logo
Who is Ong Beng Seng, the tycoon involved in the Iswaran graft scandal?

Who is Ong Beng Seng, the tycoon involved in the Iswaran graft scandal?

Business Times2 days ago
[SINGAPORE] Ong Beng Seng, the billionaire property tycoon embroiled in the corruption case involving former transport minister S Iswaran and the Formula 1 night race, has pleaded guilty to abetting the obstruction of justice.
A prominent business figure in Singapore, Ong is the founder and former managing director of Hotel Properties Ltd and is widely known for bringing the F1 night race into Singapore. Earlier in April 2025, he stepped down as managing director of HPL to tend to existing medical conditions relating to an incurable cancer. It was announced that he would also not seek re-election as a director at the company's annual general meeting on Apr 29.
Ong was handed dual charges in relation to his involvement with Iswaran - who in 2024 was convicted of charges related to obtaining valuable items as a public servant and obstructing justice and sentenced to 12 months' jail.
In October 2024, was charged with abetting offences under Section 165 of the Penal Code – which forbids public servants from accepting gifts from people involved with them in an official capacity – and with abetting the obstruction of justice.
The first charge relates to flights and a hotel stay as Ong allegedly offered Iswaran a trip to Doha in December 2022 and arranged for his private jet to fly him there. The flight was worth US$7,700.
The second charge was for allegedly instructing Singapore Grand Prix (GP) director Mok Chee Liang, in May 2023, to bill Iswaran for the business-class ticket from Doha to Singapore – which led to the obstruction of justice charge.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
On Monday (Aug 4), Ong, 79, admitted to the second charge. The other charge, for abetting an offence under Section 165, was taken into consideration for sentencing.
The business magnate suffers from advanced multiple myeloma, which has damaged his immune system and makes him vulnerable to life-threatening infections.
These are some things to know about him.
Origins
A Malaysian citizen, Ong moved to Singapore at a young age and has a degree in insurance.
With a career in shipping insurance and oil trading, Ong made millions from accurately predicting the ups and downs of oil prices during his time at Kuo International - an oil trading company owned by his father-in-law Peter Fu Yun Siak.
He joined the company in 1975, and the capital he earned during his time there allegedly helped finance his later investments and property development, laying the groundwork for the establishment of HPL.
HPL empire
In 1980, Ong founded HPL to buy the Hilton Singapore hotel for S$72 million, marking his venture into the property, hotel and retail sectors.
The company swiftly acquired more hotels and properties, especially those located in the prime Orchard Road area.
In 1982, HPL was listed in Singapore.
The company is now a conglomerate with interests spanning hotel ownership, management and operations, property development, and investment holdings.
As at December 2024, HPL's hotel division had interests in 41 hotels across 17 countries, including Bhutan, Indonesia, Japan, Italy, Malaysia, the Maldives, Singapore, the UK and the US, according to its 2024 annual report.
Its properties operate under hospitality brands such as COMO Hotels & Resorts, Concorde Hotels, Four Seasons Hotels & Resorts, Hard Rock Hotels, IHG Hotels & Resorts, Marriott International, and Six Senses Hotels & Resorts.
HPL's Singapore portfolio of prime commercial and retail properties comprise Forum The Shopping Mall and Concorde Shopping Mall.
The group formerly owned seven units in Ming Arcade, which it agreed to sell for S$61 million in December 2022.
In May 2022, HPL, in partnership with units of state investor Temasek, purchased the real estate assets of media giant Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) for S$2.8 billion.
Another instance when Ong posed challenges for Singapore-listed companies was in partnership with Temasek-linked entities in his 2002-2003 bid for steelmaker NatSteel.
The consortium, which also involved Temasek, narrowly won control of the company following a battle with Indonesian business tycoon Oei Hong Leong.
Pioneering the F1 race in Singapore
In 2008, Ong brought in the Formula 1 night race to Singapore. He owns the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix.
Iswaran is also widely credited for playing a vital role in the country's bid to host the Grand Prix since 2008.
As a junior trade minister then, he was involved in negotiations with parties such as HPL and then global F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone.
In 2022, Ong secured an extension to host the F1 race through 2028, through his company Singapore GP - the race promoter for the Grand Prix - and Singapore's tourism agency.
Personal life
Ong is said to be a relatively private person.
He has been married to prominent hotelier and businesswomen Christina Ong since 1972.
Christina Ong runs Como Hotels & Resorts as well as the retail empire Club 21 and London-listed handbag maker Mulberry.
The Ongs are one of the most influential couples in Singapore. They reportedly had a net worth of US$1.7 billion as at August 2022, according to Forbes estimates.
As at mid-2022, they were said to be the 24th richest business persons in Singapore - months after HPL joined Temasek in buying SPH assets.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US House panel subpoenas Clintons in Epstein probe
US House panel subpoenas Clintons in Epstein probe

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

US House panel subpoenas Clintons in Epstein probe

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Ex-US president Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary arrive at the White House for a state dinner on May 23, 2024. WASHINGTON - US lawmakers on Aug 5 subpoenaed former president Bill Clinton and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton for testimony on Jeffrey Epstein, in a major escalation of the controversy surrounding the investigation into the notorious sex offender. The Clintons were among multiple former Democratic and Republican government officials – as well as the Justice Department – targeted by investigators reviewing the handling of the disgraced financier's case after he died in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking. The White House has been facing increasingly intense demands to be more transparent after the Justice Department angered Trump supporters – many of whom believe Epstein was murdered in a cover-up – when it confirmed in July that he had died by suicide in his prison cell and that his case was effectively closed. The department also said Epstein had no secret 'client list' – rebuffing conspiracy theories held by Mr Trump's far-right supporters about supposedly high-level Democratic complicity. Mr Trump has urged his supporters to drop demands for the Epstein files, but Democrats in the Republican-led Congress – with some support from majority lawmakers – have also been seeking a floor vote to force their release. 'By your own admission, you flew on Jeffrey Epstein's private plane four separate times in 2002 and 2003,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer wrote to former president Clinton. 'During one of these trips, you were even pictured receiving a 'massage' from one of Mr Epstein's victims.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Singapore BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news Asia Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for Asean: Vivian Balakrishnan Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street Asia Trump's transactional foreign policy fuels 'US scepticism' in Taiwan Business Women on corporate boards give firms a competitive advantage, says Australian Governor-General Singapore CEO of sports car distributor accused of offences including multiple counts of false trading The White House has been seeking to redirect public attention from uproar over its handling of the affair with a series of headline-grabbing announcements including baseless claims that former president Barack Obama headed a 'treasonous conspiracy' against Mr Trump. Epstein was for years a friend and associate of Mr Trump and numerous high-profile people before he was convicted of sex crimes and then imprisoned pending trial for allegedly trafficking underage girls. His death supercharged a conspiracy theory long promoted by Trump supporters that Epstein had run an international pedophile ring and that elites wanted to make sure he never revealed their secrets. After Mr Trump returned to power in January, his administration promised to release Epstein case files. Past relationship When Attorney-General Pam Bondi announced on July 7 that she had nothing to release, Republicans were furious – and Mr Trump has attempted to control the scandal ever since. The case got even more complicated for the president after a Wall Street Journal report that he had written a lewd birthday letter to Epstein in 2003. Mr Trump denies this and has sued the Journal. The Journal then dropped a separate story, saying Bondi had informed Mr Trump in May that his name appeared several times in the Epstein files, even if there was no indication of wrongdoing. Other officials targeted by the Oversight Committee include former FBI director James Comey, former special counsel Robert Mueller and ex-attorney-generals Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Merrick Garland, Bill Barr, Jeff Sessions, and Alberto Gonzales. Their depositions will take place between mid-August and mid-October. Mr Comer also issued a subpoena to the Justice Department for records related to Epstein – including its communications with Mr Trump's predecessor Joe Biden and his officials. Lawmakers have also been seeking testimony from Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving 20 years in prison for her role in his alleged crimes – although her cooperation is considered unlikely. The latest move from Mr Comer comes after Democrats on the oversight panel forced a vote to issue a subpoena just before the August recess, with three House Republicans backing the effort. 'Justice must apply to everyone, no matter how rich, powerful, or well-connected they are,' said Ms Summer Lee, the Democratic congresswoman who introduced the motion. AFP

Trump's sharp India criticism on tariffs, Russia oil corner Modi as rift deepens
Trump's sharp India criticism on tariffs, Russia oil corner Modi as rift deepens

Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump's sharp India criticism on tariffs, Russia oil corner Modi as rift deepens

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox - Any expectation of the camaraderie that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi enjoyed with US President Donald Trump during the latter's first term in office – united in part over the common threat of China – has all but evaporated. India underestimated just how transactional Mr Trump would be in his second term in power, as he has made little distinction between friends and adversaries. Ties have unpredictably and quickly gone south as Mr Trump has torn into India over its long-standing ties with Russia and the slow pace of negotiations for an India-US trade deal. The strain in US-India ties is a challenge for Mr Modi, who also faces domestic calls not to cave into Mr Trump's demands on trade and oil imports from Russia. India has benefitted from cheap Russian energy imports, which the US leader claims is helping to fund Russia's invasion of Ukraine . Mr Trump's vow to 'substantially raise' tariffs on Indian exports to the US from the already substantial 25 per cent because of New Delhi's Russian oil imports, is an indication of his administration's priorities in achieving broader geopolitical goals, say analysts. 'This (oil sanctions) is obviously a pressure tactic the US is using on Russia to get an outcome of its choice in the Ukraine war. We are collateral damage,' Mr Ashok Malik, a partner at the Asia Group business consultancy, told The Straits Times. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Singapore BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news Asia Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for Asean: Vivian Balakrishnan Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street Asia Trump's transactional foreign policy fuels 'US scepticism' in Taiwan Business Women on corporate boards give firms a competitive advantage, says Australian Governor-General Singapore CEO of sports car distributor accused of offences including multiple counts of false trading 'I think things are very challenging at this juncture. It is the most challenging in a long, long time,' Mr Malik said. Mr Trump came into power promising he would end the war in Ukraine on his first day in office. But a long-term ceasefire has not materialised, and Russia has instead intensified its strikes on Ukraine, much to Mr Trump's frustration. India-Russia-US nexus 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits,' Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Aug 4. 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.' Mr Trump has lumped Russia and India together, calling them 'dead economies' in another Truth Social post on July 31, despite the fact that India is the world's fourth-largest economy by nominal GDP after the US, China and Germany. India has a longstanding relationship with Russia dating ba ck to the Cold War, and is the among the largest importer of Russian oil along with China . It imported about 1.75 million barrels a day from January to June 2025, up 1 per cent from a year ago, according to Reuters. On Aug 4, the Ministry of External Affairs called the US President and European Union 's targeting of India for buying Russian oil 'unjustified and unreasonable.' 'India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability,' the MEA said in a statement. 'India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by the global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. ' The European Union had imposed sanctions on Russian-backed Indian refiner Nayara and banned the import of refined oil made from Russian crude. In particular, New Delhi called out the United States for its continual imports from Russia of 'uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers as well as chemicals.' Mr Trump is not the first US president to disapprove of India's ties with Iran and Russia. But previous US leaders like Mr Joe Biden and Mr Barack Obama chose to look the other way due to the strategic calculation of India's importance as a fast-growing economy a nd as a counter to China in America's Indo-Pacific strategy. In any case, India's ties with Russia are also not what they were once, as Russia has drawn closer to China and Pakistan, while India has grown closer to the West. The South Asian giant has also been diversifying its defence weapon purchases to include products from the US and Israel. But that doesn't mean India can walk away from the Russia relationship as desired by Mr Trump, according to Mr Nandan Unnikrishnan, a Distinguished Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank. 'We need warm relations. India is a growing economy; it is going to consume natural resources and Russia is a country that has every element in huge abundance. We will end up buying a lot of resources,' he said. US-India tariff negotiations Mr Trump is also frustrated that a trade deal with India to his liking has so far not materialised. He has used tariffs to force countries that have a trade surplus with the US into what he claims is a more reciprocal bilateral trade relationship. The US is India's largest export market, with exports reaching US$86.51 billion (S$111.37 billion) from April 2024 to March 2025. India's imports from the US were US$45.33 billion for the same period, according to Indian government figures . While both countries are still locked in negotiations, New Delhi has refused to grant the concessions that the Trump administration is seeking, including the opening up of heavily protected agriculture and dairy sectors to US imports. More than 60 per cent of the Indian population depends on these two sectors for their livelihoods in some form or another. Farmers have opposed opening up of the agriculture and dairy sectors , arguing they would not be able to withstand competition from US agriculture. Unlike US farms, India's farms are small, fragmented and hardly mechanised . In another post on Truth Social on July 30 , Mr Trump criticised India for imposing the most 'strenuous and obnoxious' tariffs in the world. India's refusal to give in to Trump for now may also be seen as a recognition that it is not just trade interests which are at stake. 'Trump has not only unleashed a trade war but is also deploying commercial instruments for geopolitical ends,' India's former foreign secretary Shyam Saran wrote in The Indian Express newspaper on Aug 4. 'These actions threaten India's core interests and its ability to follow a policy of strategic autonomy, which every government, irrespective of its political colour, has remained wedded to since Independence,' he said. 'We should not treat the current disruption in India-US relations as just a trade dispute. It is much more than that.' Mr Modi's response to Mr Trump's belligerent language, which has pushed the Indian prime minister into a corner domestically, took a nationalistic tone. 'The world economy is facing instability and uncertainty. In such times, countries are focusing solely on their own interests. India, too, is on the path to becoming the world's third-largest economy and must remain alert to its own economic priorities,' Mr Modi said in his constituency of Varanasi on Aug 2, even before Mr Trump's latest escalation. 'At a time when the world is going through uncertainty, let us take a pledge to sell only Swadeshi (made in India) goods from our shops and markets. Promoting made-in-India goods will be the truest service to the country.' Political watchers noted that it would be very difficult for the Indian Prime Minister to give any large concessions in the trade deal, given the growing anger within India towards Mr Trump. Even the right-wing Hindu nationalist ecosystem, which has been very supportive of the US president, is angry at what it perceives as a series of other slights to India. This includes Mr Trump's statements on how he engineered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, after the neighbours were embroiled in a military conflict over a terror attack in Kashmir, and Mr Trump's subsequent hosting of Pakistan's Army chief Asim Muneer in the White House. 'Mr Modi doesn't have much space to manoeuvre on the trade deal. The economic and political costs of accepting US demand are something this government will find difficult to swallow,' said Dr Biswajit Dhar, a trade expert and former professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University. 'We have to wait and watch. What the Trump administration has done is push India into a corner.'

Zelensky spoke to Trump on sanctions against Russia and drones ahead of peace deal deadline
Zelensky spoke to Trump on sanctions against Russia and drones ahead of peace deal deadline

Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Zelensky spoke to Trump on sanctions against Russia and drones ahead of peace deal deadline

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House in Washington, on Feb 28, 2025. KYIV - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Aug 5 that he had had a 'productive' conversation with his US counterpart Donald Trump that covered ending the war, sanctions on Russia and the finalisation of a US-Ukraine drone deal. Mr Trump, who has signalled frustration with Vladimir Putin in recent weeks, has given the Russian president until Aug 8 to make peace in Ukraine or face tougher sanctions. "President Trump is fully informed about Russian strikes on Kyiv and other cities and communities," Mr Zelensky wrote on X, referring to intensifying drone and missile attacks. He added that Ukraine was also ready to conclude a deal with the US on the production of Ukrainian drones that would amount to 'one of the strongest agreements'. Ukraine is increasingly seeking financing and investment from its foreign partners to bolster its burgeoning domestic arms industry. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store