
Technology can break geographical barriers, bring legal aid to doorstep: SC judge Surya Kant
The digital divide is very real, he said and asserted that "the task before us is not simply to create digital solutions, but to ensure that these solutions are inclusive".
Justice Kant was delivering the 'Justice R C Lahoti Memorial Lecture' at Manav Rachna University in Haryana's Faridabad on the topic of 'Bridging the Gap: Reimagining Legal Aid in the Digital Age for Inclusive Justice in India.' Noting that Article 39A of the Constitution calls upon the state to provide free legal aid to ensure that no citizen is denied justice because of economic or other disabilities, he said India is among the few nations to constitutionally mandate legal aid.
"Yet, the stark truth is that vast sections of our population rural citizens, the urban poor, women, children, persons with disabilities, the elderly still encounter formidable barriers in accessing justice," observed Justice Kant.
He said these may be barriers of awareness, geography, language, money, physical mobility or social stigma.
"Legal aid, as we have conceived it for decades, has often been limited to the provision of free or subsidised legal representation," he said.
"More than seven decades since Independence, we must ask: Is justice truly accessible to all? For millions across India migrant workers, tribal communities, daily wage earners, women abandoned by families, undertrial prisoners the legal system remains distant and unintelligible," he said.
Access is hampered not only by poverty but also by illiteracy, gender, caste, and now, digital exclusion, said Justice Kant.
Citing his recent visit to Srinagar for the launch of some National Legal Services Authority schemes, he said a young tribal boy shared the hardships his community continues to face despite many schemes and welfare measures.
"What he said has stayed with me: that all the welfare schemes will remain ineffective until the tribal families get sustenance so that they can afford to send their children to school and get the basic education that may qualify them to take advantage of benefits like reservations in employment.
"His words were a poignant reminder that justice and welfare must begin with the fundamentals, without which empowerment remains incomplete," he said.
Justice Kant said the current framework rooted predominantly in brick-and-mortar models of service delivery faces inherent limitations and said in this context, the digital revolution presents a compelling opportunity.
Justice Kant said the digital age has transformed how we live, communicate, learn and interact with institutions. "Technology is not a panacea, but it is an extraordinary enabler. India today has nearly 1.2 billion mobile connections, and approximately 85.5 per cent of households possess at least one smartphone," he said.
Yet, access to justice remains largely analogue, he said, adding that courts are online, laws are also digitised, but quality legal aid has yet to trickle down to the last person in line.
"The digital divide has become the new face of inequality. But herein lies the opportunity. With the right vision and safeguards, technology can break geographical barriers, democratise legal awareness, and bring legal aid to the doorstep, or rather the palm of every citizen.
"If harnessed thoughtfully and inclusively, it can bridge the persistent gaps in our justice system," he said.
Noting that in the country, mobile phone penetration far surpasses internet-equipped computers, he said NALSA's legal literacy programmes must be recast for the digital age.
"Imagine a NALSA 'Companion' mobile application, offering step-by-step guidance, accessible in every scheduled language, using voice, video, and text. It could answer fundamental legal queries, explain rights and entitlements, and connect the users to volunteer lawyers or paralegals," he said.
"Pre-recorded legal advice via interactive voice response can serve the visually impaired or illiterate. Artificial Intelligence can simplify legal documents, translate orders into regional languages," he said.
He said virtual Lok Adalats should also become a reality by harnessing secure video platforms.
"Case hearings, especially for family disputes, minor civil issues, labour disputes, can happen with minimum travel and cost, saving litigants time and resources.
"Artificial intelligence, if ethically and transparently deployed, can be another game-changer in helping screen cases, prioritise urgent needs, and even generate first-level documents," he said.
He also shared that in remote villages of Assam, paralegals are now using mobile phones to record testimonials of domestic violence and connect survivors to pro bono counsel in real time.
"During the pandemic, virtual Lok Adalats in Maharashtra disposed of thousands of cases, helping workers recover unpaid wages without stepping outside their homes. In Tamil Nadu, legal aid chatbots in Tamil have been deployed to answer questions on land rights and tenancy," he said.
While discussing the untapped potential of technology, Justice Kant cautioned that the excitement of technology must be tempered with restraint.
Stating that digital legal aid cannot succeed if citizens are unfamiliar with basic technology, he emphasised that this is the right time for all the stakeholders, including educational institutions, to launch mass campaigns on digital literacy, prioritising women, senior citizens, persons with disabilities, and rural youth.
He also said confidentiality and security are extremely non-negotiable aspects of the digital legal aid programme and said, "As we digitise legal aid, we must design systems with built-in ethics."
"Privacy must be paramount; all platforms handling sensitive legal data must comply with rigorous data protection standards. Digital legal aid platforms must be built to serve persons with disabilities, those who use screen readers, and the digitally less literate," he said.
"Legal aid cannot become a factory of canned responses. It must not reduce people's problems to ticket numbers. There must always be a human fallback, someone to listen, explain, and reassure. Justice must still listen," he stressed.
He further said the role of government and the judiciary as catalysts cannot be overstated.
"With ongoing digital initiatives such as Digitally Accessible India, the JAM trinity, and the e-Courts Mission Mode Project, the groundwork is being laid for comprehensive justice reform. To fully realise these ambitions, these government-led digital strategies must converge with justice sector reforms.
Meanwhile, the judiciary must remain adaptable, continually updating procedures to seamlessly incorporate digital evidence, remote testimony and electronic records, said the Supreme Court judge.
He said that through such collaborative synergy, "we can bring the promise of inclusive digital justice closer to reality".
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Guv visits disaster-affected areas in Mandi, calls for stronger disaster preparedness
1 2 Mandi: Himachal Pradesh governor Shiv Pratap Shukla visited the disaster-affected areas of Thunag, Bagsiad, and Janjehli in the Siraj assembly constituency of Mandi district on Sunday. During the visit, the governor met the affected families and distributed essential relief materials. The governor first interacted with disaster victims in Thunag and remarked that the sub-division suffered the most damage in the recent natural calamity, with extensive losses to private property, land, and livestock. He said cases amounting to over Rs 3 crore in compensation had been approved for final sanction. Commending the resilience of the local people, he said, "Despite the massive loss, the courage and determination of the residents here are truly commendable. While complete compensation for the damage is not possible, all possible assistance will be provided." He emphasised the need to consider both internal resources and additional arrangements to tackle such situations effectively. Shukla also visited the relief camp at Bagsiad and held discussions with the affected residents at the PWD Rest House in Thunag. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo He later visited Panchayat Ghar Pakhred and reviewed the situation in the affected areas of Jhundi and Pakhred panchayats. The governor also met disaster-hit families in Janjehli and offered words of comfort. He said five truckloads of relief material had been dispatched to Mandi and one to Kullu from Raj Bhavan. He assured that more assistance would be sent promptly if requested by the district administration. Calling the calamity a major disaster, the governor said that immediate restoration is a challenge and there is a pressing need to take preventive measures to avoid such situations in the future. Referring to the Supreme Court's observations on environmental protection, he said they must be taken seriously and acted upon collectively. Leader of opposition Jai Ram Thakur, who also accompanied the governor, said the people are still in deep shock as their sources of livelihood were destroyed. He appreciated the state govt for restoring essential services like roads, electricity, and water supply through the district administration. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Illegal Order": Delhi Court Sets Aside 'Hands Up In Air' Punishment For Accused
New Delhi: A Delhi court has set aside an order of a magistrate directing some accused people to stand in the court with their hands raised for the entire day after finding them guilty of contempt of court. Principal District and Sessions Judge Anju Bajaj Chandna was hearing the appeal of Kuldeep and Rakesh, against whom the magisterial court had passed the order on July 15, while hearing a complaint case. In an order dated August 1, the court said the order did not qualify the test of legality and propriety, and that it was an "illegal order", passed without adopting legal procedure. It said, "Non-furnishing of bail bonds by the accused persons cannot be termed as a contemptuous act by any stretch of imagination." "The act of accused persons of not furnishing bail bonds does not fall within the scope and ambit of Section 228 (intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial proceeding) of the IPC, and can in no manner be taken as intentional insult or interruption to public servant in judicial proceedings," the court said. It said the magistrate did not afford any opportunity to the accused persons to show cause as to why they should not be proceeded against, and that, without hearing them, the accused people were asked to stand in the court till the rising of the court with their hands straight in the air. "This kind of sentence is not contemplated in law," the court said, adding, Article 21 of the Constitution conferred fundamental rights of personal liberty, which could be curtailed only by a procedure established by law. "The object of law is to ensure that basic human rights are not violated. The judges are duty-bound to safeguard basic and natural rights meant for a dignified existence of individuals," the court said. "Every person appearing before the court (even if involved in a crime) has the inalienable right to live with dignity and is entitled to equal respect. It is the duty of the court to ensure that no person can be detained without proper legal justification or without following due process of law," the court added. It said the magistrate completely failed in his duty and responsibility to conduct judicial proceedings legally and properly. "The order convicting the accused persons under Section 228 IPC and sentencing them to stand with their hands in the air till the rising of the court is not sustainable. The magistrate is advised to properly read and understand the legal provisions before using his discretionary power," the court said, setting aside the order. Earlier, on July 15, Judicial Magistrate Saurabh Goyal, who was hearing a 2018 complaint case, which was at the stage of pre-charge evidence, had passed the order. He said, "Despite waiting and calling the matter twice from 10 am till 11.40 am, the bail bonds were not furnished by the accused persons. For wasting the time of the court, which is in contempt of the order duly promulgated on the last date of hearing, the accused persons are hereby held guilty for contempt of court proceedings and are convicted for the offence under Section 228 of the IPC." "They are directed to stand in the court till the rising of this court with their hands straight in the air," the magistrate added.


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Bihar MP's Wife A Voter In 2 Separate Constituencies: Report
New Delhi: A Left MP from Bihar who challenged the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral roll in the Supreme Court has come under a cloud amid reports that his wife was registered as a voter in two separate Assembly constituencies with two distinct EPIC numbers, election office sources said on Sunday. Petitioner and Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Liberation MP Sudama Prasad's wife, Shobha Devi, allegedly had two EPIC numbers – RGX3264140 and WVA0308544. While one of her EPIC numbers was registered in Arrah Assembly constituency with Lavarish Seva Kendra as the designated polling station, the other pertained to Agiaon constituency with Samudayik Bhavan Araila as her polling station, said sources in the Bihar election office. The fresh 'dual EPIC number' controversy comes close to the one involving Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav, who is also allegedly possessing 'dual' Electors Photo Identity Card (EPIC) numbers. Earlier, the Supreme Court, while hearing a batch of pleas challenging the electoral roll revision ahead of the Assembly elections in November, posted the matter to August 12, assuring to intervene immediately if there is 'mass exclusion' of voters in the SIR. On Saturday, Tejashwi Yadav stirred a political storm in Patna with a claim that his name was missing in Bihar's draft electoral roll. ECI sources hinted that he might be possessing 'two' EPIC numbers, with only one of them being validated in the SIR. The election office on Sunday wrote to him seeking details of his 'second' EPIC number, which, according to him, had been deleted from the voter list. The Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) of Digha Assembly constituency asked the Leader of Opposition to present the original copy of the voter ID card whose number was alleged to be missing from the draft electoral roll. 'You are requested to kindly provide the details of the EPIC card (along with the original copy of the card) mentioned by you in the press conference held on August 2, 2025, to the undersigned, so that it can be thoroughly investigated,' wrote the ERO. The letter dated August 3 said the communication was linked to Tejashwi Yadav's 'statement given in the press conference held on August 2, 2025, regarding non-inclusion of names in the draft electoral list published on the basis of eligibility date July 1, 2025'. (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)