
Suaram urges govt to clarify moratorium on Peaceful Assembly Act
PETALING JAYA : An NGO has called on the government to clarify the nature of its moratorium on legal proceedings under Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act (PAA) 2012, warning that ambiguity on the matter could undermine ongoing reform efforts.
Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram) executive director Azura Nasron said home minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail's remarks yesterday on the moratorium requires clarification.
'It remains unclear whether this is a new policy shift or a misstatement of the Cabinet decision that focussed only on Section 11,' she said in a statement.
On Feb 13, Saifuddin said the government would place a moratorium on Section 11 of the PAA, which mandates that organisers seek the consent of venue owners or occupants before holding an assembly at a particular venue.
He said this was in view of the government's plan to amend the section.
'This means no action will be taken on the organisers of any assembly until the amendments are approved (by the Dewan Rakyat),' he said.
Saifuddin said yesterday an amendment to Section 11 would be tabled in the next Parliament meeting.
He said his ministry would also examine the Federal Court's ruling that Section 9(5), which criminalises failure to notify the police five days in advance of holding a peaceful assembly, was unconstitutional.
He said Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim had also enforced a moratorium on any legal proceedings under Section 9(5) of the PAA as part of his agenda to reform the law.
Azura said the moratorium must be explicitly announced and fully enforced on all ongoing investigations and prosecutions, until legislative repeal was completed.
'The government must not miss this critical opportunity to deliver the 'comprehensive reform of laws related to the right to assemble' it has pledged to implement,' she said.
She also called on the government to repeal Section 9(5), consult civil society on the amendment, and review other restrictive provisions such as the age limit under Section 4(d) prohibiting those below 21 years old from organising assemblies.
'While the move to amend Section 11 of the PAA is necessary, it must not distract from the urgent need to repeal Section 9(5) in full.
'Sections 9(5) and 11 have long operated in tandem to entrench an authorisation-centric culture, where peaceful assemblies are treated as privileges subject to approval rather than inalienable constitutional rights.
'Amending one without repealing the other leaves the underlying legal framework fundamentally flawed and impairs the development of a culture grounded in the presumption that peaceful assemblies are lawful,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Office closed when delivering defamation letter of demand? Well, I was attending grandpa's funeral, Steven Sim tells PAS man
BUKIT MERTAJAM, July 4 — Bukit Mertajam MP Steven Sim Chee Keong has accused a PAS leader of attempting to politicise his absence from his service centre yesterday, claiming it was a deliberate move to paint the centre as non-operational. Sim said there was already a notice saying the centre was closed for the whole day yesterday — which he explained due to the passing of his grandfather, whose funeral was held that day and attended by his staff. 'While my family was grieving the loss of our beloved grandfather, this PAS leader saw fit to exploit the situation for political gain,' he posted on Facebook, referring to Sungai Buloh PAS chief Zaharudin Muhammad. Sim said otherwise his doors are always open to the constituency regardless of the racial, religious or political background — with even PAS members coming to seek assistance. 'We had already put up a notice informing the public that the service centre would be closed on July 3. The notice even included four contact numbers in case of emergencies. 'So, either the PAS leader couldn't read Malay, or he was deliberately attempting to create a malicious perception,' he suggested. Zaharudin, who is the son-in-law of PAS president Tan Sri Abdul Hadi Awang, said yesterday that he had attempted to serve a letter of demand to Sim for alleged defamation. Zaharudin is reportedly seeking RM1.5 million in damages over Sim's remark against him over the promotion of a Chinese officer in the Malaysian Armed Forces. Sim said that regardless, no such letter was found at his office even this morning, and welcomed Zaharudin to settle the matter in court, attaching a Malay pantun as a response. Last week, Sim had stood firm on his accusations against Zaharudin, whom he had called racist for a remark on Malaysian Armed Forces lieutenant-general Datuk Johnny Lim Eng Seng. Lim's promotion had marked a historic milestone, as he became the first ethnic Chinese officer to be promoted to the rank of lieutenant-general in the armed forces. In response, Zaharudin had speculated that Malaysia's 50th prime minister in 2058 could be a Chinese individual, framing the scenario as a possible outcome of Lim's promotion. The post, which also compared the Malaysia's immigration policies to the Zionist settlement of Palestine, was then deleted. Islamist party PAS has since said it does not support the social media post by one of its leaders on the promotion, saying it was the personal opinion of the individual involved and 'entirely contrary' to PAS' policies and values.


Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Decision on Rosmah's bid to recuse judge from corruption trial scheduled for Sept 10
PUTRAJAYA, July 4 — The Court of Appeal has fixed September 10 to deliver its decision on Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor's appeal to recuse a High Court judge who presided over her corruption trial involving the RM1.25 billion solar hybrid project in Sarawak. Court of Appeal deputy registrar Muhammad Noor Firdaus Rosli set the date during the case management today. On June 25, the Court of Appeal three-member bench comprising Justices Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim, Datuk Azman Abdullah and Datuk Noorin Badaruddin reserved their judgment after hearing submissions from both the prosecution and defence. Rosmah's lawyer, Datuk Akberdin Abdul Kader, confirmed the date when contacted by Bernama. The wife of former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak is appealing against the decision by the then High Court judge, Mohamed Zaini Mazlan — who has since been elevated to the Court of Appeal — dismissing her application for his recusal from presiding over her case. Rosmah filed the recusal application at the eleventh hour before Judge Mohamed Zaini was slated to deliver his decision on September 1, 2022. The application was based on allegations that a draft judgment in her case, purportedly prepared by a third party, had been leaked before its official delivery. On the same day, Judge Mohamed Zaini found Rosmah, 73, guilty of three corruption charges linked to the hybrid solar project, and sentenced her to 10 years in prison and a RM970 million fine, in default 30 years in prison. However, she was granted a stay of execution on both the custodial sentence and the fine, pending the disposal of her appeal before the Court of Appeal. Rosmah was charged with one count of soliciting RM187.5 million and two counts of receiving RM6.5 million in bribes from former Jepak Holdings Sdn Bhd managing director, Saidi Abang Samsudin. — Bernama


Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Ostensible ceasefire in Gaza, real and fictional, has made the ARF more important than ever — Phar Kim Beng and Lutfy Hamzah
JULY 4 — The current state of international diplomacy is being shaped not by declarations etched in treaties, but by gestures and optics that straddle the line between the real and the imagined. The case of the ostensible ceasefire in Gaza is a glaring example. Negotiated under the auspices of President Donald Trump — now in his second non-consecutive term as the 47th President of the United States — the ceasefire proposal is not yet enforceable, but its influence is already far-reaching. It has changed travel plans, softened diplomatic tensions, and — perhaps most importantly — repositioned Southeast Asia's role in global diplomacy. What's unfolding is a paradox of modern diplomacy: an undeclared ceasefire that, despite not being real in military terms, is already reshaping geopolitical realities. For the upcoming Asean Regional Forum (ARF) in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, this fiction has provided a stage for reality to emerge. A ceasefire both real and fictional Despite ongoing Israeli airstrikes and continued resistance by Hamas in the Gaza Strip, US Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Marco Rubio has spoken publicly of a proposed 60-day ceasefire. According to the framework reportedly accepted in principle by Israel and now under review by Hamas, this temporary truce would involve a staged release of hostages and prisoners, reduction of Israeli troop presence in populated areas, and the facilitation of humanitarian aid through Egypt and Qatar. But even as talks continue, Israeli bombs have not stopped falling on Gaza — particularly in Khan Younis and Rafah — and civilian casualties continue to mount. Human rights groups and UN officials have labelled the situation not only a humanitarian catastrophe but also an example of what one UN Special Rapporteur recently called an 'economy of genocide.' Hence, the ceasefire remains an 'ostensible' one: a hopeful diplomatic façade masking an unrelenting ground reality. Yet fiction has its uses. This very illusion of a truce has allowed diplomatic momentum to shift from crisis management in the Middle East to strategic planning in the Indo-Pacific. And it has changed the itinerary of one of the world's most powerful diplomats. Israeli bombs have not stopped falling on Gaza — particularly in Khan Younis and Rafah — and civilian casualties continue to mount. — AFP pic Rubio postpones East Asia trip — but with intent Originally scheduled to travel to Japan and South Korea in the first week of July, Secretary Rubio abruptly cancelled both visits. Officially, the reason was to focus on the Middle East. But analysts have been quick to note that this decision had additional advantages for both Japan and South Korea — especially given the domestic volatility in both countries. In Japan, Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru is grappling with the possibility of an electoral backlash in the Upper House election on July 20. Trade negotiations with the United States have stalled over issues such as tariffs on automobiles, digital services, and agriculture. A visit from Rubio, carrying the pressure of the Trump administration's new economic doctrine, could have forced Ishiba into public concessions that would weaken his domestic credibility. As Sheila Smith of the Council on Foreign Relations aptly noted, Rubio's decision to bypass Tokyo was 'fortuitous'. In South Korea, President Lee Jae-Myung faces a faltering economy. The Bank of Korea has slashed its 2025 GDP forecast to just 0.8 per cent. Rumours of a US withdrawal of 4,500 troops from the peninsula have also created anxiety in Seoul. Lee is in no position to confront the twin challenges of economic downturn and American strategic retrenchment. Rubio's decision to forgo a visit removes at least one political headache from the Korean leader's immediate horizon. Asean Regional Forum as a strategic pivot The geopolitical beneficiary of all this is the 31st Asean Regional Forum (ARF), scheduled for July 9 to 11 in Kuala Lumpur. With Rubio confirmed to attend in his dual role, the ARF has been catapulted into relevance. No longer a 'talk shop', the ARF has become the multilateral venue for serious side-bar conversations between Washington, Beijing, Tokyo, Seoul, Riyadh, Doha, and Jakarta. Rubio's presence will lend heft to the ARF, but more importantly, it reflects a US foreign policy recalibration. Under Trump's renewed leadership, Washington is taking a harder, transactional approach to alliances, but also an increasingly pragmatic stance toward regional diplomacy. The multilateral format of the ARF offers cover for difficult conversations without the bilateral optics that can inflame domestic politics. Strategic relief for Muslim-majority South-east Asia For the Group Chair of Asean — Malaysia — and for preponderantly Muslim countries like Indonesia and Brunei, the ostensible ceasefire in Gaza offers strategic relief. Since October 2023, Muslim-majority governments in South-east Asia have been under immense domestic pressure to condemn Israeli actions, suspend economic relations with Israel, and vocally support the Palestinian cause. However, as state actors, these governments must navigate a delicate balance: staying true to public sentiment while maintaining geopolitical neutrality. The proposed ceasefire, though not yet implemented, grants them a temporary reprieve. It allows Asean Muslim-majority states to shift the regional narrative back toward development, security, and digital transformation. For Malaysia, this moment is particularly consequential. As ARF host and Asean Chair, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has the rare opportunity to preside over an Indo-Pacific security dialogue at a time of extreme global flux. With Rubio present, the spotlight is firmly on Kuala Lumpur. This enables Anwar to reassert Malaysia's civilisational diplomacy — grounded in Islamic moderation and Asian consensus — as a bridge between the Global North and Global South. The return of Trump: Consolidating global recalibration All of this unfolds against the backdrop of Donald Trump's aggressive political reassertion. Since assuming the presidency for a second time in January 2025, Trump has pressed forward with what his aides call the 'Golden Age' doctrine. This includes the recent passage of the 'Big, Beautiful Bill', which slashes social spending while locking in tax cuts and expanding defence budgets. The US Supreme Court has also strengthened executive power, granting Trump leeway unseen since the Reagan era. On the foreign policy front, Trump has approved surgical strikes on Iranian and Houthi military targets, even as he pushes peace negotiations in Gaza. The contradictory nature of these moves — bombing while brokering — mirrors the duality of the Gaza ceasefire it self: part illusion, part strategy. It is precisely this context that makes the ARF more important. For South-east Asia, a region often caught in the crossfire of US-China rivalry, the ARF offers a rare moment of regional autonomy. With global attention diverted to the Middle East, and bilateral diplomacy in Northeast Asia on hold, Asean must seize the moment to reassert its relevance. Conclusion: Fiction with consequences The ostensible ceasefire in Gaza may be fictional in military terms, but its diplomatic impact is already deeply real. It has shifted attention from bilateral pressure points in Japan and South Korea to multilateral engagement in Southeast Asia. It has relieved Muslim-majority governments in Asean from having to respond daily to the moral outrage of Gaza. And most importantly, it has turned the Asean Regional Forum into a newly relevant stage for strategic dialogue in the Indo-Pacific. In a world where perception often precedes policy, the fiction of peace may well be the prelude to real stability. For Malaysia and the rest of Asean, this is a chance not to be missed. * Phar Kim Beng, PhD, is the Director of the Institute of Internationalization and Asean Studies (IINTAS) at IIUM, and Lutfy Hamzah is a Senior Research Fellow at IINTAS. ** This is the personal opinion of the writers or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.