logo
7-Seater Is Finally What The VW ID. Buzz Should Have Been At Launch

7-Seater Is Finally What The VW ID. Buzz Should Have Been At Launch

Forbes26-03-2025
When the VW ID. Buzz arrived in 2023, everyone loved the way it looked. When I test-drove it, no other car evoked so many positive comments from passersby and friends. However, it felt like an unfinished product. This was the five-seater. It had loads of luggage space, but the lack of a third row of seats was a missed opportunity, and there were other niggles too. Now, at long last, the seven-seater long wheelbase version has arrived in the UK. I got to spend some quality time with it. I didn't really want to give it back.
With the introduction of the seven-seater version of the ID. Buzz, there are now four body variants for the van. The original five-seater version remains with the short wheelbase chassis, but this has been joined by a six-seater using the short wheelbase, a six-seater with the long wheelbase, and a seven-seater variant using the long wheelbase. The long wheelbase is slightly shorter in the US. The powertrain has also been upgraded across the board. The original 204 PS rear motor has been significantly improved to Volkswagen's latest AP550 286 PS unit – a 42% increase in power.
The five-seater partners this motor with a 79kWh (net) battery, up from the 77kWh unit of the original Buzz. The six-seater can also use this battery, or you can opt for an even bigger 86kWh unit, which also necessitates the long wheelbase. The seven-seater only comes with the larger battery. There are then Life and Style equipment levels to choose from. Topping off the range is a GTX 4MOTION ID. Buzz, which offers dual motors and all-wheel drive providing 340 PS. This variant is also available with all four body variants.
There are commercial versions of the VW ID. Buzz that go head-to-head with cargo-focused electric vans such as the Farizon SV, but the Volkswagen is more general-purpose in focus. The six- and seven-occupant versions now have a third row of seats. With the seven-seater, there are three places in the second row, then you can flip the seat on either side forward to enable access to the third row, which only has two. These aren't small with limited head and legroom like on many seven-seater SUVs, such as the Mercedes EQB. They are perfectly comfortable for adults and offer almost as much space as the second row.
The middle seat in the second row is also almost as wide as the outer ones, meaning it's viable to have three adults side-by-side. The downside is that the back doesn't fold forward to make an armrest with cupholders. Instead, passengers in this row will have to use the aircraft-style tray tables integrated into the seats in front for their cups. The third-row passengers have cupholders in the side panels.
One of my biggest gripes with the original five-seater Buzz was the lack of ventilation for rear-seat passengers. That has now been remedied, and very well indeed. There are vents available for both rear rows, and the climate control is quad-zone, giving the second-row passengers on each side their own ceiling-based controls to change temperature and fan speed. The side doors are motorized, too, and are a bit wider than on the five-seater to facilitate access.
The VW ID. Buzz seven-seater is a very comfy form of transport for seven adults but it's the cargo carrying capacity that makes this vehicle so very special. With all three rows of seats in place, the luggage space in the back is a hatchback-like 306 liters. But you can of course drop the third row of seats forward to provide 1,340 liters, around the same as a compact station wagon. There's a shelf behind that, which ensures the floor of this space is still flat. Two storage bins underneath provide space for charging cables and other vehicle paraphernalia.
If you need a bit more capacity and only have two people in the car, you can also drop the second row of seats forward, with a 60/40 split. That makes 2,469 liters of cargo space, which is 350 liters more than the five-seater. Still not enough for you? That shelf, the bins, and both the third-row seats can all be removed. Unlatching the seats is easy but they are heavy, so you will need to be strong to carry them out. This gives you a massive total space. Of course, you can take out the third row and still have five seats, while having as much luggage space as most SUVs – when they're carrying just two people.
The ID. Buzz doesn't have the natty array of buttons found in the back of the Kia EV9 to operate its seven-seat system. But then it doesn't have the space available with the Buzz. By removing the third row of seats and dropping forward the 60% portion of the second row, I was able to transport all the pieces for a London art fair, along with myself and two passengers.
If that's not enough, an optional £980 towbar is available. A button drops this down, after which you must manually pull it until it locks into place. When not in use, it can be stowed back where it came from. The Buzz can tow 1,000kg braked or 750kg unbraked, so not enough for a caravan but a small boat or cargo trailer would be fine.
The considerable extra power over the original Buzz is very noticeable with this upgraded version. The launch version took a pedestrian 10.2 seconds to reach 62mph, but the new seven-seater drops this to 7.9 seconds, which a decade ago was considered quite quick for any car and is still rapid for a van. The dual-motor GTX 4MOTION version is even quicker, hitting 62mph in just 6.4 seconds.
You will be surprised how well the Buzz can get off the lights or complete an overtake on a highway. Although it weighs 2.8 tons, most of that mass is low down. This is also a rear-wheel drive vehicle, so the steering is quite light. You won't want to hit a bend too fast, but at the right speed the dynamics are quite fun. This is a huge vehicle for city streets, however. The smooth power delivery and light steering make it quite maneuverable, but you always have to be careful with the length.
One thing I really appreciated during my test driving, which involved a lot of country roads at night, was the Matrix LED headlight system. This divides the beam into pixels and only dips the LEDs directly pointed at oncoming traffic or a vehicle directly in front. It meant I always had the bushes by the side of the road illuminated while not blinding other road users, which felt safer than traditional auto dipping main beams.
While the range of the original Buzz wasn't terrible, it also wasn't quite as much as you'd hope for in a vehicle that has potential for family country trips. The bigger 86kWh battery isn't a huge leap from the original 77kWh one, but it does mean that the Life trim seven-seater now offers 291 WLTP miles of range – quite a boost from the original 255 miles. The Style has larger wheels so the range drops to 285 miles, and the example I borrowed had 21in rims, which will further reduce this figure.
The long wheelbase VW ID. Buzz is... long.
James Morris
During my testing, which involved a lot of long journeys on A-roads and highways, I managed 2.4 miles per kWh. This would equate to 206 miles. However, my Buzz also didn't have the £1,050 heat pump option and the weather was cold. I was also driving mostly in Comfort mode with a fair amount of enthusiasm, so I suspect greater range is possible if you drop to Eco and make more sparing use of the accelerator pedal. I achieved more like 2.7 miles per kWh with the original Buzz, giving it similar real-world range.
However, the 86kWh battery also supports DC charging up to 200kW (the original maxed out at 170kW), which means you can still recharge from 5 to 80% in 30 minutes. In other words, a half-hour break every two hours at motorway speeds will make long journeys viable. I completed several near-three-hour journeys with a mix of A-road and motorway speeds and only needed to charge at the destinations. With a vehicle that is so well configured for taking your family places, this is exactly what you need.
Although everyone loves the VW ID. Buzz, there's a reason why you don't see more of them on the streets – they're expensive. They started around £59,000 ($76,000) at launch, and this remains the case. The six-seater is £150 ($190) more and the seven-seater £510 ($650) on top of that. It's then £4,800 ($6,200) for the Style over the Life, and then £3,600 ($4,650) more for the GTX 4MOTION, making the latter £67,435 ($87,000) in five-seater form. My test vehicle, which was a seven-seater Style with a premium two-tone green paint option with the Comfort Seat option, would set you back a princely £71,615 ($92,500).
That's a lot of money when you consider the premium luxury EVs you can get for a similar figure. However, while the price hasn't dropped, the seven-seater option has increased the utility of the VW ID. Buzz considerably. Almost all my criticisms of the Buzz at launch have been dealt with. I'd still like to see a battery around 100kWh, although I suspect that this hasn't been offered yet because it would push the weight over three tons, and reduce the cargo capacity accordingly, so we'll probably have to wait for denser batteries for that.
Even without it, the seven-seater VW ID. Buzz is an incredibly desirable vehicle. The size means it won't be ideal for city dwellers, but if you live in a more suburban or country environment, have a large family or frequently take a regular-sized one on outdoor trips with lots of equipment, it's uniquely brilliant. It costs a lot, but at least now the full potential of the platform has been realized. This is what the Buzz was always meant to be.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

F1 Engines Don't Last Long, And Replacing One Isn't Cheap
F1 Engines Don't Last Long, And Replacing One Isn't Cheap

Yahoo

time21 hours ago

  • Yahoo

F1 Engines Don't Last Long, And Replacing One Isn't Cheap

You're here because you find automotive technical minutiae fascinating. While there's plenty of cool engines in passenger cars -- oddities like the Honda S800's roller bearing crank that needs no oil pressure or the Volkswagen Beetle's magnesium engine block and transmission come to mind -- Formula 1 is where engine tech nerds drool themselves to dehydration. Despite the incredible engineering that goes into F1 engines, they are short-lived. After all, these F1 powertrains generate thrust like you wouldn't believe. 1,000-hp 1.6-liter turbocharged hybrids push these cars to stupendous speeds. Sparks glitter in the dark from the titanium skid blocks that prevent the cars from bottoming out. All this power means these engines will only last for around seven or eight races before they need to be replaced, which means the engine will last about 1,500 miles. This takes into account eight 190-mile races, but not any qualifying or practice. So, the real distance is certainly a bit more. The engines aren't cheap, either, with estimates ranging from $11 million to just over $16 million per engine. That's more than most of us even dream of spending on cars in our lifetimes, much less an individual engine. Those millions could easily fill a garage with Ferraris, Bentleys, some rare muscle cars, and maybe a six-pack of tricked-out Honda Accords to boot. Extrapolate that across the four engine allocation each team gets for the 2024 and 2025 seasons -- Formula 1 used to restrict teams to three engines -- and you're looking at $44 million to $64 million. The teams are probably happy that the current $135 million-per-year spending cap doesn't apply to engines. Read more: Everrati's Electric Porsche 911 RSR Has Me Driving Into The Future With Open Arms The Money F1 Teams Actually Spend On Engines That may not be the whole story, however. According to former racer Scott Mansell, who discussed the subject on his Driver61 YouTube channel, F1 teams spent about $16 million in 2023 purchasing engines, but that's when teams still operated under the three-engine-per-season cap. Beyond that, the numbers we hear about how much an F1 engine costs have more to do with development than purchasing. Look at Forbes' 2019 write-up on F1 engine development costs. The article claimed that developing an F1 engine cost around $1.4 billion, using the Mercedes V6 as an example. Forbes went on to report that Williams and Racing Point spent an estimated $37 million each per year purchasing engines from Mercedes, meaning that if each team had the same budget, they were both forking over $18.5 million. Where F1 engine costs skyrocket is in the design and manufacturing. Engineers work tirelessly to extract every last horsepower from the allowed parameters, and the machining of each part must be unfathomably precise with tolerances usually measured in double-digit microns. Manufacturing processes must be strictly controlled to prevent inconsistent results. For instance, maintaining a stable temperature keeps thermal expansion at bay. Scott Mansell's video How Formula 1 Pistons Are Made shows a clip of Dave Herbert, a production engineer for legendary engine builder Cosworth, saying, "If you just held the piston for about ten seconds, it'll go out of tolerance." To ensure parts can be reused after a race, teams will tear the engine down and X-ray parts to ensure there aren't any defects, among many other tests. Shocking Durability And Relatively Plain Materials Until 2004, F1 teams could use as many engines as they wanted. Today, the 2025 Power Unit Component Allocation limitations for a 24-race season include eight exhaust systems, four internal combustion engines, four turbochargers, two energy stores, and two sets of control electronics. Exceed these numbers, and expect grid penalties. Being able to replace an engine every race meant that those screaming V10s back in 2003 weren't the most durable. Don't hold your breath on V10s coming back, either, as hybrids are here to stay in F1 -- for now, at least. Teams would only get an average of 250 miles out of an engine, and considering that's only 60 miles more than the race itself, that meant the engine was essentially designed to last one race. What's surprising is how conventional the materials are in F1 engines. There's no Vibranium or Adamantium -- McLaren tried using beryllium in its pistons until the FIA banned it in 2001. F1 engines can use aluminum alloys for the block, crankcase, and pistons. Iron-based alloys -- basically steel -- are used for the crankshaft, connecting rods, and cams. Finally, nickel, cobalt, iron, or titanium alloys compose the valves. This is ostensibly to keep manufacturing costs non-exorbitant and avoid safety concerns with exotic materials, as was the case with the FIA's banning of beryllium. So, with reasonably conventional aluminum and iron alloys and no meteorite metals, F1 engines handle internal temperatures that can far exceed 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, not to mention incredible pressure. Those pistons have to change direction constantly, as well, at up to 15,000 times per minute. Honestly, it's impressive that F1 engines don't tear themselves apart faster than they do. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.

European automakers face profitability squeeze in 2025: Fitch
European automakers face profitability squeeze in 2025: Fitch

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

European automakers face profitability squeeze in 2025: Fitch

European carmakers are expected to face a decline in profitability in 2025 due to the combined impact of global trade tensions, weakening demand in China, and the accelerating transition to electric vehicles (EVs), according to Fitch Ratings. Fitch said recently announced U.S. tariffs will have negative consequences for automotive production and sales, prompting manufacturers to reassess their global manufacturing strategies and cut fixed costs. Rising raw material prices and ongoing cost pressures from suppliers are expected to further strain margins. These developments add to Fitch's prior expectation of a low-single-digit decline in European vehicle sales. The credit rating agency warned that tariff risks are especially significant for companies exporting vehicles from Japan, Korea, and Germany to the U.S. Volkswagen is expected to be particularly affected, with its high-margin luxury brands — Audi and Porsche — likely to face pressure on free cash flow and rating headroom. Mercedes-Benz also faces downside risk, as its U.S. production hub for sport utility vehicles could be exposed to retaliatory Chinese tariffs. Fitch noted that while the burden of higher tariffs is likely to be shared between suppliers and automakers, the latter are expected to shoulder the larger share. Disruptions in production may also hit suppliers' cash flows, particularly those highly dependent on automaker volumes. Although a recently announced EU-U.S. trade agreement appears consistent with Fitch's expectations, details remain unclear and require approval from EU member states. Structural challenges also persist. European auto production remains 15%–20% below pre-pandemic levels and is unlikely to recover soon. Fitch attributes this to a slower-than-expected EV transition, growing foreign competition, and shifting consumer preferences. Carmakers like Volkswagen and Stellantis have begun rationalising operations through plant closures and layoffs, which will weigh on short-term cash generation. One-off restructuring costs are expected to amount to roughly 1% of median free cash flow. In China, German premium brands continue to lose market share to domestic players and are experiencing intensifying price competition — even in the typically more resilient premium segment. While some European automakers are partnering with Chinese firms in areas like autonomous driving and software to stem further losses, Fitch does not expect significant improvement in competitive positioning in the near term. On the EV front, Fitch expects European automakers to rebound from a sluggish 2024 with increased battery EV sales in 2025, driven by new model launches and competitive gains against non-EU rivals. However, this growth will come with tighter margins as Chinese brands expand their market presence and infrastructure in Europe. As a result of these pressures, Fitch said profitability and free cash flow generation declined in 2024 and will likely deteriorate further in 2025. The agency has issued Negative Outlooks and taken negative rating actions across the sector. Nevertheless, most investment-grade manufacturers retain solid balance sheets, supported by strong capital structures and net cash positions, which provide some buffer against ongoing challenges. "European automakers face profitability squeeze in 2025: Fitch" was originally created and published by Motor Finance Online, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio

The Secret Volkswagen Sports Car That Never Happened
The Secret Volkswagen Sports Car That Never Happened

Motor 1

timea day ago

  • Motor 1

The Secret Volkswagen Sports Car That Never Happened

Picture this. It's 2017. Dieselgate is in full swing. Volkswagen is trying to divert attention from the messy scandal surrounding its emissions-cheating TDI cars by rolling out a flurry of ID. concepts. The original ID. showcar had already debuted a year earlier, followed in 2017 by the I.D. Crozz as an early look at what would become the ID.4. But behind the scenes at the design studio, something far more exciting was taking shape: a sports car. Never-before-seen sketches reveal a thrilling take on the VW Group's MEB platform. Štěpán Řehák , Spokesperson for Design & Concept Cars, recently shared striking drawings on LinkedIn of a fully electric sports car. Designed by Tibor Juhasz, the performance EV aimed to pay homage to the SP2. No, not Ferrari's Monza SP2 supercar, but Volkswagen's own sports coupe from the 1970s. Photo by: Volkswagen Developed and built in Brazil, the original SP2 was based on the existing Type 3 to keep costs down. It featured a rear-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout. Its spiritual successor, though never realized, ditched the air-cooled engine and four-speed manual in favor of an electric motor, presumably mounted at the back, since all MEB-based cars so far are rear- or all-wheel drive. While the original SP2 wasn't styled by Giorgetto Giugiaro, the ID. sports car drew inspiration from the legendary designer behind the first Golf, Passat, Scirocco, Jetta, and the wild W12 supercar concepts. In a LinkedIn post, Tibor shared the vision behind his modern-day SP2 sketch, created back in 2017: 'My SP2 proposal was born from pure intuition. It envisioned an electric future powered by progress, yet deeply rooted in classic values. My goal was clear: build forward without losing what defines us. Emotion, energy, and vision came together to create something that still resonates today.' But the low-slung coupe with its muscular arches never made it past the drawing board. VW had bigger fish to fry than launching what would've ultimately been a niche product. Instead, it focused on high-volume EVs like the ID.3, ID.4, ID.5, and ID.7. Even so, it found room to play with the ID. Buzz , though sadly, the sports car was left on the proverbial cutting room floor. Photo by: Volkswagen This unnamed performance EV isn't the first exciting concept from VW in modern times that never reached production. Since we brought up Dieselgate, some may remember the 2009 BlueSport, a mid-engined roadster with a 2.0-liter TDI. Before that came the 2005 EcoRacer, another diesel-powered concept. Then there was the 2014 XL Sport , fitted with a V-2 engine from the Ducati Superleggera. Yet all of them pale in comparison to the legendary W12. With Europe's sales ban on new cars with combustion engines looming, it's too late for VW to launch a new sports car with a combustion engine. Still, this spiritual SP2 successor offers a glimmer of hope that a dedicated performance model might one day materialize. Wolfsburg has promised to carry the GTI and R badges into the electric era, but a standalone sports car in the mold of this two-door concept would be even more exciting. Sure, it wouldn't sell like a hatchback, let alone like a crossover. But a sports car could do wonders for VW's brand image after years of damage. Audi is gearing up for its 'TT Moment 2.0," so maybe it's time for the mainstream sibling to follow suit? VW And EVs: VW's New EV Platform Still Supports Combustion Engines Volkswagen Is Making Less Money Because It's Selling More EVs Gallery: VW SP2 (1974) 3 Source: Volkswagen Sources: Stepan Rehak / LinkedIn , Tibor Juhasz / LinkedIn Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store