logo
Evidence shows Jeju Air pilots shut off less-damaged engine before crash

Evidence shows Jeju Air pilots shut off less-damaged engine before crash

The Dec 29 crash at Muan Airport was the deadliest air disaster on South Korean soil. (Yonhap/EPA Images pic)
SEOUL : The South Korea-led investigation into Jeju Air's fatal plane crash in December has 'clear evidence' that pilots shut off the less-damaged engine after a bird strike, a source with knowledge of the probe said today.
The source said the evidence, including the cockpit voice recorder, computer data and a physical engine switch found in the wreckage showed pilots shut off the left engine instead of the right engine when taking emergency steps after a bird strike just before it was scheduled to land.
'The investigation team has clear evidence and backup data, so its finding will not change,' the source told Reuters on condition of anonymity because investigators have not released an official report including this evidence.
A government source said examinations of the plane's recovered engines found that no defects had been present before the bird strike and crash.
The Dec 29 crash of the Boeing 737-800 jet at Muan Airport killed all but two of the 181 passengers and crew members on board and was the deadliest air disaster on South Korean soil.
Investigators told victims' family members at a briefing on Saturday that the right engine had been more severely damaged by a bird strike than the left, and there was circumstantial evidence that pilots had turned off the less-damaged left engine, according to a third source who was at the briefing.
South Korean media outlets including MBN and Yonhap reported that information on Saturday and yesterday.
South Korea's aviation and railway accident investigation board (Araib), which is leading the investigation, did not respond immediately to a request for comment.
Boeing referred questions about the crash to Araib.
Engine maker CFM International, a joint venture between GE and France's Safran, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Jeju Air said it was actively cooperating with the Araib's investigation and awaiting the official announcement of the results.
Most air crashes are caused by multiple factors, and under international rules, a final report is expected within a year of an accident.
A preliminary report released in January said duck remains were found in both engines of the Jeju Air plane after the flight from Bangkok crashed at Muan Airport, but did not give details about the extent of remains or damage found in each engine.
Objections from victims' families
South Korea's investigation body on Saturday cancelled a planned release to media of an update on what is known so far about the engines.
Families of the crash victims were briefed on the report ahead of its planned release, but objected to its publication, saying that it appeared to apportion blame to the pilots without exploring other contributing factors, lawyers representing the families said.
The Jeju Air flight overshot Muan Airport's runway as it made an emergency belly landing and crashed into an embankment containing navigation equipment, leading to a fire and partial explosion.
Representatives of victims' families and the Jeju Air pilots' union said over the weekend that the investigation needs to also focus on the embankment, which aviation experts have said likely contributed to the high death toll.
The Jeju Air pilots' union said the Araib was 'misleading the public' by suggesting there was no problem with the left engine given traces of bird remains were found in both engines.
The union accused the Araib of trying to make pilots 'scapegoats' by failing to provide scientific and technological grounds that the plane could have landed safely with only the left engine turned on.
Air accidents are complex incidents that occur due to a number of contributing factors, and investigators have not produced evidence so far to support the implication that the accident was a result of pilot error, the union said.
Investigators are so far 'silent about organisational responsibility', the union said.
A body representing bereaved families said in a statement there were some phrases related to the cause of the accident in the planned press release that could be interpreted as if a final conclusion had been reached, and all facts surrounding the incident must be clarified.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jeju Air jet still had a working engine when it crashed, investigation update says
Jeju Air jet still had a working engine when it crashed, investigation update says

The Star

time12 hours ago

  • The Star

Jeju Air jet still had a working engine when it crashed, investigation update says

SEOUL (Reuters) -A Jeju Air plane that crashed in December during an emergency landing after a bird strike could have kept flying on the damaged engine that was still working after pilots shut down the other one, according to an update from South Korean investigators. The Boeing 737-800 instead belly-landed at Muan airport without its landing gear down, overshot the runway and erupted into a fireball after slamminginto an embankment, killing all but two of the 181 people on board. Investigators have not yet produced a final report into the deadliest air disaster on South Korean soil, but information about the plane's two engines has begun to emerge. According to a July 19 update prepared by investigators and seen by Reuters but not publicly released following complaints from victims' family members, the left engine sustained less damage than the right following a bird strike, but the left engine was shut down 19 seconds after the bird strike. The right engine experienced a "surge" and emitted flames and black smoke, but investigators said it "was confirmed to be generating output sufficient for flight," in the five-page update, which included post-crash photos of both engines. No reason for the crew's actions was given and the probe is expected to last months as investigators reconstruct the plane's technical state and the picture understood by its pilots. Experts say most air accidents are caused by multiple factors and caution against putting too much weight on incomplete evidence. MORE QUESTIONS So far, public attention has focused on the possibility that the crew may have shut down the less-damaged engine, rekindling memories of a 1989 Boeing 737-400 crash in Kegworth, England, where pilots shut down a non-damaged engine by mistake. The disaster led to multiple changes in regulations including improvements in crew communication and emergency procedures. A source told Reuters on Monday that the South Korea-led probe had "clear evidence" that pilots had shut off the less-damaged left engine after the bird strike, citing the cockpit voice recorder, computer data and a switch found in the wreckage. But the latest update on the crash also raises the possibility that even the more heavily damaged engine that was still running could have kept the plane aloft for longer. It did not say what level of performance the operating engine still had, nor what extra options that might have given to the plane's emergency-focused crew before the jet doubled back and landed in the opposite direction of the runway from its initial plan with its landing gear up. Both engines contained bird strike damage and both experienced engine vibrations after the strike. The right engine showed significant internal damage, the Korean-language update from South Korea's Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board (ARAIB) said, but it did not describe the damage found in the left engine. The update did not say how the left engine was operating nor the state of systems connected to either engine, said former U.S. National Transportation Safety Board investigator Greg Feith when shown the document translated by Reuters. It contains some new facts but omits far more,resulting in a "cryptic" document, he said. ARAIB, which plans to issue a final report next June, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Safety experts say it is common for early reports to contain sparse facts and limited analysis while investigations continue. A preliminary report released in January said feathers and blood stains from ducks were found in both engines. The engines - made by CFM International, jointly owned by GE and France's Safran - were examined in May and no defects or fault datawere found beyond the bird and crash damage, the report said. Families of those who died in the disaster were briefed on the engine findings but asked investigators not to release the July 19 report, saying that it appeared to apportion blame to the pilots without exploring other factors. The report was withheld but Reuters and South Korean media obtained and GE referred questions about the crash to ARAIB. Safran did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Jeju Air has previously said it is cooperating with ARAIB and is awaiting publication of the investigation. Under global aviation rules, civil air investigations aim to discover crash causes without assigning blame or liability. The Jeju Air pilots' union said ARAIB was "misleading the public" by suggesting there was no problem with the left engine given that bird remains were found in both. A source who attended the briefing told Reuters that investigators told family members the left engine also experienced a disruptive "surge," citing black box data. The pilot union and representatives of bereaved families have asked that evidence be released to support any findings. Relatives say the investigation also needs to focus on the embankment containing navigation equipment, which safety experts have said likely contributed to the high death toll. Global aviation standards call for any navigation equipment in line with runways to be installed on structures that easily give way in case of impact with an aircraft. South Korea's transport ministry has identified seven domestic airports, including Muan, with structures made of concrete or steel, rather than materials that break apart on impact and has said it will improve them. Designs for the new structures are in progress, a ministry official told Reuters last week. (Reporting by Lisa Barrington and Heekyong Yang in Seoul and Dan Catchpole in Seattle; Additional reporting by Hyunjoo Jin in Seoul; Editing by Jamie Freed)

Singapore authorities say buildings near Tanjung Katong sinkhole not affected, stabilisation works under way
Singapore authorities say buildings near Tanjung Katong sinkhole not affected, stabilisation works under way

Malay Mail

time12 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Singapore authorities say buildings near Tanjung Katong sinkhole not affected, stabilisation works under way

SINGAPORE, July 27 — Singapore's Building and Construction Authority (BCA) said preliminary checks have confirmed that the surrounding buildings near the sinkhole at Tanjong Katong Road are not affected by the incident. It said it commenced stabilisation works as a precautionary measure and to ensure the safety of surrounding buildings and the worksite of the national water agency PUB, which is adjacent to the location of the sinkhole. 'BCA engineers have carried out preliminary checks on the nearby One Amber condominium and the landed houses across the road. The assessments confirmed that the buildings are not affected by the incident,' it posted on Facebook on Saturday night. It added that the BCA, Land Transport Authority (LTA) and PUB are closely monitoring the ongoing repair works and the overall safety of the area. Sustainability and the Environment Minister Grace Fu said she had asked the relevant authorities to investigate the cause of the sinkhole. 'I understand the public, particularly residents and workers around the area, may be concerned over the structural integrity of the buildings and roads following this incident. 'I have asked PUB to work with agencies, including BCA and LTA, to investigate the cause of the sinkhole thoroughly and implement rectification works quickly,' she posted on Facebook. In the incident, a woman was rescued and sent to the hospital after the car she was driving fell into the sinkhole, which formed at about 5pm on Saturday. A video circulated online showed workers from the nearby worksite helping the woman escape the sinkhole and stopping oncoming cars from approaching the affected area. Both directions of the affected road have been closed to traffic. — Bernama

Here's how to check if your MyKad is damaged before swiping for the RM100 Sara aid
Here's how to check if your MyKad is damaged before swiping for the RM100 Sara aid

Malay Mail

time3 days ago

  • Malay Mail

Here's how to check if your MyKad is damaged before swiping for the RM100 Sara aid

KUALA LUMPUR, July 24 — Before using your MyKad to buy essential goods using the government's one-off RM100 Sumbangan Asas Rahmah (Sara) cash aid, check if your identity card's microchip is damaged. If your MyKad's chip is damaged, you will need to replace the identity card with the National Registration Department (NRD) in order to use the RM100 aid. Why? That's because the MyKad's chip is used for purposes such as to: verify your identity; financial transactions such as using the government's Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah (STR) cash aid; banking matters; government clinics and school registrations. Here are a few helpful tips from the NRD: In a Facebook post, the NRD told Malaysians they could try to find out on their own first if their MyKads are damaged: 'No need to rush to NRD's counter just to check the MyKad.' Here are signs it's time to change your MyKad: When machines/self-service kiosks cannot read or scan your card; When banks or government agencies' systems cannot detect your card's data; When you have to scan your card repeatedly before it is successful (signs that your MyKad's chip is starting to have problems); When your MyKad is physically damaged (e.g. scratched, cracked, bent), it can affect the chip; When you have been having the MyKad for too long/more than 10 years (risk of chip damage). How to replace your MyKad if damaged: Go to an NRD office; Take the queue number under the category of 'Rosak' (damaged); Surrender your damaged MyKad and provide your personal details; Pay the replacement fee of RM10 for the damaged MyKad. (Note: Replacing a damaged MyKad within 12 months from when it was issued to you will be free.) You can get your replacement MyKad: In 30 minutes (at NRD state headquarters; NRD branches at UTCs; and selected NRD branches); Five working days (at other NRD branches in Peninsular Malaysia); Seven working days (at other NRD branches in Sabah, Sarawak and Labuan). Alternatively, you can apply online through the NRD's website or by calling in to 03-88808066. But the NRD also advised Malaysians to take good care of their MyKad to prevent any damage: Do not bend or fold the MyKad; Avoid exposing the MyKad to water, high heat, friction; Avoid putting it in washing machines; Avoid placing it close to magnets. Yesterday, the prime minister announced a one-off RM100 cash aid to all Malaysian adults, with the aid to be valid from August 31 to December 31 this year. Recommended reading:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store