R700 million ‘National Dialogue' ignores evangelical voices
On behalf of SAFI (the South African Friends of Israel), I must share how deeply dismayed we are by the shocking absence of evangelical representation on the panel of 'eminent persons' selected for President Ramaphosa's R700 million National Dialogue.
While the President insists the dialogue is meant to be citizen-led and non-partisan, the deliberate exclusion of evangelical voices, such as those of Pastor Bert Pretorius, who represents over 19,900 churches and half of South Africa's Christian population, raises serious concerns about the inclusivity and legitimacy of the initiative.
This glaring omission undermines the credibility of a process billed as a path toward national unity. Faith-based organisations have always been central to South Africa's moral and political awakening, from resisting Apartheid to fostering reconciliation. Ignoring their contribution today suggests this dialogue is less about unity and more about political optics - perhaps even a thinly veiled prelude to the ANC's local election campaign.
South Africans have already spoken through the ballot box in 2024, giving rise to a Government of National Unity. What citizens demand now is implementation, not more rhetoric. With unemployment at 32.9%, basic services failing, and daily life growing more difficult, a taxpayer-funded talkshop feels like a distraction at best and an insult at worst.
It's time to govern, not consult.
Daniel Jacobi
Executive Director, South African Friends of Israel
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
9 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa suspends Gauteng prosecuting head Andrew Chauke
Ramaphosa asked Chauke to provide reasons why he should not be suspended. President Cyril Ramaphosa has suspended South Gauteng Director of Public Prosecutions Andrew Chauke with immediate effect pending an inquiry into his fitness to hold office. On Monday night, the Presidency said Ramaphosa took the decision in terms of section 14(3) read with 12(6)(a) of the National Prosecuting Authority Act. Reasons 'Having asked Advocate Chauke to provide reasons why he should not be suspended, President Ramaphosa has decided suspension is the correct course of action pending an inquiry,' said Ramphosa's spokesperson Vincent Magwenya. 'President Ramaphosa has informed Advocate Chauke of his decision in writing and indicated that the President and the public would benefit from an independent assessment of issues that require elucidation and on which there are disputes of fact'. ALSO READ: Police minister Mchunu 'now under criminal investigation' Accusations Magwenya said Ramaphosa believes Chauke's 'continued tenure as Director of Public Prosecutions – while facing serious accusations – would negatively affect the reputation of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) as a whole.' 'President Ramaphosa is also concerned that Adv Chauke will not be able to fulfil his functions optimally while facing an inquiry'. Shamilla Batohi The Citizen previously reported that National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) boss Shamila Batohi told Chauke that she was writing to Ramaphosa after demanding answers from Chauke, on various decisions he made, or allegedly made, so that she could decide what to do about it, and him. Batohi questioned Chauke on his apparent initial reluctance to prosecute former president Jacob Zuma's son Duduzane for culpable homicide despite a magistrate having found there was prima facie evidence that Duduzane may have been negligent when losing control of his Porsche and crashing into a taxi in 2014. A Zimbabwean woman died and three people were left injured. Batohi also questioned Chauke on why former police crime intelligence head Richard Mdluli was not prosecuted on a murder charge related to the 1999 shooting death of Oupa Ramogibe, who had an affair with Mdluli's customary wife. NOW READ: Ramaphosa fires Nobuhle Nkabane, appoints new higher education minister
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
South Africans are sick to death of persistent corruption by politicians
Greg Mills, in his book Why States Recover, illustrates that the key reason behind economic failure is politics: 'Today, the bulk of the world's poor – totalling 1.1 billion of the planet's seven billion people – live in failed or failing state,' he states. The continued failure of South Africa's political leadership to deal decisively with corruption by holding the perpetrators accountable is turning this country into a failing or failed state. South Africans are sick to death of persistent corruption by political leaders. It seems we are headed for a possibly violent revolution if impunity is not stopped urgently. If you don't believe me, just look at the agitation of ordinary people who loudly express their support for Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. On social media, some have even threatened widespread looting if something bad were to happen to him. Against the backdrop of July 2021's devastating riots, we are treading on dangerous ground. Mkhwanazi represents an idea of the people's hatred of the impunity of the corrupt elite. People are infuriated by the repetition of hollow anti-corruption rhetoric by those in power, yet they know that behind the scenes they are colluding with criminals to milk Treasury dry. Writing in Good Governance Africa's flagship publication, Africa in Fact (special edition on the proposed International Anti-Corruption Court), researcher Nnaemeka Ohamadike states that 'the gap between anti-corruption rhetoric and real law enforcement remains a breeding ground for impunity, weakening governance and leaving citizens to bear the cost, especially in Africa'. He further refers to the World Bank's definition of corruption as the extent to which power is 'misused for private gain, encompassing both petty and grand corruption, as well as the influence of elites and private interests in capturing state institutions'. This continues in South Africa year after year, but nothing is done to combat it. South Africa has been cursed by bad political leadership and policies, from colonial times through to the apartheid period and now the so-called democratic dispensation. Colonial political leaders committed the original sin of dispossessing the indigenous people of their land and resources. The architects of apartheid curated an effective racist system that balkanised the people of this country and continued to dispossess the people of their land, minerals and other resources and entrenched grand corruption. Not to be outdone, the post-democracy kleptocratic elites continue their systematic industrial-scale corruption enterprise, siphoning public resources for the benefit of the few. Mkhwanazi's revelations are the latest in a string of corruption scandals that have blighted this country since the dawn of democracy. A quick scan of post-1994 South Africa shows a series of major corruption scandals from 1999 to 2021, exposing systemic misuse of public funds and abuse of power by high-ranking officials and political elites. Starting with the Arms Deal in 1999, it details successive scandals including Travelgate, Oilgate, the Selebi bribery case, Limpopo tender fraud and high-profile cases such as Nkandla and State Capture involving former president Jacob Zuma and the Gupta family. Despite various investigations and some convictions, many cases ended with limited accountability. Recent scandals like the Bosasa revelations, PPE corruption during Covid-19, Tembisa Hospital, Life Esidimeni and the Digital Vibes contract highlight ongoing issues with political patronage, weak enforcement and slow or stalled prosecutions. The pattern points to a deeply entrenched culture of corruption within state institutions. The boldness and audacity of the corrupt criminal elite is increasing while the decisiveness of our political leaders to deal with them is sadly decreasing. It seems that criminal elements are firmly embedded into our political systems in a way that compromises and disempowers our leaders from acting. It is a total failure to deal with corruption, year after year. Even if Mkhwanazi himself were to be found wanting in some respect, the idea will persist because people are sick of being taken for a ride by the so-called leaders. In 2011, the South African Constitutional Court judgment in the Glenister case stated that 'corruption is… an antithesis to democracy and the rule of law. Corruption diverts resources that are needed to improve the lives of citizens to enrich a few, at great cost to many. Corruption prevents the state from fulfilling its constitutional obligations, erodes the legitimacy of our democratic government and subverts the rule of law.' As this continues unabated, we must brace ourselves for a very bad retaliation, the likes of which this country has never seen. The only thing that will prevent this is strong action against the powerful political elites who enable and reward corruption in our society. On 11 July 2025, Karam Singh of Integrity Initiatives International, and Ruth Kolevsohn wrote in the Mail & Guardian that 'frustration remains that the criminal justice system in many countries is unable to deal with the weight and magnitude of high volume, multi-actor, multiple jurisdiction transactions… In global systems, where no single jurisdiction can be relied upon to have the political will and modalities to go after kleptocrats and their stolen assets, we need alternative solutions. 'Presently, there is no international institution to hold kleptocrats accountable when the countries they rule are unwilling or unable to do so. The case for establishing an international anti-corruption court (IACC) has been mooted as a feasible solution to address the constraints of domestic systems.' It is for this reason that Good Governance Africa is partnering with Integrity Initiatives International to promote the establishment of the IACC, and the drafting and ratification of the International Anti-Corruption Court Treaty.
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Manamela steps in as Nkabane gets the boot
Political parties have expressed approval of the decision to remove Dr Nobuhle Nkabane from her role as Minister of Higher Education and Training. One party has accused her of showing an "unrepentant disregard for what it means to serve the people of South Africa." Nkabane found herself at the centre of a parliamentary storm when she failed to attend a crucial meeting of the portfolio committee on Friday. The portfolio committee had invited Nkabane and the panel members who recommended the now-cancelled appointments of the chairpersons for the Sector Education and Training Authorities (SETA) boards. Advocate Terry Motau and Chief Director for SETA Coordination, Mabuza Ngubane, attended the meeting, but Nkabane was notably absent. Also present were Deputy Ministers Buti Manamela and Mimmy Gondwe, whom the committee wanted to question about their roles in the appointments. However, in a swift response to recent controversies, President Cyril Ramaphosa has appointed Manamela as the new Minister of Higher Education and Training. The decision follows Nkabane's ousting, which she announced in a brief statement on Monday afternoon. Nkabane expressed her gratitude to President Ramaphosa for the opportunity to serve in such a critical role, stating, "I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely thank the President of the Republic of South Africa, H.E. Cyril Ramaphosa, for entrusting me with the responsibility to serve as Minister of Higher Education and Training." Minutes after her statement, Ramaphosa announced Manamela's appointment as well as Dr Nomusa Dube-Ncube, who will be serving as the Deputy Minister of Higher Education and Training. The reshuffling comes as Nkabane faced intense scrutiny, particularly for her alleged misleading of Parliament regarding the process of appointing the SETA board members. Reports emerged indicating that the list of appointees was heavily influenced by affiliations with the African National Congress (ANC), incorporating figures such as Buyambo, the son of Mineral Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe. Last week, Nkabane came under fire after failing to appear before Parliament to account for the controversial appointments. She instead opted to attend a GBV event in the Eastern Cape. Nkabane sent a last-minute apology to the portfolio committee, citing a gender-based violence (GBV) event at a Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) college in the Eastern Cape as the reason for her absence. Her apology was rejected by committee chairperson Tebogo Letsie. Letsie said after receiving the letter, he told Nkabane that he is not accepting her apology because it does not make sense for her to be absent from the meeting. Nkabane was expected to brief members again on the SETA board selection process, which was eventually reversed. Many of the appointees were allegedly linked to the ANC, which raised concerns over political interference and nepotism. Although Nkabane previously told MPs that the selections were made by an 'independent' panel chaired by Advocate Terry Motau, Motau denied any involvement. Political parties were quick in their response to Nkabane's axing. Welcoming the removal of Nkabane, RISE Mzansi said: ''Nkabane epitomised political arrogance and showed an unrepentant disregard for what it means to be in service to the people of South Africa. While she no longer serves as a member of the Executive, she must still be held accountable by the Joint Committee on Ethics and Members' Interests for misleading Parliament and the people of South Africa. ''We trust that long-serving Deputy Minister of Higher Education and Training, Buti Manamela, who has been elevated to the position of Minister, will bring much needed stability and humility to the portfolio, while ensuring that its R142-billion budget contributes to educating and training a new generation of leaders who will create jobs, build the economy and contribute to the intellectual and knowledge base of the country.'' Calling Nkabane's removals a ''stunning blow against ANC cadre corruption,'' DA National Spokesperson, Karabo Khakhau, said: ''Seeing one ANC Minister depart Cabinet under storming clouds of lies, deceit, cadre deployment corruption and a Hawks Investigation is a first step to restoring our faith that the GNU will not tolerate corruption. ''Our demand to President Ramaphosa was for him to take action against the seriously compromised, corrupt and nefarious in the ANC, and the firing of Nkabane is the first step for him.'' uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party said in a statement that the removal of Nkabane was "necessary and long overdue". "The former Minister's failure to account for the irregular and unlawful allocation of Sector Education and Training Authority board positions raised serious questions about the so-called Government of National Unity's governance, their lack of transparency and the severe political interference that has become quite characteristic of the former liberation movement." I IOL News Additional Reporting by Staff Reporter
