How Trump plans to dismantle the Education Department after Supreme Court ruling
The justices paused a lower court order that had halted nearly 1,400 layoffs and had called into question the legality of President Donald Trump's plan to dismantle the department.
Now, Trump and his education secretary, Linda McMahon, are free to execute the layoffs and break up the department's work among other federal agencies. Trump had campaigned on closing the department, and McMahon has said the department has one 'final mission' to turn over its power to the states.
'The U.S. Department of Education will now deliver on its mandate to restore excellence in American education,' McMahon said Monday in a statement.
McMahon is expected to move quickly — department lawyers have already previewed the plans in court filings.
Trump and McMahon have acknowledged only Congress has authority to close the Education Department fully, but both have suggested its core functions could be parceled out to different federal agencies.
Among the most important decisions is where to put management of federal student loans, a $1.6 trillion portfolio affecting nearly 43 million borrowers.
Trump in March suggested the Small Business Administration would take on federal student loans, but a June court filing indicated the Treasury Department is expected to take over the work. The Education Department said it had been negotiating a contract with Treasury but paused discussions when the court intervened. That work is now expected to proceed in coming days.
Under a separate arrangement, nine Education Department workers already have been detailed to Treasury, according to court filing.
The department had also recently struck a deal to outsource the management of several grant programs for workforce training and adult education to the Department of Labor. The Education Department agreed to send $2.6 billion to Labor to oversee grants, which are distributed to states to be passed down to schools and colleges.
Combining workforce training programs at Education and Labor would 'provide a coordinated federal education and workforce system,' according to the agreement.
Additional agreements are expected to follow with other agencies. At her Senate confirmation hearing, McMahon suggested that enforcement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act could be handled by the Department of Health and Human Services. Civil rights work could be managed by the Justice Department, she said.
Democracy Forward, which represents plaintiffs in the lawsuit, said it will pursue 'every legal option' to fight for children.
'No court in the nation — not even the Supreme Court — has found that what the administration is doing is lawful,' said Skye Perryman, president and CEO of the group, in a statement.
Trump campaigned on a promise to close the agency, and in March ordered it to be wound down 'to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law.' McMahon had already started a dramatic downsizing, laying off about 1,400 workers.
Education Department employees targeted by the layoffs have been on paid leave since March, according to a union that represents some of the agency's staff. The lower court order had prevented the department from fully terminating them, though none had been allowed to return to work, according to the American Federation of Government Employees Local 252. Without the lower court order, the workers would have been terminated in early June.
The Education Department had said earlier in June that it was 'actively assessing how to reintegrate' the employees if courts did not rule in Trump's favor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
3 minutes ago
- CNBC
Kelly Evans: Stablecoins to the rescue
Can I just say I find it highly amusing that crypto stablecoins are now being cited as a "helpful" source of demand for government debt? Let's unpack this. Bitcoin and the rest of crypto are on the rise to supposedly save us us from the financial profligacy of untrustworthy governments. But now, crypto stablecoins are becoming one of the biggest of government bonds on the planet--thus enabling the very deficits that fuel continued crypto demand. Stablecoins are basically just dollars that don't have to leave the crypto ecosystem, which can be incredibly annoying to enter and exit from the traditional banking system. They're much more an institutional than a retail product here in the U.S., although they're also in high public demand in foreign markets with unstable currencies and high foreign exchange fees. But in order for a stablecoin to be used like a real dollar, it has to have a "stable" value of exactly a dollar. It would be kind of like if your bank had to back every dollar you deposit with exactly one dollar worth of assets. Stablecoins used to be a little more loosey-goosey with that, until "TerraUSD" collapsed in 2022 and caused a run that led the two leading stablecoins--Tether, and Circle's USDC (or U.S. dollar coin)--to "break the buck." Now, Congress is actively considering legislation that would formalize much stricter regulation of stablecoins--namely, with the GENIUS (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins) Act that passed the Senate with a 68-30 vote last month, and is now being actively considered in the House as part of their "Crypto Week." It would require every dollar of stablecoins to be backed with a dollar of ultra-safe assets like U.S. Treasury bills. If and when it passes, the crypto world gets a big win--a blessing of approval on a key piece of infrastructure. Little wonder Bitcoin et al have been shooting higher in recent weeks. But it has the probably even more important side benefit of enshrining a major source of future demand for U.S. Treasuries. Stablecoins are currently thought to hold just shy of $200 billion or so in short-term Treasury bills. By some estimates, that could now explode to $1.5 trillion within the next couple years, and hit $3 to $4 trillion a decade from now. For context, there is about $6 trillion in Treasury bills outstanding, and in the wake of the GOP's budget bill, which raised the debt ceiling, Treasury is now expected to further ratchet up bill supply. This may all help explain why the administration, which had previously criticized former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen for over-relying on short-term bills to fund President Biden's deficits, is now pursuing a similar strategy. "A thriving stablecoin ecosystem will drive U.S. Treasuries," Treasury Secretary Bessent wrote on X last month. "This newfound demand could lower government borrowing costs and help rein in the national debt." But will it backfire? As Ben Emons of Fed Watch Advisors wrote yesterday, "the anticipated demand from stablecoins has depressed the short-term premium, incentivizing the rolling of deficits with T-bills." However, he added, "this game has fiscal consequences, which are reflected in long-term yields as a rising risk." (Emphasis mine.) In other words, stablecoin demand for Treasury bills could help finance the deficit more cheaply in the short-term, but enable deficits that keep -term yields--which underpin actual mortgage and business loan rates--on the higher side. To avoid this outcome, the administration will still have to push hard to curb deficits, lower inflation, and boost growth prospects. So yes, rather ironically, stablecoins are here to the rescue--unless they just exacerbate our larger borrowing problems. And if you're worried about that, I've got some Bitcoin to sell you. See you at 1 p.m! Kelly Twitter: @KellyCNBC Instagram: @realkellyevans
Business Insider
3 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Apple's latest message to Trump: We're buying American magnets
American manufacturing is getting a half-billion-dollar boost from Apple. The Cupertino-based iPhone maker said Tuesday it has reached a $500 million deal with MP Materials to buy US-made rare earth magnets. "Rare earth materials are essential for making advanced technology, and this partnership will help strengthen the supply of these vital materials here in the United States," Apple CEO Tim Cook said in a statement. Rare earths are used in the production of high-powered magnets that enable a wide range of electronic functions, ranging from electric motors and generators to wireless charging and haptic touch responses in mobile devices. While new supplies of rare earths continue to be mined, Apple's initiative with MP Materials focuses on reclaiming and recycling neodymium magnets specifically for Apple devices from used consumer electronics and post-industrial scrap. News of the deal sent MP Materials' stock price soaring more than 25% on Tuesday morning, topping a prior price high reached in April 2022. The gains extend a run that started last week when MP Materials inked a multibillion-dollar deal with the US Department of Defense that guarantees a price floor for two of the most popular rare earth metals that is nearly twice as high as the Chinese market level, Reuters reported. The move also sends a message to President Donald Trump, who has pressured Apple to make more of its products in the US. "I said to Tim, I said, 'Tim, look, we treated you really good, we put up with all the plants that you build in China for years, now you got build us," Trump said in May. Apple said in its release that this purchase commitment is part of a larger pledge to spend more than $500 billion in the US over the next four years. The company also said that MP Materials will provide "extensive" training at its new factory in Texas to build a new specialized workforce for magnet manufacturing.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia calls Trump's demand for Ukraine ceasefire in 50 days unacceptable
Russia has rejected President Trump's "ultimatum" for Moscow to sign a ceasefire deal to end the war in Ukraine within 50 days on Tuesday as "unacceptable," calling for continued negotiations and insisting that the invasion ordered by President Vladimir Putin would continue until its goals are achieved. In response to President Trump's threat to impose 100% secondary tariffs on countries that do business with Russia if Putin's government does not agree to a deal to end the war in that timeframe, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said Tuesday that "any attempts to make demands, especially ultimatums, are unacceptable to us," according to Russia's state-run TASS news agency. "We need to focus on political and diplomatic work. The President of the Russian Federation has repeatedly said that we are ready to negotiate and the diplomatic path is preferable for us," Ryabkov was quoted as saying. "If we cannot achieve our goals through diplomacy, then the SVO (war in Ukraine) will continue… This is an unshakable position. We would like Washington and NATO as a whole to take it with the utmost seriousness." Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov separately called Mr. Trump's announcement "quite serious." "Some of it is addressed personally to (Russian) President Putin. We definitely need time to analyze what was said in Washington," Peskov said during his daily briefing on Tuesday. "If and when President Putin deems it necessary, he will definitely comment on it. I would not want to get ahead of ourselves, so let's wait for Putin's decision on whether he will comment on it himself." Russia's former President Dmitry Medvedev, who is close to the Kremlin, called Mr. Trump's remarks "a theatrical ultimatum" in a post on social media, adding that "Russia didn't care." Speaking Monday in the Oval Office alongside visiting NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Mr. Trump said: "We are very unhappy, I am, with Russia." He also announced a deal for the U.S. to sell additional weapons to its NATO allies, with the understanding that they will then send the weapons to Ukraine. "We're not buying it, but we will manufacture it, and they're going to be paying for it," Mr. Trump said. "This is really big," Rutte said. "And the decision is that you want Ukraine [to have] what it needs to have to maintain, to be able to defend itself against Russia, but you want Europeans to pay for it, which is totally logical." Mr. Trump again expressed his frustration with Putin, whom he recently called "absolutely crazy" for ordering strikes on civilian areas in Ukraine. On Monday, Mr. Trump suggested the Russian autocrat had a habit of saying one thing and then doing another. "I always hang up, say, 'Well, that was a nice phone call.' And then missiles are launched into Kyiv or some other city and I say, 'That's strange.'" Mr. Trump said. "After that happens three or four times, you say, the talk doesn't mean anything." When asked in an interview with CBS News partner BBC News if he was done trying to deal with the Russian leader, Mr. Trump said: "I'm disappointed in him, but I'm not done with him. But I'm disappointed in him." In a social media post on Monday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he had spoken with Mr. Trump and thanked his American counterpart, "for the willingness to support Ukraine and to continue working together to stop the killings and establish a lasting and just peace." "It's important that we have such a good relationship, and that the Alliance countries are working to increase defense spending," Zelenskyy said, adding that he and Mr. Trump had made plans to speak again. "We agreed to catch up more often by phone and coordinate our steps in the future as well," he said. "Thank you, Mr. President! Thank you, America!" Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The attack, involving tens of thousands of uniformed soldiers and barrages of missiles, came after Russia unilaterally annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula after backing separatist forces in the region. While Russia has maintained control over Crimea and installed its own administration there — along with a huge swathe of eastern Ukraine seized over the last three years — its dominion over those regions is not recognized by the U.S., the United Nations, or the majority of the international community. One of Putin's key demands for a ceasefire in the ongoing war is that Ukraine, and its international backers, should recognize Russian ownership of at least some of that occupied territory. Sen. Lindsey Graham says "a turning point regarding Russia's invasion of Ukraine is coming" Trump pushes senators to make $9.4 trillion in spending cuts Exclusive discounts from CBS Mornings Deals
