He donated the land that became Griffith Park. Then he shot his wife
Surely you are familiar with the sprawling, rugged glory of Los Angeles' Griffith Park. But do you know about the park's benefactor and namesake, Griffith J. Griffith?
The philanthropist and felon endowed L.A. with what was then the largest urban park in the world and still remains a jewel of the city.
He also shot his wife in the face. She survived; he served two years at San Quentin; they divorced. We'll get to that.
But first, let's rewind back to December 1896.
Los Angeles was a city with great ambitions — a rapidly exploding boomtown that was still in the process of leaving its rancho past behind.
Col. Griffith J. Griffith and his wife Tina were the talk of the town, often spotted at theater openings or the opera. She was from a prominent society family. He was a formerly penniless Welsh immigrant who'd made his fortune in mining and other ventures.
Our paper described Griffith as 'part visionary and part blowhard.' One acquaintance dubbed him as 'midget egomaniac,' another as a 'roly-poly pompous little fellow.' He was, by all accounts, bizarre.
His business card just read: 'G.J. Griffith, capitalist.' He insisted on being called 'Colonel,' though his military title was thought to be entirely phony.
On December 16, 1896, Tina and Griffith donated more than 3,000 acres of hilly splendor to be used as an L.A. public park. The massive, city-altering gift was several times larger than New York's Central Park.
'It must be made a place of rest and relaxation for the masses, a resort for the rank and file, for the plain people,' Griffith demanded at the time.
Griffith was grandiose and eccentric, but he also believed in shaping the fledgling city, according to Mike Eberts, a historian and author of 'Griffith Park: A Centennial History.'
'He was a fellow who wanted to be loved. He wanted to be seen as a great leader. He was also, in his own way, and for his time, something of an idealist,' Eberts said.
Some believed that Griffith's mighty bequest was also angled, in part, to dodge taxes. But for generations of Angelenos who've savored the park, such details are — like Griffith's military title — mere semantics.
The initial gift brought him great acclaim locally. Here's how our paper put it in 1898: 'No need to ask 'Who is G.J. Griffith?' The individuality of the man has impressed itself so deeply and favorably on this community that his name is even as a 'household word.''
While thought to be in a delusional — and potentially drunken — stupor in a room at Santa Monica's Arcadia Hotel, Griffith shot his wife in the face in 1903.
She lost an eye but lived. Our paper breathlessly covered the ensuing trial, which ended with Griffith taking a short trip to San Quentin.
A few years after his release, Griffith (now divorced, according to Eberts) appeared at City Hall once again bearing gifts just before Christmas and hoping to rehabilitate his tarnished image.
'I wish to pay my debt of duty in this way to the community in which I have prospered,' Griffith reportedly told the mayor and City Council as he offered a significant sum of money to build Griffith Observatory.
They accepted, though our paper reported that other citizens and public officials angrily protested the decision.
One prominent community member suggested that the 'bribe' would send an egregious message to the city's youth: 'Are you prepared to say to them that if a man is a millionaire he can commit a crime and then with his wealth bribe the community to receive him back into fellowship?'
The city's parks commission eventually rejected Griffith's gift, our paper reported, and it wasn't until after his death in 1919 that it was accepted as a bequest in his will.
The observatory celebrated its 90th birthday this year.
For Eberts, the takeaway is simple: 'You don't have to be a perfect person to do a great thing.'
Today's great photo is from Times photographer Myung J. Chun, outside the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art, which is set to open next year.
Kevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters
How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@latimes.com. Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on latimes.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
8 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
When the Golden Gate Bridge turned 50, and a good city descended into chaos
It was a day for San Francisco to honor the Golden Gate Bridge. But by mid-morning on May 24, 1987, the gridlocked horde trying to celebrate its 50th anniversary got so desperate people were urinating off the side of the landmark. 'For a few, necessity overcame modesty, producing a rush to the railing and relief into the choppy waters below,' the Chronicle's Carl Nolte wrote the next day. That was just one indelible memory from the bridge's golden anniversary celebration, where bridge officials planned for 50,000 revelers and more than 800,000 showed up. Muni service was brought to a standstill. Hundreds of children were lost. And, most alarmingly in the moment, the bridge itself visibly flattened and warped under the weight of the masses. I called my mother, Jeanne Hartlaub, who attended the event, and she raged like it happened yesterday. 'What a freaking s—-show,' she said. 'We had no control over where we were going. I lifted my feet off the ground, and I was being carried by the crowd.' A recent search in the Chronicle archive revealed unpublished images — including one of a frustrated walker who hopped over the bridge railing to shimmy precariously sideways over the San Francisco Bay, plus time-lapse photos taken from high on the span that document the mounting chaos. I searched further in the archive to get the full story. Bridge organizers had reason to anticipate massive crowds would show up. More than 200,000 people arrived for the bridge's opening in 1937, when the Bay Area population was one third its 1987 size. A similar fiasco occurred in 1982 at the first 49ers Super Bowl victory parade, when City Hall planned for 25,000 fans, and half a million flooded Market Street. But when the Golden Gate Bridge Authority suggested closing the bridge for its 50th birthday, Marin County drivers were furious. A compromise was reached for the bridge walk to last just three hours and finish at 9:30 a.m., with a fireworks show later. Organizers said they expected just 50,000 attendees. They were off by a factor of more than 15. A growing crowd on the city side burst through the barricades at 5:45 a.m., and found another tidal wave of humanity coming from the opposite direction. 'For about 45 minutes it was fun,' the Chronicle reported. 'Then, at 6:10 a.m., a human wall from Marin hit a human wall from San Francisco and the Great Golden Gate Bridge Walk turned into the Great Golden Gate Gridlock.' Chronicle photos show a chaotic scene, including a baby in a stroller being passed above the throng like a crowd surfer at a punk rock show. In an era before texting and widespread cellular phone use, thousands were separated and lost. Walkers on the sidewalks shivered in 35-mile-per-hour winds, while those in the center shed clothes in the sweltering body heat. My mother's strongest memory was of a high school band from Pennsylvania who came to perform, but quickly pivoted to survival mode. 'Those kids in the band were fainting,' she said. 'They were passing them hand over hand over the crowd.' The Chronicle's Steve Rubenstein reported from a small 'lost and found' shack where Mayor Dianne Feinstein was helping children looking for their parents. 'I started out with four children,' bridge walker Sue Madrid said, as she approached the lost and found. 'Now I have one.' 'Officials lost count of the lost,' Rubenstein wrote. Miraculously, the Chronicle reported the next day that no one was seriously hurt or killed. The walk's organizers apologized and admitted the bridge should have been opened to pedestrians all day with a clearer flow of traffic. Days after the event, photos emerged showing the roadway flattened and slightly twisted under the mass of humanity, which led to some alarmist media reports. Engineers then and now insist there was no danger. ('There is no way to put enough people on that bridge to cause any structural failure,' bridge engineer Dan Mohn said at the time. 'You'd have to stick them three high and even that wouldn't do it.') But the day is still remembered by those who were on the shaking bridge as a near-catastrophe and a good time. While some were stuck at downtown BART stations — a frustrated crowd of 5,000 waited at the Embarcadero for buses that never arrived — there was a spirited we're-all-in-this-together mood at the bridge. Many brought bottles of champagne and shared with neighbors. 'I love this bridge,' Ollie Oliviera told the Chronicle, pulling out a bottle of cognac. 'It kept me sane in my younger years. I used to walk across the bridge to keep it together.' And my mother reports that my grandmother Louise Leal, a Mexican immigrant who loved San Francisco and walked the bridge on opening day in 1937, had the time of her life. My mother said she was also grateful … that she brought my grandmother's heart medication.
New York Times
2 days ago
- New York Times
For the Future of Water Conservation, Look to … Los Angeles?
Los Angeles was built in a desert. And it takes a colossal infrastructure to transport water to the city. But large-scale construction isn't the only way the city has quenched its thirst. Critic's Notebook Supported by You've probably come across more stories about water woes in California than you can recall, so you may feel you've had enough for a while. I understand. There's no easy or permanent fix. The protagonists don't divide neatly into good and evil. Water in the state often isn't where the people are — or, as with the recent fires, isn't there at all. After looking into the subject for years, I still can't wrap my head around the endless ins and outs. But there is one indisputable fact that keeps surfacing in the conversations I have about California water that feels like something of a beacon. The first time I heard it, it came as quite a surprise. Over the last half century or so, millions more people have moved to greater Los Angeles, settling in increasingly far-flung reaches of the desert and in the mountains, requiring more faucets, toilets and shower heads, producing more garbage and more gridlock on the 405 freeway, reinforcing all the clichés about excess and sprawl. And during this same time, Angelenos have been consuming less water. I don't just mean per person, though that figure, according to state authorities, is down by a whopping 43 percent since 1990. I mean, residents and businesses in the Los Angeles area now consume less water in total. The population has grown, yet the city consumes less water. How Los Angeles Gets Its Water CALIFORNIA Sacramento River Sacramento/ San Joaquin River Delta Mono Lake Owens River Owens Lake CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCT COLORADO RIVER AQUEDUCT Pacific Ocean Los Angeles Colorado River 100 miles CALIFORNIA Sacramento River Sacramento/ San Joaquin River Delta Mono Lake Owens River Owens Lake CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCT Pacific Ocean Los Angeles Colorado R. COLORADO RIVER AQUEDUCT 100 miles By Barbara Berasi The L.A. Aqueduct starts at Mono Lake … … and taps into the snaking Owens River… … diverting water from Owens Lake, now a toxic moonscape. The aqueduct crosses deserts … … and flows into reservoirs … … and spills down into the city delivering water to millions. How do you think about water in your community? You just read our story about water in Los Angeles, but we're curious: How do you think about water where you live? Whether you're dealing with drought, trying to conserve, facing rising costs, trying to use less or just trying to understand it, we want to hear from you. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Los Angeles Times
5 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
As jacarandas bloom throughout L.A., fire victims hope their purple flowers will return too
It was Alexis Murphy's tradition to photograph the jacaranda that guarded her childhood home in Pasadena. One year, she arranged its violet droppings in the shape of a heart. Another year, she turned them into a cartoon smiley face. But this spring, after the January Eaton fire scorched her childhood home and the jacaranda along with it, the scene was too grim to capture. Where the aged tree's limbs once exploded into violet, singed branches crisscrossed in colorless sterility like an unfinished painting. Murphy didn't want to post something too depressing. So she snagged a flower from a neighbor's lawn and filmed a close-up of the blossom, panning out to her burned tree. That was when she saw it. Barely discernible in the May gloom, a glint of purple shone from the jacaranda's canopy; nearby, seed pods dotted patches of green. The tree was in bloom. 'Oh, my God, maybe it is coming back,' she said, half-wishing for the tree's revival. Jacarandas, among the most divisive of L.A.'s imported plant species, have long signified to Angelenos the coming of warmer, more vibrant days. Their symbolic weight has been all the greater for those who lost their homes to the January wildfires that devastated L.A. County as well as swaths of its natural landscape. 'Any tree that's leafing out or recovering is a sign of hope for everyone, and I think people really take some joy in that,' said David Card, a longtime Pacific Palisades resident and board president of the Palisades Forestry Committee. 'Right now, it's the jacarandas that are center stage,' Card said. Originating in subtropical South America, jacarandas typically bloom around May and June, taking their cue from the season's first stretch of consistent heat. In wetter years, the 25- to 40-foot-tall trees may not push out flowers until well into July. This year, hot spells in May encouraged some early bloomers, said Lisa Smith, a consulting arborist and president of the tree-consulting firm the Tree Resource. Still, at the time of the January fires, the semi-deciduous trees had not yet flowered, which likely minimized the damage they suffered. The arborist said what also helped is that jacarandas are highly heat-tolerant and generally planted among low grasses rather than tall shrubs, limiting the potential for upward burn. 'They're a pretty rugged, tolerant species. They can handle harsh conditions,' Smith said. Because jacarandas across the county sustained significant bark char and crown damage, L.A.'s purple bloom was down some patches this year. The issue might worsen. Healthy-seeming flowering on trees like Murphy's could be a 'false start' belying the plant's sickness, Smith said. Trees have been known to experience delayed deaths years after a wildfire has been extinguished. Nonetheless, researchers in Pasadena and the Pacific Palisades shared positive outlooks for the trees' future recovery. Gretchen North, a biology professor at Occidental College, said plant recovery efforts in the canyons above Altadena have revealed that jacarandas have fared 'remarkably well.' 'They're blooming, even though they are burned at the base,' North said. The professor added that most of the damage is limited to scorched bark. In cases of more severe scarring, North said, 'the jacaranda looks like it will recover.' In the Palisades, the trees this year began flowering far earlier than expected, said Card. However, experts warned that L.A.'s trees, including jacarandas, still face threats from post-fire recovery efforts. For one, construction activities like excavation and soil compaction from heavy machinery can damage a tree's critical root zone, preventing uptake of water and nutrients crucial for the plant's survival. On a wider scale, activists said joint cleanup efforts by FEMA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have prompted the premature removal of trees in the Palisades, hundreds of which were misidentified by unqualified contractors. 'They were bringing in people from states so far away they never even heard of jacarandas,' said Carl Mellinger, a consulting arborist and member of the Palisades Forestry Committee. 'In my opinion, if you can't tell what the tree is, you have no business identifying its fiber-building period,' Mellinger said. A spokesperson for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said that 'every decision about tree removal is made thoughtfully and with expert guidance from professional arborists.' 'While we strive to preserve as many trees as possible, public safety and recovery progress must come first,' the spokesperson said. 'We continue to work closely with homeowners, the county and community groups to make informed, responsible decisions about tree removal and preservation. ' A representative for FEMA declined to comment. Mellinger was able to work with a colonel to get the Army Corps' protocol changed and minimize errors, he said, 'but there were still trees out there that were gonna get cut down, even though they were viable.' Residents whose injured trees were removed were surprised to find themselves more distraught about losing the trees — which would take decades to regrow — than losing their homes. LuAnn Haslam, Murphy's next-door neighbor in Pasadena, said losing her jacaranda felt like a second wave of grief after her home burned down. For more than 25 years, she'd marveled at the tree, one of her favorites gracing the street. When it blossomed each spring, coating her lawn in purple blooms, she'd beg her husband, 'Don't clean those up!' Haslam said she didn't watch the cleanup crew remove the tree this year. She couldn't bear it. 'That's one reason why I really pushed it on the colonel that you can't be cutting down these trees that are going to make it,' Mellinger said. 'People have already been through one disaster,' he said. They needn't endure another. The Palisades Forestry Committee in March published a waiver for property owners that allowed them to retain so-called 'hazardous' trees on their property. Card said the system has largely worked, save for the occasional complication by an overly aggressive contractor. However, arborists and activists agreed that Zone 0 regulations may spell trouble for those working to preserve the Palisades' natural landscape. The defensible space directives, meant to minimize burn risk to homes and other structures, are poised to drastically reduce the number of trees permitted in residential L.A. neighborhoods, said North. The trick, North said, will be balancing safety assurances that cities require with the green recovery that their residents need to move forward. Many factors affecting the survival potential of burned trees, including jacarandas, are out of individuals' control: the level and frequency of rain, the pace of bark generation, the passage of time. Still, arborists said residents can take several steps to improve their trees' chances of recovery. The most critical factor, Smith said, is water. Without it, scores of jacarandas won't even make it through the summer. 'Don't seek perfection. Just get water on the tree,' Smith said. She added that those who live far away now can ask a neighbor or friend to place a tree watering bag around the trunk of the injured tree. This way, water is slowly released, trickling down to the roots. Smith added that if the tree is able to push out fresh leaves, residents can prune its dead branches and leave the live ones to foster 'meaningful new growth in the canopy.' A good visual cue for a salvageable tree is the growth of new bark beneath its burned outer layer, said Mellinger. 'You have to scrape the bark or cut under the bark to try and find the living tissue that's under the cambium and the inner bark,' he said. Removing dead bark before watering a burned tree can also protect it from pests and pathogens, said Jim Henrich, curator of living collections at Los Angeles County Arboretum & Botanic Garden. Priority No. 1, Henrich said, is making sure water is actually saturating the soil. After that, all you can really do is wait. For many jacaranda lovers, the labor of preservation was a knee-jerk reaction, like shielding a child from a blow. Valeria Serna of climate nonprofit Resilient Palisades recently purchased a 500-gallon water tank on her own dime and lugged it to several neighborhoods that lacked water access. Vicki Warren, on the other hand, wasn't much concerned about the fate of the jacaranda outside her late father's home, which burned in the Palisades fire. It was the magnolia in the backyard she loved. But when the Army Corps removed her beloved tree this year, all that remained was the jacaranda — the one that for years had left her car sticky with sap and stunk up the street. One day in May, Warren parked in the spot on Radcliffe Avenue, which she had trained herself to avoid, right below the purple giant. Then she made a promise. 'You and I are the only ones left here,' she told the tree. 'I'm going to take care of you.'
