Council of Trade Unions take NZ's pay equity fight to international conference
Photo:
RNZ/Marika Khabazi
A representative from the Council of Trade Unions has taken New Zealand's pay equity fight to an international conference.
The International Labour Organisation (ILO) is a United Nations agency, which brings together workers, employers and governments to discuss work-related issues, and whose mandate is to advance social and economic justice by setting international labour standards.
Council of Trade Unions secretary Melissa Ansell-Bridges is at its annual conference in Geneva, Switzerland.
The coalition government announced in early May it would use urgency in Parliament to raise the threshold for proving work has been historically undervalued when making a pay equity claim.
Workplace
Minister Brooke van Velden said at the time
, claims had been able to progress without strong evidence of undervaluation, and some had been "very broad", where it was difficult to tell whether differences in pay were due to sex-based discrimination or something else.
The move cancelled 33 in-progress pay equity claims, and
saved the government billions of dollars
.
Ansell-Bridges told RNZ she spoke about the changes during her speech to the ILO plenary on Tuesday.
"It was important to inform the 187 member states that despite not being signalled in the last election, reforms to severely undermine the legislation were passed under urgency without any consultation with workers or their unions."
The issue had come too late to make it onto the agenda for the ILO's committee on the application of standards, which sat during the two-week conference.
"But that's definitely something that we'll be considering in advance of the conference next year," she said.
If a case ended up being heard by the committee - which operated on a triage system - it would then be able to make recommendations to governments on how to stay in alignment with agreed conventions.
Ansell-Bridges said the response from those international representatives who heard her speech had been one of warmth, support and surprise.
"Obviously we have this reputation of being quite a progressive and forward-thinking country that values equality, and so to hear that these kinds of changes are happening in New Zealand, people are very surprised."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
30 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Workers at New World Victoria Park destroyed by fire facing redundancy
The massive blaze more than 10 hours to put out and left the building badly damaged with a collapsed ceiling. Photo: RNZ/Marika Khabazi Dozens of supermarket workers could be facing redundancy after a fire destroyed the New World Victoria Park store in central Auckland. The massive blaze two weeks ago took more than 10 hours to put out and left the building badly damaged with a collapsed ceiling. The New World employs more than 180 people. The supermarket has so far continued to pay the staff, but First Union, which represents about 40 of the workers, told Checkpoint there's now a proposal to make all the workers redundant. Some will have the opportunity to work at other stores. Foodstuffs North Island confirmed in a statement that the process of disestablishing roles at the store is underway. It said it's supporting staff to find new roles, including positions at nearby stores, at its support centre, and distribution centres. It comes after Foodstuffs North Island confirmed it would bring forward the opening of New World Pt Chevalier following the Victoria Park fire. The Pt Chevalier store, originally scheduled to open on 9 September, will now open earlier, with the team working towards an opening date of 19 August. Foodstuffs North Island chief executive Chris Quin said the damage to New World Victoria Park was extensive, and the store was expected to be out of operation for approximately two years while significant rebuild work takes place. He said the new Pt Chevalier store will be the closest New World option for many affected Victoria Park shoppers, especially those in surrounding suburbs. "Since the fire, we've heard from so many locals who told us how much they'll miss Victoria Park. Some even described it as their 'extended pantry'," he said. "We know how important it is to have access to a full-service grocery store in the area, and bringing forward the opening of New World Pt Chevalier is one way we can help meet that need." Foodstuffs North Island said it is expected some staff from the Victoria Park store will have opportunities at the new Pt Chevalier supermarket while others are being redeployed elsewhere in the company. "We're actively prioritising affected team members in recruitment across our network," he said. "It's been a challenging time for the Victoria Park team. Our goal is to support them into a new opportunity and ensure they feel looked after through this transition." Foodstuffs North Island said it is working with the owner-operators of Victoria Park and its wider co-operative network to support affected staff in finding new roles, including positions in nearby stores, its support centre, and distribution centres. The company also confirmed the fire investigation work was completed, with Foodstuffs next week beginning to process of removing damaged parts of the building to make it safe for teams to begin clearing stock and equipment from the store. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
34 minutes ago
- RNZ News
300 percent increase on home insurance
A home insurance hike of 300% over the past five years has left one Napier man shocked. Bluff Hill homeowner Harry Machiela says he's used to muttering expletives when the letter comes each year, but this year he crunched the numbers and the cost of his house and contents insurance has gone up a whopping 300%. He lives in Napier, but says his property isn't in a flood zone. He spoke to Lisa Owen. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.


Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
'Silenced Before Anyone Can Hear': Youth MP Breaks Script To Challenge Alleged Censorship
Chris Hipkins' Youth MP made waves in Parliament on Wednesday, changing his approved General Debate speech last-minute to call out what he and others have described as censorship by the Ministry of Youth Development (MYD). Ryan Grant-Derepa, 17, represents the Leader of the Opposition in this year's Youth Parliament. Just hours before taking the floor in the Debating Chamber, he altered his speech to criticise MYD's handling of Youth MPs' contributions – claiming that while rangatahi are invited to share their voices, they're also being filtered in the process. 'But here's the irony: there's no livestream. No cameras. No public record. We're told to speak, but silenced before anyone can hear,' Grant-Derepa said in his speech. 'And if the government won't take action, our rangatahi will. We're not here half-hearted. We're not here half-asked. And we're not backing down. We are the future. And they are not ready.' His address was met with murmurs of support from peers across the House, and audible approval from ministers, whānau and observers in the public gallery. Youth MPs push back The three-day Youth Parliament kicked off with orientation on Monday, followed by two days of debate, questions and parliamentary working groups. But behind the scenes, controversy had already begun to build. An open letter published earlier in the week, signed by numerous Youth MPs – particularly those on the Opposition side – alleged that MYD staff were requesting significant changes to speeches, especially where they involved criticism of current government ministers or policies. A second open letter, released Thursday, included signatures from prominent voices outside the programme, including 2023 Young New Zealander of the Year Shaneel Lal, and mental health advocates Jazz Thornton and Genevieve Mora. The letters describe an environment where Youth MPs felt unable to speak freely – despite the purpose of the programme being to elevate youth voice in national politics. Speaking after his speech, Grant-Derepa said he changed course not for shock value, but because 'it was the right thing to do.' 'If MYD want us to share our voice, why should they also be stopping us at the same time? It doesn't make sense.' 'We're not given a chance to show people hope… show that we're working together, that we're not as polarised as people like to think. Yet somehow, we're still the ones causing the ruckus. Isn't that exactly what this government says it wants? Obviously not, right? They're scared of young people.' His shift in tone echoed earlier comments made by Labour leader Chris Hipkins, who, when asked on Monday about the speech review process, said: 'Any idea that they're being asked to submit their views in advance so that they can be censored, so that they can have critical comments about the government taken out of them, is just totally out of step with the spirit of Youth Parliament, which is hearing from young people.' The Ministry responds In a statement attributed to Minister for Youth James Meager, the Ministry of Youth Development strongly denied any form of censorship. 'MYD did not stop or censor any Youth MP's speech,' said Meager. 'The Ministry's suggested changes were just recommendations for the young people to consider. However, they acknowledge that recent feedback received from some of the young people is that this was not as clear as it could've been in every instance.' 'If Youth MPs felt like that amounted to censorship, that is unfortunate, because at all times the Ministry had their best interests at heart and repeatedly reminded Youth MPs that ultimately what they say and do is up to them… Many, if not most Youth MPs were grateful for the support and guidance provided by the Ministry, and made excellent, robust and challenging contributions to the debate.' He added that safeguarding participants was the Ministry's primary concern: 'MYD's number one priority throughout this programme was keeping all participants safe and protected as much as possible… and advising them on how to best express their views without falling foul of the law, the standing orders, or the horrible trolling which can occur online.' Addressing the decision not to livestream this year's proceedings, Meager said: 'Youth Parliament participants were told early on that the event would not be livestreamed, although all debates and speeches have been filmed – and will be provided in full for all participants to share as they please.' The statement did not mention the reason behind this decision, though an Instagram comment made by Green Party MP Benjamin Doyle says it was due to funding cuts. The Minister also addressed concerns over legal protections, noting that Youth MPs do not have parliamentary privilege: 'What Youth MPs say in the House will not be protected in this way. MYD reviews speeches to look for any aspects which could fall under defamation, copyright, privacy or contempt of court – which the Youth MPs may be unaware of.' 'This review is not about changing the content of speeches – it's about MYD being responsible organisers of an event that is predominantly made up of minors who may be unaware of such rules and laws.' Meager concluded by reaffirming the value of Youth MPs' contributions: 'The Youth Parliament speeches were full of diverse and differing points of view, which is the entire point of the event and democracy as a whole.' A growing call for transparency As debates wrap up and Youth MPs return home, questions remain about how best to balance safeguarding with free expression. For Grant-Derepa, this week's experience has been a turning point, one he says made him even more determined to challenge the status quo. 'We're told, 'Wait your turn.' But that's the problem. We have things to say now.'