How Business Insider investigated the true cost of data centers
The actual price, though, has never been fully measured. So a team of Business Insider reporters and editors set out to find the true cost of the US data center boom — in water, power, pollution, and tax incentives.
We pulled obscure state records, scoured corporate disclosures, and sought analysis and guidance from government researchers in Virginia and elsewhere. We spoke to engineering specialists who study data centers, including Shaolei Ren at the University of California, Riverside, and Vijay Gadepally of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. We also spoke to researchers who study incentive packages, such as Kasia Tarczynska of Good Jobs First, a research group that advocates for transparency and equality in public subsidies. And we sought input from companies and industry groups.
The result is the most complete accounting yet of data centers' impact on our environment, economy, and lives.
Here's how we did it.
We started by identifying how many data centers there are, and who owns them
Data centers can never be without power. Developers build backup generators to provide emergency electricity. Since these generators emit air pollution, they are regulated by state environmental agencies and need permits.
We requested these air permits and applications from 50 states and Washington, DC, asking agencies to search permits using federal industry codes associated with data centers. To confirm state searches were complete, Business Insider cross-referenced permits against company disclosures, news articles, and data from datacentermap.com, Baxtel, and other trade websites.
Some of the permits we obtained were actually for other types of facilities. If public or corporate records confirmed the facility was not a data center, we removed it from our analysis.
We compiled permits for 1,240 existing or planned data centers across the country, the most definitive tally to date. Tracking the year each permit was first issued reveals a construction boom. Until 2010, companies had filed permits for 311 data centers. By 2024, that number had nearly quadrupled.
Often the permit holders are subsidiaries of Big Tech companies, with unfamiliar names like Nova Mango Farms. Business Insider determined the owners using emails, addresses, and other information on permit applications, secretary-of-state disclosures, county databases, and SEC filings.
Then we mapped those centers' locations and estimated the resources they consume
Business Insider mapped location information from the permits onto the Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas built by the World Resources Institute, a Washington, DC, group that advocates sustainability. The atlas measures a location's relative water stress — the ratio between demand and available, renewable supplies. Business Insider found that 40% of data centers were sited in areas of high or extremely high water stress.
Data centers can use staggering amounts of water. Business Insider requested metered water use records and water supply agreements from dozens of public utility agencies for every data center in areas with extremely high water stress.
Data center water use is a closely guarded secret. Many agencies denied our requests for facility-specific water use or released the records only in aggregate for all data centers in a water utility's service area. In Denver and Colorado Springs, Colorado, utility agencies sued Business Insider to prevent the release of metered water use records. Business Insider prevailed in both lawsuits.
Business Insider found that some of the largest data center facilities were permitted to use more water a day than you might expect nearly 49,000 Americans to use.
Companies also disclose little information on how much power their US data centers consume. Data center power use varies based on factors including the types and frequency of use of servers, cooling systems, and other infrastructure. To account for this, Business Insider calculated a range of estimated annual data center electricity use.
To calculate this range, Business Insider used air permit data to identify the total power-generation capacity of every backup generator at each facility. Companies rarely install generator capacity that is more than twice what a data center consumes — and often they install significantly less than that. So Business Insider, in consultation with experts, conservatively estimated that a data center's maximum electricity use is between half and 80% of its generators' capacity.
A 2024 federal report estimates that across the industry, data centers operate at just 50% of that maximum electricity use level, to avoid straining their equipment. So Business Insider multiplied the low and high ends of its initial range by 50%.
Business Insider's data includes permits for data centers that are not yet built and fully online, and therefore estimates expected electricity use in the near future. If all permitted data centers go online, we estimate, they will use between 149.6 terawatt-hours and 239.3 terawatt-hours a year. Business Insider's low-end estimate is roughly equivalent to the state of Ohio's electricity needs in 2023, and on the high end, is nearly as much power as the entire state of Florida used that same year.
Our estimates are conservative. The low end of our estimate is below the federal report's estimate for data center power use in 2023. The federal report estimates data center power use could reach the upper end of our estimate by 2026.
Business Insider used the range average to identify the 322 largest facilities in our dataset that, according to our estimate, consume 40 megawatt-hours of electricity or more an hour.
An Amazon spokesperson said the methodology "oversimplifies complex data center operations and is based on assumptions that do not account for important differences in how companies build and operate data centers."
Google and Meta did not respond to Business Insider's queries about data center power use estimates, and QTS declined to comment. A Microsoft spokesperson acknowledged that its data centers "do not always run at 100% of their installed capacity."
Nineteen permits across 10 states — including 12 held by Google — have their generator capacity information fully or partially redacted under public disclosure exemptions for trade secrets. Business Insider was unable to estimate the electricity use of these facilities, so our estimate likely undercounts the true total.
Next, we calculated data centers' likely public health and environmental impact
The US uses highly polluting fossil-fuel-fired sources for at least 60% of its electricity. Data centers draw power from a wide regional grid, so Business Insider needed to estimate the public health impact attributable to data centers' use of electricity generated from far-away power plants.
The US electricity grid is complex and does not map closely to state boundaries. To model the complexity of the US electricity grid, Business Insider used an Environmental Protection Agency tool called AVERT that splits the contiguous 48 states into 14 independent electricity regions that approximate grid regions.
Using our estimate for data center power consumption, along with US Energy Information Administration data and the AVERT tool, Business Insider calculated the likely share of total power use attributable to data centers in each of these 14 regions. Then, using another EPA tool with the acronym COBRA, Business Insider estimated the public health cost engendered by that share of total electricity-generation-related pollution in each region. Even a careful calculation like this is inherently imperfect, but in the absence of industry transparency about such emissions it provides a rare and well-founded estimate of the health costs of the data center boom.
Business Insider estimated that annual public health costs from electricity generation for data centers could reach between $5.7 billion and $9.2 billion.
Power plants are not the only source of data center air pollution.
The diesel backup generators installed at data centers emit volatile organic compounds, nitrous oxides, sulfur dioxides, and particulate matter — all regulated air pollutants the EPA labels as hazardous to human health. Air permits issued to these facilities set total annual pollutant emission limits that determine how frequently their generators can be used.
Data centers generally run their generators infrequently so emit only a fraction of the pollutants their permits allow. A 2024 report to the state legislature in Virginia — which is home to nearly a third of US data centers with permits — calculated that data center backup generators on average emit 7% of their permitted pollution limits each year. Business Insider used that percentage to estimate each county's air pollutant emissions from data center backup generators.
Business Insider then input these county-by-county totals into COBRA, which models how air pollution emitted in a county affects public health nationwide. The tool assigns a dollar figure to what it would cost to avoid negative health outcomes like premature deaths, asthma attacks, heart attacks, and missed school or work days.
The COBRA tool estimated that air pollutants emitted by data centers across the country could trigger nearly 20,000 asthma symptom cases a year and create a $385 million annual burden on public health.
Generator pollution is more harmful to communities already overburdened by environmental pollutants. A community that already has high levels of air pollution will experience greater negative health impacts from additional pollutants, for example, than a community that isn't already saturated with harmful pollutants.
To better understand their impact on these communities, Business Insider mapped all 1,240 data center locations onto a third EPA tool called EJ Screen that combines census and pollutant data within a mile radius of a specified location. We found that more than 230 data center locations were in communities highly overburdened by environmental pollutants.
Finally, we reported on data centers' impact on the economy
Business Insider requested and obtained the most detailed data-center-related economic development deals and annual tax incentive disclosures for facilities in and around Columbus, Ohio. Some of the oldest data center deals in the state are in Franklin and Licking counties, and companies are required to disclose how much they've saved from these tax exemption agreements each year, which made the state a useful case study for judging data centers' actual economic impact. Business Insider tallied these numbers, then used company-reported property investment totals to calculate total state and local sales and use tax savings (7.5% for Franklin County and 5.75% for Licking County).
We did not include personal property tax in our calculations, as Ohio eliminated that tax. Because of fluctuations in the number of jobs employed at data centers, Business Insider also did not include state or local job creation tax credits in the analysis.
We nevertheless found that these tax incentive packages given to tech companies were highly lucrative, amounting to as much as $2 million in tax savings per full time job at a data center.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Could Roll Out Robotaxis in San Francisco Soon. Its Stock Is Surging.
Tesla (TSLA) could expand its robotaxi service to San Francisco as early as this weekend, according to a report Friday. Its stock surged, making up some of its losses from the day before. Tesla shares were up over 4% in recent trading, but are still headed for a losing week after tumbling nearly 8% Thursday on a weaker-than-expected earnings report. The electric vehicle maker's profits declined for a second straight quarter, as Tesla has seen sales fall in key markets like the U.S. and China. Tesla could be prepared to roll out its robotaxis in San Francisco as early as this weekend, after their launch in Austin, Texas last month, Business Insider reported Friday, citing an internal memo to staff. The test program will operate in a geofenced area that includes a large portion of the Bay Area, the report said. Tesla did not immediately respond to an Investopedia request for comment on the report. Cathie Wood's ARK Invest Buys the Dip in Tesla Stock Separately, a trio of Cathie Wood's ARK Invest ETFs collectively bought more than 140,000 shares of Tesla for nearly $44 million on Thursday, according to an Investor's Business Daily report. The longtime Tesla bull's ARK Invest purchased more than 115,380 shares on Tuesday, and 60,000 shares on July 18, an earlier IBD report said. Tesla is the top holding of the ARK Innovation ETF, making up nearly 10% of the fund's weight. Read the original article on Investopedia


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Tesla Robotaxi to Launch in San Francisco: Reports
Tesla plans to begin robotaxi service in San Francisco this weekend, according to reports from Business Insider. Bloomberg's Max Chafkin discusses why Tesla's plans fall short of other robotaxi rivals operating in the city. He joins Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow on "Bloomberg Tech." (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
From living off Panera samples to self-made millionaire. How a 43-year-old options trader built a seven-figure portfolio after losing everything.
Jason Brown rebuilt his wealth using principle-based investing after his portfolio got wiped out. Brown's early trading mistakes taught him the importance of emotional control and strategy. He now shares his insights through his book, a YouTube channel, and speaking engagements. Jason Brown hit rock bottom in his mid-20s. He'd dropped out of college a few years earlier so he could trade options full-time, blew up his account, and found himself living off Panera Bread samples and mooching off the café's WiFi. "I had cut my internet off because I couldn't even pay for that," he told Business Insider. Every morning, he'd put on a suit, pack his laptop, and set up shop at Panera. "You would think I was in there handling business, but I was actually looking for a job," he said. "They used to come around with these free samples every day, and you could get as many as you wanted, so those free samples were my meal for the day. It was one of the most humbling experiences of my life." Brown knew what it was like to live without money. Raised by a single mother in Detroit, and it wasn't until he went to a friend's house that he realized it wasn't the norm to sleep without a bed. "I thought beds were for grown-ups because you need a good night's rest to go to work the next day." "I just became very curious about money at a super young age," he added. Building a six-figure portfolio in college, and then losing it all After reading books like "Think and Grow Rich," Brown figured that investing was his ticket to wealth, so he took the $2,000 he received as high school graduation money to the bank to invest. The teller asked him two questions: "'Why do you want to invest?' I'm like, 'To be rich.' I thought it was a silly question. And then she said, 'So you want aggressive funds, right?'" Two years later, he returned to the bank eager to check in on his investments. "It was down to $700," he said. "My heart just dropped." Brown withdrew the remaining funds, figuring he'd rather lose the money himself so he could at least understand how he lost it than leave it up to the bank. He spent $200 on a pair of Jordans — "I didn't want to see the whole money just disappear and I had nothing to show for it," he said — and began his investing career as a college freshman with $500. Buying Sprint stock was a natural place for him to start. He worked for the company on the weekends, earning $8 an hour selling cellphones. If he could make $50 in the stock market, he could afford to take one Saturday off. His plan was simple: "Our stock was $5 at Sprint, and I had $500. I could buy 100 shares, and all I needed it to do was move $0.50." He bought 100 shares at $5, watched in dismay as the stock gradually fell to $4, and then regained optimism as it climbed back to $5. As the price fluctuated, he formulated a new plan: Get out at $5 to break even, wait for the stock to fall to $4, and then get back in. "I got in at four, it went back up to five, and I made my first hundred dollars," he said. "That's what really changed my life. I was like, 'Woah. It worked.' And not only did I make $50, I made $100, so that's two Saturdays I can take off." He later learned that he'd stumbled into a strategy known as channeling. From there, he spent all his free time reading stock charts and patterns. He grew his account to six figures, dropped out of college, moved to the suburbs, and bought a Lexus GS300. Brown had his eyes on a $500,000 condo he wanted to buy in cash, and he was confident he could make the money in one trade. "I was up $100,000 in my trade, but because I was not up $500,000, I was like, that's not enough. That trade ended up reversing on me," he said. "It just became this whole scenario of gambling, hoping, praying it goes back up. I had no emotional control." Ultimately, "I just blew up the account. I'm flat broke. I move back home. I have to sell my car." Using principle-based investing to build a seven-figure portfolio from scratch Brown was determined to get back into the stock market, but knew he'd have to do things differently. He took a job selling cellphones again, this time at Verizon. He lived off his hourly pay and used his commissions to trade. He also started hosting local seminars from coffee shops and libraries, teaching community members what he'd learned from losing so much money, and he started a YouTube channel to document his experience trading options. He started following a few key principles to ensure he would never have to rely on Panera samples again. 1. You never go broke taking a profit. Brown could have profited $100,000 from the trade that ultimately wiped out his account, but "I thought I had to make it all in one trade. I needed one trade to make me half a million," he said. The experience taught him that, rather than succumb to greed, "take the money and find another trade." 2. Know your 'I'm wrong level.' In his early 20s, Brown never considered his "I'm wrong level," he explained. "I only thought, 'What would happen if this goes right? I'm getting a condo.' I never stopped to think, 'If I'm wrong, I'll lose it all and I have to move back home.'" Now, he knows exactly when he needs to cut his losses and shut down a trade. 3. Follow the 1:3 risk-reward ratio. "Any trade I take has to have a one-to-three risk-reward ratio, where I risk one dollar to make three," he said. "Because I've found that you could be wrong two times and be right on the third time, and you would be back at break even." For example, say he has $3 to work with. If he risks $1 to make $3, if he loses one, he's down to $2; if he loses again, he's down to $1; if he's right the third time and it makes him $3, he's back up to $4. "So, I can still be profitable and be wrong two out of three times, as long as I've got that discipline to only risk one dollar trying to make three," he said. 4. The stock market doesn't care that rent is due next week. Trading has never worked well for Brown when he's had to put pressure on his investments to make a certain amount within a specific timeframe to cover rent or a car payment, for example. That pressure "will have you doing things you wouldn't normally do because you fear missing a payment," he said. He started seeing a lot of success once he had zero debt, at least six months' worth of living expenses set aside, and was living well within his means. The lack of pressure allowed him to keep his emotions out of his trades. Following these four principles helped Brown grow his account back to six figures in about a year and a half. And, about five years after starting from scratch, one big trade sent him into the seven-figure club. He used a chunk of those earnings to pay off his mortgage completely. "That lowered my expenses, so I don't need as much from the stock market, which allows me to keep my emotions in control and not force the stock market to do something," said Brown. BI confirmed his current seven-figure net worth by reviewing an account summary that shows his 2024 investment activity. Brown, who published "Five Year Millionaire" in 2025, continues to grow his YouTube channel, hosts a podcast, and does speaking engagements in addition to trading. At 43, his big takeaway is that he always understood the tactics and strategies that make a good options trader, "but it was emotion that was taking me out of the game every single time." Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data