logo
Smith, Costello & Crawford takes over the late Phil Johnston's lobbying business

Smith, Costello & Crawford takes over the late Phil Johnston's lobbying business

Boston Globea day ago

Advertisement
Bob Johnston was hopeful to ensure his father's clients continued to get good representation on state lobbying matters, and to find some financial benefit for his mom, Beverly.
A few lobbying firms in Boston pursued the deal, but Smith, Costello & Crawford successfully made the case that it would be the best advocate for Johnston's clients. Smith said he hopes to take on all of Johnston's dozen lobbying clients except one who has a conflict with one of the firm's preexisting clients.
'It's been a sprint to talk to everybody, meet with everybody, and hopefully have them feel comfortable joining up,' Smith said. 'So far there's been a great response. ... We're not looking to expand. This is not manifest destiny. We're already big, frankly. ... It just kind of came together.'
Advertisement
This is an installment of our weekly Bold Types column about the movers and shakers on Boston's business scene.
Jon Chesto can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If you answer 'yes' to these 4 questions, paying for a laundry service could be worth the money, financial experts say
If you answer 'yes' to these 4 questions, paying for a laundry service could be worth the money, financial experts say

CNBC

time4 hours ago

  • CNBC

If you answer 'yes' to these 4 questions, paying for a laundry service could be worth the money, financial experts say

Tackling an enormous load of laundry can feel nearly impossible at the end of a long work week. When your to-do list is growing — or a new episode of your favorite show is calling — the thought of paying someone else to pick up your dirty clothes and return them freshly folded can seem like a dream. But at around $2 per pound of laundry, or around $20 to $30 for washing an average load, it can be hard to determine if the convenience is really worth the ongoing cost, says Ben Smith, a certified financial planner in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. "As a financial planner, I always encourage folks to consider the long-term benefits and impacts [of paying for convenience], not just thinking about a week or two or just a few months," he says. Smith recommends treating your finances like you're running a business. If you can afford it, outsourcing tasks that bog you down can help you focus on what you value most — whether that be family time or an exciting new side hustle. Here are a few questions that he and other financial pros say to ask yourself to determine whether to handle the load in your closet yourself, or pay someone else to do it. One of Smith's first steps with his clients is determining their personal hourly rate, usually with the help of online tools, like the salary to hourly calculators on Indeed or The Calculator Site, he says. While making your calculations, you should account for several factors: base salary, bonuses, recurring job costs, benefits and vacation time. For a quick estimate, add your annual income and typical bonus together, then subtract estimated taxes and work-related expenses, such as gas to and from the job. Divide that number by the total hours you work in a year, which is usually around 2,080 hours for full-time employees. Once you have an hourly number to work with, you can more accurately determine if delegating makes financial sense, Smith says. If your hourly rate comes to $75, you may be comfortable paying someone $50 an hour on occasion to help with a tedious home maintenance task, he says. When weighing if it's worth it for you to outsource an activity like doing laundry, you should consider not only the cost, but how much time it normally takes out of your week, says Jovan Johnson, a CFP based in Atlanta, Georgia. If you have a washer and dryer at home, it may be a relatively easy task to manage while going about your day. But if you have to haul your loads to a laundromat and wait around while they wash and dry, it might be worth it to buy back some of your time, he says. If laundry is truly the chore you dread most — to the point that doing it is dragging you down in other areas of your life — it may actually be a smart financial decision to outsource it, per Smith's advice. Your income is "the engine" of your financial health, and on top of the mental benefits of prioritizing your happiness, reducing the risk of burnout is essential to keeping that engine running as long as possible, Smith says. "If I can help a client outsource one or two things in their personal lives that don't bring them joy, but that help them stay motivated to work hard and create and grow income, they're going to be miles better for it in the long run," Smith says. Even if a service is within your budget and below your hourly rate, it still might not be "worth it" to you. You should always pause to consider if you're legitimately comfortable with a premium price, Johnson says. Many people are often unaware of how much they spend on convenience services month to month, he says. Part of evaluating how much you're comfortable spending now is looking back at past purchases and weighing if those costs feel worth it in hindsight, Johnson adds. Although $20 or $30 for a load of laundry may not seem like much, you may look back at your budget and realize you're paying around $100 a month to wash your clothes when a bottle of Tide and some patience would have run you much less. If outsourcing laundry services means cutting back on how much you put into retirement savings or emergency funds, the service might not be as worth it as you may think, Johnson says. "You want to prioritize happiness in life now without sacrificing the future," Johnson says. "I always have a savings-first mindset."

Environmental activists explain concerns with U.S. Steel deal
Environmental activists explain concerns with U.S. Steel deal

Chicago Tribune

time20 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Environmental activists explain concerns with U.S. Steel deal

About one week after a partnership between U.S. Steel and a Japanese company was finalized, environmental activists called on the companies to address the health, climate and economic impacts of the deal. 'It's our conclusion that, whether in Japan or the United States, emissions from blast furnaces cannot be significantly mitigated,' said Roger Smith, Asia lead at SteelWatch. 'The company should transition to a renewable energy-based approach that would achieve its net-zero target and fulfill its obligations as a leading global steelmaker.' Speakers at a press conference organized by the Sierra Club highlighted their concerns with blast furnaces, which Nippon Steel has previously said is a technology it plans to invest in through the deal. A more environmentally friendly alternative is a direct reduction furnace to create iron ore and then an electric arc furnace to create steel, Smith said. 'This is already in commercial use in the United States, the Middle East and beyond,' Smith said. 'Switching from fossil fuel to green hydrogen and powering the electric arc furnace with renewable energy can nearly eliminate emissions from this production method.' U.S. Steel released a statement in response to the Tuesday event, saying environmental stewardship is a core value, and they're committed to protecting its workers. 'The finalization of the partnership is just the first step in an integration process that will take time to complete,' said a U.S. Steel spokesperson in an email. 'There are still many things to be determined about how the companies will come together. We will share relevant information as this process continues.' Other participants expressed their concerns with the steel deal, including Matt Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, a Pittsburgh-based coalition that fights for better air quality. Mehalik wants Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel to make it their highest priority to end severe health impacts in Pennsylvania's Mon Valley. 'Real progress will only come when public health and community revitalization are treated as non-negotiable priorities for this new deal,' Mehalik said. 'There have been too many years of promise breaking and too much emphasis on short-term investments that continue to perpetuate community health harms and workforce anxiety.' Northwest Indiana activists asked for the same priority to be given in the region. An October report from Industrious Labs found that most residents in Gary are in the top 10% of U.S. residents most at-risk for developing asthma and at-risk of low life expectancy. In 2020, Indiana had a lung cancer rate of 72.5 per 100,000 people, with Lake County as one of the state's counties with the highest cancer mortality rates, according to the American Lung Association. A 2016 JAMA Network report also found Gary as one of the top five U.S. cities with the lowest life expectancy at one point. Dorreen Carey, president of Gary Advocates for Responsible Development, participated in Tuesday's conference, saying she believes now is the time to initiate newer steelmaking technologies. 'If investments are not made now in newer technologies, the long-term survival of Gary Works and the jobs it provides are in jeopardy,' Carey said. '(GARD) and the people who live in Gary want a clean environment, the good jobs a steel mill can provide and sustainable economic development. Investing in direct reduction ironmaking will provide a cleaner, greener future for the city of Gary, and we urge Nippon to commit to these investments.' Susan Thomas, director of policy and press for Just Transition Northwest Indiana, said Tuesday night that the region is 'an epicenter of toxic air pollution.' 'Globally, this tragedy is preventable,' Thomas said. 'We say to Nippon Steel, you have an opportunity and a responsibility to become a global leader in clean steelmaking technology here and now. It is urgent that you do so, for if you prolong the lives of coal-burning blast furnaces, you will be diminishing ours.' Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel announced June 18 that they have finalized the 'historic partnership,' according to the Associated Press, making the combined company the world's fourth-largest steelmaker. On May 23, President Donald Trump announced that he would approve an investment from the Japanese company to U.S. Steel, according to Post-Tribune archives. Through the partnership, the U.S. government receives 'a golden share,' which allows de facto rights on company decisions and appointments. The 'golden share' seemingly fixes national security concerns previously outlined by former President Joe Biden and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. Before leaving office, Biden denied the deal. Both Trump and former Vice President Kamala Harris said during campaigns that they planned to block the steel deal. Through the partnership, the Northwest Indiana Gary Works facility should receive about $1 billion. Gary Mayor Eddie Melton has been vocal about his support since August 2024, when it was first announced that Gary Works would receive $300 million from the deal. In a previous statement, Melton said he will continue to meet with both steel companies about the projected job increases to Gary, improving environmental protections and future economic development. 'I am pleased thus far on how the current agreement has been structured that allows U.S. Steel to remain an American-owned and operated corporation under this new partnership,' Melton said. 'I'm equally pleased the pledges made during this negotiation will be honored, and I'm optimistic that this was the best decision for steel workers and the communities like Gary across the country.' Since it was announced that Nippon Steel would invest $300 million in Gary Works, Northwest Indiana environmental activists have been concerned. In October, GARD and Just Transition Northwest Indiana announced they supported a letter opposing the deal from the Sierra Club to U.S. Congress members. 'Nippon Steel's revealed plans to extend the life of the most polluting parts of a steel mill currently operated by U.S. Steel leaves no doubt that the company is not acting on climate or accounting for public health,' the letter said. Carey, on Tuesday, also mentioned concerns with U.S. applying for two-year presidential air exemptions from hazardous air pollutant rules for integrated iron and steel, coke and taconite iron ore process. A previous statement from U.S. Steel said the company challenged the three rules because they were not supported by science or law and would impose significant costs while setting technically unachievable standards. 'The presidential exemptions provide an additional path to achieving reasonable, effective environmental standards, which we support as part of our commitment to environmental standards, which we support as part of our commitment to environmental excellence and to being a good neighbor in the communities where we live and work,' the statement said. 'These requests do not change our continued commitment to environmental performance and safety.'

Mayor Wu says interest is growing in downtown office-housing conversion program
Mayor Wu says interest is growing in downtown office-housing conversion program

Boston Globe

timea day ago

  • Boston Globe

Mayor Wu says interest is growing in downtown office-housing conversion program

'We're still going by trying to expand the footprint of what kinds of buildings will qualify for that,' Wu said. Advertisement Actual construction, though, Wu rattled off several other city housing initiatives: a $110 million 'Housing Accelerator Fund' to help jump-start market-rate housing stalled by high borrowing and construction costs, selling off surplus city-owned sites, streamlining permitting for big projects, implementing citywide zoning, and a newly launched 'co-purchasing' pilot program to help households team up to buy multifamily properties. Advertisement 281 Franklin Street is the first office-to-residential conversion to begin construction in downtown Boston. Lane Turner/Globe Staff And she fielded a separate question from Thomson about buttressing the city's competitiveness, by indicating that perhaps the most important attraction for businesses is 'making sure Boston is a city where employees, where people, want to build their lives.' There was little indication of how some of Wu's more progressive policies — increased requirements for affordable housing, for example, or climate-friendly construction — faces resistance in some corners of the business community. A number of prominent executives have donated to her most prominent challenger in the fall election, Josh Kraft, a former nonprofit executive and one of Patriots owner Robert Kraft's sons. To introduce Wu at the AIM event, M&T Bank regional president Grace Lee talked about how the mayor stood her ground before confrontational members of Congress in March, over immigration policies. 'Mayor Wu bore the weight of our city, the weight of our state [and], I felt, the weight of our nation,' Lee said. 'Everyone that needed a voice, she stood up for.' Wu hearkened back to that moment in Washington when Thomson asked about the mayor's controversial rollout of more bike lanes, a rollout that Kraft targeted 'When I was sitting in that congressional hearing room in D.C.,' Wu recalled, 'and the questions were coming fast and furious and trying to, you know, call me names, and this and that, I quickly realized, ... none of these congressional Republicans have been in a bike lane meeting in the city of Boston.' Advertisement This is an installment of our weekly Bold Types column about the movers and shakers on Boston's business scene. Jon Chesto can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store