logo
Ramokgopa dismisses claims US tariffs target BEE policy but admits it needs ‘tweaking'

Ramokgopa dismisses claims US tariffs target BEE policy but admits it needs ‘tweaking'

The Citizen3 days ago
Electricity minister said 'South Africa is not being targeted and isolated as a country'.
Electricity and Energy Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa has denied allegations that the United States (US) imposed a 30% tariff on South Africa due to its broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) policy.
The tariffs on South African goods are set to take effect on 7 August, after the South African government failed to secure a trade agreement with the US ahead of President Donald Trump's deadline.
In response, the government is preparing a support package for companies expected to be affected by the 30% tariffs.
Experts have warned that the automotive industry, as well as citrus farmers, will be the hardest hit by the US tariffs.
ANC NEC meeting focuses on economy, US tariffs
On Friday, the ANC's national executive committee (NEC) commenced its much anticipated four-day meeting at the Lakewood Conference Centre in Ormonde, south of Johannesburg.
The committee last met in February.
Key issues on the agenda include the state of the economy, the functioning of the government of national unity (GNU), and preparations for the 2026 local government elections.
The NEC is also set to receive reports from both the national working committee (NWC) and the integrity commission.
The ANC's economic transformation committee (ETC) held a media briefing on Saturday to update the public on discussions thus far.
ALSO READ: US tariff of 30%: Rand weakest in 3 months, thousands of jobs in danger
Ramokgopa said there had been a focused discussion on the US tariffs, describing it as 'spirited and robust'.
Given that the US remains South Africa's second-largest trading partner, Ramokgopa stressed the importance of maintaining the relationship.
'It has got huge economic implications to South Africa and the most direct is in relation the number of jobs that potentially could be lost as a result of these tariffs,' the ANC NEC member said.
He said negotiations between South Africa and the US were ongoing, expressing hope that both countries would be able to 'find each other'.
Ramokgopa highlighted the tariffs had accelerated South Africa's efforts to diversify its trade markets.
Watch the briefing below:
ANC defends B-BBEE
Ramokgopa rejected suggestions that the US tariffs were a reaction to domestic policies such as B-BBEE or the Expropriation Act.
'South Africa is not being targeted and isolated as a country; there's over 90 countries that are subjected to these tariffs and some of them are historic.'
The minister also emphasised that B-BBEE remains a core government policy, though he acknowledged it might require 'some degree of tweaking'.
'As is the case with any other policy, there are moments of reflecting on the efficacy of that policy and how we are discharging that policy.
'It remains a central pillar of our request to ensure that we fundamentally alter the economic relations of society.
READ MORE: 'Is it greed or jealousy?': Ramaphosa fires back at critics of BEE, Transformation Fund
'It's a major part of that work, but we do accept that there is a case for us to rethink how it's going to be implemented going into the future, but we are not about to abandon it.'
Ramokgopa added that B-BBEE has often been misinterpreted, which has led to exploitation.
'It's important that we are able to distinguish a criminal enterprise that abuses what we mean by black economic empowerment and the honest intentions of how we want to incorporate the participation of local communities.'
Furthermore, he made it clear that economic growth and the implementation of B-BBEE were not mutually exclusive.
'You can achieve both.'
ALSO READ: Government is failing to comply with its own B-B-BBEE policies
Reserve Bank's 3% inflation target
Ramokgopa also weighed in on the recent announcement by South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) Governor Lesetja Kganyago regarding a proposed inflation target of 3%.
The proposal, made public on Thursday, drew swift criticism from Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana the following day.
The finance ministry criticised Sarb for making what it described as 'unilateral announcements that pre-empt legitimate policy deliberation'.
The ministry clarified that there had been no official change to the inflation target and that such decisions would not be made during the upcoming medium-term budget policy statement (MTBPS).
The Ministry emphasised the need for broad consultation involving the National Treasury, Cabinet, the Reserve Bank and others.
Minister of Finance, Mr Enoch Godongwana's Statement on Inflation Targeting.#NationalTreasury pic.twitter.com/bCEHhrhq8y — National Treasury RSA (@Treasury_RSA) August 1, 2025
On Saturday, Ramokgopa reiterated that the current inflation targeting policy – within a range of 3% to 6% – remains in place.
'What the Reserve Bank has been doing historically since the introduction of the tariff ban was to pursue a mid-point of 4.5%,' he said.
While acknowledging Kganyago's suggestion to shift the inflation target ceiling closer to 3%, Ramokgopa said the ANC welcomes the debate.
'I must say we did not have sufficient time to conclude on that because it's something that has become topical and the ETC never had an opportunity to discuss that in its completeness,' he said.
He confirmed that the NEC has tasked the ETC with conducting a more in-depth discussion and formulating a recommendation.
'The NEC has assigned the ETC to have a much deeper conversation and provide guidance on how best we can respond to these proposals. Ultimately, it will the minister of finance, comrade Enoch, who will make that determination.'
NOW READ: Reserve Bank cuts repo rate despite US Fed decision
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anti-dumping investigation: top loader prices set to rise
Anti-dumping investigation: top loader prices set to rise

Daily Maverick

timean hour ago

  • Daily Maverick

Anti-dumping investigation: top loader prices set to rise

South Africa's washing machines are about to get more expensive, and Defy is hoping that's good news. The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) has endorsed the defence of the fully automatic top-loading washer hill. What began as a complaint lodged by Defy Appliances has now become a formal anti-dumping investigation and, soon, the likely imposition of provisional duties against imports from China and Thailand. It looks like a straightforward response to cheap foreign goods flooding the market, hammering local manufacturers and threatening jobs. But it is simultaneously a complex web of strategic policy, protectionism, precedent, and unintended consequences in the spin cycle. A heavy load The saga officially began in October 2024 when Defy asked the International Trade Administration Commission (Itac) to investigate imports of top-loading washers (10-17kg capacity) from China and Thailand. Defy alleges dumping margins of 21.48% for Chinese products and a whopping 67.11% for Thai machines, figures based on SA Revenue Service import data and overseas retail prices. It claims these imports have undercut local prices, slashed profits and forced an inventory build-up – a sign of unsold stock piling up in warehouses. In Defy's view, unless something is done, the injury will get worse as global overcapacity looks for cheap destinations such as South Africa. Itac seems to agree, at least enough to say a prima facie case exists. Provisional duties are expected by the end of 2025. Caught in a whirlpool Hisense South Africa was named alongside Chinese giant Midea in the Government Gazette, but the company says there's nothing sinister at play. 'Hisense SA categorically affirms that it has never been complicit in facilitating any form of alleged dumping, nor has it acted in contravention of South African trade laws or ethical business practices,' Luna Nortje, deputy general manager at Hisense SA, told Daily Maverick. 'We are fully committed to fair, transparent trade and continue to work closely with all relevant regulatory bodies to ensure full compliance.' 'These are standard processes designed to ensure market fairness and in no way imply unethical practice,' she said. Hisense's local credentials are significant. Since setting up shop in 1996, the company has invested more than R350-million into its Atlantis manufacturing plant, which today produces up to 500,000 refrigerators and a million televisions annually – not just for South Africa, but for export to more than 10 African countries. In fact, Nortje said Hisense was exploring further localisation: 'We are currently in the process of assessing the viability of manufacturing chest freezers at (the Atlantis) facility.' That said, she acknowledged the consumer pain. 'These tariffs will sadly affect consumers – as the product prices of those specific items would correspondingly increase.' A beast of Defy's own design Defy has danced this policy waltz before. Back in 2004, the company lobbied for a reduction in washing machine tariffs – it had halted local production and argued that duties hurt consumers. Then in 2019, it asked for a 30% hike on smaller top-loaders to protect planned investments in local manufacturing. Fast forward to 2025, and Defy is calling for protection again, but this time with localisation and industrial strategy riding shotgun. The DTIC's 'Reimagined Industrial Strategy' leans heavily on import substitution and job retention, and Defy's latest campaign aligns perfectly with those goals. In a way, the company is using trade policy not just as a shield, but as a tool to de-risk investment. Whether that's smart industrial pragmatism or self-serving protectionism depends on where you sit in the value chain. Copying moves from across the pond South Africa's washer war borrows heavily from America's. When Whirlpool triggered a trade war in the US against Samsung and LG a decade ago, it led to a game of global musical chairs. Once South Korean and Mexican washers were slapped with duties, production shifted to China. Then, when Chinese goods were targeted, factories moved to Thailand and Vietnam. This tactic (called 'country-hopping') made the US tariffs look more like speed bumps than roadblocks. Defy's decision to hit both China and Thailand out of the gate is a direct nod to that history; to plug the loopholes before they appear. But the American experience also shows how these moves can backfire. Prices on US washing machines rose by nearly 12% after those 2018 tariffs. Even dryers, which weren't tariffed, saw price hikes because retailers usually sell them in pairs. In the end, American consumers forked out $1.5 billion more, for 1,800 saved jobs. That worked out to more than $800,000 per job. Who wins, who spins? South Africa's washing machine trade wars come at a bad time for the economy. Winners: Defy gets a reprieve, likely recovering margin and market share. Policymakers score localisation points and can point to job protection. Local component suppliers might benefit if production ramps up. Losers: Consumers face higher prices – potentially 22% or more on affected washers. Low-income households bear the brunt; appliance affordability is a key cost-of-living metric. Retailers and importers scramble to find new sources, maybe from Vietnam, Turkey or Eastern Europe. Chinese and Thai exporters are likely to lose Southern African Customs Union market share, at least temporarily. Even complementary goods such as dryers could see price bumps, mimicking the US model. And as Defy gains pricing power, don't expect them to keep prices flat. Airing dirty laundry Anti-dumping duties sound noble, shielding local jobs from unfair trade, but they also set a precedent. What's stopping other industries from filing similar complaints? And if each results in price hikes, the inflationary impact stacks up. This matters for the South African Reserve Bank, which is already trying to keep inflation within the 3-6% target band. Appliances might be a small piece of the pie, but multiple actions like this create a cumulative effect. There's also the question of what happens in five years when the duties expire. Itac will have to decide whether the 'injury' risk still exists, and that decision will be just as political as it is economic… and Defy needs to show it was worth the effort with local investment. DM

August fuel price adjustments: What petrol and diesel owners need to know
August fuel price adjustments: What petrol and diesel owners need to know

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

August fuel price adjustments: What petrol and diesel owners need to know

The August fuel price outlook is a mixed bag as motorists are set to fork out more for diesel. Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Media Motorists can look forward to a much-needed reduction in petrol prices at the pumps this Wednesday, whereas diesel prices are set to see a substantial rise. Month-end data from the Central Energy Fund (CEF) is pointing to petrol price decreases of 29 cents for 95 Unleaded and 33 cents for 93 Unleaded, while diesel prices are expected to rise by between 63 cents (50ppm) and 66 cents (500ppm). This follows July's petrol and diesel price increases of up to 55 cents and 84 cents, respectively. In the case of petrol, 95 Unleaded should recede to around R20.79 at the coast and R21.58 in Gauteng, where the slightly less expensive 93 ULP is expected to retail for R21.46. The wholesale price of 50ppm diesel is predicted to reach R19.28 at the coast and R20.04 inland. International product price movements are the driving force behind the August price adjustments, while a slightly stronger South African rand provided relief to the tune of around five cents. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading It's not unusual for diesel prices to rise during the winter and summer months, due to international demand patterns. In the northern hemisphere's summer, for instance, increased travel and economic activity can drive up prices. However, the main reason for the mid-2025 surge in diesel prices is due to the European Union's restrictions on Russian fuel, Total Energy CEO Patrick Pouyanne told Bloomberg. 'We think that stronger diesel prices will become a persistent feature on the global market,' he said. 'The sources of diesel are now coming from the Middle East or from US refineries further away, so it has increased the cost,' Pouyanne said. Following the August price adjustment, 50ppm diesel will be around 60 cents more expensive than it was at the beginning of this year. 95 Unleaded petrol, on the other hand, will be priced almost identically to its January 2025 level of R20.80. Both petrol and diesel have seen two increases and four decreases this year. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus

US set to swoop on SA poultry industry, says FairPlay
US set to swoop on SA poultry industry, says FairPlay

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

US set to swoop on SA poultry industry, says FairPlay

The government is hinting at yet another blow to the country's poultry producers, says Fairplay Image: Umfanekiso ogciniweyo The government is feeding South Africa's chickens to eagles swooping in from the United States. Not for the first time, the country's poultry industry is being sacrificed to secure a trade deal with the US. Worse, it is happening without consultation with the industry on the details or implications of what it is proposing, or possible alternatives. No trade deal has yet been concluded, and there is little information about what South Africa is putting on the table. Yet, as it attempts to avert the 30% tariffs on all South African exports that President Donald Trump has threatened, the government is hinting at yet another blow to the country's poultry producers. A statement by trade minister Parks Tau gave little away. Outlining what South Africa had proposed – so far without any response from the US – Tau said South Africa had offered increased access to South African markets for US poultry producers. This would be achieved 'by (the) simplifying of US poultry exports under the 2016 tariff rate quota and unlock approximately $91 million in trade'. Exactly what this means is anybody's guess – the only thing that is clear is that, as in 2015, the poultry industry is once again going to be made to suffer for the sake of a trade deal. The 2016 quota which Tau hopes to 'simplify' resulted from negotiations in 2015 when the US demanded that South Africa exempt huge volumes of US chicken from the anti-dumping duties that should apply according to World Trade Organisation rules. This was a make-or-break condition for the renewal of South Africa's benefits under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa). The result was an annual quota which started at 65 000 tonnes in 2016 and rose to 72 000 tonnes last year. It was effectively a licence to dump chicken in this country – US producers could send South Africa their chicken offcuts at any price they chose, and the country could do nothing about it unless the quota was exceeded. The quota was exceeded in early years, rising to nearly 83 000 tonnes in 2019, before US exports dropped sharply as bird flu spread across the country. The fact that US negotiators are once again pushing for duty-free chicken exports indicates that they anticipate the flow will resume. The sting was that the US chicken quota was tied to the Agoa agreement, which is itself under threat. In terms of the US Agoa legislation up for renewal again this year, if South African industries lost their beneficial access to US markets, then the chicken quota falls away. Because of tariffs already ranging from 10% to 25%, those benefits have been lost by South Africa's steel, automotive and fruit industries, so the quota should no longer apply. Poultry producers have asked for the quota to be nullified, but they have so far been ignored. Does Minister Tau intend to 'simplify' the quota by making it a standalone item, not linked in any way to Agoa, which may or may not be renewed? That would expose South African poultry producers to a potential R1.65 billion worth of unfairly priced US bone-in chicken pieces such as leg quarters. These are the cuts specified in the anti-dumping duties which the US has demanded should not apply. Minister Tau should remember that those anti-dumping duties were recommended by the trade regulator ITAC, which falls under his department. Since 2000, ITAC has repeatedly renewed anti-dumping duties - and has just done so again – because, in terms of World Trade Organisation rules, it has found that US chicken is being imported at unfairly low prices, threatening the local poultry industry and its jobs. Now Minister Tau wants to make it even easier for US poultry producers to dump their chicken here, competing with the popular packs of locally produced individually quick frozen (IQF) chicken pieces. South African chicken farmers and South African jobs will be at risk. Not only does this extend the contravention of international trade rules, but it is completely against the spirit and objectives of the poultry master plan, which he is in charge of resuscitating. The master plan aims to protect the South African poultry industry from unfairly priced imports, boost local chicken consumption and expand local production and job creation to meet increased demand from domestic and export markets. In terms of the first phase of the master plan, signed in 2019, the poultry industry invested more than R1.5 billion to increase production. Unfortunately, some of that new capacity has been idle, because the government failed to come to the party, particularly in terms of promoting domestic consumption and expanding export markets. That is what Minister Tau should be doing, instead of meekly acceding to US demands that anti-dumping duties should not apply to them. Clearly, he is under extreme pressure to offer the Trump administration something that would prevent 30% tariffs applying to everything South Africa sends to the US. However, if he is going to ask the poultry industry to make costly and job-threatening sacrifices, as it did in 2015, then he should take poultry industry leaders into his confidence and ask for their input. Better still, he should give the poultry industry a seat at the negotiating table, instead of ignoring their request. It is their future that is at stake. Francois Baird is founder of the FairPlay movement. Image: Supplied Francois Baird is founder of the FairPlay movement. *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL. BUSINESS REPORT

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store