates that rent increases in city centres were significantly greater than this average. So, as of 2025, which European cities have the most expensive rents? Where are rents the most affordable? And which cities have seen the largest increases since 2020? Athens is the cheapest, London the most expensive In 2025, the monthly rent for a three-bedroom flat in the centre of 28 cities in Europe ranges from €1,080 in Athens to €5,088 (or £4,278) in London. European cities can be grouped into three categories based on rent levels: After London, the most expensive places to rent in Europe are Zurich, Geneva, and Amsterdam, all above €3,800. Swiss cities are the priciest, with rents over €4,250. Dublin, Luxembourg, Paris, Copenhagen, and Munich also have high rents, all above €3,000. These cities are major financial, political, or international centres, driving strong demand for housing. Several well-developed cities have mid-range rents between €2,000 and €3,000. Milan, Edinburgh, and Lisbon are on the higher end of this range. Madrid, Stockholm, Berlin, Frankfurt, and Barcelona are a bit more affordable, with average rents around €2,500. Birmingham, Brussels, Vienna, and Prague are closer to €2,100. These cities offer relatively lower living costs compared to the top tier. Only five European cities have average rents below €2,000. In addition to the lowest, Athens, they include Budapest (€1,225), Istanbul (€1,614), Warsaw (€1,881), and Helsinki (€1,928). These figures show that Western and Northern Europe have the highest rents. Strong economies, high living standards, and housing shortages are key factors in these cities. Southern and Central Europe have more mixed rent levels, while Eastern and Southeastern Europe remain the most affordable. When non-European countries are included in the report, New York stands out as an outlier with average rents of €7,676 ($8,388), while Cairo is the cheapest at just €377. Average salaries in the city centres of Dubai and Sydney exceed €4,000. This makes them more expensive than most European cities. Rents in Toronto, Seoul, Tokyo, Moscow, and Shanghai fall into the mid-range at around €2,500. Rents for a one-bedroom apartment in the centre Rent for a one-bedroom dwelling mostly follows the same pattern as three-bedroom. However, some cities change places in the ranking. The price ratios are also different. Still, London (€2,732 or £2,297) remains the most expensive in Europe, while Athens (€595) is the cheapest. In general, one-bedroom apartments cost about half as much as three-bedroom ones. This share rises to 64% in Oslo and 62% in San Francisco, but drops to 37% in Seoul. That's why San Francisco surpasses London in one-bedroom rent prices globally. Where rents increased the most The report shows figures in US dollars, but we converted them to euros for a fairer comparison. Changes may differ when viewed in local currencies. Between 2020 and 2025, monthly rent for a three-bedroom apartment in city centres across Europe increased by between 3% in Helsinki and 206% in Istanbul. In general, Southern and Eastern Europe experienced the strongest rent increases. Lisbon (81%), Prague (73%), and Edinburgh (71%) followed Istanbul, each with rises of over 70%. Rents also rose significantly in Spain—by 65% in Barcelona and 59% in Madrid. Athens and Warsaw were the other two European cities that saw just over 50% increases. Rent changes vary by apartment size For a one-bedroom apartment in the city centre, the highest and lowest rent increases across Europe between 2020 and 2025 were still seen in Istanbul (191%) and Helsinki (18%). The increase in Helsinki was higher compared to that for a three-bedroom flat (3%). In some cities, the rent increase was higher for three-bedroom apartments—such as Istanbul (15 percentage points more), Prague (23 pp), and Amsterdam (10 pp). Other cities saw greater increases for one-bedroom flats, including Milan (20 pp) and Warsaw (10 pp). 'Big cities, bigger housing costs' shows how housing prices can vary significantly within a country. For example, housing in London is 50% more expensive than the UK average. Income levels matter when discussing rent affordability. 'Europe's cities ranked by rent-to-salary ratio' article compares average incomes with rental costs.

Monthly rents in European city centres: 2020 vs 2025
Monthly rents in European city centres: 2020 vs 2025

Euronews

time6 hours ago

  • Euronews

Monthly rents in European city centres: 2020 vs 2025

As rent prices across the bloc keep climbing, the biggest jump in costs over the past five years was detected in Southern and Eastern Europe. This is according to a recent Deutsche Bank report, which scrutinised 67 cities worldwide and 28 in Europe. According to Eurostat, house prices increased by 27.3% between the first quarters of 2020 and 2025, while rents rose by 12.5% from June 2020 to June 2025. But this report indicates that rent increases in city centres were significantly greater than this average. So, as of 2025, which European cities have the most expensive rents? Where are rents the most affordable? And which cities have seen the largest increases since 2020? Athens is the cheapest, London the most expensive In 2025, the monthly rent for a three-bedroom flat in the centre of 28 cities in Europe ranges from €1,080 in Athens to €5,088 (or £4,278) in London. European cities can be grouped into three categories based on rent levels: After London, the most expensive places to rent in Europe are Zurich, Geneva, and Amsterdam, all above €3,800. Swiss cities are the priciest, with rents over €4,250. Dublin, Luxembourg, Paris, Copenhagen, and Munich also have high rents, all above €3,000. These cities are major financial, political, or international centres, driving strong demand for housing. Several well-developed cities have mid-range rents between €2,000 and €3,000. Milan, Edinburgh, and Lisbon are on the higher end of this range. Madrid, Stockholm, Berlin, Frankfurt, and Barcelona are a bit more affordable, with average rents around €2,500. Birmingham, Brussels, Vienna, and Prague are closer to €2,100. These cities offer relatively lower living costs compared to the top tier. Only five European cities have average rents below €2,000. In addition to the lowest, Athens, they include Budapest (€1,225), Istanbul (€1,614), Warsaw (€1,881), and Helsinki (€1,928). These figures show that Western and Northern Europe have the highest rents. Strong economies, high living standards, and housing shortages are key factors in these cities. Southern and Central Europe have more mixed rent levels, while Eastern and Southeastern Europe remain the most affordable. When non-European countries are included in the report, New York stands out as an outlier with average rents of €7,676 ($8,388), while Cairo is the cheapest at just €377. Average salaries in the city centres of Dubai and Sydney exceed €4,000. This makes them more expensive than most European cities. Rents in Toronto, Seoul, Tokyo, Moscow, and Shanghai fall into the mid-range at around €2,500. Rents for a one-bedroom apartment in the centre Rent for a one-bedroom dwelling mostly follows the same pattern as three-bedroom. However, some cities change places in the ranking. The price ratios are also different. Still, London (€2,732 or £2,297) remains the most expensive in Europe, while Athens (€595) is the cheapest. In general, one-bedroom apartments cost about half as much as three-bedroom ones. This share rises to 64% in Oslo and 62% in San Francisco, but drops to 37% in Seoul. That's why San Francisco surpasses London in one-bedroom rent prices globally. Where rents increased the most The report shows figures in US dollars, but we converted them to euros for a fairer comparison. Changes may differ when viewed in local currencies. Between 2020 and 2025, monthly rent for a three-bedroom apartment in city centres across Europe increased by between 3% in Helsinki and 206% in Istanbul. In general, Southern and Eastern Europe experienced the strongest rent increases. Lisbon (81%), Prague (73%), and Edinburgh (71%) followed Istanbul, each with rises of over 70%. Rents also rose significantly in Spain—by 65% in Barcelona and 59% in Madrid. Athens and Warsaw were the other two European cities that saw just over 50% increases. Rent changes vary by apartment size For a one-bedroom apartment in the city centre, the highest and lowest rent increases across Europe between 2020 and 2025 were still seen in Istanbul (191%) and Helsinki (18%). The increase in Helsinki was higher compared to that for a three-bedroom flat (3%). In some cities, the rent increase was higher for three-bedroom apartments—such as Istanbul (15 percentage points more), Prague (23 pp), and Amsterdam (10 pp). Other cities saw greater increases for one-bedroom flats, including Milan (20 pp) and Warsaw (10 pp). 'Big cities, bigger housing costs' shows how housing prices can vary significantly within a country. For example, housing in London is 50% more expensive than the UK average. Income levels matter when discussing rent affordability. 'Europe's cities ranked by rent-to-salary ratio' article compares average incomes with rental costs.

Cognac drags down LVMH's spirits division
Cognac drags down LVMH's spirits division

LeMonde

time3 days ago

  • LeMonde

Cognac drags down LVMH's spirits division

The engine driving cognac sales has yet to regain full speed. LVMH acknowledged it in its half-year results, published Thursday, July 24. Moët Hennessy, its wine and spirits division – of which British company Diageo owns 34% – reported an 8% drop in revenue to €2.58 billion. This marks a further slide after an 11% decline over 2024, to €5.9 billion. The blow was even harsher for recurring operating profit, which fell by one-third to €524 million in the first six months of 2025. The group, led by Bernard Arnault, explained the disappointing performance due to "weak demand for cognac" and "the impact on customers of trade tensions weighing on key markets in the US and China." The US and China accounted for 80% of sales of the prized Charente region spirit, whose leading brand is Hennessy. Across the Atlantic, LVMH – and major competitors such as Pernod Ricard, owner of Martell, or Rémy Cointreau, known for its Rémy Martin brand – were caught off guard. After the post-Covid-19 boom, the wave of inflation disrupted consumer behavior. They suddenly became more cautious about spending just as spirits groups continued to raise their prices. The drop-off was abrupt. Chinese customers also adopted a wait-and-see attitude, troubled by their country's economic slowdown. After trade battles On top of this new consumer mindset, fierce trade battles compounded the problem. Since early 2024, cognac has been ensnared in a conflict between Europe and China. The sector breathed a sigh of relief in early July. Although Beijing decided to impose 32% tariffs on European wine-based spirits, most companies that agreed to set a minimum price – in effect, a price increase ranging from 12% to 16% – were granted exemptions. LVMH benefited from this agreement. Likewise, Rémy Cointreau revised down the impact of Chinese tariffs on Friday, July 25, from €40 million to €10 million. Conversely, the impact in the US would rise from €25 million to €35 million.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store