&w=3840&q=100)
Explainer: What's inside Trump's controversial 'One Big Beautiful Bill'
While it's been billed by Trump supporters as a pro-growth and pro-worker blueprint, the nearly 900-page legislation carries significant implications for the United States' federal tax policy, social programmes, border enforcement, and the national debt.
Here's a breakdown of what the bill entails—and what it would change if passed into law.
Permanent tax cuts and new deductions
At the centre of the bill is a permanent extension of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was set to expire at the end of this year. The legislation locks in lower income tax rates, expands the standard deduction, and extends various business-friendly provisions.
No tax on tips: Creates a federal income tax exemption for tip income, up to $25,000 per year. The benefit phases out for individuals earning over $150,000.
Standard deduction: Permanently expands the standard deduction, nearly doubling the amount filers can subtract from taxable income.
Child tax credit: Increased from $2,000 to $2,200 per child. Now it requires only one parent to have a Social Security number.
Social security income deduction: $6,000 income deduction for retirees earning under $75,000, plus a temporary $4,000 senior deduction (2025–28).
These provisions amount to more than $4.5 trillion in tax reductions over the next decade, according to House estimates.
Major cuts to Medicaid and SNAP
To offset the tax cuts, the bill proposes more than $1.2 trillion in spending reductions, largely targeting Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programme (SNAP).
Medicaid reforms:
Work mandate: Starting December 2026, able-bodied, childless adults must work or volunteer at least 80 hours per month to qualify.
Stricter work rules: Parents with children aged 15 and older would also be required to meet the 80-hour monthly threshold.
More frequent checks: Recipients must verify income and residency biannually.
Provider tax cap: Reduces the cap on provider taxes (used by states to fund Medicaid) to 3.5 per cent from 6 per cent by 2032.
Hospital fund: Rural hospitals to receive a $50 billion stabilisation fund amid funding cuts.
The Congressional Budget Office projects over 11 million may lose Medicaid access if the bill is enacted.
SNAP changes:
State cost-sharing: States with error rates above 6 per cent would have to pay 5–15 per cent of SNAP costs starting in 2028.
Expanded work requirements: Raises the age limit for work-eligible, able-bodied adults without dependents from 54 to 64.
State flexibility: States like Alaska and Hawaii could receive waivers if they demonstrate 'good faith' efforts to comply.
Immigration and border security
The bill designates $350 billion for border security and immigration enforcement, reflecting Trump's top domestic priority.
Key provisions include:
Wall construction: Allocates $46.5 billion for wall construction and maintenance along the southern border.
Detention capacity: Expands detention facilities, with $45 billion earmarked for this purpose.
ICE staffing: Includes $30 billion for new hiring, training, and equipment for US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Asylum application fee: Introduces a $100 fee for asylum seekers. An earlier House proposal to set the fee at $1,000 was removed after a Senate ruling.
SALT deduction increase
The state and local tax deduction, or SALT, is capped at $10,000 under current law. The Senate bill increases this cap to $40,000, but only for five years. After that, the cap returns to its previous level.
This provision was included to satisfy Republicans from high-tax states, particularly in the House, according to a report by CBS News.
Clean energy rollback
The legislation phases out Biden-era clean energy tax credits, but more slowly than the House had proposed. This has been a point of contention for tech billionaire Elon Musk, who has threatened to form a new party if the bill is enacted.
Phase-out timeline:
Companies breaking ground on wind or solar projects in 2025 would still receive 100 per cent of the existing credit.
Projects begun in 2026 receive 60 per cent, and those in 2027 get 20 per cent. Credits will end entirely in 2028.
Projects with supply chains linked to 'foreign entities of concern', such as China, are ineligible for these credits under both the House and Senate bills.
Debt ceiling increased
The bill raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, exceeding the $4 trillion hike in the House version. This provision is intended to avoid a potential standoff over government borrowing later this year, with Treasury officials warning that the US could run out of funds by August.
Fiscal conservatives have criticised this provision, calling it a betrayal of Republican pledges to rein in spending.
AI regulation clause removed
The original bill included a clause that would have prohibited states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI) if they accepted federal tech funding. A bipartisan Senate amendment removed that language amid growing unease about AI oversight at the state level.
Why 'Big Beautiful Bill' matters for Trump
This is Trump's most ambitious domestic policy push of his second term. While framed as pro-growth and middle-class friendly, the bill shifts federal priorities toward tax relief and immigration enforcement at the cost of social safety nets and clean energy incentives. The $3.7 trillion projected deficit impact has sparked backlash, even among Republicans.
What's next
The House is expected to take up the bill later this week. If passed without changes, it will head to Trump for signature. Any modifications will trigger fresh negotiations with Senate leaders.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
How America's economy is dodging disaster
Economic doom beckoned after President Donald Trump announced his 'Liberation Day" tariffs on April 2nd. Stocks crashed; forecasters predicted a recession within the year. Three months on, the mood is rather more relaxed. Prices in shops are not noticeably higher, unemployment is flat and the S&P 500 index is resurgent, back at all-time highs. Mr Trump's 90-day pause for many of his tariffs, announced a week after Liberation Day to calm markets, will end on July 9th. Although he has threatened to send letters declaring talks over and tariffs back on, nobody seems too worried. What gives? Was the president right in thinking that tariffs were a smart way to squeeze money from foreigners? Were the doommongers overdoing it? For the moment, businesses, households and financial markets are locked in an elaborate game of wait-and-see. Companies stocked up heavily early in the year in anticipation of tariffs. Indeed, they did so by enough to drag measured GDP growth into the red in the first quarter, as a surge of imports distorted the numbers. These stockpiles will be run down. In many cases, they are already being depleted, meaning that businesses are turning again to imports. Last month customs duties were more than three times as high as the average in recent years (see chart 1). Companies that bring in goods from abroad now face an unpalatable choice: either they can eat the tariffs and accept lower profits, or they can pass the additional costs on to consumers. So far, they have mostly chosen the first option. Bosses are attempting to wait out the president. Why alienate customers with higher prices if Mr Trump might change his mind and render the exercise pointless? Even in the latest consumer-price data, which still shows inflation a little above the Federal Reserve's target of 2%, it is difficult to spot a tariff impact. In fact, doing so requires an economic microscope. Zooming in on the prices of affected categories at a few large retailers, Alberto Cavallo of Harvard Business School and co-authors do discern some slight price rises in both imported goods and their domestically produced competitors (see chart 2). However, such prices have risen by only a percent or two—a far smaller increase than that seen in tariffs. America's effective tariff rate is now at 12%, according to calculations by the Tax Foundation, a think-tank, its highest in nearly a century. Reverting to Mr Trump's initial Liberation Day offering would mean a significant step up. Oddly, though, tariffs may be pushing down prices via another mechanism—by taking a toll on the economy. The Liberation Day drama crushed consumer confidence, possibly softening demand. Until recently, this has been evident only in 'soft" data (surveys and the like). Now signs of it are starting to appear in 'hard" data, too. A recent release showed that household spending fell month-to-month in May. Employment figures for June were strong, but bolstered by government hiring, especially of teachers. Those for the private sector were lower than expected. A running estimate of GDP, produced by the Fed's Atlanta branch, suggests that its core components (private investment and consumption) have fallen from an annualised growth rate of 2-3% at the start of the second quarter to 1% now (see chart 3). Goldman Sachs, a bank, has compared the latest data to previous 'event driven" shocks that led to recessions, and found that today's slowdown is roughly in line with the historical norm. Whether this is the start of something more serious depends, in large part, on how punchy the president feels on July 9th. Without a deadline extension or similar, and especially if Mr Trump doubles down on tariffs, a further slowdown seems likely. As Britain discovered after Brexit—the most recent case of a rich country imposing large trade barriers on itself—elevated uncertainty can by itself be sufficient to suppress business investment for quite some time. And America is now an extremely uncertain country (see chart 4). All the same, a worse slowdown does not necessarily mean a recession. Tariffs are colliding with an economy that is, by any historical or international standard, extraordinarily dynamic. It has been growing at a consistent 2-3% a year since 2022. As a consequence, America is one of the few rich countries that might be able to shoulder even a big hit to growth and still dodge recession. The additional stimulus in Mr Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill" is also front-loaded, meaning that it will provide a boost this year and next, which could help obscure the impact of tariffs (even if it also creates an inflationary mess for the Fed to handle). All of this suggests a future in which economists endlessly debate the true impact of the tariffs, while the American public barely notices them, despite having been left poorer. Not a triumph for Mr Trump—but not a disaster either.


Hans India
19 minutes ago
- Hans India
Musk launches ‘America Party'
Washinton: Techbillionaire Elon Musk has launched a new political party to the surprise of many Americans and consternation of some.'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party, and you shall have it!' he posted on X on Saturday and declared the result of the 24-hour poll he had conducted on the social media platform he owns. The poll showed that 64 per cent of the respondents favoured the formation of a new political party. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom. The way we are going to crack the uniparty system is by using a variant of how Epaminondas shattered the myth of Spartan invincibility at Leuctra: Extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield,' he explained in a subsequent post. Epaminondas was a Greek statesman and military strategist in the 4th Century BC credited with breaking the military dominance of Sparta and disrupting the balance of power among Greek states. Musk had threatened to form a new political party if President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' was passed by the Congress. He had also threatened that every single member of the Congress who voted for the Bill did not deserve winning another term. In the event, barring three Republican Senators in the US Senate and two Republican Members of the House of Representatives voted in favour of the Bill, while every Democratic Member in the two Houses voted against. The MAGA (Make America Great Again) supporters of President Donals Trump reacted to the announcement with disappointment, dismay and even anger, believing that a third party will cut into Republican votes, divide Trump supporters and allow the Democratic Party to win the next election. However, some Republicans seemed to believe that the third party will destroy the Democratic Party by attracting opponents of Trump into what will be essentially another conservative and 'rightist' party. The poll that Musk conducted on X, however, was immediately contested. Some even claimed to have asked the AI tool created for X, Grok, about the party affiliation of the respondents. The reply received from Grok was claimed to be the following: 'X doesn't track or reveal voter nationalities in polls, so the exact number is unknown. However, with Elon's global audience (over 200M followers) and X's user base being only 17 per cent American, it's likely a significant portion—possibly over half—of the voters are non-American)." Response from Republican Party supporters were varied. 'A big mistake. A third political party would be Perot 2.0 and guarantee electing Democrats to the Oval Office and Congress. We have seen this show before. If you want to curb government spending, devote resources to elect more Republicans because the solution is not more Democrats in office,' responded one of them. Ross Perot was a businessman and industrialist from Texas who ran for the US presidency as an independent candidate in 1992 and 1996, losing both times to Bill Clinton. Perot passed away in 2019. Others were angry at Musk's seeming betrayal of President Trump. 'You turned out to be a real Trojan horse. There is nothing in you but a thirst for power and profit. Even a thousand lifetimes would not be enough to spend what you have now. Why want more? In history books, you will be described as a Judas who backstabbed the sitting president,' posted another. Others vented their outrage by asking, 'Does anyone remember the Leftist surge in attacks on Elon Musk and vandalisation of Tesla? Many large MAGA accounts and millions of other Trump supporters strongly, vocally expressed their support of Musk and Tesla - often stating they would buy stock and buy vehicles in support of Elon. Is he really mocking us now?' Many more respondents appeared convinced that the venture would never take off. Musk responded to them by reposting a supporter who reminded people that sceptics who believed that Tesla, the electric car with a driverless model, would never succeed, that Musk could never start a space company, that SpaceX could never re-use a rocket, that SpaceX would never occupy Mars, that Musk cannot do politics or run a social media have already been proved wrong. Sixteen hours after Musk's announcement of the America Party, Donald Trump was yet to dignify it with his response, choosing to ignore it. The US President, soaking in his moment under the Sun after getting the Congressional approval for his 860-page 'Big and Beautiful Bill', can afford to ignore the blip—at least for the time being.


Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
Australian shares steady ahead of RBA rate decision, Trump tariff deadline
July 7 - Australian shares were little changed on Monday, with losses in miners and gold stocks offsetting gains in healthcare stocks, as caution prevailed ahead of the local central bank's policy this week and U.S. President Donald Trump's July 9 tariff deadline. The S&P/ASX 200 index was flat at 8,601.3 points as of 0042 GMT. The benchmark had ended Friday 0.1% higher at 8,603 points, a record close. The U.S. will notify about a dozen countries of higher tariff rates starting Monday, Trump said last week, with the higher rates scheduled to take effect on August 1. "Expect plenty more headlines this week, both positive and negative, as countries negotiate," analysts at ANZ said. Australia faces a 10% duty on all goods entering the United States, matching Washington's baseline tariff on imports even as U.S. exports to Australia are tariff-free. Meanwhile, all eyes are on the Reserve Bank of Australia , which will announce its cash rate decision on Tuesday. Markets are pricing in a 99.7% chance of a 25-basis-points cut. On the local bourse, gold stocks shed 1.5% after losing 3.1% earlier in the session. Northern Star Resources slipped nearly 6% after the miner said gold sales at its Kalgoorlie project were lower than its revised outlook. Evolution Mining fell 1.4%. Energy stocks declined 0.2% as oil tumbled. Woodside Energy lost 0.5%. Miners dropped 0.2%, tracking a fall in copper prices, while rate-sensitive financials were down 0.3%. Bucking the trend, healthcare stocks rose 0.8%, with heavyweight CSL adding 1.3%. New Zealand's benchmark S&P/NZX 50 index fell 0.1% to 12,759.70. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand is expected to keep interest rates unchanged on July 9, according to a Reuters poll. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.