logo
Council leader to discuss SEN and devolution

Council leader to discuss SEN and devolution

Yahoo14-05-2025
Special educational needs provision and local government reorganisation will be among the topics discussed when Surrey County Council's leader answers questions on BBC Radio Surrey.
Tim Oliver will appear on the hot seat on the breakfast show on Wednesday from 09:00 BST.
The council's provision for children with additional needs has been previously criticised, with the cabinet member responsible saying the authority was "resolute" in its ambition to improve.
Its children's services department was rated "good" on Friday, after "inadequate" ratings in 2015 and 2018.
Listen to the BBC Radio Surrey breakfast show from 06:00 - 10:00, Monday to Friday, on BBC Radio Surrey or on BBC Sounds.
The council submitted plans to central government earlier in May for how local government could look in the future with fewer, larger councils responsible for services.
Surrey County Council, supported by Elmbridge Borough Council and Mole Valley District Council, is proposing that two new councils are created, with one in the east and another in the west.
Elections that were due to take place in 2025 in Surrey have been postponed until 2026 as part of the devolution plans.
Oliver has been the leader of the county council since 2018, and is a councillor for the Weybridge division.
In 2024, he was awarded an OBE for services to local government.
Follow BBC Surrey on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
Council's 'long journey' to good Ofsted rating
More than 1,800 children with SEN missing school
Council apologises to families over SEND provision
Fines for education failures approaching £1m
Surrey County Council
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hong Kong police offer rewards for tips leading to the arrest of 19 overseas activists
Hong Kong police offer rewards for tips leading to the arrest of 19 overseas activists

Los Angeles Times

time5 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Hong Kong police offer rewards for tips leading to the arrest of 19 overseas activists

HONG KONG — Hong Kong police announced rewards for information leading to the arrest of 19 overseas-based activists for their roles in what they called a subversive organization abroad, accusing them of violating a national security law imposed by Beijing. Police said in a statement Friday that the group, Hong Kong Parliament, aimed to promote self-determination and establish a 'Hong Kong constitution,' alleging it was using illegal means to overthrow and undermine China's fundamental system or usurp the institutions in power in Hong Kong or Beijing. At the request of the police, the city's court issued arrest warrants for activists Elmer Yuen, Johnny Fok, Tony Choi, Victor Ho, Keung Ka-wai and 14 others. They are alleged to have organized or participated in an election abroad for the Hong Kong Parliament, as well as setting up or becoming members of the group. According to a Facebook statement by the group on June 30, its election drew some 15,700 valid votes through mobile app and online voting systems. It said the candidates and elected members came from various regions, including Taiwan, Thailand, Australia, the U.S., Canada and Britain. While the group calls itself Hong Kong Parliament, its electoral organizing committee was founded in Canada and its influence is limited. Police already offered 1 million Hong Kong dollars, or about $127,400, for information leading to the arrest of Yuen, Ho, Fok and Choi when previous arrest warrants were issued against them. For the other 15, rewards of 200,000 Hong Kong dollars were offered, and residents were urged to provide information about the case or the people. 'The investigation is still ongoing. If necessary, police will offer bounties to hunt down more suspects in the case,' police said. They also called on the wanted activists to stop their activities, saying that they hoped they 'will take this opportunity to return to Hong Kong and turn themselves in, rather than making more mistakes.' Yuen said in a Facebook Live broadcast that the election was not quite successful in drawing active participation, and that the police campaign would help the group rally support for the resistance movement. 'It helps us with a lot of advertising,' Yuen said. During the live chat with Yuen, Sasha Gong, another activist targeted by the bounties, accused Hong Kong of becoming a police state. She said she is a U.S. citizen and would report her case to the American authorities and lawmakers. Over the last two years, Hong Kong authorities have issued arrest warrants for various activists based overseas, including former pro-democracy lawmakers Nathan Law and Ted Hui. Authorities also canceled the passports of some of them under a recent security law introduced to the city last year. The moves against overseas-based activists have drawn criticism from foreign governments, especially given the former British colony was promised that its Western-style civil liberties and semi-autonomy would be kept intact for at least 50 years when it returned to Chinese rule in 1997. U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said in a joint statement that the warrants and bounties on people living in Britain are 'another example of transnational repression,' and that the act encourages reckless behavior on U.K. soil. In March, the United States sanctioned six Chinese and Hong Kong officials who it alleged were involved in 'transnational repression' and acts that threaten to further erode the city's autonomy. Beijing and Hong Kong contend that the national security laws were necessary for the city's stability. Hong Kong police have maintained that the Beijing-imposed law applies to permanent residents in Hong Kong who violate it abroad. In retaliation for the U.S. move, China in April said it would sanction American officials, lawmakers and leaders of nongovernmental organizations who it says have 'performed poorly' on Hong Kong issues. Leung writes for the Associated Press.

Tejano singer Bobby Pulido is considering running for Congress
Tejano singer Bobby Pulido is considering running for Congress

Los Angeles Times

time9 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Tejano singer Bobby Pulido is considering running for Congress

Tejano singer Bobby Pulido is taking steps toward a congressional bid in South Texas to challenge Republican Rep. Monica De La Cruz. On Thursday, Pulido announced that he is launching an exploratory committee to look at 'possibly' running as a Democrat for a U.S. Congress position in 2026. The 'Desvelado' singer took to social media to clarify his reasons for his shift away from music and toward politics. 'Many of you know me from my music career, so you know I'm not a career politician, but I've always had a desire to serve,' Pulido said in a Thursday Instagram video. 'I studied political science at St. Mary's University [in San Antonio] before I decided to launch a music career. And I've chosen to leave the stage to see if I can help make the future a little bit better for our kids and our community.' The Edinburg, Texas, native took aim at De La Cruz's management of the Lone Star State's 15th Congressional District. 'Like a lot of South Texans, I'm tired of watching these folks like Monica De La Cruz go to Washington and put her party before the people,' he said. 'She's made that choice every single time.' Pulido promised he would listen to the voices of 'everyday Texans' regardless of their political affiliations or professions, before saying he is prepping to host 'ranch halls' to meet and learn from potential constituents. The 54-year-old performer will face an uphill battle if his potential campaign takes off as Texas emergency physician Dr. Ada Cuellar launched her campaign as a Democrat for the same congressional seat on July 17. Pulido said he got the idea to pursue political office from Lorena Saenz Gonzalez, the wife of Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D-Texas). She told Pulido she was impressed with his political knowledge and nudged him to consider running for office. Gonzalez had previously served as the 15th District's representative but announced in October 2021 that he would run in the 34th District due to the statewide redistricting done by the Texas Legislature in fall 2021. The redistricting was criticized for leading to the dilution of the Latino vote in the region and upheld as a prime example of Republican gerrymandering. In 2022, De La Cruz became the district's first Republican representative following the restricting and was reelected in 2024. President Trump also became the first Republican presidential candidate to win the majority of votes in the district in decades during the 2020 election. Speaking on the redrawing of the 15th District, Pulido was very clear on where he stands. 'I'm not happy with the redistricting. I think it's cheating, and I don't think this is what democracy should be like,' he told The Times Friday afternoon. 'But at the end of the day, you can draw the lines, but you can't draw the people.' One way he aims to focus on the people of the district is through his emphasis on immigration policy. 'Nobody wants to fix it, everybody wants to campaign on it — we absolutely need comprehensive immigration reform,' Pulido said. 'We should not have to choose between let them all in or kick them all out. People on both sides have to have the will to actually do something about it.' He also expressed concern for the struggle of immigrants amid the ongoing Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids happening nationwide. 'They're ripping people from families, and then, you know, they're taking even American citizens and detaining them just based on how they look, and so it has to stop,' Pulido said. We have to do something about it, we can't continue to ignore it, because people are not pawns and that's what I feel is happening.' Another major issue for the musician-turned-hopeful-politician is the struggling economy of the Rio Grande Valley. 'I feel the economy and tariffs need to be addressed,' Pulido said. 'By all the metrics that we're seeing, even on a national scale, [the economy] is not well. Inflation is going higher, and I don't think these [current] policies are what the people expected; it's not giving us good results.' Pulido also expressed concern for the state of healthcare in the district, noting that people often prefer to go across the border for medical services. 'We have a lot of people that go get their healthcare in Mexico because it's more affordable. I'm not talking about a little difference; it's an astronomical difference,' he said. 'It's just it's very sad that people have to go to another country to get the healthcare that they can afford, and I feel like special interests have really dug their claws into politicians and they don't do anything to help the people.' The 'Se Murió de Amor' musician acknowledged that the Democratic Party has failed the district, which has led to Republican gains. 'I feel like the party's been a little bit negligent and not really addressing the values that Latinos have,' Pulido explained. 'I don't think the Republicans have done anything special. I don't think that's the case, but nonetheless, I think a lot of people down there feel like their vote was taken for granted.' He explained that he wants to run an 'issues-based campaign,' making sure not to run on a platform of 'vote for me because I'm famous.' 'We have to really go work on issues that affect everyday people's lives,' Pulido said. 'So that's what I intend to do, if the people are accepting of me being as a candidate, and we'll find out with these with these ranch halls.' In November, Pulido announced that he would be leaving music behind after a 2025 farewell tour to pursue a career in politics. 'To be quite honest, I'm enjoying the most success I've ever had. But like the saying goes: All good things must come to an end,' Pulido said last year during a press conference. 'Today, I'm announcing my farewell tour for next year. It's not a decision I have hastily made. I've given it a lot of thought. I think my life has reached a full circle.' He added, 'Growing up, public service always intrigued me. I was a Texas Boy Stater in high school and studied political sciences because it was a passion of mine. In 2026, I will be running for office in an attempt to fulfill my lifelong dream: to serve my people.'

5 questions for Danielle Citron
5 questions for Danielle Citron

Politico

time13 hours ago

  • Politico

5 questions for Danielle Citron

Danielle Citron is a University of Virginia School of Law professor. As a leading expert in online privacy and harassment, she has advised Facebook (now Meta), Twitter (now X), Bumble, Spotify and TikTok on issues like trust and safety. She also served on then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris' task force to combat online exploitation and abuse of women between 2014 and 2016. Citron won the MacArthur Foundation's 'Genius Grant' in 2019 in recognition of her work on sexual privacy on online platforms. Citron talks to us about how tech companies have dismantled many of the safety features in their systems, and how the country itself has strayed from its once-bipartisan wariness of data collection. The following has been edited for length and clarity. What's one big, underrated idea? That data collection is not an imperative and not a given. Since the late 1950s, with the advent of data banks, we have essentially presumed that data collection is a good, almost in some religious way. We have long ignored this important inclination that collection itself is endangering our privacy and civil liberties. We've had moments of agreement in Congress in the 1970s that we shouldn't be collecting data unless we have congressional authorization and a really good reason. These are Democrats, Republicans — we were really worried that amassing of information was control, and would lead to really dangerous power in the government and private sector What technology right now do you think is overhyped? What we overhype is the magical idea that AGI [artificial general intelligence] will synthesize information in a way that's close to thinking. Normatively it is so troubling, because humanity is messy and wonderful. It's the joy and love and grief. There's some things I think are under hyped. The promise for me of all this data is health. Let's cure Type 1 diabetes, let's work on cancer. We're underleveraging where it most matters, and we're over leveraging on fake promises. What do you think the government could be doing now about tech that it isn't? [Implementing] the precautionary principle. I thought we'd learned our lessons. We built cars without seat belts, and a lot of people died. And then the car industry faced liability. They then had to internalize the costs. We have learned time and time and again that when you build things just because you can, you don't think about the risks and the harms that aren't in view, and you don't test for them. We really ought to think hard about regulation that requires, especially when it comes to certain technologies, that we just don't build [things] unless we've got not only a proven use case, but also an assessment of harms. What has surprised you most this year? Having worked on trust and safety for the last 20 years voluntarily — pretty much no one paid me to help them on nonconsensual intimate imagery and stalking and threats and harassment — what surprises me is the gutting of both trust and safety staff at these big companies and their ripping apart of their commitments. I really bought into the story that there was some virtue to what we were doing. I feel like I got snookered into thinking this was genuine. I thought they had seen that people were feeling safer on the platforms. It's just the eyeballs are much more worth it to them, because the salacious sells better. What book most shaped your conception of the future? 'Databanks in a Free Society' by Alan Westin and Michael Baker. It's a report for the National Academy of Sciences. It's like 600 pages in which they show how many data banks we have. We get a sense for counties, localities, states, the federal government amassing information and sharing it. If we looked at this book and took it seriously, we would've really in earnest said, 'Hold on, we've got to do something.' This isn't new, this is not unregulable, this isn't something we don't understand. We've been building databases of information effectively since the mid-1960s, and we've been sharing it through network systems since the early 1970s. Intel cancels chipmaking plans in the EU Intel is canceling billion-dollar projects in Germany and Poland, which POLITICO's Pieter Haeck reports will have major consequences for the European Union. During an earnings call late on Thursday, Intel said that it was nixing plans to build a €30 billion chip-manufacturing complex in Magdeburg, Germany, and a €5 billion plant in Wroclaw, Poland. The facilities were set to begin production in 2027, and national governments had pledged to contribute large subsidies to the efforts. In a note tied to the earnings call, Intel announced that it also expects to cut 15 percent of its employees this year. Intel's moves are spoiling the EU's ambitions to boost its domestic infrastructure for manufacturing semiconductors. The bloc has pledged to increase its share in the global microchips value chain to 20 percent by 2030. Yet the EU reported last year that it has only raised its share to 10.5 percent. California's AI rules could set a new national standard After much dissension, California privacy regulators have finalized rules on automated decisionmaking tools, POLITICO's Tyler Katzenberger reports. On Thursday, the California Privacy Protection Agency's (CPPA) board passed the regulations in a unanimous vote. The nation-leading protections enable consumers to opt out of some automated systems that make decisions on everything from college admissions to hiring. However, California's Office of Administrative Law still has to approve the policy plan. Labor and privacy advocates, business groups and Big Tech companies such as Apple and Google have been bickering over the scope of the rules. Tyler reports that none of them are happy with the final result, as many of their recommendations didn't make it into the final plan. While companies handling personal data do have to submit to regular audits and risk assessments, the regulations won't apply to generative AI systems and first-party behavioral advertising. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store